US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
1726494374376.png
https://x.com/realchrisrufo/status/1834926318883852543 https://archive.is/1NXHQ
https://x.com/realchrisrufo/status/1835354219454533862 https://archive.is/wnR9Y
CBS News has published a response to the “Cat Eaters of Ohio” story. It’s a supremely dishonest and completely partisan report, but let’s break it down, to show exactly how the establishment media maintains its lines of propaganda. The CBS report hinges on two arguments. First, CBS writes: “The video shows what appears to be animal carcasses on a grill. The man filming the footage alleges, without evidence, that they are cats.” Without evidence? The eyewitness directly observed the incident and took a video recording of it—both of which are firsthand evidence. But CBS’s apparent standard, when such evidence violates the establishment narrative, is: Don’t believe your lying eyes. The report also quotes Dayton’s Democratic mayor, who says there have been “absolutely zero reports of this type of activity.” Which is true, but does not contradict the evidence at all. Nobody filed a police report, so there would be no police report—and the absence of a police report does not mean that something did not happen. This is a convenient way of ignoring the evidence, and laundering lies through friendly media apparatus. What did CBS not do? Journalism. The network, which has massive resources, did not send a reporter to the scene, interview the eyewitness, interview the neighbors, investigate the visual evidence, conduct background research, or provide a detailed analysis. They simply adopted “don’t believe your lying eyes” as their standard and repeated an empty, evidence-free statement from a partisan political figure. Now, I’d like to take you through exactly how we produced the story and analyzed the evidence. This is precisely the case that I made in the original piece, that the establishment media is more interested in denial and obfuscation, even when the evidence points the other way. Sourcing An individual in my personal social network reached out with a tip and a link to the social media post with the video. (This source neither requested, nor received, the monetary prize I had posted on social media a few days prior.) Our team then collected the timestamped social media from August 2023, which was still live. We tracked down the author, authenticated the video, matched it to his voice, and conducted an interview by phone, in which he confirmed the key details of the story. The following day, we had the author bring us to the location and make introductions, had a team member conduct background research, and sent a reporter into the field to make observations and conduct interviews. To confirm the exact location of the video, we matched the visual elements in the picture to the visual elements on the scene, down to matching knot patterns in fence planks, which provided us with the precise address and camera position relative to the scene. For extra care, we also cross-referenced the visual evidence with street and satellite images, plus residential property records. Eyewitness Account Our interview with the eyewitness matched the details of the original video and was unambiguous in its conclusion: “This African dude next door had the damn cat on the grill. They was barbecuing the damn cat!” The eyewitness was familiar with the African families in the housing complex (his son played with their children) and his child’s mother, who lived next door to the Africans, had observed them on at least one occasion butchering a large mammal on the street. The eyewitness had a close, unmediated look at the incident and maintained a consistent story over one year, to multiple different groups, including his own peer group. He is familiar with barbecuing and, like anyone, is familiar with cats. The source of his initial shock was that the animal on the grill was not a chicken, burger, hotdog, or other usual fare. Again, he witnessed the incident firsthand, recorded a video, and maintained a consistent story over a year. This is all direct evidence, contrary to CBS News’s disingenuous claim. Field Interviews Our field reporter spoke with a half-dozen people in the housing complex, who confirmed the following details: all of the residents of the complex were migrants from Africa, most commonly the Congo; they were familiar with the eyewitness, his child’s mother, and his son; they told us another African family had recently moved out of one of the units; this family owned and used a blue grill; the father would go out with a knife and gather meat; there were stray cats breeding on the property and some residents wanted to get rid of them. We also made the following direct observations on the scene: we matched the visuals in the video to the location; we found an abandoned grill that matched the make, model, and color in the video and the descriptions in the interviews; we noticed that there were at least ten cats on the property, which appeared to be strays and were very comfortable with the residents, coming onto the porches and milling around the exterior of the house. Background Research Our research team learned that there is a tradition of cat eating in the Congo and surrounding nations. We also learned that, since at least 2021, Dayton has accommodated a relatively large number of migrants from the Congo. By chance, one of our in-house researchers had experience dissecting cats and studying their anatomy. In addition, we spoke on background with a chicken farmer, surgeon, biologist, hunter, and medical professor. After some left-wing conspiracy accounts on social began claiming that the animals were chickens, rather than cats, we asked them to provide their opinion. I will reproduce some of the quotations from two of those interviews below. Chicken Farmer Interview This farmer, who has processed thousands of animals per year, confirmed that it could not be a chicken in the video: • “The most obvious evidence is that the claws on the grill are facing the wrong way for it to be an avian creature. Size-wise the only poultry [the claws] could credibly be compared to is a Cornish game hen or something small, but the carcasses are much larger than that. Literally any poultry farmer or butcher would tell you that’s not a chicken or a waterfowl.” • “A bird wouldn’t be able to rest upside down like that. Its heavy legs would cause it to flop to one side or another, or the legs would just drop down to either side … There’s no way for a bird to naturally sit that way. They’re bottom-heavy creatures.” • “The legs are too skinny [to be a chicken]. The ‘drumstick’ even on a laying hen would be much meatier. Number two is that, even if it were a bird, the talons are facing in the wrong direction. But they are in the right direction for cat’s paws. They are basically claiming that the two legs on the left are those of a chicken, and that its butt is somehow propped in the air. First of all, why would it be propped in the air? ... But more importantly, why would the drumsticks be stuck up in midair? For a quadruped like a feline this makes sense (they are the front legs) but not an avian creature which has one set of legs with a sort of folding joint in them. If the bird were face up as they are claiming, the legs would fold down onto the thighs, not project straight into the air.” • “The feet of a chicken or a waterfowl are much larger in proportion to the carcass than what’s in the video. Whereas the proportion fits that between a cat’s leg and paw. When you shoot a cow or sheep or pig, they might fall and roll onto their back with their legs straight up in the air like the cat is. Because they’re also quadrupeds. Not possible with a chicken because it just has a totally different leg structure. Made to do different things.” Surgeon Interview This surgeon, who also has practical experience with animals, explained that the proportions of the animal, particularly the “ileum-to-scapula distance,” resemble a mammal, more specifically, a cat, rather than a chicken: • “It’s fascinating how different animal species have remarkably similar skeletal structures - the humerus is proximal to the radius, the sternum anterior to the scapula - but the relationship of those bones to each other is what largely differentiates one animal species to the next, not only in appearance but also in function.” • “[In the video,] you can see that a cat has a greater distance between the scapula and the ileum. This provides more space for the abdominal organs (i.e. small bowel, liver) between the thoracic cavity and the pelvis. When the legs are stretched, a 90-degree angle is formed between the legs and the pelvis/abdominal cavity (as can be seen in the picture).” • “In contrast, a chicken has a very short distance between the scapula and the ileum. The reason for this is that the abdominal organs are located more caudally (i.e. towards the tail). When a chicken’s legs are stretched, this exaggerated 90-degree angle (as is seen in the video) is absent because the thoracic cavity is so close to the pelvis - hence, short distance between the scapula and ileum.” • “The animals in the video are cats and not chickens due to the pronounced right angle between the legs and the abdomen that occur as a result of a longer ileum-to-scapula distance.” Conclusion The CBS News report is not credible and does not make any attempt to investigate the facts. Rather, it simply denied the eyewitness account and firsthand video as “without evidence”—a logical contradiction—and copied a statement from the Democratic mayor, who also did not investigate the matter. There is no indication that CBS sent a reporter into the field, conducted any interviews, or provided any visual analysis. There is no indication that CBS even knows where the incident occurred, something that took our team some time on the ground. As I wrote in my original piece about the story, the establishment media wants to maintain a line of propaganda and wish away any evidence to the contrary, appealing to authority rather than evidence. This is dishonest and does a disservice to productive debate.

I don't think the feds care very much about Kiwi Farms itself. They're interested when people post obvious threats, which people are wont to do because they're retarded and think this is the place for that, but that's about it. This website is not used to facilitate any crimes and follows US law more closely than 4chan.
this website mocks the liberal agenda and posts evidence to back up it's beliefs. you can be sure they're trying to make it illegal.
 
So, uh, what's everyone's prediction on any October Surprises?

Because holy shit, this entire election cycle has been a series of October surprises, it seems.

>attempt is accidentally successful in harming or killing Harris/Witz
Glowies, pretending to be Trump supporters, take out Waltz, thereby "disqualifying" Trump and Harris wins by default. Sounds ridiculous but other ridiculous stuff has already happened.
 
Glowies pretend to be Trump supporters as they take out Waltz, thereby "disqualifying: Trump and Harris wins by default. Sounds ridiculous but other ridiculous stuff has already happened.
After Columbine, school shootings were normalized.
What's going to happen if regular citizens killing politicians get normalized?
 
Sure, you shout out @AnOminous and @John Badman but what are the rest of us, chopped liver?
The most shocking thing was Null coming on here and shitposting a bit. I wasn't on here for 2020 (for politics here) but I'd imagine that didn't happen then. A lot has changed it seems.

Late last year most were saying 2024 would be insane, but it's so far been even more than anyone would've predicted. Trump surviving a near headshot miracle? Then another one so fast?
 
Glowies, pretending to be Trump supporters, take out Waltz, thereby "disqualifying" Trump and Harris wins by default. Sounds ridiculous but other ridiculous stuff has already happened.

Bold claim. If Crooks and this guy are the best assets the Powers that Be can scrape up in 2024 they are up shit creek. Who else do they have rattling around in the bargain bin to go on these ops?

It isn't that they aren't bringing their best its that these are the best they can bring.

Crooks himself must have been fairly well groomed as he was 20 years old and maintained no social media presence. Which is difficult to do as a kid these days could even have one unintentionally. Just by doing dumb kid shit like playing Roblox.

This Routh guy was a bag man for the regime and constantly posted his dumb spook shit on Facebook. While somehow maintaining enough cashflow to go interact with big time NGOs and physically fly to Ukraine multiple times on their behalf/
 
Betting markets didnt care about Sunday.

Attempts against Trump now normalized.
Too soon, even this one shows a bit of tightening though. But yeah, it's from the debate high for the bitch wearing off.

I doubt this will 'help' Trump that much, it is indeed kind of expected and built into the polls that a leftist will kill him.

Screenshot 2024-09-16 091009.png
 
I doubt this will 'help' Trump that much, it is indeed kind of expected and built into the polls that a leftist will kill him.
It won't change any votes, at this point nothing will. What it will do is drive turnout for him as Trump supporters will crawl over broken glass to vote for him. Kamala, not so much.
 
I believe it.
So do I. But I've also been telling people for years that you can't rig an election where everyone hates you. This is partially why. People are cowards. People turn coat. People don't want to go to prison. Important people flip because they'd rather face the consequences from a dying, desperate party than eat the punishment when they inevitably lose. That lines up with what we've been seeing. Desperate media scrubbing the first Trump assassination. The attempts to memory hole the picture of Trump with his fist in the air. The blatant disregard for any subtlety during the debate. They're scrambling because they're facing internal strife and push back because people are looking to get out of dodge. Part of my schizo theory was that the involvement of DEI politics pozzing the US military wasn't just foreign influence to weaken the US. But rather, both foreign AND national influence to weaken and loyalize the military. Purge the true patriots loyal to America and force them to quit. Fill the military with nothing but the blindest loyalists possible.
 
It won't change any votes, at this point nothing will. What it will do is drive turnout for him as Trump supporters will crawl over broken glass to vote for him. Kamala, not so much.
It's insane how she has no support, at all. The swift thing fell flat too. It's just another 'I'm not Trump' election.

I guess that's a safe move now, just hide and say nothing and hope for the best. That and cheating won 2020. If they cheat again like 2020 or Venezuela.. I'm wary of giving our side too much credit to react, but it'll be a mess.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back