Commander X
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 6, 2018
People keep saying this has to be an elaborate money-laundering scheme but I say you can never underestimate the idiocy and incompetence of gaming executives.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dustborn was made with a grant from the Norwegian gov't, as long as whichever committee made the grant likes the game the studio is fine.Then there's that other game where you play a band of whatever, where you can TRIGGER and CANCEL people. That studio is the next one on the chopping block, mark my words.
The two do have one thing in common: Like the trucks in Big Rigs, Concord went backwards way faster than it went forwards.So does this mean that Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing is no longer the worst game ever made and sold?
Yea but the guy who wrote it burned all his credibility. When the committee changes, as elections sway. His ass is going to be left with nothing. It is all well and good saying he does not lose today. But in 3 years when all his committee friends are up for re-election and lose their seats. Then he is going to be crawling back. More right winger causes are gaining momentum in Europe right now, despite attempts to sabotage it. In 10 years we will have to once again point out how a kid playing a video game is not a school shooter or summoning the devil by playing D&D. Because the nutter Christians will be back in cultural power.Dustborn was made with a grant from the Norwegian gov't, as long as whichever committee made the grant likes the game the studio is fine.
That crown was stolen and is still held by FlatOut 3 though. Big Rigs has the meme value of being an engine test sold as a "game" and Concord is incredibly high quality for what it is, meanwhile FlatOut 3 has to be seen to be believed. You thought Concord was a waste of $40?So does this mean that Big Rigs: Over the Road Racing is no longer the worst game ever made and sold?
Those 2 are from /v/, BTW.Checked if anyone was degenerate enough to somehow find any of these characters attractive, these were the r34 results...
View attachment 6384648View attachment 6384649
It's not really a scheme - it's just to a scale that people don't seem to understand.People keep saying this has to be an elaborate money-laundering scheme but I say you can never underestimate the idiocy and incompetence of gaming executives.
To add to that, the PC gaming market in the 80s managed to offset the video game crash despite personal computers themselves suffering a similar fate soon after. Now, PC gaming is arguably more accessible than ever thanks to the Steam Deck and lower cost of entry for parts. I don't even think Concord will be the catalyst of a gaming crash, just a contribution. GTA 6's $2 billion budget will be more of a factor for such a crash; Sony themselves may suffer long term to recoup costs from Concord.The ET comparisons are interesting because they’re nearly opposites.
ET was made by a single competent dev (the same guy who made Yar’s Revenge) under an extreme time crunch of less than six weeks, and its infamy is less because of the game itself - the 2600 had a lot of crap, after all - and more because Atari marketed and produced it to such a ridiculous degree that even its respectable 2 million-ish units sold wasn’t nearly enough for their massive gamble. With a mere month of additional dev time and maybe one or two other people working on it, Atari could have toned down the marketing, produced a reasonable number of units, and had a modest success on their hands.
Concord was made by well over a hundred people over the course of eight years and was so laughably hated by everyone that even making it F2P isn’t worth the cost of keeping the servers running two weeks after launch, and it had fewer concurrent players than Sex with Hitler. No amount of additional time, money, or developers could ever have hoped to save it.
Seeing current year trans Alucard upsets meChecked if anyone was degenerate enough to somehow find any of these characters attractive, these were the r34 results...
View attachment 6384648View attachment 6384649
If they hadn't made her look dirty and pockmarked she would've been way more popular.There is a way to put 'ugly' characters in a game without people complaining about them. Just include them in the cast and don't put them in the forefront.
Back in the Quake III days, it was easy to tell which female characters were popular by the amount of custom skins being made for them. Lucy barely got any
The crime is this shirt:https://uploads.kiwifarms.st/data/attachments/6372/6372535-5139d8eae6b2270747658af1e480c187.jpg
You know it " journalism of colour " when they are perfectly okay with selling t-shirts that add to the sentiment that minority groups commit the most crimes lmfao.