New Fag
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
you are saying you need to be a downstairs DJ every day to get through the day, what would you say about someone saying they need a skinful (or a rock) everyday to get through the day?
reddit General
- Thread starter SpessCaptain
- Start date
you are saying you need to be a downstairs DJ every day to get through the day, what would you say about someone saying they need a skinful (or a rock) everyday to get through the day?
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
They even have a name for just having giant homosex for days on end, fueled by MDMA and meth. They call it chemsex.
[THIS IS WHAT FAGGOTS ACTUALLY BELIEVE]
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2016
PARTY AND PLAY is what hear it’s called.
Remember watching YouTube video where the cops set up a sting.
Well, a 60 year old homo shows up to meet a 14 year old boy. With a bottle of lubricant and a syringe filled with meth.
(Not to be IVd but for shooting it up the ass of course.)
1. I doubt that most of the guys who admit to having this problem just “spend 10 minutes a day” jerking off.
2. Even spending 10 minutes a day on it, ultimately becomes a self soothing habit. Some people cut (why would cutting yourself occasionally be a problem?), some people wash hands 10 times a day. If it’s no big deal to fap 10 minutes a day, then surely it’s no biggie to NOT do it for a week or a month, no? And if you can’t do that, then maybe that daily fap IS a problem.
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2022
I'd like to once again remind everyone, this is the thread ABOUT Reddit, not the one where you act like you are ON Reddit. Kindly shut the fuck up about whacking off.
Gondolindrim
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2020
Who gives a shit? More to laugh at
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
Redditor's autistic tranny "partner" triggered by form using words.
At least some replies are sane.
To be fair, I'll call him, er, her, a potential pedophile.
HR handed an employee a form comparing being gay & trans to pedophilia (California) (self.legaladvice)
submitted 18 hours ago * by -Historical-Lime-
EDIT: Can't change title, to remove all ambiguity here's an updated title:
"HR hands employee a form that classifies "pedophillia" and "homosexuality" as "sexual behavior disorders" and includes the slur "transvestism"
My partner is an autistic trans man. He was trying to get a very simple disability accomadation: transcription software for zoom meetings as autism causes him to have auditory processing issues. He requested this months ago.
After constantly forgetting then actively trying to discourage him from requesting an accomadation for months, they finally gave him a disability form to fill out and I was genuinely speechless. One section reads like it hasn't been altered since the 1970's. This is the exact wording, all under offical company letterhead (emphasis mine):
"The following are excluded from the mental & physical conditions described above: transvestism, transsexualism, pedophilia, exhibitionism, voyuerism, gender identity disorders not resulting from physical impairments, or other sexual behavior disorders; homosexuality, bisexuality, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs"
Obviously upset about being handed a form with multiple slurs & basically calling him a pedophile that suggests being gay & trans are a disorders on par with pedophilia, my partner went straight back to HR. They agreed to change it, of course, but the employee he told the issue about apparently lodged a complaint against him because she felt "uncomfortable" with how "hostile" he was. Again, my partner is autistic & is just blunt, he had absolutely no intention of making her uncomfortable & was just upset by the situation. He literally said just said "this form has fucking slurs on it" but monotone/ with a blunt affect because, ya know, he's autistic. (his boss & most of the office quite literally say "fuck" all of the time, for context).
Inexplicably, HR thought it would be a good idea to just take the other employee's word for it that my partner was "too hostile" and pulled him into their office to get mad at him. I cannot tell you how furious this situation makes me.
This isn't even the first time he has been bullied by HR; his managers fucked up by creating his position in the first place & rather than take responsibility & just let him go, they have been attempting to fire him with cause, misgendering him & treating him like shit for things that are blatantly his manager's fault through the whole thing (he has been told to "manage up", whatever tf that means). This is just the most egregious BS that has happened to him.
So does my partner have a case against this organization? Would it be worth him consulting a lawyer?
EDIT 1: for typos & took out last paragraph which was motivated by me being upset on my partner's behalf more than anything & not relevant. I'm on mobile so sorry for the awful formatting.
EDIT 2: "basically calling him a pedophile" were my words, not his. I reworded it to say what I meant. I also feel I should clarify here: the "this form has fucking slurs on it" was a part of a larger conversation he was having with the HR person. He was in no way blaming her & thanked her for listening to his concerns. He thought the conversation ended on a good note & got his point across well about why he was so distraught.
It is very common for autistic people to be completely misinterpreted as being hostile due to difficulty modulating inflection & tone of voice. Inability to read subtle social cues is part of what makes autism disabling. One comenter said they have borderline personality disorder which can cause them to "act like a bitch". Yeah, well "acting like a bitch" isn't a clinical symptom. Misreading social cues (such as believing "fuck" was an acceptable word when his boss literally used it in a group chat a half hour earlier & says it constantly) & not being able to properly modulate one's inflection are actual clinical signs of autism. Again, in no way did he fly off the handle or scream at her. That of course would be unacceptable no matter someone's disability.
In fact, he was genuinely shocked and upset at the possibility that he made anyone feel uncomfortable. I also feel it is important to note that he is literally 5'1" and the least intimidating human on the planet. Also he unfortunately does not pass, so he is socially read as a woman by the majority of people right now. I feel like this adds further context to the "hostile" comment, as some were understandably thinking this HR woman felt genuinely a little rattled by a big, intimidating dude speaking harshly at her.
EDIT 3: Okay uh guess comments are locked for now, but yeah I do understand now that this is the exact language of the ADA in 1990, thank you all. I am still upset and appalled at the organization's choice to include this language in their forms when California has a free form for employeers to give to employees to have their doctors fill out. The form my partner got handed was needlessly lengthy and clearly needed to be looked over more carefully. Why include a bit of the statute that uses such outdated and awful language when a simpler, free form already exists?
I probably should have also included some other facts. I'm just not a lawyer & was just so shocked by the language I thought for sure that'd cause the most legal issues, however this organization tried to discipline my partner over the meeting notes he took after he had asked for accomadations for the second time (he was waiting for them to give him more info on forms to fill out to get accomadations/ next steps when they punished him), and now I'm starting to see that's definitely the bigger legal issue here & where I should have started.
Frankly that isn't even all they've done to him at this job, this was just the straw that broke the camel's back for me as his partner having to watch him suffer for months.
submitted 18 hours ago * by -Historical-Lime-
EDIT: Can't change title, to remove all ambiguity here's an updated title:
"HR hands employee a form that classifies "pedophillia" and "homosexuality" as "sexual behavior disorders" and includes the slur "transvestism"
My partner is an autistic trans man. He was trying to get a very simple disability accomadation: transcription software for zoom meetings as autism causes him to have auditory processing issues. He requested this months ago.
After constantly forgetting then actively trying to discourage him from requesting an accomadation for months, they finally gave him a disability form to fill out and I was genuinely speechless. One section reads like it hasn't been altered since the 1970's. This is the exact wording, all under offical company letterhead (emphasis mine):
"The following are excluded from the mental & physical conditions described above: transvestism, transsexualism, pedophilia, exhibitionism, voyuerism, gender identity disorders not resulting from physical impairments, or other sexual behavior disorders; homosexuality, bisexuality, compulsive gambling, kleptomania, pyromania, or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from current unlawful use of controlled substances or other drugs"
Obviously upset about being handed a form with multiple slurs & basically calling him a pedophile that suggests being gay & trans are a disorders on par with pedophilia, my partner went straight back to HR. They agreed to change it, of course, but the employee he told the issue about apparently lodged a complaint against him because she felt "uncomfortable" with how "hostile" he was. Again, my partner is autistic & is just blunt, he had absolutely no intention of making her uncomfortable & was just upset by the situation. He literally said just said "this form has fucking slurs on it" but monotone/ with a blunt affect because, ya know, he's autistic. (his boss & most of the office quite literally say "fuck" all of the time, for context).
Inexplicably, HR thought it would be a good idea to just take the other employee's word for it that my partner was "too hostile" and pulled him into their office to get mad at him. I cannot tell you how furious this situation makes me.
This isn't even the first time he has been bullied by HR; his managers fucked up by creating his position in the first place & rather than take responsibility & just let him go, they have been attempting to fire him with cause, misgendering him & treating him like shit for things that are blatantly his manager's fault through the whole thing (he has been told to "manage up", whatever tf that means). This is just the most egregious BS that has happened to him.
So does my partner have a case against this organization? Would it be worth him consulting a lawyer?
EDIT 1: for typos & took out last paragraph which was motivated by me being upset on my partner's behalf more than anything & not relevant. I'm on mobile so sorry for the awful formatting.
EDIT 2: "basically calling him a pedophile" were my words, not his. I reworded it to say what I meant. I also feel I should clarify here: the "this form has fucking slurs on it" was a part of a larger conversation he was having with the HR person. He was in no way blaming her & thanked her for listening to his concerns. He thought the conversation ended on a good note & got his point across well about why he was so distraught.
It is very common for autistic people to be completely misinterpreted as being hostile due to difficulty modulating inflection & tone of voice. Inability to read subtle social cues is part of what makes autism disabling. One comenter said they have borderline personality disorder which can cause them to "act like a bitch". Yeah, well "acting like a bitch" isn't a clinical symptom. Misreading social cues (such as believing "fuck" was an acceptable word when his boss literally used it in a group chat a half hour earlier & says it constantly) & not being able to properly modulate one's inflection are actual clinical signs of autism. Again, in no way did he fly off the handle or scream at her. That of course would be unacceptable no matter someone's disability.
In fact, he was genuinely shocked and upset at the possibility that he made anyone feel uncomfortable. I also feel it is important to note that he is literally 5'1" and the least intimidating human on the planet. Also he unfortunately does not pass, so he is socially read as a woman by the majority of people right now. I feel like this adds further context to the "hostile" comment, as some were understandably thinking this HR woman felt genuinely a little rattled by a big, intimidating dude speaking harshly at her.
EDIT 3: Okay uh guess comments are locked for now, but yeah I do understand now that this is the exact language of the ADA in 1990, thank you all. I am still upset and appalled at the organization's choice to include this language in their forms when California has a free form for employeers to give to employees to have their doctors fill out. The form my partner got handed was needlessly lengthy and clearly needed to be looked over more carefully. Why include a bit of the statute that uses such outdated and awful language when a simpler, free form already exists?
I probably should have also included some other facts. I'm just not a lawyer & was just so shocked by the language I thought for sure that'd cause the most legal issues, however this organization tried to discipline my partner over the meeting notes he took after he had asked for accomadations for the second time (he was waiting for them to give him more info on forms to fill out to get accomadations/ next steps when they punished him), and now I'm starting to see that's definitely the bigger legal issue here & where I should have started.
Frankly that isn't even all they've done to him at this job, this was just the straw that broke the camel's back for me as his partner having to watch him suffer for months.
At least some replies are sane.
[–]Aghast_Cornichon 259 points 17 hours ago*
That is language that sounds like it has not been altered since the 1970's. All of those words are or were clinical, and none of them are vulgar, obscene, or slang. Many standardized forms have been amended through paperwork reduction and other modernization efforts not to include that kind of language which is both archaic, inaccurate, and potentially offensive.
But those specific words are from Federal disability anti-discrimination code.
It is also not something that a person at his employer said to him. In no way did anyone "call him a pedophile".
Your partner may have a disability claim if they deny his transcription software request, but not if he also refuses to participate in the interactive process because he takes umbrage at the presence of archaic clinical statutory language in standardized forms.
Your partner may have a sexual discrimination claim due to alleged misgendering. You didn't describe it in detail, and the details matter. It does not serve him for you to apply your experience with transphobia and discrimination in other contexts to the actual words, context, and events he experienced at work.
If he does consult with an employment discrimination attorney, he should choose one who specializes in public agency work.
But he should also be ready to be told that his intellectual disability doesn't give him the right to be aggressive with his colleagues without objection.
[–]CharlesForbin 176 points 17 hours ago*
Came here to say precisely this.
Also, OP is hysterically claiming that the form 'compared' their partner to a pedophile. To anyone who can read/write English, it very clearly doesn't. It lists a large number of conditions, which includes both your partner, and pedophilia. At no point does it imply that any of the things on the list are comparable or the same. If I were to list the colours of the rainbow, nobody would take that list to mean that red = blue.
Just reading the hysteria in OP's account, makes me suspect that they and their partner would be a HR nightmare, manufacturing baseless complaints and outrage at the slightest inconvenience. They would need to be spectacularly good at their job to tolerate that noise.
That is language that sounds like it has not been altered since the 1970's. All of those words are or were clinical, and none of them are vulgar, obscene, or slang. Many standardized forms have been amended through paperwork reduction and other modernization efforts not to include that kind of language which is both archaic, inaccurate, and potentially offensive.
But those specific words are from Federal disability anti-discrimination code.
It is also not something that a person at his employer said to him. In no way did anyone "call him a pedophile".
It sounds like your partner took personal offense at a standardized form. Their autism may require an employer to accommodate them with transcription software, but it does not require them to allow him to behave in aggressive, hostile, or threatening ways to co-workers.
He was both vulgar and incorrect.
Your partner may have a disability claim if they deny his transcription software request, but not if he also refuses to participate in the interactive process because he takes umbrage at the presence of archaic clinical statutory language in standardized forms.
Your partner may have a sexual discrimination claim due to alleged misgendering. You didn't describe it in detail, and the details matter. It does not serve him for you to apply your experience with transphobia and discrimination in other contexts to the actual words, context, and events he experienced at work.
If he does consult with an employment discrimination attorney, he should choose one who specializes in public agency work.
But he should also be ready to be told that his intellectual disability doesn't give him the right to be aggressive with his colleagues without objection.
[–]CharlesForbin 176 points 17 hours ago*
Came here to say precisely this.
Also, OP is hysterically claiming that the form 'compared' their partner to a pedophile. To anyone who can read/write English, it very clearly doesn't. It lists a large number of conditions, which includes both your partner, and pedophilia. At no point does it imply that any of the things on the list are comparable or the same. If I were to list the colours of the rainbow, nobody would take that list to mean that red = blue.
Just reading the hysteria in OP's account, makes me suspect that they and their partner would be a HR nightmare, manufacturing baseless complaints and outrage at the slightest inconvenience. They would need to be spectacularly good at their job to tolerate that noise.
To be fair, I'll call him, er, her, a potential pedophile.
SpiderBitch
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2023
Less coomertalk, more reddit postsing
>Mystery flavour arab woman wears hijab with palestinian pattern
>Joos want to control the hospital
>Mystery flavour arab woman wears hijab with palestinian pattern
>Joos want to control the hospital
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2024
What a surprise......the obvious, more sensible answer to a retarded rant gets downvoted to oblivion. Never change, reddit and their idiot user base.
MeatSuki
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 2, 2024
Apparently if you think Mickey Mouse is a boy and Minnie is a girl, then you’re agreeing that gender is a social construct. What do you all think?
Last edited by a moderator:
3deadniggers
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 20, 2024
Most hospitals are now full of DEI garbage and there's rainbows painted on everything. Would this Redditor support removing all this political stuff too?
Gender IS a social construct. Lets get rid of the whole concept and stick to biological sex. Can't misrepresent someone if it's their genetics we're judging.
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2022
Yeah, this is what i've heard it called here in Europe. I don't associate with faggots at all anymore but back in more liberal days fags were around when i partied and these motherfuckers go hard in the paint when it comes to partying on drugs. If you are already about to head home after two days of binging, fags were just getting started. Fag hedonism is on a completely different level.
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2024
Does he want to see Mickey's balls or something?
I don't see what's wrong with people separating gender from gender stereotypes. It's not like we call a mature and serious child an "adult" or an immature and dependant old person a "kid", and yet, they still act like the stereotypical opposite individual.
- Joined
- May 7, 2022
They practically invented the rave and destination orgies in Fire Island and Ibiza. Let's not even mention the NYC Club Kid scene and all the accessory drugs like weed, ket and poppers.
MeatSuki
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 2, 2024
I’m going to insert some of my own opinions on this post: I don’t think that seeing Mickey as a male and Minnie as a female because of their clothes/names/voices necessarily means that you think that gender is a social construct. I do, however, think it means that gender roles are artificial to an extent. What might be considered to be “masculine” attire by one society could be considered to be “feminine” by the next. Same goes for names (they don’t objectively have a gender).
I do think men and women generally tend to sound different and that is rooted in biology, so I would assume that a character is a specific gender because they sound like that gender. However, there are cases where someone can sound like the opposite sex and dress/look like the other gender (ex. Many traps in anime). When that happens, I’ll label that character’s gender as whatever they’re biologically stated to be, regardless of how feminine or masculine they sound/look.
Gender roles socially constructed, but gender itself is a biological reality. If a woman is named Nathan and dresses up as a guy, then her gender is still clearly female despite having masculine attributes.
Blarmed&Dangerous
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2015
It's fascinating to me the degree that the culture has just been wholesale ceded to this nonsense.
"Gender" was invented by literally one fucking pedophile in the mid-1950s. It's not a legitimate concept worth talking about.
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2017
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2018
I have to say, this post is a pretty terrible advertisement for whatever the fuck a "Gabb phone" is if these are the kind of parents who buy them.
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2019
"Work Experience is a social construct because hiring managers just base it off of whatever you wrote on your résumé, they weren't actually there overseeing your past jobs back when you work there. Only prejudiced hardasses expect it to actually reflect your actual employment history, people are really just asking what career you want to present yourself as. Someone could come in fresh out of Durgasoft and claim 'I spend eight year working for The Microsoft sir' and you wouldn't even be able to tell, in fact I bet you've hired multiple! You probably secretly think they're better workers than basic assigned-qualified bitches, and you're just overcompensating to look good to your HR friends."
Bitch, we only base our perception of biological sex off of secondary characteristics insofar as those characteristics actually signalling what sex the person is, they do not themselves define either sex and nobody outside of the gender crowd thinks it works that way. Making an educated guess on what something is, is not the same as saying "it has to be x, and if it isn't then I'll redefine the term so that it still is," it's something that any fucking mammal can do instinctually by judging a wide variety of physical attributes.
Also, their argument is presupposing that Mickey/Minnie being male and female (respectively) is some sort of viewer assumption and has never been explicitly stated in the show or by any sort of official material, which is false.
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2019
We call the male and female because of how they present, and we have no reason to doubt that presentation. There were, once upon a time, men who did their best to present as women to trick their audience, only to ruin the presentation with the reveal of their ruse. These men were called traps, because they trapped men into thinking they were women. You can put a pig in a dress, but a pig it remains. You can put a man in a dress and he remains a man.
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2021
