LawTube - Lawyers sperging at each other on YouTube

[Caticorn]

Based on that, I'm gonna presume he didn't abandon ship.

Thanks.

Yeah, it wasn't the vibe I got from the part of the stream I could view but seeing the snake comments here I thought maybe others had seen more than I did and that the tone must have changed later on. As days went on without any clips or details of the contents of his anlaysis I realized maybe no one else watched.

At the beginning of his analysis of the motion he was definitely not happy with the structural style (similar to what Potentially Criminal pointed out). I didn't see him get into any of the details of the arguments, but I think he would have blamed any problems he saw on Nick's lawyer and not on Nick himself based on the way he started the stream.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Did anybody actually bother to watch this? Has Joe really abandoned ship?

I watched the beginning before he made the stream members only. He gave a long speech about how disingenuous it was for people who have always said cops are liars to automatically believe the cops when it comes to statements against Nick. The stream went members only before he really got into the analysis of the motion.

ETA: He also talked about how Nick is looking better on streams lately than he did 6 months ago so that means Nick is "clean" now.

I was able to source a way to review the stream

TL;DR: He's a Balldowasher

Spoiler: Summary of the LOCALS stream

- He called Nick a 'friend' and wants the best for him and family. He acknowledges he cannot be 100% objective. Wanting Nick to go to jail is not the best for juafamily. It might be for Nick.

- He had Nick send him the document when he asked for it for his show. Nick did not ask him for anything in return.

- He repeated Nick's line: 'I would not have my kids if he was using drugs'. He also repeats the like that 'there are people who said not to trust government' but have changed that stance.

- He critiques the formatting and structure as 'confusing' and hard to follow. Not conforming to IRAC.

- He concludes that Aaron is not a concerned citizen, so the police have a higher level of vetting required. He critiques White for not making it clear what in law makes him ineligible for CC status. He is unsure if the 'falling out' is enough to establish that, and he says White was unclear. Aaron's 'threats' in the communications cited in the affidavit might have done it. The cops should have wondered if his report was carrying out the threat.

- He also says the video the cop watched was 'altered' because it was a 'slice' and the 'original' would be 'hours long'. It hurts Nick that the affidavit says that the full video is longer but obviously they did not watch it all. The argument is that the judge was misinformed, but if they knew that it was clipped, they had full knowledge of that when signing.

- He says the affidavit of Pomplum was 'stupid' to assume Nick would be a caregiver for the children during the show.

- Someone who was grifting hard off this (Joe uses the term without animus - HASW) has yelled at him that he 'doesn't hate government enough', but they are being inconsistent now. He mentions they were on his 'let 100 men go free panel' and were trying to make him more sceptical of government.

(This was Sean. - HASW)

- He circles back to talking about what is 'best' for his family and society is not Nick in jail. People that want it to happen are feeding 'schadenfreude' and making money.

- Joe conudes that if he were the judge reviewing the affidavit or Nick's motion to suppress, he would need more information before signing off.

- Joe stops before the guns section and says he will do a part 2

- He says that Nick is asking for a Franks hearing. His gut is Nick does not win so far.

(This seemed vague in the motion itself, but he could have picked up the line form Nick - HASW)

 

[Maraschino]

Guess he didn't learn to keep his internet/real life separate. The only lawyer who did that was Peacock I think, man was smart enough to take his IRL job over internet shitpost (talking).

I think if there was anyone from the Big Brain panels that could've made it in what would later become Lawtube but didn't want to for whatever personal reason, it'd be Kian. Dude was fucking hysterical. Too bad we lost him and got retards like Aussie Overlaw'd and Camelot.

Last I'd heard he was a federal employee but it seems as though he's recently started up his own law firm in southern California. Now he looks even more Mexican than he did previously.

 

[Darkholme's Dungeon]

I think if there was anyone from the Big Brain panels that could've made it in what would later become Lawtube but didn't want to for whatever personal reason, it'd be Kian. Dude was fucking hysterical.

For his personal life he is indefinitely better off where he is now.
For the laughter of the farms it was a great pang of loss at a possibility of an additional lolcow...

UPDATE:

View attachment 6342795

If I were Gosney I'd be looking for 1st amendment firms, not civil defense. He also should have done the lawyer 101, shut the fuck up about where he's going, cause this shit is going to follow him forever.
Then again, Andrew Branca X sperging is a thing. But the 2nd is much more politically charged than the 1st so I'm kinda not surprised.

In Branca news. He's dunking on MN's duty to retreat (which anyone with a pea brain can realize) and also this NY case:

Can we go back to the "nothing of value was lost" for the thieves getting shot?

Also, I saw what is the potentially the biggest cope comment on Branca's videos. Apparently some dude was getting his home burgled ran in and bashed the guy with a skillet pan (LMAO) while the guy ran down the road.

The homeowner is an idiot. He entered his house and confronted the burglar. That wasn't wise. He's very lucky the burglar was unarmed and was running away. It was hilarious that the homeowner joined the cops in pursuing the burglar down the street. The burglar was running away and was not an imminent threat or no longer a threat if he was. The homeowner's wife was not pleased with his actions. He could have gotten killed. Unlike him, she has common sense.

Is it stupid? Yes. But is he doing society a favor if the perp dies? Yes.
Not like Chicagos' PD doing a great job of crime prevention.

https://www.youtube.com/live/JtBt0vBTY8w?si=XBsKQeKMzCDTTPYV&t=456

 

[Permanent Resident Cope]

Someone who was grifting hard off this (Joe uses the term without animus - HASW) has yelled at him that he 'doesn't hate government enough', but they are being inconsistent now. He mentions they were on his 'let 100 men go free panel' and were trying to make him more skeptical of government.

(This was Sean. - HASW)

Nick has used similar allusions about 'not trusting the government before' and I always took it as being about Sean. Of course Nick doesn't always stop at allusions, sometimes he goes into his 'Sean voice.'

Sean used to go on Joe's stream fairly frequently (once or twice a month on the spur of the moment) and I always really liked those occasions. I know Joe feels very indebted to Nick for helping his channel, but there is more to YouTube than Nick - he's not even a law channel.

It seemed like a bad sign when Sean superchatted Joe on his birthday and Joe didn't send him the link. I'm pretty sure he would have before Nick's arrest and before he felt like he needed to admonish Sean, Quartering and Yellowflash for covering it how they were.

I think Sean was last on Joe's channel May 11 reading Stormy Daniels' testimony (in character). It was a great stream.

And while people keep taking sides for whatever their own personal reasons are, Nick will just sit back and shrug. And drink.

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

- Someone who was grifting hard off this (Joe uses the term without animus - HASW) has yelled at him that he 'doesn't hate government enough', but they are being inconsistent now. He mentions they were on his 'let 100 men go free panel' and were trying to make him more sceptical of government.

Joe is mad that Sean doesn't believe Nick's bullshit?

Because that's where we are currently at.......this situation isn't the government making shit up. We all saw Nick do coke.

And while people keep taking sides for whatever their own personal reasons are, Nick will just sit back and shrug. And drink.

That's the sad part. Nick will reward "loyalty" by being a drunk scumbag.

 

[TurdThrower]

I think if there was anyone from the Big Brain panels that could've made it in what would later become Lawtube but didn't want to for whatever personal reason, it'd be Kian. Dude was fucking hysterical. Too bad we lost him and got retards like Aussie Overlaw'd and Camelot.

Last I'd heard he was a federal employee but it seems as though he's recently started up his own law firm in southern California. Now he looks even more Mexican than he did previously.
View attachment 6344614

I always wondered what happened to peacock.

 

[AnOminous]

I watched the beginning before he made the stream members only. He gave a long speech about how disingenuous it was for people who have always said cops are liars to automatically believe the cops when it comes to statements against Nick.

That's nonsense. Saying some cops are liars doesn't mean all cops are liars, or that if a cop says something you ALREADY INDEPENDENTLY KNEW that it suddenly makes that false.

 

[SargonF00t]

I think if there was anyone from the Big Brain panels that could've made it in what would later become Lawtube but didn't want to for whatever personal reason, it'd be Kian. Dude was fucking hysterical. Too bad we lost him and got retards like Aussie Overlaw'd and Camelot.

Last I'd heard he was a federal employee but it seems as though he's recently started up his own law firm in southern California. Now he looks even more Mexican than he did previously.
View attachment 6344614

It is a damn shame he doesn't want to be a LawTuber, I think he has tremendous potential and could have made a small fortune if he was disciplined and learnt to not make the mistakes Rekieta made.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Kian

Is this the same Kian who’s an associate of Dax Herrera?

 

[Chirping Smoke Detector]

Someone who was grifting hard off this (Joe uses the term without animus - HASW) has yelled at him that he 'doesn't hate government enough', but they are being inconsistent now. He mentions they were on his 'let 100 men go free panel' and were trying to make him more sceptical of government.

Yes, this was absolutely Potentially Criminal. I do remember this stream and Joe said he was fine if people's rights were trampled if it got a criminal off the streets. I believe the example was a murderer transporting a dead body who gets pulled over and their car searched for no reason. Joe was okay with that since it caught a murderer.

 

[KittyLoaf]

I think Kian had the good sense to get off the internet. He was an interesting character for sure and super entertaining.

I hope his good sense extended to pulling away from Daxipad.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

It is a damn shame he doesn't want to be a LawTuber, I think he has tremendous potential and could have made a small fortune if he was disciplined and learnt to not make the mistakes Rekieta made.

Is this the same Kian who’s an associate of Dax Herrera?

I think Kian had the good sense to get off the internet. He was an interesting character for sure and super entertaining.

I hope his good sense extended to pulling away from Daxipad.

He had a short-lived YT channel where he read literature and discussed it in short chunks. It went away when he got a government job. He disappeared from the internet when he got the government job becuase people were reaching out (according to Nick) to his employer and being upset about things he said.

If he were to return, he would probably support Dick. He, Nick, Burch, and Josh (thr one with thr multi-colour cloak) from Bibg Brain Panels all met as Dick Heads.

 

[DumDum Did Nothing Wrong]

Lawtube was called out by a university by New South Wales

 

[Barry McKockner]

Lawtube was called out by a university by New South Wales

That paper is hilarious because it goes out of its way to NOT mention Crackeita's stream for Johnny Depp or Kyle rittenhouse which were absolutely key lawtube moments.

 

[Meat Target]

Lawtube was called out by a university by New South Wales

That paper is hilarious because it goes out of its way to NOT mention Crackeita's stream for Johnny Depp or Kyle rittenhouse which were absolutely key lawtube moments.

Even without his commentary, you can hear the seethe in that paper. Lawyers are blue-bloods who cannot stand their club being breached by peasants.

 

[Lian Xing]

Joe (a lawyer who only did collections) is currently trying to gaslight Nate and Kurt on search warrant procedure.

 

[Sam Losco]

Joe (a lawyer who only did collections) is currently trying to gaslight Nate and Kurt on search warrant procedure.

Tuned in just in time to hear him admit he's wrong.

 

[Lian Xing]

Tuned in just in time to hear him admit he's wrong.

Joe will be washing the Balldo tomorrow, conveniently forgetting about that case law Kurt showed him. Pilpul of the highest order.

 

[Lian Xing]

Joe is live with the following tag line:

The Following Program: Rebutting Uncivil Law's Take On Nick Rekieta's Motion; + News​

Should be interesting given what happened mere minutes before his livestream.