"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

KingFrampt said:
View attachment 6379195View attachment 6379196

I laughed out loud
Click to expand...

Whiscash said:
Fantasy wheelchairs are becoming a thing now.

View attachment 6380314
Click to expand...
The fantasy wheelchair will never not be funny, especially after people started pointing this out:
20240830_102202.jpg
20240824_221429.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Drama Fan, Gorton Colu, NSA and 11 others
I tried to find the censored video of the India MATI bonus episode (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F_Wctkw-X-w youtube archive, 27:17).
Tried to look through the India thread, but it exploded in the past couple months and couldn't find it (like every page has a highlight).

So I had the great idea to google it, and found a bunch of different similar cases, none of them were the censored video. Next I had the big brain idea to reverse image search the last frame, which Null didn't censor, and that gave me another video of a similar event but not the MATI one.

This feels like a weird type of SEO poisoning, where they try to hide away a sexual assault video with 50 other sexual assault/rape videos. Anyone has to original?
 
Croak & Caw said:
Might be a dupe or already covered, don't remember, hit me with those watches if it is.
Article from 2024 AUG 29 so not extremely old. As far as I understand, an exception to Section 230 was made for TikTok.
Click to expand...
No. The ruling is that algorithms are speech. For instance, I am likely liable for the text on the front page feature area, because it's written by staff. The ruling is that content delivery by algorithm is a product or speech directly from the company that they are liable for.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Marchesa of the Vast, PunkinMan, donjulio and 22 others
Null said:
No. The ruling is that algorithms are speech. For instance, I am likely liable for the text on the front page feature area, because it's written by staff. The ruling is that content delivery by algorithm is a product or speech directly from the company that they are liable for.
Click to expand...
Does that mean that I can sue you for the crippling balldo news addiction, I’ve been exposed to through the front page?
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: donjulio, Nonconsentual Pronouns, SofondaCox and 5 others
Null said:
No. The ruling is that algorithms are speech. For instance, I am likely liable for the text on the front page feature area, because it's written by staff. The ruling is that content delivery by algorithm is a product or speech directly from the company that they are liable for.
Click to expand...
so what changes are you going to have to make to the front page if any?
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
Reactions: Nonconsentual Pronouns and Null
WrenchWring said:
minecraft movie trailer starring jewish children, fat black woman, and man in pink coat
Click to expand...
I hate so much the trend of all these faggot ass movies where they take a song from at least 30 years ago, slather it with reverb, add nostalgia twinkly piano and/or bombastic, wall of sound orchestral hits like it's the smashed and slammed bastard of the 70's and the Inception bwaaaaaaaaaaaa. What makes it worse is that almost every single fucking song is lyrically or thematically inappropriate for the movie they're being used to advertise for but the Hollywood shitbirds don't fucking care because they know people love listening to the jangling keys of shit they recognize.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: indomitable snowman, galah, donjulio and 11 others
Useful_Mistake said:
What Null said was that the ruling didn't affect something that was already true; namely that he would "likely liable for the text on the front page feature area, because it's written by staff."
Click to expand...
but if say a thread gets featured on the frontpage and in that thread someone says something that could be actionable does that then make null also liable for it because it was featured or would it have to feature the exact post with the actionable content?

i mean if crazy people are going to sue they're going to sue the farms itself, there's nothing null can really do about that. I'm just curious if this ruling will make it harder to get the case thrown out.
 
Train Operator said:
but if say a thread gets featured on the frontpage and in that thread someone says something that could be actionable does that then make null also liable for it because it was featured or would it have to feature the exact post with the actionable content?

i mean if crazy people are going to sue they're going to sue the farms itself, there's nothing null can really do about that. I'm just curious if this ruling will make it harder to get the case thrown out.
Click to expand...
Well this only applies at this point in the third circuit court. So for the vast majority of retards in the US, no, they can't use this.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Train Operator
@Null this is crazy. Maybe good content you can offer some thoughts on. Not even 5 minutes in and this 60 year old guy is talking about his father's life story involving writing speeches for Reagan, just to explain the backstory for his disagreement with his liberal arts major daughter.
firefox_3kVoxe2nC3.jpg
mfw 2.png
firefox_iRNkvgROy1.png

>mfw

oh and by the way @Lidl Drip, this ungrateful whore is shitting on her normal parents that sent her to an expensive college for tiktok clout, so you can drop the whole women stick together schtick, her father gives all the juicy drama receipts and screencaps in this video, it's not just "abortion bad". Try watching something before judging it.
 
Last edited:
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Dumb
  • Winner
Reactions: Bioniclelover, Thé au lait, Gorton Colu and 13 others
Train Operator said:
but if say a thread gets featured on the frontpage and in that thread someone says something that could be actionable does that then make null also liable for it because it was featured or would it have to feature the exact post with the actionable content?
Click to expand...
Null is liable for the text of the feature. If someone said something defamatory and Null repeated the defamation he could himself be liable, yes. That's why you won't ever see features like "John literally raped Jessica!!!! WOW!!!" and instead see features like "Jessica accuses Famous Actor John of rape."
Train Operator said:
I'm just curious if this ruling will make it harder to get the case thrown out.
Click to expand...
Is Null an algorithm?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Train Operator
Wodanaz said:
@Null this is crazy. Maybe good content you can offer some thoughts on. Not even 5 minutes in and this 60 year old guy is talking about his father's life story involving writing speeches for Reagan, just to explain the backstory for his disagreement with his liberal arts major daughter.
View attachment 6380702
View attachment 6380712
View attachment 6380713

>mfw
Click to expand...
Listening, I haven't heard anything outrageous, but I have to ask. He seems well spoken and this isn't his first video, so why does he have his screen reflecting off his glasses in such a way that he looks like his eyes are divorced too?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Dumb
Reactions: I'm a Silly, Wodanaz and Lidl Drip
Train Operator said:
but if say a thread gets featured on the frontpage and in that thread someone says something that could be actionable does that then make null also liable for it because it was featured or would it have to feature the exact post with the actionable content?

i mean if crazy people are going to sue they're going to sue the farms itself, there's nothing null can really do about that. I'm just curious if this ruling will make it harder to get the case thrown out.
Click to expand...
nothing has changed. calm down.
 
  • Feels
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Marvin, PermaLurker69, SofondaCox and 4 others
Wodanaz said:
@Null this is crazy. Maybe good content you can offer some thoughts on. Not even 5 minutes in and this 60 year old guy is talking about his father's life story involving writing speeches for Reagan, just to explain the backstory for his disagreement with his liberal arts major daughter.
View attachment 6380702
View attachment 6380712
View attachment 6380713

>mfw
Click to expand...
This nigga is trying to get Internet famous from being a deadbeat dad. His daughter hates him and wants nothing to do with him because he left her and her mom for another woman. She doesn't care about him at all but she's got a lot of followers on the Internet and he's trying to make a career out of their family drama for himself. Piece of shit.

Edit: Lmao ofc the woman that he dumped his family for is some mail-order chink with plastic titties

Screenshot_20240904-133807.png
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Dumb
Reactions: Nevermore Fish, Belgians in the Congo, fake farts and 15 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back