Apalachee Highschool Shooting in Georgia on September 4th, 2024

Unless ive missed any yes. And to be fair, he was extremely fucking negligent.
I dunno man, the previous case where this precedent was set was on shaky ground to begin with, and one that is somewhat "cut and dry" versus the previous case doesn't change the fact I think it was a shit ruling to begin with.

I wonder if they'll ever apply this to cities where Jamal steals a gun from his grandpa's lockbox (that he happened to find the key for) to shoot up 4 of his fellow hoodrats under a bridge. Would they arrest the single mother Shaniqua and her father who's in his 70's who actually came from a better time or is this only going to be applied disproportionately to school shootings?
 
That will be a challenge with the growing demographic change in America. It´s not the case here regarding race but I think that goes beyond race - it is way too easy to survive nowadays, there is little societal checks for completely antisocial retards and you definitely dont want low impulse control, low IQ people bearing arms - what barely works in America regarding public safety doesnt work in Chade. You will be revisiting gun policy in a decade or two.
Maybe there isn’t societal checks in place for a retard to survive… get a low-end job… make ends meet in our society… but that doesn’t equate to them being able to afford a firearm/ammunition, meet the requirements in place to legally own one, have the malicious intent to plan, execute, and survive an act of domestic terrorism.

We have a place full of low-IQ and low impulse control people who own guns… It’s called Chicago… and they’ve been blasting for awhile and no law or policy is going to stop that. They shoot people every weekend. Thing is, that’s with handguns. People have been trying for decades to revoke the second amendment. It’s all or nothing… and if that’s the case… it ain’t happening in another couple of decades.
 
Going county by county based on address history for parental rap sheets now.

1725582609137.png
This may be in:re: dad's prior marriage. Or may be a different Colin Gray. I will need to do some digging to ascertain, as it does not have a DOB or MI for him:

1725582713295.png


Those names DO pop on his "possible associates" list so likely it's him.

Debt issues for mom:

1725582838843.png

Criminal charges for mom:

1725582911962.png


"Allen" is a typo, this is all her (keep scrolling for more documents)

1725582983743.png

1725583027108.png1725583085093.png1725583085093.png1725583219725.png

Need to feed the dogs and grab a burger, then on to the next county...
 

Attachments

  • 1725583119722.png
    1725583119722.png
    170 KB · Views: 28
In the Southeast mullets are making somewhat of a comeback, I don't think this poon is a troon, but an faggot who thinks he is a gangster nigger with a georgia mother saying, "Oh he is just a sweet lil' Boooyyyyyy.
He might be angry but never harm a fly."

Colt's father:
...
Turned out to be the opposite. The kid's poor stupid dad got him guns to give him a healthy outlet, to keep him away from video games. I just saw it on the news. I can't believe I was right. I'd said way earlier in the thread there are a number of idiotic parents of school shooters that bought their kids guns to channel their psychosis in a healthy way.

To ANY parents on the farms- if your kid is even slightly troubled, please ignore gun enthusiasts' advice to "teach your kid how to use a gun RESPONSIBLY." No, please fucking don't. If you have any guns, lock them up, and don't bring them out until your kid has moved out of state. It didn't work for Adam Lanza's mom, it didn't work for Ethan Crumbly's parents, it didn't work for Colt Gray's dad, it's not going to fucking work, okay?
 
It‘s not a cultural “thing” for us… like Marvel movies or rap music… it is something quite literally woven into the moral fabric of the nation. Our forefathers etched “the right to bear arms shall not be infringed” onto our most sacred document, the second inalienable right they gave us in the Bill of Rights.

A foreign warship chock full of rifles and cannons sat out in the harbor right after our constitution was ratified because it refused to come into port. They needed to restock their provisions, but waited, because the crew wanted to make us aware of their armaments and confirm they weren’t an issue. Thomas Jefferson wrote them a letter back to not worry about it and come the fuck in. He quoted the constitution… it was their right to be armed. That was an entire warship stuffed with cannons and armed soldiers, not one singular semi-automatic rifle… which they’re trying to take away today.

One of my points was that you don’t simply just take away guns in America. I get that you’re playing devil’s advocate for a normie argument… and trust me, I don’t want more dead kids… but I believe it’s a human right to protect yourself, to be self sufficient in defense of your life and property, and not be denied the appropriate tools to do it. There’s much more deeply rooted issues that can be addressed. They won’t explore other avenues because this is a political argument used for the sake of getting votes and building a narrative. We can propose more ideas to fix this other than “gun bad, take gun, problem solved.”

I get this man, well i dont get it because where im from we dont have anything like this

" something quite literally woven into the moral fabric of the nation"

but i understand its important to You all, hence it shits me when people over here act like its retarded for you to own guns.

And i agree that its not normal for teenagers to decide they want to go to school one day and murder a bunch of their fellow classmates and the fact that it doesnt occur in other first world western countries with stricter or outright bans on guns with things likes knives needs to be looked at more importantly than just outright infringing on your rights
 
There is only one answer when activists ask “How many kids have to die before you give up your guns?” All of them. I’m not a Constitution worshiper but the Second Amendment is more important than the First; without the Second we’ll have neither.

I wish just one journalist would ask these activists how many kids have to die before they question the sanctity of compulsory education.
 
* According to CCN, the father bought his son a gun as a "Holiday" gift. I assume that means Christmas.
* When the parents were evicted, the parents split up. The two youngest siblings went with the mother. Shooter went with the father.
* Aunt says that the shooter was asking all of the adults around him for help. Aunt says that she tried to help from afar.
* Aunt arranged for the shooter to attend a different middle school so that he could graduate 8th grade. He had already missed too many school days at his original middle school to graduate.
Edit:
* "Child Services" were involved with the child at some point.
 
Last edited:
Look, im not from Burgerland, and guns just arent a thing i particularly care about owning where i live, i also hate the stupid dumb americans and their guns meme that does the rounds where i live every time a school shooting hits the news here, its a cultural thing for you lot and i get it.

i say this because this isnt my argument im presenting, but the normie one that gets thrown around here whenever this shit happens.

But at a minimum if you took the guns away then youd assume this guy would have killed significantly less kids,
I heard in europe they use homemade bombs and vans for domestic terrorism. Turns out people willing to litterally massacare other people prob dont give a fuck and are on a mission to do the worst shit in society, you take the guns away, wait until they get their hands on basic hardware store chemicals
 
I saw something strange and wanted to see if anyone else can corroborate, but there's claims that the mainstream media reported the shooter was a black boy without waiting for details 'because the US has an anti-black agenda.' Even though I rarely look at MSM I am pretty sure they were actually mum on the shooter's identity before reporting it was that Colt boy. Who was trying to push that it was some other kid, or is this just another insane race grift attempt?
 
So according to MSM
The kid was already a sperg who was sending threats and got talked too by the FBI.
Then the big brain dad buys him a rifle for Christmas.
In this case i happen to agree, with the dad catching charges.
The warning signs were there
Yet he still "here boy you are old enough for your first rifle"

What did he think was going to happen?
I am not sure defending this smooth brain dad out of loyalty to the 2A is a good thing. Yes the democrats will use it, but they use everything anyway.
What sort of logic was this guy on?
"Let's shut up my spastic of a son for 10 mins by giving him a weapon."
This is not a 2A issue, this is a giving guns to smooth brains issue.
Yeah this is ultra tarded I mean you litterally had glowies show up to your house about your son potentially being a danger to society maybe the best purchase is not a AR but a couple of therapy sessions
 
What is the thought process behind gifting your kids AR-15? It's like letting your kids drive drunk.
It's perfectly normal when your family isn't a gaggle of chronic fuck ups and your son wasn't literally visited by the FBI for terroristic threats, I hope the dad gets thrown in the darkest hole for this, the son too.
 
* According to CCN, the father bought his son a gun as a "Holiday" gift. I assume that means Christmas.
* When the parents were evicted, the parents split up. The two youngest siblings went with the mother. Shooter went with the father.
* Aunt says that the shooter was asking all of the adults around him for help. Aunt says that she tried to help from afar.
* Aunt arranged for the shooter to attend a different middle school so that he could graduate 8th grade. He had already missed too many school days at his original middle school to graduate.
Edit:
* "Child Services" were involved with the child at some point.
Is the school he went to a diverse hellhole, or just a regular school?
 
I saw something strange and wanted to see if anyone else can corroborate, but there's claims that the mainstream media reported the shooter was a black boy without waiting for details 'because the US has an anti-black agenda.' Even though I rarely look at MSM I am pretty sure they were actually mum on the shooter's identity before reporting it was that Colt boy. Who was trying to push that it was some other kid, or is this just another insane race grift attempt?
I hope this is not another attempt to derail the thread but no, the first name MSM gave was given by the GBI.
 
I heard in europe they use homemade bombs and vans for domestic terrorism. Turns out people willing to litterally massacare other people prob dont give a fuck and are on a mission to do the worst shit in society, you take the guns away, wait until they get their hands on basic hardware store chemicals

how many 14-18 year olds are building homemade bombs and driving vans into crowds at school in europe?

Mass murders happen everywhere, its school massacres committed by children that are comparatively rare in the west,
 
Back