Apalachee Highschool Shooting in Georgia on September 4th, 2024

Does bolt action even exist for .22lr? I've seen lever action, pump action and semi-auto for .22lr, but never bolt action on a caliber that small.

I'd be inclined to agree, but I feel like the kids are too stunted nowadays, they take too long to grow up. Your great grandfather used to sneak into the military at the ripe age of 15 to earn the honor of garroting krauts in the Ardennes forest, but they don't make kids like that anymore. For the minor to have unrestricted access, I think it would need to be something that's not legally a firearm. A .177 pellet gun, or possibly a muzzleloader. Something that's so inefficient for a mass shooting that they either won't kill anyone or they'll get one shot off before being taken down.

For everything else: If the minor "owns" it, the parent should still restrict and monitor access until adulthood. Zoomers and Gen Alpha kids have proven themselves thoroughly stunted and we need to stop extending inalienable rights to minors like they're tax-paying American citizens.
My first ever rifle was a tube fed bolt action .22. Best possible rifle for prairie dog control, shooting cans, or plinking. I prefer it over a ruger 10/22 which is basically baby's first rifle that isn't a Red Ryder BB Gun.

large-150373.0_1.jpg
 
In this case however the Feds and the Local Sheriff both sat this retards parents down and told them their son was "on their radar" and that he needed to "do something about it".
Just to play devils advocate here. Kid gets a talking to, convinces feds and father it’s a case of mistaken intentions/account hacked. Feds leave it at that. If the accusation is the father is guilty then the feds are guilty too.
Dont get me wrong, his entire family made him what he was. I’m just very uncomfortable with people being jailed for for something they didn’t do. It will get precedent and then it will be weaponised hard and used selectively. Also, the kid is being tried as an adult, and the father for him being a minor. Either or, but not a mix of both.
Charge dad with neglect, abuse, fine. But not murder. Unless he’s shown to be directly culpable, or telling, encouraging the kid to do it or aware of intent directly.
I think a lot more is going to come out about why the family moved and why sheriffs were warned about this kid when he moved. IF it turns out the family knew or suspected he was going to do this, which it may do if that’s what the warning was for then ok, they are accessories to the crime. But if both feds and family bought that he wasn’t, then why only family charged?

I want to see the background to the family move and why they warned local law about them before I decide if his dad is guilty of actual murder or ‘just’ being a terrible parent here.
 
If they can charge the parents, then the next logical step is to charge the feds on whose "radar" the kid was.
If there are real grieving survivors out there with awareness of that alleged foreknowledge, they'll jump at the chance to hold everyone in the chain of command accountable.
i still think that the shooter isnt trans
but a faggot.
he was a faggot at school
and he did some next level faggot thing (school shooting)
My Widely Publicized Violent Event folder is named "fags."
fags.jpg
 
Gay(BI)shooter not trans
but was bullied by both normies & Trans .
reason why is vague .
only thing got as reason for the shooting was privilage of being TRANS over being gay. ( only other joke/meme issue most kids pushed down the gay/trans pipeline current year).
Maybe he was a fucking weirdo lol
 
Dont get me wrong, his entire family made him what he was. I’m just very uncomfortable with people being jailed for for something they didn’t do.

So am I. But this is also a facet of Liberalism that atomizes society to the most individual possible individual. IMO Societies do not function in this way. The smallest unit of any given society is not the individual. Its the family. And at a certain level families need to be held to account for their failures. We already do this anyway with child welfare laws.

If you look into the Juvenile criminal justice system, it will make you weep. Most of the kids who end up in State custody are never visited by their parents. Until they are released or turn 18 the Government is their daddy and that rapidly disillusioned 22 year old social worker fresh out of college is their mother. I think there could very well be a benefit to forcing mommy and daddy to spend a few months in the clink with Junior, with supervised release to do adult things like jobs. If they even have them.

What is justice in this case? A 14 year old just got told by a Judge the maximum possible sentence under the charges he faces is execution. News is saying as a matter of practice the most he faces is life without parole. But that is just guideline. Under the law the kid can be strapped to a gurney, wheeled into the death chamber and killed by the State. What is the fathers responsibility for this? He's responsible for something, if nothing less then the fact his son's life is now in jeopardy by transgression against the State. He needs to answer for that.
 
Last edited:
The hair is kinda bad but is all we have for alphabet status, the dad just saying: they called him gay/said he was dating a dude ?

Could that have been just normal name-calling and reddit loving faggot journos took that to mean "obv he's a queer persyn" though they usually don't claim one for their side until they have to so maybe there is more.

Yeah, so far I’ve just seen the dad saying that the bullying consisted of calling him gay and claiming that he was dating other guys, not that he IS gay. Considering that the kid is a manlet that looks tiny compared to the men in the courtroom that’s pretty much standard teen bullying. Short guy=gay. I’m guessing the dad was so keen to get him out in the woods killing things because that would make him seem more masculine to his peers. Maybe he was worried it was true.

The DailyFail is the one claiming he was gay in their headline but, y’know, DailyFail.

I think the hair is pretty simple. It was a TikTok trend at the beginning of summer for boys to bleach their hair. His dad didn’t even enroll him in school until two weeks after it had already started so it’s not surprising that he doesn’t take him for haircuts regularly either. He just looks like a scruffy, neglected teen to me.
 
Just to play devils advocate here. Kid gets a talking to, convinces feds and father it’s a case of mistaken intentions/account hacked. Feds leave it at that. If the accusation is the father is guilty then the feds are guilty too.
Dont get me wrong, his entire family made him what he was. I’m just very uncomfortable with people being jailed for for something they didn’t do. It will get precedent and then it will be weaponised hard and used selectively. Also, the kid is being tried as an adult, and the father for him being a minor. Either or, but not a mix of both.
Charge dad with neglect, abuse, fine. But not murder. Unless he’s shown to be directly culpable, or telling, encouraging the kid to do it or aware of intent directly.
I think a lot more is going to come out about why the family moved and why sheriffs were warned about this kid when he moved. IF it turns out the family knew or suspected he was going to do this, which it may do if that’s what the warning was for then ok, they are accessories to the crime. But if both feds and family bought that he wasn’t, then why only family charged?

I want to see the background to the family move and why they warned local law about them before I decide if his dad is guilty of actual murder or ‘just’ being a terrible parent here.
The Feds didn´t give him the murder weapon for Christmas.
 
Watch these politicians believe in "common-sense" gun control until it involves a pooner or a walking black guy stereotype. Then in that case, they're perfectly fine with an anarcho tyranny shithole.

Like it doesn't take a fucking rocket scientist to realize that the hicks (the only group they actually care about), nigs, and pooners with guns and a itchy trigger finger are mentally ill. But we know that they likely won't spin it under that narrative because they don't want to piss off the feds.
 
He just looks like a scruffy, neglected teen to me.
And this is a huge red flag. The biggest social bullies should be the parents. There was a guy in my middle school that went through a "Goth Phase", wearing the full kit, complete with skirt and boots and wat not.

His parents cracked the whip the freshman year of highschool. We aren't buying any of this shit. Here is a list of employers we've reached out too and signed the paperwork to allow you to work after school for the late afternoon, early evening shift until 8 PM. Some of them are farms. If you want to buy any of this shit, you will do so with your money. Here are your polo shirts and beige slacks.

Dude came to school in Beige slacks and polo shirts for 3 fucking years lol.
 
I want to see the background to the family move and why they warned local law about them before I decide if his dad is guilty of actual murder or ‘just’ being a terrible parent here.
There should be no reason we would end up with a murder indictment on the dad, but we might very well get involuntary manslaughter. The law could not be any more fucking clear, and any decent gun shop owner should spell it out for you every step of the way until you actually have the sucker in your hands. You cannot purchase a gun for anyone other than yourself. The law ruled for good reason that Colt could not register a gun. Daddy didn’t just break that law, he spat on it.

Imo he should be charged even if he simply left the gun out in the open. But it was far beyond that. He put it directly in Colt’s hands on his birthday. Even if he wasn’t aware of the law, it’s so common sense that he should have been able to work that much out on his own. He had plenty of time to think, “hey wait a minute, maybe my son is so terrible because instead of giving him a nintendo switch and saying i love you i am giving him a whole entire ass gun for his birthday.” If that didn’t process for him, then he is a menace to society.

Sorry to keep banging the same drum but I really just cannot get over that. It’s like the dad was covertly telling him to do it. If there was any hope at all (spoiler alert there wasn’t) that the visit from the FBI changed Colt’s mind and he wanted to reconsider, that was crushed on his birthday. What a terrible gift for anyone’s birthday—I can’t imagine anybody other than a gun nut being happy and not totally put off by that.
 
Bullied for being gay could mean actually gay, could mean trans, or could mean weirdo. Gay can mean any number of things or just an excuse to bully someone for being a (non-literal) fag.
Although it would not be surprising if he were trans the only evidence one way or the other is an ambiguous sentence which could be pro- or anti-tranny.
Seems like a lot of people here are jumping to conclusions.

The dad said he was gay so he's gay. It's not the kids stating that, it's the dad.
 
We really need an "ausfag" triangle or something like that. Consistently the worst takes coming from among "white" people
I propose two nearly perpendicular and intersecting pink lines, almost a cross with slightly tilted arms biased to the left. A pink Crux. Platypus bills, koala heads, eucalyptus leaves, funnel web spiders are all too complicated of shapes for a recognizable single-color icon.
Sorry to reply to your post a second time, but there's nowhere else to post this. Enjoy this attempt.
aussiesBTFO.png

The dad said he was gay so he's gay. It's not the kids stating that, it's the dad.
Dad says you're gay, that makes you gay. We don't make the rules
 
Initial interview with the shooters dad?
“Ah matta a fact..” Dude gives Ralphamale’s redneck ass kissing of, “I take it vary seriously” authority vibes. He couldn’t agree more with the officers and “please give that kid a talkin too, I’m right pissed off to tell tha troof.” The white trash respectful grovel in full force.
 
Back