That's exactly the kind of opinion I'd expect from a Nintendo fanboy who's mad that the Genesis version of Mortal Kombat has a blood code but the SNES version doesn't. Genesis does what Nintendon't!
I started playing from botw but I still like the older zeldas. They are good Zelda games whereas botw is a good modern day game, it's closer to ni no kuni or a jrpg than Zelda. The people with autistic mindsets are primarily of two types, the new good old bad people and the old good new bad people, both are slop consumers who cannot see past their preconceived biases. There are things in old Zeldas which have not aged well (second half of links awakening, n64 collision detection and movement controls, first half of Twilight Princess) but they're still better complete cohesive experiences than botw. Even though it's one of my favourite games I'm starting to come around to the opinion that it's just nintendos far cry 3, I don't know why. It's a great game but it's not a great Zelda game with all the secrets exploration and puzzles of earlier games.
Aonuma mentioned a few open world games from the west that they took inspiration from, which included Far Cry, Witcher 3, and Skyrim.
[a]
[a]
These are two entirely different games, source is generally considered the worst by far but it had good mod support. As a competitive games its just a wonky 1.6 though.
yes i know that, but they were still good.
by who? competitive players? who cares about those fags, all that shit wrecks good games anyway.
competitive video game playing is fucking gay, it only gets hyped so faggot companies can cash in.
You have this on 1.6 as well... And every mod on css has been recreated on csgo/2. Source was just really inconsistent with reg and that's not "fun" to experience.
Still more fun than getting wallbanged with assault rifles because the walls are made out of paper in 1.6
that was the fun part
They put in those minimalist UIs for "better readability" or whatever the fuck but I had no problem telling units, buildings, techs etc. apart back when their icons were visually distinct and not just an abstract approximation of what they're supposed to be. Matter of fact, they make it worse. I remember in Rome 2 Total War I once accidentally recruited 6 regular Legionaries when I wanted 6 armored Legionaries. The unit icons are literally the same but the armored ones have a slightly different pattern on the shield. Compare that to Attila which came out afterwards and you could tell similar units apart because their unit icons have them face a different direction, assume a different pose etc. You can instantly tell them apart.
i probably shouldnt have said 2 then cause csgo i had no issues finding them. Havent actually played 2.
Looks boring and uniform and had to find a mobile game ui screenshot because that is where this shit comes from.
Age of Mythology got butchered.
oblivion's ui sucks too though. Morrowind let you resize and move your windows to customize your character screen
What if you told people in 2009, while they were enjoying an actual fun game lacking any sort of propaganda like Killzone 2, that in just a few short years the gaming industry would be controlled by mentally ill activists who demand that every female character in a game looks like an ugly tranny and insist on such insane censorship that Jack Thompson, the biggest villain in the industry at the time, would look normal in comparison? Remember how amazing we thought gaming would be shortly with more advanced technology, only for it in reality to largely turn into "progressive", buggy, broken slop that isn't even worth playing for free immediately after that generation?
At least Bethesda had the decency to hide the stupid list menu after about one or two other stylized menus, they had a pretty cool "skill" menu, and at least they made it so that you can see the items in your inventory in some detail.
I appreciate them for it. It's a breath of fresh air in a sea of microplatic infused UIs.
