US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
I dunno, I'm not really feeling the whole "proud cat ladies" thing.

Like, sure you can try to own it. But it seems like people who have sex with manakins trying to own that. Being proud of your embarrassing label and "embracing it" doesn't make you less of an embarrassment.

unmarried and childless cat lady = the female equivalent to incels

The more these women try to "own it proudly," the more pathetic (and hilarious) it becomes.
 
Might be because it is really annoying and requires a lot of work for little reward. Not to mention we all know how things are (D)ifferent meaning right wing fact checkers would quickly find themselves swamped in lawsuits and deplataformed.
the true power for the baises on the left is that they have terminally online janies that will cling to the only validation they have, hence the sweeping for free
 
- Villain has a literal auction with a bunch of dictators from WW2 somewhere in south France (feat. totally not Franco and absolutely not Mussolini)

Although Franco was a dictator Spain was technically neutral in WW2, although not as neutral as Switzerland as Franco did give a bit of help to both sides (on the Axis side it was to fight the USSR, among other thing he allowed Spanish mercenaries to fight for the Axis but only against the USSR and they were forbidden from fighting other Allies) and also allowed jewish refugees to seek asylum in Spain. He also wasn't Fascist as so many call him. Socialism is the core of Fascism and he was anti-socialist. He was just an authoritarian nationalist, but you have to view it in the context of the time. He had just beaten the communists ("Republicans", but most were just commies) in a civil war and communism was a massive threat so his government was protecting the people against that threat and got less totalitarian over time as he wasn't just some evil dictator who was a dictator for the sake of being a dictator.
 
Although Franco was a dictator Spain was technically neutral in WW2, although not as neutral as Switzerland as Franco did give a bit of help to both sides (on the Axis side it was to fight the USSR, among other thing he allowed Spanish mercenaries to fight for the Axis but only against the USSR and they were forbidden from fighting other Allies) and also allowed jewish refugees to seek asylum in Spain. He also wasn't Fascist as so many call him. Socialism is the core of Fascism and he was anti-socialist. He was just an authoritarian nationalist, but you have to view it in the context of the time. He had just beaten the communists ("Republicans", but most were just commies) in a civil war and communism was a massive threat so his government was protecting the people against that threat and got less totalitarian over time as he wasn't just some evil dictator who was a dictator for the sake of being a dictator.
He also delayed the civil war as much as he could because he hoped for a peaceful resolution that ousted the left. It was only when he realized no peaceful solution could come that he decided to throw his hat out in the ring.

He only played the role of Falangist up until he felt comfortable to throw away the whole veneer.

He was an authoritarian but not every country is America. Authoritarian conservativism was always a core aspect of Spain so our American sensibilities shouldn't get in the way of what Spanish were comfortable with for centuries.
 
Although Franco was a dictator Spain was technically neutral in WW2, although not as neutral as Switzerland as Franco did give a bit of help to both sides (on the Axis side it was to fight the USSR, among other thing he allowed Spanish mercenaries to fight for the Axis but only against the USSR and they were forbidden from fighting other Allies) and also allowed jewish refugees to seek asylum in Spain. He also wasn't Fascist as so many call him. Socialism is the core of Fascism and he was anti-socialist. He was just an authoritarian nationalist, but you have to view it in the context of the time. He had just beaten the communists ("Republicans", but most were just commies) in a civil war and communism was a massive threat so his government was protecting the people against that threat and got less totalitarian over time as he wasn't just some evil dictator who was a dictator for the sake of being a dictator.

Nigger do you really think the people who thought having this as a plot for Captain Planet was a good idea could comprehend those points?
 
Remember one of the highlights at the DNC being the speech by the parents of one of the Israeli-American hostages held by Hamas? Well the IDF just found their son Hersh Goldberg-Polin among six dead hostages in a Gazan tunnel, reportedly executed and abandoned by Hamas just a couple of days prior.
View attachment 6370173View attachment 6370217
God I feel bad for the victims family learning their loved one's fates
 
Do not listen to these Frutiger era types, whose entire mindset depends on being Baja blasted with computerized graphics. This basket of shiny, glossy deplorables can barely look themselves in the mirror without it exploding into crystals of bad breath shattering minty flavor, like five gum. My friends, my fellow Americans. Let me be crystal pepsi clear. Let me take you back to a time of simple delicious, Wrigleys fruit flavors and hubba bubba that didn't need complex shading and gloss to get your attention.
The greatest time for American logo design was the mid-late 60s into the 1970s and early 80s. It was a time of American exceptionalism and ingenuity. We made it through the assassination of JFK and RFK. We made it through Carter to Reagan, where it was morning in america again. Where Corn flakes boxes looked like they contained food and not skibidi toilet fortnite memes. We can have that time again. We can have that high contrast, simple but effective design.
View attachment 6371581
MAKE LOGOS GREAT AGAIN
MAKE INGREDIENTS GREAT AGAIN
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

Why are you showing the lame modernised (at the time) Warner Brothers logo? The shield has been the logo since the late 20s and other than the logo you posted the only other time it deviated from that (except for the simple name logo they started with and the next logo that was still the shield but had a pic of the studio on the top half of the shield above the WB) was for a couple of years in the 60s.
 
What is that?
A vile color scheme consisting of pink, purple and blue
So apparently Kamala cars are a thing, but they're still extremely rare, and are the lowest-effort compared to Trump ones, and feel forced and cringy:

View attachment 6371092

The reddit logo in that Harris poster explains it all.

View attachment 6371095 View attachment 6371100

View attachment 6371110 View attachment 6371126View attachment 6371111

And even the Kamala bumper stickers are rip-offs of the Trump logo stylization:

View attachment 6371116 View attachment 6371117View attachment 6371118

It's surprising that the Harris/Walz campaign didn't use the "Obviously" slogan. And when did the Harris campaign use the "We Are Not Going Back" slogan?
I'm surprised there's only 1 Subaru in your imagedump
 

How cute.

Without Captain Planet we would not have got this absolute unit of a TV show:

What are you talking about? The Real Adventures Of Johnny Quest is a reboot of a 60s cartoon just called Johnny Quest.

I don't see a single "Coexist" sticker anywhere.
I still do, occasionally.
still do, as well. But they're usually old and weather-worn. Newer lefty virtue signals usually surround them.

I saw one a few weeks ago...

 
I'm hoping all the polls saying Kamala will win are Hillary in 2016 levels of inaccurate. America already has to bear the shame of having Kamala as VP. There'd be no living down the shame if she becomes president. I don't mind if America has a female president as long as it's not Kamala.
 
I'm hoping all the polls saying Kamala will win are Hillary in 2016 levels of inaccurate. America already has to bear the shame of having Kamala as VP. There'd be no living down the shame if she becomes president. I don't mind if America has a female president as long as it's not Kamala.
Hillary Clinton actually had authentic fans before 2016, and I remember her being telegraphed as a future president when I was in elementary school. But, she didn't have many, and you could see the difference on Reddit alone. Hillary's sub was almost entirely focused on Trump, with very few people actually excited about her. Trump's subreddit was huge, and felt like a 24 hour party, real optimistic and patriotic.

Everything surrounding Kamala is focused on either her countless gaffs, or how she compares to Trump. Granted, it's a different playing field, what with it being 8 years later and after tremendous advances in AI, but it's clear that all of her support is completely fake, and anyone actually voting for her is entirely doing it because they'd also vote for Osama Bin Laden over Trump.
 
I dunno, I'm not really feeling the whole "proud cat ladies" thing.

Like, sure you can try to own it. But it seems like people who have sex with manakins trying to own that. Being proud of your embarrassing label and "embracing it" doesn't make you less of an embarrassment.
Basically this:

1725247781782.png

They were REALLY butthurt over that ONE comment. Oh well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back