Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CNN was surprisingly fair during the 1st debate. As long as ABC doesnt do that live "fact-checking" shit it should go okay.
Knowing them though, they're going to make it all about 1/6 and Tim Cool accepting money from Tenent, aka Shit Nobody Cares About
They need her down so that she can go up in October. The idea might be to create the illusion of momentum.There's a fine line though between trying to push people to action and completely demoralizing them to where they feel like it's pointless to even bother.
That’s why I think it’s best to avoid such situations entirely but not getting involved in the first place. And if you read about the evacuations, it wasn’t exactly a ton of families, it was fighting age men who did shit like prevent old people and children from getting on helicopters and boats so they could save themselves. Can’t say I have much sympathy for people who abandoned their families.Imagine backing people for two decades and consistently stating you'll help them if the whole situation goes to shit. Then the situation goes to shit and the new guy says "nah, fuck yourselves," and your family gets killed. Not good.
Here's the thing, though: a lot of the Afghanis we would have taken in were already Americanized to some extent and fought for our side. Abandoning them makes us look bad and there may come a day we need friends in foreign places, but they point at Afghanistan and tell us to fuck ourselves.In regards to the Afghanistan thing I would rather the United States be embarrassed internationally then to import tens of thousands of afghan rapists
I can understand most of the regime changes you mentioned, even Vietnam, I however don’t think Afghanistan or Iraq were justified at all. We objectively made both countries worse. Afghanistan is in the hands of the people we were supposed to kick out and Iraq is an Iranian puppet and had TWO civil wars post invasion. With the added benefit of removing saddam who could have been a counterweight to IranYour point about not getting involved in the first place is valid, though, even if I don't agree with it.
Iraq was about removing Saddam after he made the batshit decision to invade Kuwait when the whole word knew he would lose that war. Also, Saddam was a major sponsor of terrorism even after 1991. While Saddam was, indeed, batshit crazy and needed to go, the way we handled it was straight retarded. Banning all the Ba'aths was pants-on-head stupid. There were so many mistakes.I can understand most of the regime changes you mentioned, even Vietnam, I however don’t think Afghanistan or Iraq were justified at all. We objectively made both countries worse
uh you do understand that’s why we invaded them in 1991 over Kuwait right? The 2003 invasion was 100% a war for nothing, muh WMD never existed. 2003 wasn’t for Kuwait. The only alternative to saddam was a Shia dominated puppet state of Iran or a Sunni Islamist hellhole, both of which are worse then baathist IraqIraq was about removing Saddam after he made the batshit decision to invade Kuwait when the whole word knew he would lose that war. While Saddam was, indeed, batshit crazy and needed to go, the way we handled it was straight retarded.
Saddam Hussein was a major sponsor of state terrorism, dude. That has never been disputed or disproved. He was a pain in the ass.uh you do understand that’s why we invaded them in 1991 one right? The 2003 invasion was 100% a war for nothing, muh WMD never existed
But they did have confidence in Joe Biden.I am not really sure not debating Trump three times is going to work for kamala..... Every debate is an opportunity to debase your opponent... If you fuck up one debate, you can make it up the second time....
But apparently kamala is so bad that they have zero confidence in her going into the first debate...
View attachment 6397345
And they are state sponsor of terroism now? Millions dead and two civil wars just for them to sponsor a different type of sectarian terrorism . Mission accomplished. If sponsoring terroism was enough to justify an invasion how come we didn’t invade SA, Pakistan or QatarSaddam Hussein was a major sponsor of state terrorism, dude. That has never been disputed or disproved. He was a pain in the ass.
I already said it failed because of dumb decisions by the US on how to handle it. I'll go further and say that it failed spectacularly. However, had it not failed, we would not be having this discussion. Hindsight is 20/20.And they are state sponsor of terroism now? Millions dead just for them to sponsor a different type of sectarian terrorism . Mission accomplished
I was very surprised when I found out how tiny a minority Christians are in Japan. The Japanese seem to adore Christmas
They "adore" it for the complete opposite (religious) reasons and morals Americans do. It's more just see pretty lights, consoom everything, eat all the KFC and cake.
I have some friends who are missionaries to several of the prestigious universities in Japan, and they tell me that a lot of the Japanese students that they talk to don’t know what Christianity is about. They most likely don’t see beyond “Christian symbols look cool. Jesus seems to be a good guy.” Japan’s appreciation of Christianity does not come out of the appreciation of the faith, but rather an appreciation of what Americans do.What I heard was "Shinto for the festivals, Buddhist for the afterlife."
Ironic, that island was anything but virginThe British Virgin Islands are tiny though. Just look at Epstein Island, which is one of the US Virgin Islands. (In the same place basically, The Virgin Islands are quite a small group of islands. About 250 square miles for the whole group including the sea.)
Ironic, that island was anything but virgin
Pretty damn high. Its standard Democrat factionalism bullshit. Meaningless fluff up the dem faction you oppose, go tooth and nail at the enemy, provide no substantive support whatsoever for that faction. It is their most basic form of neutrality. Meant to prevent open warfare between the factions.What are the odds that ABC is merely fluffing up Harris so she feels comfortable doing the debate, then will be more neutral during the debate because either the see the writing on the wall or just want ratings?
Their AU site is different from the US site, but this is very interesting information.Notice on their website, I have to go below the -second- fold to reach the first -mention- of Harris... and its the Debate.
Oops, accidentally revealed where I am right now... I have yet to be attacked by a kangaroo, so I am disappointed with this trip. Also, I am a boomer.Their AU site is different from the US site, but this is very interesting information.
Buying Greenland is merely a preparation to take the real prize
Iceland
Whoever owns Iceland is better than halfway to owning the North Atlantic. If someone owned both...
No one has to mark your words, buddy. It's an open secret that Jill Biden despises Kamala - not only did Kamala trash her husband in 2020 (good marks for loyalty there), but she also has been gunning for Joe and Jill's gig the entire time. Jill Biden does not want to give up being First Lady.
Speaking of KFC by @Non-breath oblige, KFC marketed that eating fried chicken on Christmas is something Americans would do, and the Japanese basically gobbled it up to it becoming a ”Christmas” tradition.
Ironic, that island was anything but virgin
Nevertheless, the lack of interest on the AU site is telling. In 2016 and 2020, the international outlets pulled out the stops for the Democrats.Oops, accidentally revealed where I am right now... I have yet to be attacked by a kangaroo, so I am disappointed with this trip. Also, I am a boomer.
https://abcnews.go.com/ Linking the correct site we still... see absolutely nothing actually supporting Harris.