US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
IIRC, Gish Gallop is a technique creationists use. Like Ray Comfort the banana guy. Overload people with questions so they give a stupid answer.
it's not really fishing for stupid answers per se ( tho obviously you likd it) but if you ask him 10 loaded question and he only has the time to respond to 2 you can claim "victory" on all the others, and it stops them from getting out their own arguments. Very jewish tactic
 
Gloria Romero is a Dem switch to the Republican party.
The dimensional realignment is upon us.

Jokes aside, it really does speak volumes how positions have shifted so radically, at least in paper. Maybe they are just going were the wind is blowing, or maybe, just maybe, they realized that the DNC is literally Globohomo INC.

She hasn't been in office for a long time, but to be fair, neither has Biden or Kamala.
 
So I'm currently reading J.D. Vance's book Hillbilly Elegy.
On page 170, when retelling the events of his Mamaw's funeral arrangements, he mentions that the family cemetery is in a place called Keck. He explains that Keck is a very special holler in family lore because his great grandmother "Mamaw Blanton" was born there. The Blanton's sound like an absolutely unruly, wild living bunch that don't take shit from anybody. Exactly the kind of characters you'd expect to be from a place called Keck.

The Meme Magic is real and it's back!

Putin-Pepe-Sting.jpg


Idk, I find TikTok an incredible useful people filter. And it's not like the retards would stop being retards because they can't use it anymore. And now it would be just harder to spot them at first glance. It also serves as a containment place. Keep those people there and don't let them shit up the rest of the internet any more than it already is.

As much as I'd love for TikTok and everyone involved with it to catch Ebola, the reality of things is a bit more complicated.

I've never used TikTok beyond clicked on the odd link or 2 that was a TikTok video but for those who hate the content of TikTok why not try to fill it full of red-pilling videos and other generally useful videos?

The suspect is reportedly a 14 year old youth according to CNN

I never trust CNN these days, it's probably a 14 year old geriatric.

with make-up, maybe, but without it....
View attachment 6381247
then again, she's from Long island, and since i see that shit everyday, it might be just me because she does NOTHING for me.

She still looks cute and at least use a bigger version of the photo. This is the biggest I could find.

shoe0nhead_0052.png
 
She hasn't been in office for a long time, but to be fair, neither has Biden or Kamala.
lmao
That's not a good thing.
I think it is actually because it emphasizes momentum. The media cannot help but rabidly attack these people. Like the CNN anchor bug-eyed interrogating the gold star step-mom, hand waving away her testimony, trying to get any soundbite possible to denigrate Trump.

They didn't get a bounce from convention, the facade is crumbling, the debate is next week, and the week after they're gonna sentence Trump.

Either the judge will realize they can't/won't protect him once he's served his purpose and he'll give Trump a suspended sentence, or we'll see an even bigger meltdown when JD Vance is sworn in after Trump has been murdered in prison.

Bonus Chimp Out - He goes to prison and not only survives but becomes beloved by the inmates, achieving media impervious street cred.
 
Somehow I don't think being easily bullied would be seen as good presidential material. I could be wrong tho, maybe the Democrats really want a traumatized victim making life and death decisions for the nation.
The idea is to capitalize on how it makes Trump look, downplaying how it makes her look. It would be a blatant attempt to rile up the TDS vote because as is... that vote is lackluster. in 2016 and 2020 you had a lot of enthusiasm... not -for- Clinton or Biden, but -against- Trump. And while the general sentiment has, if anything, only grown... the fervor of it and the enthusiasm to vote on it has severely diminished.

I have mentioned before that the vast majority of votes against Trump are not actually mentally articulated as such by the person. Rather they convince themselves they are voting for the candidate of their choosing and argue backwards from "I want to vote so Trump can go fuck himself" to that point. The big problem here is that without the same degree of fervor to it, you will have a lot less people who actually come out to vote. They just won't have the motivation to argue themselves backwards due to sheer apathy for Harris.

They can complain and seethe all they want but in the end, they have their orders. In the last debate, it was like 99% a Biden self-destruction. The only thing that it could be attributed to the network was that they constantly showed Trump just stumped at Biden's incoherence by having that splitscreen.

Working for someone who you know is dumb has to suck but it's what they chose to do. Best I can hope for is that the moderators press the candidates with follow-up questions instead of giving them multiple choice answers like they did with the totally organic Harris' interview.

I don't expect them "going rogue" if that's what you are implying. It would be friendly fire at this point.
I am implying they are going to do their job, ironically. No special rule changes unless mutually agreed upon, no hardballing or softballing either side unequally, no attempting to directly interfere. They will just leave them both to sink or swim on their own out of mutual disgust for both of them. You say 'they have their orders', but have you stopped and considered -whose- orders.

The people up top are not a unified front, and never have been. You have factions within the Democrats that all hate eachother and mostly hate Trump more. The problem here is Harris is part of one faction (Progressives) and ABC is part of another faction (The Establishment) and... the hate between The Establishment and The Progressives is just about equal to the hate between The Establishment and Trump.
 
This guy is a living fairy, I don't know how else to put it. He has all the mannerisms gay men have.


I'm not sure if it's Tim Walz on the videos below, don't take my word for it. I just found them to be funny because it could very well be him. (1st video Xeet, 2nd video Xeet, 3rd video Xeet)
 
Last edited:
This guy gets absolutely shat on, and the lie that Candace was okay with what Hitler did gets debunked when it was in fact about separating the concept of nationalism from Nazi ideals. They bring VIDEO EVIDENCE TO HIS FACE. She laughs at how absurd he is. Pierce has none of his bullshit. She even mentions the Tunnel Jews prior to 20 minutes
They brought in the most retarded attention whore rabbi who couldn't debate his way out of a paper bag. Rabbi Shmuley was not looking to debate, he was looking to attack and he's really bad at that. He's a disgrace to us.

I'm completely unprepared for a debate and could do better. Going off the top of my head:

No tunnels in any of those cities, tunnels require additional bombs because the building above could be ruined while the tunnel is fine
Germans and British didn't have military targets in civilian areas while Hamas does.
Precision bombing of specific areas means more ordinance is used with lower amounts of deaths

Then I would bring up Hitlers Nero decree which advocated for complete destruction of German infrastructure and the Nazi broadcasts urging Germans to commit suicide.

Because rabbi Shmuley is a clout seeking retard, he just gets triggered and starts ranting.
 
Media rebranded him a hip rebel because they desperately wanted him as the GOP nominee in 2000 instead of Bush. Even when the media got new NPC updates in 2008 telling people to hate McCain, they went back to sucking his dick once the election was over.
IIRC they referred to him as a “maverick.” Basically he played spoiler, so of course he got a cute nickname from the media.
 
All true. But she's really cute.

edit: what kind of homosexual you'd have to be to say that's an ugly girl wtf
If that is the worst pic you have of her... That's a really cute girl imho. Also camera quality, lighting, etc etc.
Simping is not my intention, but even without makeup, she is what normal people would call "pretty." Only a coombrained porn addicted freak would think she's ugly.

I agree people have way too high standards; it may be due to excessive porn usage. I would like to see a picture of what kind of women the people who call shoe ugly would find attractive.
That's so crazy. Without makeup, she just looks like a reasonably attractive girl who's not wearing makeup.
I know if I saw that everyday I left the house I'd have to start wearing white pants exclusively
She still looks cute
Hey, you know what would be a REALLY good idea?

You should go on her KF thread and tell the BP users that hang out there how you REALLY feel
 
London most certainly had tunnels in their deep-level shelter system.
Should have clarified, military tunnels. London didn't have known military tunnels and the technology didn't exist on the German side to drop bunker buster bombs. They had artillery for that.

The Germans and the British terror-bombed each other anyway. The Genevan Conventions didn't exist yet.
That's also true.

My point is more about how easy it would be to debate her if someone would be willing to.
 
This might sound silly, but how did you guys and girls learn about politics, and when did you become conservative?
Welcome to the Farms! A surveyor, perhaps?

The short version: I'm not really a conservative, per se. I just fucking despise liberals.

The long version: cut my political teeth on Rush Limbaugh and South Park. I moderated and became more centrist in college.

Then one day in 2017, I decided to subscribe to the Washington Post. The readers and writers of that jizzrag are more hateful and unhinged than a thousand MovieBobs. WaPo subscribers make Redditors and Twitter users look reasonable.

Look at this headline:

Austere_Religious_Scholar_Al_Baghdadi_Washington_Post-2194993281.JPG

This proves that they will compose a flowery eulogy for a mass murderer who took American women as sex slaves before they acknowledge the humanity of anyone on the Right.

Over the last 8 years, I have seen liberals lie, obfuscate, slander, and gaslight. I would not resent liberals half as much as I do if they weren't shameless liars. They demand you reject the evidence of your eyes and ears in favor of their decrees.

None of their bloviating poetic about "Our Democracy" is sincere. Scratch a liberal, and a fascist bleeds. I will do everything in my individual capacity to deny these psychopaths the power they covet.
 
Last edited:
Should have clarified, military tunnels. London didn't have known military tunnels and the technology didn't exist on the German side to drop bunker buster bombs. They had artillery for that.


That's also true.

My point is more about how easy it would be to debate her if someone would be willing to.
It's so easy it seems every Rabbi she tries to debate, personally attacks her and never seriously tries to talk in good faith about difficult topics.

I would like to know if she's ever backed out of an interview with a Rabbi. Because if she hasn't that's quite telling.
 
It's so easy it seems every Rabbi she tries to debate, personally attacks her and never seriously tries to talk in good faith about difficult topics.

I would like to know if she's ever backed out of an interview with a Rabbi. Because if she hasn't that's quite telling.
Multiple rabbis have challenged her to a debate and she ignores them. In my opinion she seems to pick out people who get emotional and lose composure quickly.

She also pulls tricks to piss them off. Rabbi Shmuley was furious that she brought a laptop with her because he considered that cheating and he started the interview heated.

I would love for her to interview Rabbi Tovia Singer or any outreach rabbi, they would wipe the floor with her.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back