Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[AnOminous]

I think we have also suggested that until we get the segmented hair results we won't know which one was the case. I assume they did do segmented hair tests, so time will tell when that appears in public.

And it hasn't yet. We still know literal jack-shit about that specific issue.

I think the prosecutor would have a really difficult time piercing that privilege after stipulating the children aren't victims.

They're totally different issues. As for the privilege, the issue is whether the child was adversely affected by the act. I'm not sure what you're not getting about that, especially in light of the actual case law I cited.

 

[Sharpeteer]

And yes, if you're going to do incredibly dumb shit and maybe die of excess, pick your 20s for that shit. There's still time to get out once you've had your fun. If you're doing that shit in your 40s, when you have responsibilities to your family that you completely shit on by doing that, you're just a fucking loser and you look pathetic, not cool.

From my perspective, you can spend your 20s fucking around and figuring out what exactly you want to do with your life. And I can sort of look the other way while you, as a 20-something year old kid, make some very poor choices, Because Lord knows I made some terrible decisions in my 20s.

But when you get to your 30s, that's when you really need to start actually getting your shit together if you haven't already. I'm not saying everyone because I'm sure there are exceptions, but if you're in your 30s and you still don't have your shit together in life, it really just starts to look like there's something wrong with you. Like why are you still trying to do shit everyone else did 10 years earlier? Why are you still doing hard substances and getting hammered every night? Wouldn't that get in the way of your career, or your rent/mortgage payments and stuff?

Nick is in his 40s. At that age, if you still don't have your shit together, you're probably just not ever going to. Nick has problems in his 40s that I would expect from somebody in their early 20s just starting out in life, and got to start going out drinking and doing drugs for the first time.

 

[videoman]

Like so many others I "discovered" Nick during the Rittenhouse trial. I had followed many of the other youtubers he eventually would connect with prior to that. I enjoyed his coverage of the Depp trial, then noticed his streams becoming more and more pointless and eventually unsubbed. The constant "we're going to talk about this big legal case" but then after skimming 2 hours of a stream nothing about it and then the bizarre "I'm not against Eric July but I am, crap" just drove me off. I had no clue he had turned into a drug addicted perv until the arrest. My rando's take on Nick story:

1) Nick's past: Things I have learned, Nick's family has money and he had two houses and was a failure of a lawyer that now (I believe) has the local law firm he worked at, that hates him so much they're working with someone on a defamation suit against him. I would bet his rich family used money to force him into law, marriage and Church and I bet he resents all of these decisions, them and his wife and kids now. Nick then, through a fluke but in his mind genius, achieved economic independence with his youtube show and became the pervert drug addict he always wanted to be and now with his own money we can see the massive ego trip he is on. He is always right in every way shape and form and his money backs him up.

2) Nicks fall - Nick would sperg endlessly as if he was this wise man, toasting guests and spewing his genius. It must have irked him to have cultivated a conservative audience that would put the same shackles on him for cash ironically that his parents had, he needed to behave a certain way to keep the cash rolling in, faking being a trad. In reality, he ran down his wife, breaking her down so she'd slip into his perversion on cam. He lusted after a guy who catfished him posing as a woman. He'd spew his basically satanic shit (due to his resentfulness over the church) likely to his priests face and online. He likely had his wife ho herself on their trip. All the while still pretending like his every perversion was totally in line with his morality and he was still a trad. Nick's ego would know no bounds and this is the source of everything, he is a spoiled little child acting out, trying to shit on everything he was raised to believe to prove he is "right". The drugs were the next step and seemed to have destroyed his mind. The lack of coherence allows him to reconcile his narcissism with his hate of who he had to be his whole life and create this mockery persona of what he pretended to be.

3) The Imholtes - My belief is once he had power, not unlike Harvey Weinstein or anyone in Hollywood who could make a career, he knew he could launch a youtuber just by going on their show. There is a tea guy on youtube who said Nick saved his business with just shout outs. That is power. Now we know Nick abuses power and appeared on tons of female youtubers shows, Anna that star wars girl, Nina infinity and melonie mac come to mind. All 3 defended him vehemently and my bet is he was all over their DMs acting as he does, likely trading pics which we know is his MO and flirting or more with them. He met April on Anna's stream, I'm betting she hooked him up with April in exchange for support for her channel. This would be a lot of money for her and she'd push April to Nick and get "her buddy laid" and as a result a lot of success for her shitty calendar.

4) Nicks plan - I think Nick had already broken his dimwitted wife's mind, now he saw April close by and wanted to bang her but she was married. Enter the polycule plan. Nick had his wife seduce Aaron so he could get April. He was likely at least sexting April before and most likely she was in on the plan to pull a swap. Considering the sexting and other things we learned about "the community" (see a streamer called Mandy Summers using sexual blackmail for EVS against other comicsgate people) it is safe to assume Nick was getting picks of every female youtuber he could in exchange for going on their "shows" and hyping them.

5) the betrayal - Aaron is spinning shit like crazy (your boy didn't do too bad) but what really happened is this nitwit let a guy bang his wife while he got stuck with the guys much older, beat up and dullard wife. Then before he realized what was going on his own wife was stolen and he was on the outside looking in. Aaron obviously dropped dime out of spite on Nick, Nick knows this, maybe rallying other relatives to join in and made a ton of trouble for Nick. Nick then tagged him back with the revenge pron.

6) What will happen next - Nick's show is shrinking and his costs are rising. Guys like him won't stop spending and will keep that lifestyle until the cash is gone, every penny. (he is already down one house) With drugs in the house and his narcissistic defiant attitude this could end in tragedy for one of his kids, he will lose all his homes and have to move in with his parents but I doubt Kayla will leave him. April has onlyfans written all over her and that will likely be her fate. Aaron will go on being a schmuck.

 

[AnOminous]

Nick is in his 40s. At that age, if you still don't have your shit together, you're probably just not ever going to. Nick has problems in his 40s that I would expect from somebody in their early 20s just starting out in life, and got to start going out drinking and doing drugs for the first time.

More importantly, he DELIBERATELY chose to have five children. He knocked up his worthless apparently barely sapient "wife" (apparently just some kind of dumb domestic animal who lies around on benzos all day) five times. Then he blamed his broodmare for his own choice to have her pump out a retard every nine months.

And instead of taking care of the children he brought into the world, this faggot instead decided to go into a drug daze in his middle age years, resenting and hating them, to the point that literally every time he got pulled over by the police and we got the records of it, he incessantly whined like a little bitch about "MUH KEEEEEEDZ" and how tough it was to have to drive them around.

Maybe he shouldn't have had them then, since he hates them so much.

He took on responsibilities, but being an impotent loser, he had no actual ability to live up to the responsibilities. His whole life is a lie. Every promise he has ever made is a lie. He says he'll do something. He never does. Because he's an absolute faggot coward liar.

No wonder he's cowering underground, terrified to stream. COME OUT YOU CUCKOLD!

 

[Watching Rekieta]

This is what's called res ipsa loquitur. THE THING SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. There is absolutely no way the set of facts where Nick's 9 year old daughter tests positive for cocaine does not involve criminal conduct by Nick himself and his whore of a wife and his side whore.

The very fact of the positive test proves criminal conduct beyond a reasonable doubt, because this shit does NOT happen without criminality being involved.

Oh definitely needed for the original hair test. I was responding to the need for segmented hair tests after they have the evidence they were exposed to drugs. I think it's enough that it was positive to corroborate the endangerment charge. But even if the all the original hair tests were negative, they'd still deserve the endangerment charge. 26 grams of coke in the house with 5 kids warrants that.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

I have no issue with you praising Tucker Max. When I was younger, I thought he was funny too. So was pre-Juju Maddox, Seanbaby, and Robert Hamburger (you can tell I'm old).

My main point is IF you insist on letting your freak flag fly, it makes sense to do it like Max did, and not the way Rekieta is. Do it in your 20s, get it out of your system, and then grow the fuck up.

Enh, I thought tucker max was an idiot (he was, and way back in the day his gross outshone his funny for me); he's probably still a dick, but as compared to Nick, he at least had the arrogance of youth as an excuse, and he also moved on to real-ish efforts in life, did well, and has pivoted again to other things. And as you said, better to go publicly wild in your 20s than at 40.

Tucker Max is 7ish years older than Nick, finished (from a far, far better) law school 14 years earlier, practiced less than Nick (not at all; he was fired from a summer associate job during law school and afaik never attempted another law job), and has since spent time actually working in his -qqqway, and making a ton of money, for the last 20 years. He's undeniably smart, and is savvy, even if not a "good" person. His wife is a nurse practitioner who monetizes it with remote (and maybe concierge/ non-insurance-based, I'm not sure) care. He also, while maintaining a SM presence and doing publicity for his efforts, doesn't seem to live/die by it. So I don't necessarily think much of Max as a human, but by comparison to Nick, he wins on all fronts.

 

[Mike Stoklasas Spock Ears]

More importantly, he DELIBERATELY chose to have five children. He knocked up his worthless apparently barely sapient "wife" (apparently just some kind of dumb domestic animal who lies around on benzos all day) five times.

It’s actually worse than that. Technically, Nick has knocked up Kayla EIGHT times. Three were miscarriages.

 

[Mandatory User Name]

This is what's called res ipsa loquitur. THE THING SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. There is absolutely no way the set of facts where Nick's 9 year old daughter tests positive for cocaine does not involve criminal conduct by Nick himself and his whore of a wife and his side whore.

The very fact of the positive test proves criminal conduct beyond a reasonable doubt, because this shit does NOT happen without criminality being involved.

I can think of only a few reasons why his kid would be on Cocaine.
The first would be that she snuck into their room and took it, possibly Leading to that "Medical Emergency" that happened a couple of months before the arrest. 2. Passive smoking by being in the room where the Cocaine was being used, it's been said that that particular daughter is always going into the room to snuggle with mum (where the Cocaine is used). Both of these come under Criminal neglect (and a few other things).

Then we have it being done on purpose, now I can only think of a few reasons why someone would purposely dose a child. 1. Trying to kill the child, unlikely here since she's not dead. 2. Someone was diddling the child and wanted her out of it, again unlikely since CPS gave her back. 3. Nick was using Cocaine to Medicate the child because (according to Nick Logic) Cocaine, Ritalin and amphetamines are the same thing (uppers) and so must have the same medicinal use right? this could have happened if in a drug fuelled binge the three "adults" of the house took all of the girl's Ritalin 4. They did it for fun because they're just complete and utter cunts.

If there's an innocent explanation then I can't wait for Nick to eventually tell his Funny and Weird story to the court.

 

[Lemondale]

It’s actually worse than that. Technically, Nick has knocked up Kayla EIGHT times. Three were miscarriages.

did nick realy knock kayla eight tjmes? what about the other couples nick swinged? how are we sure nick knocked her 2 times?

 

[Active User]

After she quit his nannys Insta was filled with "Surviving Narc Abuse" and "How to spot a Narcissist", "Narcissistic Gaslighting" and other narc related content, something she showed no signs of being into before and is a fairly good indication that she quit because she got sick of Nicks bullshit, whether the final straw was he made unwanted advances (not an unlikely possibility) or something, its clear having to live with Lord Balldo was about as pleasant as you'd imagine and eventually got too much for her to take.

How was this even found? Searching the thread, all I saw was @Fapcop posting some pinterest that was apparently the nanny's without any real lead up. The thread was super fast back then so I could have missed something, but still.

She can't. MN law prohibits one spouse from testifying against the other except for very limited exceptions which don't apply here.

She can testify if she wants. Spousal privilege is against compulsion (with certain exceptions, spouses can still be convicted of conspiracy and stuff) but it doesn't mean Nick can just decide she's not allowed to voluntarily testify against him.

One of the bigger issues is that private communications tend to be defined super narrowly in spousal privilege statutes, to a degree that the presence of kids itself interferes with that. Given there's five kids, they'd probably get something useful out of even a truncated testimony accounting for that. I don't personally think Kayla's going to end up going this route, however.

 

[Airstrip One]

Enh, I thought tucker max was an idiot (he was, and way back in the day his gross outshone his funny for me); he's probably still a dick, but as compared to Nick, he at least had the arrogance of youth as an excuse, and he also moved on to real-ish efforts in life, did well, and has pivoted again to other things. And as you said, better to go publicly wild in your 20s than at 40.

Tucker Max is 7ish years older than Nick, finished (from a far, far better) law school 14 years earlier, practiced less than Nick (not at all; he was fired from a summer associate job during law school and afaik never attempted another law job), and has since spent time actually working in his -qqqway, and making a ton of money, for the last 20 years. He's undeniably smart, and is savvy, even if not a "good" person. His wife is a nurse practitioner who monetizes it with remote (and maybe concierge/ non-insurance-based, I'm not sure) care. He also, while maintaining a SM presence and doing publicity for his efforts, doesn't seem to live/die by it. So I don't necessarily think much of Max as a human, but by comparison to Nick, he wins on all fronts.

I was there at the end of the Tucker Max forums (Rudius Media as it was known then) when he was spiraling hard in lolcowdom. Credit where its due. Max, despite all of his bullying and bloviating, and his ham-fisted attempts at combining the personas of Caligula and Alexander the Great, at least had the self-awareness and the humility to see where it was taking him. He pulled the plug on the forums overnight, which was a big deal, and he pivoted.

Rekieta is obviously an alcoholic and may also be addicted to harder drugs. He will not admit fault even when his actions cause direct harm to his children. There is no reinvention for him; no redemption arc.

 

[Fapcop]

How was this even found? Searching the thread, all I saw was @Fapcop posting some pinterest that was apparently the nanny's without any real lead up. The thread was super fast back then so I could have missed something, but still

Yeah, I found the nanny, (Good Christian girl it seems!) and looked up her Pinterest.

The weird thing was that it was full of you know: Stuff a young Christian girl might post about, and then suddenly all these posts about narcissists and narcs. As if she had a an epiphany or something happened.

I was there at the end of the Tucker Max forums (Rudius Media as it was known then) when he was spiraling hard in lolcowdom. Credit where its due. Max, despite all of his bullying and bloviating, and his ham-fisted attempts at combining the personas of Caligula and Alexander the Great, at least had the self-awareness and the humility to see where it was taking him. He pulled the plug on the forums overnight, which was a big deal, and he pivoted.

Rekieta is obviously an alcoholic and may also be addicted to harder drugs. He will not admit fault even when his actions cause direct harm to his children. There is no reinvention for him; no redemption arc.

There is a fundamental difference though.

Tucker Max is if anything the reverse Rekieta. Tucker went from libertine drug, alcohol and sex abuser to married trad dad and rancher.

Rekieta otoh went from a trad dad living out in the country to drug abuser, cuck and swinger.

In Tucker’s case he didn’t just “pull up”. He did what you’re supposed to do. Grew up.

Nobody minds a young man sowing his oats and doing crazy shit. It’s when the young man turns into a grown man, hits 30 and still continues that behavior that shit turns pathetic.

What Rekieta did was a very public degeneration and deroute.

It’s, technically not even to late for him to have a redemption arc, but we all know Nick won’t do that because he knows best and don’t you dare tell him what to do you prude!

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

What's funny and weird is the statute has a felony version of neglect in same subsection which is triggered if there was actual injury - which would seem to need a victim. Would they have to charge a separate crime for the injury ("victim crime") to invoke the felony endangerment ("constructive crime")?

I believe there is an option to stipulate facts before trial, that both parties agree on as truth. This would include for example that certain facts about a child testing positive and how it came into possession of the drugs. The goal would be to save time for the court (which judges like) and avoid a child testifying (which the court very much likes and in this case CPS likes even better).

But it is not a felony charge, because I believe they lack the element of "significant harm". Of course we can argue what constitutes significant harm, but I imagine CPS will be all over this and since we do not have access to all the documents related to the children's case, we will likely never know.

I would not think they did this. It would satisfy our curiosity, but the prosecutor would be more practical with the range of results. The physical exam showed no injury from drug use. Urine tests are clean. There are only a few outcome permutations and I don't think any would influence their course of action. The test results would not influence any decisions.

Outcome
1. Comes back completely clean. Does it change the existing charges? Does it change KCHHS conditions for returning kids? Probably not.
2. Comes back as single large dose. Child shows no injury. Change charges? Change conditions for return?
3. Comes back as regular exposure. Change charges? Change conditions for return?

I think they would see no value in the results. Return conditions were set and seem pretty standard. Without establishing an injury, the neglect charges are what they are.

The segmented test would only create FUDD without revealing evidence of additional crimes, generating exculpatory evidence of charged crimes or corroborating accounts of current crimes. I think the prosecutors would see it as a waste of their time/money and I would be surprised if they ordered it.

I would like to point out that as far as I know Nick only ever said "the kids are back", he never clearly stated or provided proof of a written order what the actual arrangement was and under what stipulations.

He also never said that ALL children were returned to his home. It is entirely possible that the child exposed and tested positive to drugs was placed elsewhere as a precaution, because there might be issues with putting the child back into an environment with a alcoholic father and a prescription med addict mother.

For all we know Nick has been unable to stream because he is running his bitch ass ragged visiting Retards Anonymous meetings all over Minnesota to get his "I am good addict" card stamped and collect his participation coin as proof he can be a non-retard. He and Lady Crackit could also be visiting a drug addiction clinic for a half a day as a stipulation for the return of the kids (kids in school, parents at drug treatment), and/or visiting parenting classes.

All the things above are very typical court ordered things that drug addict parents have to do, so I imagine at least a few of them would apply for the Rakieta's as well. (And Nick would be 100% too embarrassed to stream and explain or admit any of this)

More importantly, he DELIBERATELY chose to have five children. He knocked up his worthless apparently barely sapient "wife" (apparently just some kind of dumb domestic animal who lies around on benzos all day) five times. Then he blamed his broodmare for his own choice to have her pump out a retard every nine months.

Most men know this type of woman, the "everything will be better this time round", who want to do the same things over again deeply invested in that idea that they will be better if they just get another chance.

Obviously I do not know Kayla, but this is a very typical type of failed mother who neglect their children and are still completely self-assured in the delusion that they can be a perfect mother if they just get another chance. They will manage to pull themselves together for about a year and then start falling apart again when the glowie "I have a kid" phase is over. Seen it happen IRL and it is not pretty.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

It’s actually worse than that. Technically, Nick has knocked up Kayla EIGHT times. Three were miscarriages.

Sir, in this case, let’s just go ahead and call them divine interventions

 

[Shig O'nella]

we were right all along.
With nobody around to correct the record, we sure have won completely and totally over Nick Rekieta.
Joyous day, Kiwi Farms users.

Not exactly an uncommon event.

 

[repentance]

I can think of only a few reasons why his kid would be on Cocaine.
The first would be that she snuck into their room and took it, possibly Leading to that "Medical Emergency" that happened a couple of months before the arrest.

One thing which doesn't sit right with me about this theory is that cocaine tastes bitter. It's not likely that a young kid would either ingest a large amount or repeatedly ingest enough to get a decent reading because it tastes unpleasant. If Nick had sufficiently shitty coke to not taste bitter enough to deter a kid, it probably wouldn't have produced those readings either.

I absolutely believe that they're all reckless enough to leave items that have contained coke around and that a kid might have retrieved them for use because no-one ever washes the dishes, but I still can't see a kid getting past the taste.

 

[Vibralldo]

One thing which doesn't sit right with me about this theory is that cocaine tastes bitter. It's not likely that a young kid would either ingest a large amount or repeatedly ingest enough to get a decent reading because it tastes unpleasant. If Nick had sufficiently shitty coke to not taste bitter enough to deter a kid, it probably wouldn't have produced those readings either.

I absolutely believe that they're all reckless enough to leave items that have contained coke around and that a kid might have retrieved them for use because no-one ever washes the dishes, but I still can't see a lid getting past the taste.

I still subscribe to the theory that Nick thinks he's smart, believes he figured out the secret medicinal properties of cocaine if dosed properly, and "prescribed" his daughter cocaine to deal with ADHD because "the dumb incel prudes don't understand that cocaine is actually good for you"

 

[August Levasseur]

She can testify if she wants. Spousal privilege is against compulsion (with certain exceptions, spouses can still be convicted of conspiracy and stuff) but it doesn't mean Nick can just decide she's not allowed to voluntarily testify against him.

Normally, yes that's what spousal privilege means. However, in Minnesota:

Minnesota Statues, Sec. 595.02, Sub. 1, Para. (a)

A husband cannot be examined for or against his wife without her consent, nor a wife for or against her husband without his consent, nor can either, during the marriage or afterwards, without the consent of the other, be examined as to any communication made by one to the other during the marriage. This exception does not apply to a civil action or proceeding by one against the other, nor to a criminal action or proceeding for a crime committed by one against the other or against a child of either or against a child under the care of either spouse, nor to a criminal action or proceeding in which one is charged with homicide or an attempt to commit homicide and the date of the marriage of the defendant is subsequent to the date of the offense, nor to an action or proceeding for nonsupport, neglect, dependency, or termination of parental rights.

"Without the consent of the other" to me says that, in this case, Kayla cannot testify against Nick unless Nick allows her on the stand. The only potential way around this would be his Child Endangerment charge because it's an offence against a child under their care. However, because all of his charges are really based around one criminal act (possession of a controlled substance) it would be difficult to meaningfully separate testimony about one charge from testimony about all his charges, which, in my layman's understanding of the law, makes it awkward to really justify putting her on the stand.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Of course, these were weed gummies, which Nick seems to have enjoyed regularly because he is "neurodivergent" and things don't impact him the same way it would for normal people (lol):

He specifically bought out the whole store stovk of gumnjes out of defiance when MN Republicans accidentally made gummies legal. He told this story with devillish glee.

He was force-fed one spoonful of Jell-O as a child by a teacher he hated, so the vomited all over himself.

I don't think it was 'one spoon', but I do recall that he said his teacher blamed him to his parents.

He also hated swinging and of at one point

We are MuhNOGuhMUS!

The human part of me is hoping that that is for his cocaine infused daughter, [REDACTED NAME].

edit: wtf I didn't realize I was responding to a comment from a fucking month ago.

Naming minor children is gay.

I would not think they did this. It would satisfy our curiosity, but the prosecutor would be more practical with the range of results. The physical exam showed no injury from drug use. Urine tests are clean. There are only a few outcome permutations and I don't think any would influence their course of action. The test results would not influence any decisions.

They did the segmented tests and submitted it to the court.

The first would be that she snuck into their room and took it, possibly Leading to that "Medical Emergency" that happened a couple of months before the arrest.

This was discussed and the timeline with the length of hair and period it covered did not overlap with the date of the emergency.

. 2. Someone was diddling the child and wanted her out of it, again unlikely since CPS gave her back. 3

One thing which doesn't sit right with me about this theory is that cocaine tastes bitter. It's not likely that a young kid would either ingest a large amount or repeatedly ingest enough to get a decent reading because it tastes unpleasant. If Nick had sufficiently shitty coke to not taste bitter enough to deter a kid, it probably wouldn't have produced those readings either.

I absolutely believe that they're all reckless enough to leave items that have contained coke around and that a kid might have retrieved them for use because no-one ever washes the dishes, but I still can't see a lid getting past the taste.

There is a containment thread for this sick speculation. Use it. https://kiwifarms.st/threads/rekietas-child-neglect-abuse-speculation-thread.194821/

 

[SpergioLeonne]

We are MuhNOGuhMUS!

“Technically I still am muhnigganus. It’s not your fault; you couldn’t know that”