Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[thebigdream]

Also, this thread spergs about the same shit and wasted like 100 pages on if some random court chick was hot. It is really difficult for newfags to “lurk moar“ when it’s shit up constantly.

Good. Suffah newfags

 

[Isaiah Praer]

the lawyer dog thing is dumb but why don't you just give me a lawyer isn't exactly emphatically and explicitly asking for a lawyer. It's fucking retarded legalese but he didn't actually ask them to get him a lawyer, and when dealing with the government you have to assume everyone involved is autistic

The accused isn't asking for a canine, member of the bar or not. He's addressing whoever's questioning him as "dog", just like so many traffic stops start calling the cop "bro".


"I need to talk to my lawyer, bro!"
"Considering you're trying to speed-dial a pack of cigarettes, I concur. Out of the car. Now."

 

[RudyRayMoore]

Is anyone planning on trying to view, and screen capture April's first appearance this coming Wed? I wonder if Nick will attempt to represent her, and if she zooms from the Baldo bunker, or the main Baldo house?

Also of interest will be her bail conditions. I would imagine she will get a similar RoR offer with all the limiting conditions as Nick and Kayla received, or post a bond with no conditions. Then does Nick cover her 10 percent cost to get a bail bondsman? She may have to surrender herself, and go in for another booking photo and fingerprints, so keep an eye on the Sheriff's inmate website for a new mugshot.

Notice of Remote Zoom Hearing
APRIL DIANE IMHOLTE
PO BOX 97
SPICER MN 56288
_____________________________________________________________________________
State of Minnesota vs APRIL DIANE IMHOLTE
You are notified this matter is set for a remote hearing. This hearing will not be in person at the
courthouse.
Hearing Information
August 28, 2024
First Appearance
2:15 PM
The hearing will be held via Zoom and appearance shall be by video unless otherwise directed
with Judicial Officer Jennifer Fischer, Kandiyohi County District Court.

To join by internet:

Type

https://zoomgov.com/join

in your browser’s address bar.

Enter the Meeting ID and Meeting Passcode (if asked):

161 918 1925

862437

Update your name by clicking on your profile picture. If you are representing a party, add your role to your name, for example, John Smith, Attorney for Defendant.

Click the Join Audio icon in the lower left‐hand corner of your screen.

Click Share Video.

 

[BaddestSeagull]

TL;DR, same type of hideous, cheap-but-expensive dress worn by April in her post.

Thank you for investigating, this is a great find - confirms a lot of what I was thinking and is psychologically fascinating.

 

[AltisticRight]

Let's see if Balldo's retarded claims of downloading and reuploading a video holds up.
I nabbed an image from dpreview and loaded it into DaVinci Studio to make a dynamic zoom clip.

I'll be zooming into the 1951 USAF targets in one of the corners, just to test in Balldo's favour.

Spoiler: Why?

Generally, for average lenses, the periphery of an image is worse than the centre so any degradation becomes more obvious. This is due to those light rays bending, and sometimes they are unable to focus on a perfect spot.

(Screenshot from the original 39MB jpeg.)
Since Balldo uploads 1080P, I'll downsample to that.

Call this source.mp4.

Three seconds, ~9MB, a pretty big file considering it's just a still image being zoomed with no audio, of just 1080P.

Call this re.mp4.

Downloaded from YouTube, it has been compressed and worked on already. 2.6MB is the new size. I will now upload this copy and download it again to simulate what archivers do.
Original is uploaded from Balldo's PC to YouTube.
An archiver downloads the version after YouTube's compression.
An archiver then uploads this version.
>>>Me: I will download this and compare it

Call this NPL.mp4.

Interesting, the bitrate did drop slightly. The size shrunk to 2.5MB.

I will be loading both re.mp4 and NPL.mp4 into Photoshop to ensure the best " collar grating, quantem efficacy, DSNU, SNR blahblah I read it in FORTY SOYENCE PAPERS on SPIE" of the images instead of using screenshots which might add cocaine to my USAF targets in the form of compression artefacts.

So, do you see a difference? It's night and day right? My chart is now full of cocaine! The original one is on the right/bottom/second.

Here is a gif animation.
What, you're saying I forgot to animate it?
This is your delusions, stalker child.
Your life is already over, enjoy prison.
Your life is already over, enjoy prison.
Your life is already over, enjoy prison.

I lied, the first one is the original copy.

So what will this balding skeletal menace say next? YouTube's compression was to blame?
Sure, if that flies in any court.

I mean, even on an ordinary monitor, there's no discernable difference between the original image and one that has been compressed. Maybe Biden's budget cuts meant officers cannot view YouTube from 8k tax-funded monitors.

I hope he does contest this to the bitter end. Can you imagine the court handing him subpoena to acquire the original video footage from his expensive stupid camera? We get to see the cocaine adhered to his nose in full 4k after an FOIA.

Fuck off with your compression cope. Just like that hair follicle test shit, you don't know what you're talking about, Balldo.
Your bullshit won't fly.

 

[AltisticRight]

Or even a search warrant for his phone to get access to his YouTube account and then DL the stream.

His new cope for that would be "the downloaded version from YouTube studio is only 720P, compressed significantly!
Yeah, that's how it works at least from the sock account I made just for this experiment. When you download your own uploaded video, the quality is utter rubbish at 720P.



They'll have to tackle the source footage, whatever this freak uploaded.
Wanna bet some catastrophic error happened and corrupted all his files or something equally stupid?

 

[Prokhor Zakharov]

EVS says that Nick told him that the police touched his daughter's hair with cocaine on their gloves and that is why his daughter tested positive. Nick also claimed that it is on video (bodycam footage?). Is this something Nick tells people to try and control the narrative, or is he really wanting to try this as a defense? Is this the "full story" he keeps saying will come out? I wonder if he means to admit that there was cocaine in his house or if he intends to say the police brought cocaine into his house.

Spoiler: Trashcast 8/22/2024

View attachment 6341912

View attachment 6341978

This all really shows either how desperate Nick is, or how stupid he is. His entire discussion of the video related to recompression, etc... is all 100% crap. Downloading, uploading, transcoding, compression, none of that would create artifacts that are so significant it would make things appear materially different in the video. You can see degradation in fine details, but for obvious parts of the video, it will have no serious material effect. You have to really do stupid things to video to really compromise it, like high compression, then resize it to a smaller resolution, then resize it again to a larger resolution, then use really high compression with a very bad codec. Now that would make video looks like total shit, but that isn't what happened. It shows that nick doesn't know much of anything about modern digital video formats and containers.

Also, his argument regarding the hair sample is complete shit. If they found cocaine as its salt or freebase, unmetabolized, on the surface of the hair, that would obviously be contamination, However, that isn't what they look for when processing a hair sample. They are checking for the incorporation of end metabolites into the hairs actual structure, not on the surface. The only way you get end metabolites incorporated into growth structures is that it has gone into the body, been metabolized completely, and then incorporated into the structural elements of the hair. That would be impossible to mistake for environmental contamination, they look absolutely nothing alike. Again, this shows either his ignorance of testing methodology, or he is just grasping at fucking straws.

Hopefully he doesn't actually try this in court, it will just make him look stupid and desperate.

 

[Justa Grata Honoria]

I have a feeling nick will gum up the justice system with everything he files for, that the judges might give in to his bs as long as he enters plea deal that gives him out and they will allow everything to be sealed

 

[DairyFarmsWholeMilk]

"I've never asked people to be uncritical..."

I've only asked them to believe me, critically.

2:30 onwards is real addict mannerisms, he keeps involuntarily looking towards the drink and doesnt take a sip

 

[NaggotFigger]

Balldo is coping real hard, and he refused to accept the reality and surrender himself the Chris-chan way. Rubbish claims makes no sense as backed up proof, along with pitiful and childish-sounding excuses like coming from a 4 y.o toddler trying to excuse for their behavior. Except, the Balldoverse is full of nose-soaked cocaine retards that only knows how to use their luck and role as a cudgel just to get away from the court. How hard Nick tries, it always get the short end of the retard stick because his bullshit is too easy to debunk, especially with his hair follicle test argument.

At the end of the day, Balldo has no idea what he is fucking talking about, but to lie and use his role as a "true and honest lawyer" as a meaning to have far more lenient judgment and as a meat shield against criticism and getting away to continue putting coke on his red nose and get drunk. He would never really take these and change himself, but rather doubling down further into degeneracy of the Balldoverse with his coke wives. Narcissistic retards are hilarious in hindsight

 

[Faceless Whore]

I mean, even on an ordinary monitor, there's no discernable difference between the original image and one that has been compressed.

In the interest of investigative integrity I want to point out that YouTube offers videos of the same resolution at multiple levels of VBR (Video Bit Rate) and different codecs, both of which affect quality.

Here is an example of a video for 720p and 1080p:

[info] Available formats for HJFSInI4Ir4:
ID      EXT   RESOLUTION FPS CH │   FILESIZE   TBR PROTO │ VCODEC          VBR ACODEC      ABR ASR MORE INFO
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
232     mp4   1280x720    30    │ ~281.38MiB 1389k m3u8  │ avc1.64001F   1389k video only
136     mp4   1280x720    30    │  191.21MiB  944k https │ avc1.64001F    944k video only          720p, mp4_dash
609     mp4   1280x720    30    │ ~180.89MiB  893k m3u8  │ vp09.00.31.08  893k video only
247     webm  1280x720    30    │  116.52MiB  575k https │ vp09.00.31.08  575k video only          720p, webm_dash
270     mp4   1920x1080   30    │ ~495.82MiB 2448k m3u8  │ avc1.640028   2448k video only
137     mp4   1920x1080   30    │  330.00MiB 1630k https │ avc1.640028   1630k video only          1080p, mp4_dash
614     mp4   1920x1080   30    │ ~272.14MiB 1344k m3u8  │ vp09.00.40.08 1344k video only
248     webm  1920x1080   30    │  166.88MiB  824k https │ vp09.00.40.08  824k video only          1080p, webm_dash

Note there's four entries for each resolution.
Note the VBR column. Lower VBR = shittier quality (but smaller file size).
Note that half of the options for each resolution are of one codec, the other half of another.

If the reuploader in question downloaded a shitty quality copy and reuploaded it, then watched the shittiest quality of the reuploaded video, there would be a lot of artifacting.

But therein lies the rub. I archive videos, and when I do I take quality into account. When a video is of something where detail matters I naturally download the best quality possible. If I were to reupload a high VBR video, and others were to watch the recode in high VBR, I expect the image quality would be indistinguishable.

So if Balldo wants to make this case he needs to prove that the video in question was downloaded at low quality and/or the reuploaded version was watched at low quality. Given that this is about him snorting coke I expect a knowledgable archiver would've obtained the best quality possible so they would have the clearest image of his nose cake.

ETA: I also want to note that yt-dlp, the most popular video downloading tool in use today and almost certainly the tool the archiver used, downloads the highest resolution and the highest quality by default, so even if the archiver wasn't knowledgable about yt-dlp and just gave it a URL with no quality settings they would've ended up with the highest quality and highest resolution anyway.

That said all of this is irrelevant because I big doubt any artifacting would cause the area around his nose specifically to magically become whiter in this one video specifically and not any of the other zillion shitty reuploads of his streams.

 

[TrainWreckWatcher]

I have a feeling nick will gum up the justice system with everything he files for, that the judges might give in to his bs as long as he enters plea deal that gives him out and they will allow everything to be sealed

The time to take a plea day was probably before the 21st.
He's beyond that honeymoon phase and is now wasting the state's time. Something they're hopefully happy to punish him for.

 

[Ventrue]

Nick is funnier in a courtroom than in a comedy club.

 

[Pizdec]

I don’t get the point of Nick coping over the coke on his nose, because if I’m recalling correctly, the officer’s experience in handling people under the influence lead him to conclude after watching the video that Nick was shit faced and clearly out of his gourd on Coke and whiskey.

Besides, what sober man opens the same super chat fifteen fucking times and stares at a fat dragon ass farting?

 

[Desktop User2]

His new cope for that would be "the downloaded version from YouTube studio is only 720P, compressed significantly!
Yeah, that's how it works at least from the sock account I made just for this experiment. When you download your own uploaded video, the quality is utter rubbish at 720P.
View attachment 6345215
View attachment 6345216

They'll have to tackle the source footage, whatever this freak uploaded.
Wanna bet some catastrophic error happened and corrupted all his files or something equally stupid?

If there was only a better way to know he was probably under influence like finding 25g of cocaine in his personal safe... this whole song and dance of him is so frustrating... the warrant was a SEARCH warrant, exploratory with pretty defined objects on it: drugs and parafernalia. He was not arrested on a prison warrant signed because some fat copper saw a video of him jacking off to inflation dragons, he was booked because they found the objects of the warrant on his drug fiend crack den.
If there was cocaine or not on his beak - probably inherited from his real jewish father his whore of a mother picked up on one of their swing parties because she has a thing for hairy goblins... allegedly - it is irrelevant and there is no way in hell to know because the search was days later; the point is, based on image AND BEHAVIOR, Pomplun stated for the best of his knowledge Rackets could be under influence.

 

[Mandatory User Name]

So if Balldo wants to make this case he needs to prove that the video in question was downloaded at low quality and/or the reuploaded version was watched at low quality. Given that this is about him snorting coke I expect a knowledgable archiver would've obtained the best quality possible so they would have the clearest image of his nose cake.

I was watching the stream live, as were many others in this thread once we realized what a total shit show it was, the people here were reacting in real time to Rekieta's stream and called out the powder on his nose as it was happening. Even if the cop was relying on a lower quality video after the fact, the powered nose was still on the original, as someone in this thread mentioned earlier, we're coming down to a distinction without a difference.
But something else that's being overlooked, cops are allowed to be wrong on a search warrant and don't have to wait for a primary source if one's not readily available. Nick seems to be attempting to hold the police to an evidentiary standard that wasn't required at the time, just like when he objected to hearsay at the original CPS hearing.

 

[Desktop User2]

At least we learned valuable lessons from this lying faggot: dont stream committing crimes like a watermelon eating nigger, kids, specially when you already had a CPS visit in recent days.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

The test is for metabolites and screens out external exposure. It is not perfect because no test is when done affordably, there are exceptions. It is still designed with that in mind though. “Technically” is just playing Nick’s game.

There was a scientific paper shared that showed that several day contact exposure deposited metabolites within hair samples subsequently used in follicle testing. The test only differentiates between exposure and ingestion when the ratio of metabolites (there are a handful) are assessed. Cocaine (and to a greater extent crack) is self-metabolising, but the biological metabolites are not created bu auto-metaboliss.

Nick is still in a grey area, but the choices are idiotic. Regardless of that, he will continute to play upon the ambiguity while leaving out the only possible conclusions that either he:

A: Had his child exposed to cocaine for days in her hair where whe went unwashed.

Or

B. She ingested it.

Neither looks good, but a comparison of metabolite population in the sample would be needed to confirm.

 

[DumDum Did Nothing Wrong]

I've given up on ever staying current on cuckieta's misadventures.

- had hearing and got told to stfu twice by judge

- another hearing on the 5th

- ralphamale trying to mess with Aaron who is a witness in this so could get a witness tempering charge

like feel like every 20 pages null should post a recap. After all it's Null's fault the sonichu demon has spread.

 

[Oxyjen]

Judging by the rest of her face, my guess is she wears the eye makeup to bed and sleeps with her arm near her face. It’s clean and swooshy like a makeup swatch, and it’s not red or scabby like a cut (that I can see, at least.)
I call bad hygiene.

This won’t happen to you if you shower. But…

You’ve seen the shower. Can you blame her?