Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Major]

We know Nick would like to add Keanu to his polycule, but the one he should really get is her mother. She looks like she could peg him real good, maybe he'd finally stop pining for Aaron.

so he's collecting them, like pokemon?

 

[Captain Manning]

I smell a plea deal.

No way. Nick would never

Nor would anybody here want that. The epic chimp-out that'll happen if and when his motion to void the search warrant is denied will make the Cokestream (spurred by the Appeals court siding with Monty) look like mild disappointment.

I don't think he'll take a plea deal at all, but if he did, it'll be only after exhausting every single stupid asinine ploy short of putting the case in the hands of a jury.

 

[Pentamidine]

Weren't we expecting the State's response filing today?

Filing just dropped in the lawsuit thread

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/state-...la-rekieta-april-imholte.191978/post-19223200

https://kiwifarms.st/attachments/mcro_34-cr-24-341_briefs_2024-08-30_20240830161706-pdf.6364720/

 

[DSP for president 2032]

Women ain't posessions lad, so allowed is the wrong word.

I'm being pedantic here because this is my pet peeve. Allowed is the correct word.


For the swinger sex to happen, Nick Rekieta must have told or VERY STRONGLY implied to Kayla Rekieta that:
-She would not get in trouble for fucking Aaron
-She has permission to fuck Aaron
-He would not prevent the Aaron-fucking

Ordinary dating and/or marriage partners do not simply fuck anyone they come across and expect it to have no consequences for their relationship. Why is that? In my opinion, the logical conclusion is that they do feel a claim of ownership from their significant other. If Kayla isn't Nick's wife, then she becomes "our" communal wife, or FapCop's wife, as people here joke frequently. Someone owns a wife, and someone owns a husband. The question is, who?

 

[BaddestSeagull]

so he's collecting them, like pokemon?

Troot troot!
A wild Whore appears!
Can he catch em all with his pokeballdos?

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

Filing just dropped in the lawsuit thread

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/state-...la-rekieta-april-imholte.191978/post-19223200

https://kiwifarms.st/attachments/mcro_34-cr-24-341_briefs_2024-08-30_20240830161706-pdf.6364720/

Here's my TL: DR for the State's 10 page response filing:

"Your honor, Nick Rekieta's lawyer is an imbecile."

 

[Finger Pistols]

Yeah. The sudden dead air when he completely stops the show to look for a soundboard button to play a "funny" clip is agonizing.

The discovery of the soundboard has been a disaster for the YouTube entretainment industry. I genuenly hate, hate, hate, the soundboards. If I had the location of every soundboard that's being used right now I would grab my hammer and destroy them until they can't reproduce those repetitive chirps no more. Specially Keemstar's, his particularly unfunny use of it on every fucking stream he's involved in is a crime against the senses.
I HATE SOUNDBOARDS! Kill all soundboards! Behead soundboards! Roundhouse kick all soundboards!

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

SHOTS FIRED!

This filing is deadly.

 

[Father Time]

Here's my TL: DR for the State's 10 page response filing:

"Your honor, Nick Rekieta's lawyer is an imbecile."

Balldo BTFO

 

[Finger Pistols]

SHOTS FIRED!

View attachment 6364776

This filing is deadly.

Oh shit! This reads like they are pissed at Nicky boy for trying to snake his way out of this. There will be no plea deals from the prosecution I assume

 

[Turbo Hornbag Hervez]

“The Defendant may disagree with it but that does not make it a lie.”

No truer words have been spoken about Nick

 

[Mike Stoklasas Spock Ears]

Bruh, this prosecutor HATES him

 

[Maraschino]

The VTuber memes he uses make me want to shoot myself. And I actually watch some anime (go ahead and judge me).

It irritates me he uses vtuber memes for non-vtuber related streams and yet he has the perfect clip of Ralph screaming LeEgUlL MOiNDsET and hasn't put it in his rotation/soundboard. It's fucking gold and I can't unhear Ralph's stupid ass whenever Andrew is mentioned.

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

Oh shit! This reads like they are pissed at Nicky boy trying to snake his way out of this. There will be no plea deals from thr prosecution I assume

Rekieta's only argument for throwing out the warrant is that it was based on an edited (fake) video. Nick lied to us.

To make it worse the BarnesWalker didn't even bother downloading the full video evidence from the state for two weeks after getting the "fake" clip.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

I'm being pedantic here because this is my pet peeve. Allowed is the correct word.

View attachment 6364671

For the swinger sex to happen, Nick Rekieta must have told or VERY STRONGLY implied to Kayla Rekieta that:
-She would not get in trouble for fucking Aaron
-She has permission to fuck Aaron
-He would not prevent the Aaron-fucking

Ordinary dating and/or marriage partners do not simply fuck anyone they come across and expect it to have no consequences for their relationship. Why is that? In my opinion, the logical conclusion is that they do feel a claim of ownership from their significant other. If Kayla isn't Nick's wife, then she becomes "our" communal wife, or FapCop's wife, as people here joke frequently. Someone owns a wife, and someone owns a husband. The question is, who?

Speaking of pedantic:

A more correct phrase would be "consented to." Directly or indirectly.

Independent adults have the right and capacity to do whatever. Short of locking her in a closet, he couldn't have "prevented" her from anything.

And "get in trouble" is something more appropriate in relation to a child. Get mad, leave her, whatever may be the consequence of unsanctioned fucking around, to equate that to "getting in trouble" is kind of creepy re an adult. He's not (at least not by virtue of being her husband) her disciplianarian; he is her (supposed) partner. But the role requires mutual agreement. And consequences aren't "getting in trouble" (putting aside colloquialisms like "in trouble with the law," though even that phrase implies an authority [figure]).

And as an aside, the use of possessive pronouns is as much about specificity as it is "ownership." But even "ownership" is not meant in the same sense as when a person owns a thing.

 

[BaddestSeagull]

Don't they know that it's Nick who decides what is truth and what isn't based on what makes him feel nice and gay?

 

[AnOminous]

Lmao.

Everything's mental at Casa Balldo, even the cooking utensils.

Also while all the other stuff is pretty damning, don't something like 100% of $100 bills have cocaine on them?

ETA: It's only 90%. https://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/08/14/cocaine.traces.money/

 

[Balldo's Gate]

He seethed at that guy efapping April's arraignment. The one most people here said was cringe.

That guy barely even said anything over the stream, he just made soyjak faces at the camera over it and yelled "Another dub for the toe" one time at the end.

Rekieta superchatted the guy like $10 or whatever a couple weeks or months ago, he probably expected him to be nice to him and his polycule FOREVER after that that. How DARE he mock April??? He probably ran to the shower afterwards, phone in hand.

Speaking of pedantic:

A more correct phrase would be "consented to." Directly or indirectly.

More like "facilitated", if not "encouraged".

 

[yydszmiteg2]

Speaking of pedantic:

A more correct phrase would be "consented to." Directly or indirectly.

Independent adults have the right and capacity to do whatever. Short of locking her in a closet, he couldn't have "prevented" her from anything.

And "get in trouble" is something more appropriate in relation to a child. Get mad, leave her, whatever may be the consequence of unsanctioned fucking around, to equate that to "getting in trouble" is kind of creepy re an adult. He's not (at least not by virtue of being her husband) her disciplianarian; he is her (supposed) partner. But the role requires mutual agreement. And consequences aren't "getting in trouble" (putting aside colloquialisms like "in trouble with the law," though even that phrase implies an authority [figure]).

And as an aside, the use of possessive pronouns is as much about specificity as it is "ownership." But even "ownership" is not meant in the same sense as when a person owns a thing.

This is very autistic. Here in the real world partners "get in trouble" with each other all the time over things like "forgetting the anniversary", "Being indecisive on where to eat" and many other subjects. If you want to pilpul over words do it somewhere else.

 

[Canard]

Nick's plea deal is getting worse and worse...

I hope Kayla's attorney does better... Or CHIPs has lot more work...