Debate watch! - Fuck yeah!

who won?????

  • big T

    Votes: 902 46.8%
  • little T

    Votes: 200 10.4%
  • tie

    Votes: 352 18.3%
  • indian woman

    Votes: 248 12.9%
  • Black woman

    Votes: 224 11.6%

  • Total voters
    1,926
I don't understand why Haitians are here at all. Even among niggers they are worthless, they are an aboriginal-tier blight on the land. The only possible reason they would be in a place like Ohio is to eradicate the country's breadbasket.
View attachment 6404626
The Dominican Republic is home mostly to (slightly more civilised) niggers too

Well, it's inaccurate because most of the DR niggers are descended from Spaniards who couldn't achieve the bare minimum and not lay with negresses

Also known as the Thomas Jefferson shuffle
 
Dude, do you not have eyes or ears? What the hell are you babbling about? What does Biden have to do with this? Trump's old, yes, but he's always been a fucking idiot. His usual ravings on the stage proved as much. People in this very thread were panicking and losing their shit when he started bringing up the bullshit claims about Haitians eating cats and fumbled around on topics like the Central Park 5 and abortion.

How? The shooter was a registered republican. A republican shot a republican. Absolutely nothing to do with the dems or Kamala in particular.
the act blue shit with this dude has been brought up so many fucking times that i have to wonder if youre being willfully ignorant
 
As stupid and cringe as it sounds, it probably had some influence. It at least had an influence on Steve Bannon, who likely deserves a lot of the credit for Trump's 2016 campaign if we're honest.
For sure, Bannon and Milo were the bridge between GG shitposting and the meme wars/16 Trump win. There are a lot of other people who globbed on to GG and grifted their way into temporary relevance and permanent lolcowdom and you can read about all of the on this site.

Whoever decided that in the wake of the Quinn articles they needed to release infinite articles on gamers being dead deserves some credit for Trump's win, as does Buzzfeed and the producers of the ole "dear white people" videos.

Hell you could even give John McCain and Steve Schmidt credit for nominating Sarah Palin who emboldened the populist wing of the party. By the time 2016 came around the groundwork for a know nothing outisder populist was already laid by the senator who thought accomplished statesmen were the true heirs to the presidency.

I'm discovering a lot of these things just typing and I'm loling at how almost every major politician/political movement in the last 15 years has been effective at giving their opposition W's.

Only Hillary could get Trump elected, only Trump could get Biden elected. I'd bet the farm on Harris this cycle, I thought after the 16 DNC keynote she would be forcepushed into the presidency like Obama after his 04 keynote, but she never had his charisma.

Now she's 4 months from her first term without ever winning a single delegate in a dem primary. Trump ate a bullet at a rally and still is outside looking in. Only Trump could give Kamalla the west wing.
 
the act blue shit
Okay? What does this matter, Trump donated to Kamala back when she was running for DA. He's currently the Republican party candidate. People's political opinions can change.

His donation was made as a minor on Inauguration Day 2021 in response to a donation-begging email about tuning in to the Inauguration. He unsubscribed in 2022, the same year he registered as a republican and voted in the midterm elections.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Drip Torch
Okay? What does this matter, Trump donated to Kamala back when she was running for DA. He's currently the Republican party candidate. People's political opinions can change.

His donation was made as a minor on Inauguration Day 2021 in response to a donation-begging email about tuning in to the Inauguration. He unsubscribed in 2022, the same year he registered as a republican and voted in the midterm elections.
Difference being donating to a political cause means something, while registering as a Republican means nothing as doing it to influence primaries is a common tactic, and he lived in a state with a closed primary.

It's also incredibly suspicious that no one has leaked his online presence if he's a hardcore right winger who wanted to kill hitler for not being hitler enough
 
Okay? What does this matter, Trump donated to Kamala back when she was running for DA. He's currently the Republican party candidate. People's political opinions can change.

His donation was made as a minor on Inauguration Day 2021 in response to a donation-begging email about tuning in to the Inauguration. He unsubscribed in 2022, the same year he registered as a republican and voted in the midterm elections.
The gab guy posted the shooter kids poosts where he was spouting typical libshit nonsense.
I don't give a shit what he registered as, if you spout retarded libshit online, then you're a libshit. simple as.

The kid went out of his way to try and assassinate the republican nominee. acting like he was some secret counter-psy-op pseudo chud is complete blueanon retardation.
 
people say all kinds of shit from the sidelines, but it hits a lot different when you're staring down the barrel of something that has extremely serious legal consequences, especially if you've signed a paper swearing that both God and the state are allowed to ram you up the asshole if you abuse the trust of your office. besides, a local conspiracy would stand out on a national backdrop; if you believe the election was actually fraudulently swung for Biden, the most believable explanation (IMO) is a wide-scale effort across multiple states which would have to be organized by somebody in or adjacent to the national party - that "somebody" being a group of highly connected, politically affiliated operators, elected or not.
I want to preface my comments by stating I don't think the 2020 election was stolen, rather, the Democrats just had more money and more people working on ways to win. That being said, the idea that election fraud is something a consorted group of people are doing by getting together, planning it out, and executing deliberate goals, isn't the concern. The concern is thousands of white liberal wine mom's willing to fill out and submit ballots for their husbands, adult children, elderly parents, etc or 2-3/100 partisan poll workers who, while maybe not willing to throw out all Trump votes, are willing to be more lenient on ballots for Kamala and more strict on ballots for Trump. 5 ballots for Kamala with bad signatures allowed here, 5 ballots for Trump that aren't bubbled in entirely being thrown out there, over the course of millions of ballots spread out across a few dozen unassociated poll workers is all it takes to sway thousands of votes. These are things that I doubt individuals would consider that big of a deal on a personal/legal level and are likely not doing as part of some kind of large-scale operation. It'd also be hard to prove it happened never the less prosecute.

The word "conspiracy" has been psyop'd by the feds for a long time now and people forget a conspiracy doesn't need to be a bunch of evil people sitting at a table in a dark room, a conspiracy can be a bunch of different people who know nothing about each other all working towards the same goal.
 
Last edited:

IMG_0610.jpeg
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Smar Mijou
How? The shooter was a registered republican. A republican shot a republican. Absolutely nothing to do with the dems or Kamala in particular.

Dick Cheney is a Republican and he's voting for Kamala. He also shot a fellow Republican in the face before. Bush Sr was a Republican and he had Reagan shot. Republicans shoot each other sometimes, it happens.
 
Honestly the best way to tell how the debate went will be seeing tommorow how the Kamala team decides to astroturf it.

They are gonna claim a big win no matter what, but also gonna refuse to have another debate.
"We’ll look at it, but they want a second debate because they lost,” Trump told reporters in a surprise visit to the “spin room” after the debate.

Trump later appeared less willing to participate, telling Fox News’ Sean Hannity, “I sort of think maybe I shouldn’t do it.”

“I have to think about it, but if you won the debate, I sort of think maybe I shouldn’t do it. Why should I do another debate? She immediately said, ‘We want another.’ That’s, you know, what happens when you lose you immediately want to do a rematch.”
 
Back