Aaron Imholte / Steel Toe Morning/Evening Show / "The Toe Boys" / r/steeltoeboringshow - Disgraced Minnesotan radio host turned racist Internet shock jock. Cuckold chef de Spaghetti-os, "2-2" boxing "coach". Has a legion of a-logs. Lost his wife to a coke addict he played "Strip Twister" with. Fined $50 for sharing nudes of Kayla Rekieta.

Is this an older message? Because she did actually post nudes somewhere, so this is either outdated or she lied.
She hasn't publicly posted any images which reveal "intimate body parts", although she could share them on Fetlife or similar for all we know, whereas Aaron shared an image which does.
 
It's merely "Eat a bullet". Aaron DOES deserve to eat a bullet. Just because he's taking Nick down with him doesn't change that.
They should all eat a bullet. It's just a question of the caliber.
I agree, and people need to slow down. Aaron is a total nigger, but he is a whole lot better than Nick.
I wouldn't go so far as to use a positive adjective like "better," much less "whole lot better." I prefer "least loathsome."
Nick's committed worse crimes, but literally sharing someone's nudes ON LIVE STREAM WHILE YOU HAVE AN ACTIVE RESTRAINING ORDER WITH ANOTHER WOMAN is beyond retarded and Aaron deserves the $75k bail just for being such a nigger.
My gripe is more with the general policy of the thing than whether Aaron personally deserves it. Fuck Aaron. Minnesota is still a commie shithole.
 
Last edited:
The face of a man who knows his mugshot is instantly getting posted on Kiwi Farms.
Tbh he looks a lot better than the others, who all look like walking corpses, with Balldo in particular with his narc rage glare looking like an absolute faggot in his fag cuck Jamaican shirt he got cucked while wearing.
Wanted for multiple counts of public indecency, assault with a deadly balldo, and crimes against comedy.
And one moving violation several unpaid moving violations.
You really aren't supposed to smile in your mugshots.
It's still better than glaring angrily at the guy taking the picture trying to look like Charlie Manson or some shit.
Dumb question potentially, but would a restraining order on comments about Kayla mean he can’t testify about her in a criminal or civil suit?
No. It doesn't apply to legally compulsory speech.
 
Last edited:
Aaron brought his kids to a crackden so they could do cocaine, his wife can sleep with other men, and all so he can get his dick wet. How on God's green earth can you faggots be so laissez-faire about this? That IS irredeemable. It's irresponsible. Willingly take them into that environment so you can clap some cheeks is horrifyingly bad parenting. This is not just "people make mistakes" moment. This is a major act of child abuse. What is fucking wrong with you?


75k?! Holy fuck, did he bone the judge's mother? Damn, who knew revenge porn came with such a price tag.


Finally, we have the complete set. Now to sell them on eBay.
Calm your tits. I think more of us than not agree with you.
 
If Aaron fights this and brings up cocaine use, child neglect, exhibitionism(jamaica, clubs) and conversations that may or may not have happened about sharing those nudes he could nuke everything Rekieta has left.

Keep in mind this all depends on what kind of messages are on Signal, something as little as Kayla saying "don't share this uwu :3" may be enough to turn this situation into one where is better for the toe to take a cuck plea and hope they at least take out the felony charge.
But shit dude even if there was a "don't share this uwu :3" and you really wanna hurt the Rekietas as much as they are trying to hurt you, then just get a lawyer to argue the expectation of privacy of this ghoulish looking, whiskey bottle shoving, nudist beach going, jamaica BBC train enjoying excuse of a woman.

After all:
View attachment 6377519
That post bolsters the evidence that she would not have consented to dissemination. She says she would not "post" nudes. She did, apparently, share them to between 1 and 3 people, with whom she had a personal relationship. Clearly she has articulated a limit. Posting (in that comment, a reference to, iirc, Locals) =/= a privately shared photo.

And that's the whole fucking point and premise of "revenge porn" laws.
 
Yo did he make bail? Please tell me he hasn’t
Isn't he in the same situation as the Rekietas (and April) were in where he either gets out with nominal bail that he doesn't have to put up up front but with conditions, or he can put up the $75,000 and not have the conditions?
 
That post bolsters the evidence that she would not have consented to dissemination. She says she would not "post" nudes. She did, apparently, share them to between 1 and 3 people, with whom she had a personal relationship. Clearly she has articulated a limit. Posting (in that comment, a reference to, iirc, Locals) =/= a privately shared photo.

And that's the whole fucking point and premise of "revenge porn" laws.
This very much depends on when that post is dated and if it is actually true.

If she said this before the swinging and drug use, posting of semi-nudes and then sending full nudes through messenger apps then I think there is an argument to be made here that her lifestyle and behavior changed, that she started having sex with other men, sharing nudes with them and then the story starts to sound a lot different.

It all depends on the timeline and what was actually shared with people, through what platforms etc.
Right now I do not believe anything Nick, Kayla and April claim and they have to prove that this is exactly what happened and that there are no nuances to this.

If what you say is proven to be accurate, then I agree and he is guilty of the misdemeanor. (I still do not see the harassment angle)
 
Isn't he in the same situation as the Rekietas (and April) were in where he either gets out with nominal bail that he doesn't have to put up up front but with conditions, or he can put up the $75,000 and not have the conditions?
The restraining order would continue to apply until at least the next hearing no matter which path he chooses, but he may not be concerned about the standard bail conditions which apply in Minnesota.
 
That post bolsters the evidence that she would not have consented to dissemination. She says she would not "post" nudes. She did, apparently, share them to between 1 and 3 people, with whom she had a personal relationship. Clearly she has articulated a limit. Posting (in that comment, a reference to, iirc, Locals) =/= a privately shared photo.

And that's the whole fucking point and premise of "revenge porn" laws.
Objection your honor that argument is nothing but baloney!
Since that post was published by Kayla on locals she became a drug addicted whore who goes to nudist beaches and engages in swinger activities, you could even call her an exhibitionist skank!
Does someone who engages on those activities has the same expectation of privacy on a nude picture than a normal person would?

:diddler:Matter o'fact! During one of her cocaine induced rants she told and even encouraged my client to share those noods!

Take the stand and deny saying that or ever using cocaine then Kayla, come on! you're under oath!
 
You really aren't supposed to smile in your mugshots.

Any decent lawyer will tell you that.

To be fair Aaron hasn't been around one of those in quite some time... :really:
Yeah that makes common sense, but common sense isn’t common to Aaron he thought it was a good idea to share a bedroom with the Rekeita’s.
75 000 USD for sharing a nude, to a father of 3 not swimming in money????

Aaron is a piece of shit but man that judge is out of her fucking mind
Probably shooting liquor out of her pussy just like Judge Jenna Fisher.
 
Back