Let me preface this with the info that I am not a lawyer or legal expert and I just laughing my ass of reading this motion.
It is some of the worst shifty-assed lawyering I have had to read. They are trying to get the judge to give them a hearing for something they have yet to show cause for and THIS brief is supposed to deliver that cause.
But read for yourself the little bits I snipped from the document. We will get real good laugh from lawyers destroying this garbage.
As is obvious from the substance of Defendant’s Motion to Suppress and Dismiss, Defendant is challenging the accuracy of material facts in a facially valid search warrant
That is actually not the case. The Defendants Motion insinuates and makes the accusation that Officer Pomplun lied, but not once in that entire motion is explained what material fact that lie was about and in what way the material facts were inaccurate.
2. A defendant in Minnesota has the right to challenge the truth and accuracy of allegations in a facially sufficient affidavit which is used to obtain a search warrant.
Nick, you are a fucking retard. Not once have you explained what exactly in that affidavit was inaccurate or false that is material to the search warrant. All you did was dance around the insinuation that Pomplun lied, without straight up saying what about.
Even if Mathison applied, in the instant case, the required corroboration is information readily discernable to the Court, namely the altered video. Ironically, it is the state that has provided the Court with the evidence necessary to corroborate Defendant’s assertions that Deputy Pomplun materially mislead Judge Fischer, especially as to the origin of the video Deputy Pomplun reviewed.
What was altered Nick? Please, spell it out for our poor retards on the Kiwi Farms. WHAT WAS ALTERED YOU FUCKING FAGGOT?
The clip embedded in the PowerPoint Presentation, did not come from Defendant’s YouTube channel, as is evident from the screenshot taken, at the same elapsed point in time of the video that the state uploaded on August 30, 2024.
Holy mother of god, the retards are really going for Chewbacca defense. It is completely irrelevant what channel Pomplun watched the video on, where they retrieved a copy from. When I go and watch Alien 27 in the cinema like a good paypig I get to see THE MOVIE, which is identical to all other copies of THE MOVIE, even it the physical medium it is saved on differs. This is such a fucking moron argument.
Deputy Pomplun’s failure to do so, leaving Judge Fischer with the impression that he had watched Defendant’s unaltered video is a material misrepresentation.
What was altered Nick? Please explain you fucking moron. That is such a gingerbread nigger defense. "I didn't do nuffin, those are pixels on my nose from the altered video! I swear!"
The state, however, has a second problem. The metadata on the video in the state’s initial disclosure12 shows that the state hadn’t downloaded Defendant’s original video, and the video they did downloaded after the warrant had been requested13 and issued14 is not Defendant’s original video.
This is actually not a problem at all, since unless material differences in the video are apparent and can be proven to have influenced the warrant being issued it does not matter at all where the video is from, as long as it is a true and accurate copy of the original video.
“[T]he screening of child maltreatment reports is controlled by an entirely different set of statutes and standards than criminal offenses.” The standards are much lower for screening child maltreatment reports. The state is suggesting that the failure to meet probable cause to satisfy the lower burden of proof for the clear and convincing standard has no impact on probable cause to satisfy a beyond a reasonable doubt standard.
So they [CPS] had the information about Cocaine and Ketamine in the house and did not investigate? Is that what Nick is trying to say here? Because its omega cope trying to insinuate the police cannot search your house for drugs and possible child endangerment (caused by the presence of said drugs), just because CPS did not do it when they had no knowledge of the drugs.... lol
d. The Firearms Seizure Remains Unlawful The state is overly reliant on the Plain View exception, which Defendant distinguished in his motion. The state, however, failed to address either the “strong relationship between the seized and described items”16 standard or the “nexus … between the items seized and criminal behavior”17 standard raised in Defendant’s motion. As such the Court should consider any counterargument waived and grant Defendant’s motion.
This is all they say about the guns being seized. lmao
This is all so weak I want to cry, this won't even be good for 1 week of lawtube commentary.
"They cannot take the guns because they saw them when they seized my illegal drugs, because Police is overly reliant on their eyes!!!!111"
Due to the numerous inconsistencies in Detective Pomplun’s probable cause affidavit, it is unlikely that Detective Pomplun could have seen or detected what he states. His integrity as a police officer is in question at this point
"POMPLUN LIED!!!1111"
[EDIT] I cannot believe they actually spelled out the accusation against Pomplun like this. Nick is making the case for law enforcement to demand release of all bodycam footage to dispel these rumors. I hope we get some more media coverage of these allegations that could lead to the release.
