Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

Thousands of years of evolution has enabled women to sniff out genetic dead ends with incredible efficiency.
If that were true how come there are so many mongoloids, criminals and overall deadbeats with plenty of children? Foids being adept at finding high quality partners is one of the more prevalent and delusional foid copes.
 
If that were true how come there are so many mongoloids, criminals and overall deadbeats with plenty of children? Foids being adept at finding high quality partners is one of the more prevalent and delusional foid copes.
I mean if you're stuck between picking criminals (bad boy they can fix) and male feminists (The guy who waits till she's passed out on the couch) can you really blame them?
 
If anything, being "educated" is a TURN OFF for men. Men don't like "educated". Educated doesn't mean smart. It just means indoctrinated at worst or a bitchy "smarter than you" attitude at best. Being educated is not an attractive trait. Not saying men like dumb women, men like women who aren't argumentative. The smarter a woman is, the more argumentative she tends to be. Cleverness and general intelligence is not tied to education. That's what men find attractive.
Not many things more repulsive on this earth than a midwit with a useless degree. That goes for the moids, too. The level of smug is just insufferable and I'd much rather have a conversation with a literal retard.

Germany wants to criminalize calling women fat. That's where rule by women goes. You can't call them fat, and you have to let niggers stab you.
I didn't believe you, so I checked. It's fucking true.

My incel brother in christ I know that you have seen the content creators do this, but had you ever been with a woman you would know that it does not work.
It does if she respects you as a man. The first time she's going to bitch and moan, but if you just keep your calm and take her to a restaurant, she'll ease into it. If she doesn't, she doesn't respect you, and either you need to start being more of a man or you're dealing with an absolute cunt and you should just throw her away anyway.
 
I’ve never known a woman who doesn’t want her man to decide for her in terms of activities. Despite sitcoms making jokes about this, the women I’ve been with think it’s attractive when you order for them, and they also think it’s attractive when you hand over your card to the waiter when it’s time for the check and you don’t even look at the check.

Of course, thanks to the Tinderization of dating, you’ll get to know her favorite position during sex before you know what kind of food she likes. If you haven’t dumped loads in her ass yet, you shouldn’t be taking her to restaurants.
 
>criminal drug addict
>I can fix him
>funko collecting nutrient drinking reddit visiting soyboy
>I can't fix him

:thinking:
Collecting funko pops is low risk and safe. Being a retard criminal is unsafe and high risk. More risk, more sex appeal.
 
If she says you've got a small organ, tell her it's not used to playing in a cathedral. [Not my joke, thank Roy 'Chubby' Brown for that one].

Anyway, why didn't you just go arse-to-mouth? That'll shut a bitch up. Did you learn nothing from porn? Kids today, man...
In all seriousness, sexual interactions make me very nervous. I think Im okay with staying a virgin. I am content.
 
Dog-walking thought: women's erotic fiction where the woman becomes a millionaire grrrlboss and then bangs a billionaire handsome chad is the female equivalent of a porno where a man sprouts tits and dick-sucking lips and then has orgies with attractive women.

The more I think about the Flynn Effect and Reverse Flynn Effect, the most skeptical I am that the driving mechanism is evolution.

The Flynn Effect has been happening in the last century and the countries experiencing the Reverse Flynn Effect have been seeing the decline in the last ~40 years. Both timeframes are too short to be evolutionary.

Genetic bottlenecks can cause a large shift in gene distribution in only a single generation.

I'm with the rat utopia school of thought on this subject, societies with a highly intelligent population generally tend to structure themselves as meritocracies, and a certain lifestyle and standard of living that can only be achieved through working in major metropolitan areas is promoted.

The problem is that smart people, after developing technology to the point where we don't need to put all our energy into survival, build rat utopias. We've done it everywhere, including Israel.

Nobody really knows what will happen next. Maybe high intelligence is an evolutionary dead end. It did great for a while, but negroes and feather Indians never developed it and existed for thousands and thousands of years until the more intelligent races conquered them. But what if all we ended up doing in the end was feeding them, sterilizing ourselves, and going extinct, leaving them to go back to the Stone Age and wander the bones of our now-depopulated cities?

Or maybe we'll go through a genetic bottleneck, but not extinction, and people who are smart enough to build computers, but still keep the part of their brain that makes them religious, will win. Or maybe people whose brains generate endorphins when they think about their great-grand children being numerous will win.
 
The problem is that smart people, after developing technology to the point where we don't need to put all our energy into survival, build rat utopias. We've done it everywhere, including Israel.

Nobody really knows what will happen next. Maybe high intelligence is an evolutionary dead end. It did great for a while, but negroes and feather Indians never developed it and existed for thousands and thousands of years until the more intelligent races conquered them. But what if all we ended up doing in the end was feeding them, sterilizing ourselves, and going extinct, leaving them to go back to the Stone Age and wander the bones of our now-depopulated cities?
For the past 30 years, we're actively decimating our supply of smart students. Simply put, the education system is designed to break you, especially if you're a smart, energetic boy, and try to reshape you as a "productive member of society". The feminization of the education system directly contributes to this problem.
 
No, but the push to get high-IQ women to sterilize themselves so they can spend their twenties contributing to the GDP instead of the population is.
Lol, lmao.
The actual high IQ women are the ones being obedient housewives and chilling while living their best life. Femoids with daddy issues and plain midwits are the ones trying to become the breadwinner while giving up parenthood.
 
Lol, lmao.
The actual high IQ women are the ones being obedient housewives and chilling while living their best life. Femoids with daddy issues and plain midwits are the ones trying to become the breadwinner while giving up parenthood.
Women were "liberated" to become wageslaves. The biggest change from women joining the workforce is needing two incomes for housing. Good job, Feminism.
 
Then how come there are more genetic dead ends now more than ever?
If that were true how come there are so many mongoloids, criminals and overall deadbeats with plenty of children? Foids being adept at finding high quality partners is one of the more prevalent and delusional foid copes.
I disagree that this is a foid cope. Research indicates that a woman’s intuitive sense of whether or not her partner will be violent toward her is a substantially more accurate predictor of future violence than any other warning sign. (Page 406)

I think mongoloids, criminals, and overall deadbeats have been relying on the Genghis Kahn method of reproduction and arranged marriages for a large portion of human history. Women’s rights is a relatively recent development in history and it is directly correlated a reproductivity crisis (which I suspect impacts men much more than it impacts women.)

I think women finally being allowed to trust their intuition about men has led to a massive spike in involuntarily celibate men. I think incels are statistically more likely to have abusive tendencies and women can sniff that out. Kinda like we all have an uncanny sense of who’s a real woman and who’s a troon.

Sure, there are exceptions to the rule and dumb women who still marry mongoloids. I think nature is going to heal in an evolutionary timeline, which means these traits will slowly become less prevalent, now that force is increasingly a less viable reproductive avenue for them.

Or, if this is a true genetic bottleneck, I’ll defer to @The Ugly One:
enetic bottlenecks can cause a large shift in gene distribution in only a single generation.
If this is true, I think anyone who’s struggling to get a GF should internally assess their abusive tendencies like their genetic line depends on it. I think this will be more efficient than looksmaxing or any other objective method because a woman’s sixth sense of a man’s entitlement can’t currently be scientifically measured.

Otherwise, billions must die to return to the old ways.
 
Back