Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Why is Nicholas Rekieta offline?

  • He's spending time with his family, NERDS.

    Votes: 72 10.7%
  • He pissed hot and he's in trouble!

    Votes: 95 14.2%
  • Yet another "family incident" happened.

    Votes: 209 31.1%
  • His lawyer ordered him to shut up.

    Votes: 175 26.1%
  • He's busy procuring the 5k LOCALS gift.

    Votes: 69 10.3%
  • He's dead.

    Votes: 51 7.6%

  • Total voters
    671
Sean - never go full lolcow.jpg
rekieta - never go full lolcow.jpg
 
It was possible though because Nick didn't private it until the middle of the next day. It was up for like 10-12 hours IIRC until Nick regained consciousness. Many people here downloaded the replay directly from Nick's YT channel during that time and the removal was documented in this thread in real time. The video is still up on Nick's Odysee channel too for whatever reason. That argument is disingenuous at best.
The state reviewed the copy. They said as much when they said the clip that Pomplun submitted was created from the larger video Pomplun viewed. That means Pomplun's original video has the watermark.
 
The state reviewed the copy. They said as much when they said the clip that Pomplun submitted was created from the larger video Pomplun viewed. That means Pomplun's original video has the watermark.
Not really. If I download a full video using YoutubeDownloader.com or whatever it's not going to have a watermark. If I then use some boomer freeware demo video editing software to extract a clip from that full video the resulting clip is going to have a watermark. I've done this myself before discovering Handbrake.
 
Sean looks like he would take you for a nice meal. Nick looks like he would complains about the price of the complementary bread rolls.
Sean's probably ready to have a beer with a side of nice pork ribs or steak with you at a local bistro.
Balldo looks like he wants so sell you caffeine powder laced cocaine or suck your cock for pocket change.
Juju looks like he knows all the shady spots in town for child molesters.
 
Question for the former drug users and reformed drug dealers.
Is there any legit reason for a user to own a fine scale and baggies?

Because every time I read a report I feel like someone could be charged with intent to distribute here and only Nick and Kayla have that option with their charge.
The statute covers both possession for personal use and intent to distribute.
 
Question for the former drug users and reformed drug dealers.
Is there any legit reason for a user to own a fine scale and baggies?

Because every time I read a report I feel like someone should be charged with intent to distribute here and only Nick and Kayla have that option with their charge.
The statute covers both possession for personal use and intent to distribute.
Unless Kayla is measuring grams of flours for her famous banana muffins in the morning, they were weighing drugs, probably giving April her 3 grams to keep her happy, I don't think Nick was selling to the whole block but they probably weighed up what they were going to take with them and just to make sure they got the right amount after buying the drugs too. Don't rip off Lord Balldo or his ladies or you will be getting that shower text.
EDIT: Also if they were cooking up crack in the metal pan they'd need the right amount of cocaine and baking soda and water and ice cubes to teeeewhack it correctly, too much or too little of one ingredient will fuck the whole thing up and it wont rock properly. I wouldn't doubt they were smoking crack too. They'd smoke it out of the metal or glass tubes they found with metal chore boy scrubbies for metal pans. Trust me bros, I know crack heads when I see them.
 
Last edited:
Question for the former drug users and reformed drug dealers.
Is there any legit reason for a user to own a fine scale and baggies?

Because every time I read a report I feel like someone should be charged with intent to distribute here and only Nick and Kayla have that option with their charge.
The statute covers both possession for personal use and intent to distribute.
I have a few digital scales for quick-testing silver/gold coins and valuing scrap. Fakes are everywhere and they never weigh right. Use them all the time. Mini baggies too.

I don't think Nick is much of a coin collector though although I do look forward to hearing all about his lifelong hobby for the first time very soon.
 
Question for the former drug users and reformed drug dealers.
Is there any legit reason for a user to own a fine scale and baggies?

Because every time I read a report I feel like someone could be charged with intent to distribute here and only Nick and Kayla have that option with their charge.
The statute covers both possession for personal use and intent to distribute.
On the face of it with how much cocaine was in the household and the scales it wouldn't be a huge stretch of the imagination to say "he's dealing cocaine" many habitual cocaine users sell cocaine to help fund that lifestyle. The one reason why I think it was all for personal use vs sale/use is that Nick seems to have enough money for his habit already and would probably just prefer to do cocaine rather than spend time selling it for his re-up.
 
Also if they were cooking up crack in the metal pan they'd need the right amount of cocaine and baking soda and water and ice cubes to teeeewhack it correctly, too much or too little of one ingredient will fuck the whole thing up and it wont rock properly. I wouldn't doubt they were smoking crack too. They'd smoke it out of the metal or glass tubes they found with metal chore boy scrubbies for metal pans. Trust me bros, I know crack heads when I see them.
I had not thought about the pan and the possibility of home cooking crack. That would actually be a reasonable explanation for the scale.
But admitting that would bring the crack fumes polluting the house and affecting the children into the mix.

What a fucking mess.
 
Here's a thought I'd like Nick to explain. Nick and Barnes having talking about how the state has been after Nick because he's been calling out the corruption.

Ignoring the fact that the corrupt government only went after him after a multitude reports of concerns from his community.

What's the point in even fighting? The government is corrupt and want him to shut up. The judges, police and other officials are just going to get him anyway, even if he could prove they planted everything and lied about everything. Clearly he's not that big of an issue or the governments not corrupt enough where they no knock raid him and shoot him other percieved reaching.

I expect it's this logic that's making his locals community express terroristic actions of bombing as the only viable path now.
 
Question for the former drug users and reformed drug dealers.
Is there any legit reason for a user to own a fine scale and baggies?

Because every time I read a report I feel like someone could be charged with intent to distribute here and only Nick and Kayla have that option with their charge.
The statute covers both possession for personal use and intent to distribute.
Not a "drug user" but I do make capsules for our supplements. I used to shoot with a dude that was a competitor, he used one to measure powder weight down to the grain. I have another that will measure weights down to the gram +2 decimal places. I used to portion food on that.
 
Not a "drug user" but I do make capsules for our supplements. I used to shoot with a dude that was a competitor, he used one to measure powder weight down to the grain. I have another that will measure weights down to the gram +2 decimal places. I used to portion food on that.
They're used in cooking a lot too, especially in Europe where ingredients for recipes are measured by weight (grams) instead of volume (tablespoons, cups). Far more consistent results that way. I imagine every kitchen in the UK has an inexpensive digital scale.

The Rekieta's aren't known for cooking meals though.
 
Last edited:
They're used in cooking a lot too, especially in Europe where ingredients for recipes are measured by weight (grams) instead of volume (tablespoons, cups). Far more consistent results that way. I imagine every kitchen in the UK has an inexpensive digital scale.

The Rekieta's aren't known for cooking meals though.
He's not known for cooking crack either. From the description of his gear Crackets had no clue how to cook up a batch.
 
On the face of it with how much cocaine was in the household and the scales it wouldn't be a huge stretch of the imagination to say "he's dealing cocaine" many habitual cocaine users sell cocaine to help fund that lifestyle. The one reason why I think it was all for personal use vs sale/use is that Nick seems to have enough money for his habit already and would probably just prefer to do cocaine rather than spend time selling it for his re-up.

I don't believe he or she was dealing. The market in area is likely small and it would have come up if they had any idea it was going on. And Nick is at the same time too busy with streaming and too lazy to actually do anything for money.

Preparing doses for church or when going somewhere to do something is most immediate idea I can come up with, explains those bullets as well.
 
Not really. If I download a full video using YoutubeDownloader.com or whatever it's not going to have a watermark. If I then use some boomer freeware demo video editing software to extract a clip from that full video the resulting clip is going to have a watermark. I've done this myself before discovering Handbrake.
The state has bigger problems if the software they use for video evidence modifies it this way. (Hint: they don't).
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAroXX
The state has bigger problems if the software they use for video evidence modifies it this way. (Hint: they don't).
This is a small town police department not FBI's Quantico forensic crime lab. I would not be surprised in the least if the detective did a google search for "how to clip a video" and used the freeware from the first adsense link. I work with such departments for similar things and the extent of their knowledge is basically needing VLC or MPC-HD to open various video formats from cheap security camera footage provided to them by residents. Investigating famous Youtubers and evidence from their 4-hour livestreams isn't really a common thing for local cops.

I would also not be surprised if the detective relied solely on a clip and then later the full video downloaded and provided by a 3rd-party viewer like Cog or PPP. It doesn't matter. If the video has been altered in any way Nick can demonstrate that in court with his own original copy. There's a reason he hasn't and only made vague insinuations instead.
 
Last edited:
Back