Semantics aside, my point remains. Nips shouldn't be illegal. I agree with Nick, they're all a buncha Scandiwhovian prude incels!!!
Well, just so you know, as a (non incel) Scandinavian prude...
I completely agree with you.
I always thought we defined porn as a work which, taken as a whole, is meant to appeal to the prurient interests. I certainly don't consider a lot of renaissance artwork to be porn, for example. Exposed beasts and nipples are not, in and of themselves, porn. I agree with those here saying that the law, as written, is overbroad.
With that said, can you
really argue with a straight face, without even having to see the pic in question, that this picture of Kayla wasn't taken for the expressed purposes of sexual gratification? I mean, come on. I suspect even under a law with a more narrow definition of revenge porn, Aaron's goose may well be cooked here. At least as far as the misdemeanor.
My main argument here wouldn't be so much that Aaron is a gud boi who dindu, but rather that in order to get any sort of W here, Nick has to take another L. And that Nick's L is actually bigger than his W. Nick basically admitted in a police report to being a cuck. This amuses me greatly.
That "kike bullshit" is in the Christian Bible too and believed by many non-Jews. This includes references made in portions of the New Testament that Jews had nothing to do with.
Only major difference is in the Christian Old Testament the names are often anglicized from Hebrew (i.e. Esau, Jacob, Rebeckah).
Then how does he explain how he got it?
He's desperately hoping people don't think about it too hard (spoiler: it's too late).