Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 21.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 48 15.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 106 34.8%

  • Total voters
    305
View attachment 6364920
It's this line for me. The entire thing is consistent with what Imholte said. In the era before everyone recorded themselves committing crimes and uploaded the footage to the internet, they gave out search warrants for a lot less than this. They have Imholte saying Nick's a cokehead, and footage that screams Nick's a cokehead. The warrant is going to hold up, or I'll be very surprised!
They have Aaron, the pastor, Kayla's sister and potentially other people. And then not only the video was consistent, but detective went through several streams from previous months and could see signs of potential drug use. It's solid. Nick is a faggot.
 
But Nick's motion seems to be saying that their video (I'm assuming the full video they uploaded and Nick's side downloaded at the beginning of July) is the one with a watermark and "not the same video because compression". It's possible the state doesn't realize this is not directly from Nick's channel, they just go "what do you mean retard, it's your full stream, nothing is added or cut, it's full length, you're dumb" and they are not wrong.

I agree. The State and Nick are not being precise, and I hope we get a lot of juicy sperging over it from Nick.

In the end, it will be sorted. It may not even matter as a boomer judge says: 'I can see your face here! What edits?'


ETA: As autistic as we may be, I think it important to note that over-analysing the language in the motions will not be productive. Just watch Nick sperg over it and wait for clarification in the later motions and hearings. Nick will be sure to argue this point for us. Let him do the work.

Please do not fill up the thread with parsing of badly written documents.
 
Others have said something similar in the thread, but you sometimes you wind up with a client who’s just fucked. Some dickhead walks in with some dirty pond water and moldy lemons, gives 10k upfront, and tells you to try and make lemonade.

Also, you generally do not know how bad the case is until you’ve already established that relationship. Balldo could definitely make a compelling case to some defense attorney who is only vaguely familiar with the details, money notwithstanding.
You throw all the shit towards the wall, spread your arms, open your mouth and see what sticks, and how much shit comes back for you to eat.

“It pays the bills.”
 
I agree. The State and Nick are not being precise, and I hope we get a lot of juicy sperging over it from Nick.

In the end, it will be sorted. It may not even matter as a boomer judge says: 'I can see your face here! What edits?'
Nick is the one that has to be precise though. He has to go "here is where the officer is lying based on this."

He didn't
 
Has Nick even argued with some video comparison that video was somehow modified like adding something to it or editing it more than re-encoding and slapping water mark? I mean like substantially tell what exactly was altered?
He was very vague about the supposed differences. That's how you know it was bullshit.
But Nick's motion seems to be saying that their video (I'm assuming the full video they uploaded and Nick's side downloaded at the beginning of July) is the one with a watermark and "not the same video because compression". It's possible the state doesn't realize this is not directly from Nick's channel, they just go "what do you mean retard, it's your full stream, nothing is added or cut, it's full length, you're dumb" and they are not wrong.
I think what the prosecutor realizes is that Nick is full of shit (compression doesn't mean shit about content; he was just trying to suggest the LEO is a LIAR).
 
So we have Kayla's nudes, Nick's nudes, Keanu's nudes, Keanu's mom's nudes (gross), Chrissy Mary's nudes, and I think April flashed her tits somewhere. Do we have Aaron's nudes yet? It'd be hilarious if we got nudes of everyone involved in this story to complete the collection.
Do some exist of Kayla's mams? If so i must've missed that
 
I think what the prosecutor realizes is that Nick is full of shit (compression doesn't mean shit about content; he was just trying to suggest the LEO is a LIAR).
Oh, fully agreed. Whether it's purposeful or not, they didn't entertain Nick's completely ridiculous argument at all and I think it's truly glorious. Can't wait for Nick's tantrum reply claiming that they didn't address the RIGHT THING. He will die on the hill of "compression changes everything" and "it's not the SAME video". It's fun and more fun is on the way.
 
Tough break for Balldo. The only thing that can clear Nick Rekieta’s name is if he takes the witness stand and clears it all up and explain to the jury how there’s a government conspiracy against him to deny him his rights. A good competent practicing lawyer with intelligence can pull it off. Alas Nick Rekieta is retarded, not very smart, and a non practicing lawyer so he will never take the witness stand and prove once and for all he’s innocent.
I am fully expecting him to go with the jury nullification defence now, there is nothing else he has that I can think of. The Franks was his hail mary to not have to fight it in court.
 
Nick likes to take obvious jokes and hold them up as proof that KF lies. Plus jokes are supposed to be funny.
63f.jpg
 
Has Nick even argued with some video comparison that video was somehow modified like adding something to it or editing it more than re-encoding and slapping water mark? I mean like substantially tell what exactly was altered?
Nope. No specificity at all.

Really, what this comes down to is Nick knows the video looks like shit and he needs it gone in the hopes it take out the warrant too. That's all. The warrant has gotta go, or he's outright fucked on the possession charge. He probably knows it too. Nick is placing all his chips on torpedoing the warrant, to the point he seems to have all but admitted the coke was there in his recent livestream concerning April's case.

Also, worth a reminder (as the Prosecution pointed out in their reply) that the cokestream is hardly the only thing they used to get the warrant.
 
Nope. No specificity at all.

Really, what this comes down to is Nick knows the video looks like shit and he needs it gone in the hopes it take out the warrant too. That's all. The warrant has gotta go, or he's outright fucked on the possession charge. He probably knows it too. Nick is placing all his chips on torpedoing the warrant, to the point he seems to have all but admitted the coke was there in his recent livestream concerning April's case.

Also, worth a reminder (as the Prosecution pointed out in their reply) that the cokestream is hardly the only thing they used to get the warrant.
I may be getting a little in my cups already this long-weekend-eve, but Nick's formal legal positions thus far are embarrassing.
 
Back