- Joined
- Feb 28, 2021
If he stopped after the word "angry," it would be a perfectly reasonable tweet. Shame he had to make himself look stupider than the guy going "muh termites."
Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging
- Thread starter José Mourinho
- Start date
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2021
People running cover for Haitians driving badly again. This was a response post to Tyler Sternbach telling people to shut the fuck up about Haitians.
On the brave Sir Sternbach and Maga chuds:
This guy is gonna round up all you Nazis.
This is the guy who's gonna round up you Nazis:
An AIDS faggot pimp in a weed suit, that's who.
This Troon veteran thinks only black people have a unique claim to slavery. Anything else is white supremacy.
That's right: this tranny thinks he's a part of a radfem movement in Korea. But give him some money, won't you?
On the brave Sir Sternbach and Maga chuds:
This guy is gonna round up all you Nazis.
This is the guy who's gonna round up you Nazis:
An AIDS faggot pimp in a weed suit, that's who.
This Troon veteran thinks only black people have a unique claim to slavery. Anything else is white supremacy.
That's right: this tranny thinks he's a part of a radfem movement in Korea. But give him some money, won't you?
Briananderson1138
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2022
I desperately want this troon to go off on his Negro grievance simping spiel in front of a Serb or a Greek or an Armenian or a Pole or a Korean and just see what happens.
KoldHardTruth
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2021
Not sure if it's a good place to post this but it does relate to social justice as it has to do with women's rights. What this person in the video is trying to convey, if you don't feel like having to sit and listen to the entire video, is that women that dress provocatively simply do it because they feel pressure to appease the male gaze, pretty much ignoring the fact that women dress in skimpy outfits in events that are exclusive to women (slumber parties, bachelorette parties, or even women parading around the house in skimpy pajamas). Let's not forget that women who are bisexual or lesbian also sexualize other women too. Not every woman who dresses provocatively does it because of "misogyny", there are still plenty of women out there who enjoy looking sexy:
The comments section is even worse, I bet you these were the same women who also got upset when they were dress coded in high school for showing too much cleavage or showing their navel. If you tell them to dress more modestly and tell them to cover up, you're sexualizing them and being misogynistic, if you tell them to show more skin, they'll do the same thing and say you're sexualizing them. I know the point that they're trying to make is for people to not tell women how to dress, which I can agree with, but they're going about it all wrong by making so many sweeping generalizations about men:
This person seems to talk as if ugly men aren't treated horribly by women as well, ugly people in general are seen as less worthy, it isn't just ugly women who are treated horribly. Even other women have treated unattractive women horribly. Women like these are the inverse version of angry incels:
Here's one of the few people in the comments section who actually has some damn sense and is able to look at this topic objectively:
The comments section is even worse, I bet you these were the same women who also got upset when they were dress coded in high school for showing too much cleavage or showing their navel. If you tell them to dress more modestly and tell them to cover up, you're sexualizing them and being misogynistic, if you tell them to show more skin, they'll do the same thing and say you're sexualizing them. I know the point that they're trying to make is for people to not tell women how to dress, which I can agree with, but they're going about it all wrong by making so many sweeping generalizations about men:
This person seems to talk as if ugly men aren't treated horribly by women as well, ugly people in general are seen as less worthy, it isn't just ugly women who are treated horribly. Even other women have treated unattractive women horribly. Women like these are the inverse version of angry incels:
Here's one of the few people in the comments section who actually has some damn sense and is able to look at this topic objectively:
Jacques1194
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2023
I can never tell if these people are straight up trolling or its real and they're so chronically online that they've convinced themselves that gay people are the norm and straight people are this tiny minority of people irl.
"I did a hecking heteronormalcy". These people sound like they've committed a heresy. Maybe I'm thinking too deep into this because people can interpret the image however they want, but its moreso how these people bully and harass people for liking a straight couple. I've seen it many times in fandoms I'm in.
"I did a hecking heteronormalcy". These people sound like they've committed a heresy. Maybe I'm thinking too deep into this because people can interpret the image however they want, but its moreso how these people bully and harass people for liking a straight couple. I've seen it many times in fandoms I'm in.
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2024
I never really thought that my schizo thoughts on them and how they operate might even be what they truly believe...
stinkpickle1
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2024
typical left winger, shadow boxing imaginary nazis and klansmen.
- Joined
- May 21, 2019
Whatever your sexuality is, that will seem like what is "right", natural and normal. And in turn the opposite will seem abnormal and even gross.
Of course a gay person who is rational will look around and realize that they aren't the norm, and also also realize that nature is designed for male/female interactions for the purposes of reproduction. But a gay person who is egotistical will reject that reality if it doesn't align with their self interest and their self conception as the center of the universe. It's the way the egotistical operate.
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2021
Astroturfed Evan got community noted for this 200k tweet. Predictably, he didn't actually read the source - same with his other posts.
People were pointing out mass shootings don't always involve dead people, but people shot, and blacks are overrepresented for that.
People were pointing out mass shootings don't always involve dead people, but people shot, and blacks are overrepresented for that.
stinkpickle1
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2024
Blacks make the majority of gun violence stats. Whites make the majority of gun violence headlines.
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2014
What is it with the seeming increase of cult-like SJWs projecting that cult-like mentality on non-SJWs lately?
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2024
They're aware their days are getting numbered in the general public's eyes, since more info is coming out on how they just want to give the genie that is America their power and, in a desperate attempt to save face, shift the blame to their enemies.What is it with the seeming increase of cult-like SJWs projecting that cult-like mentality on non-SJWs lately?
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
India-based people in America: SLEEP
India-based people in Britain: WOKE
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Except Americans don't mean jeets when they say "Asian."
This guy is either a mental retard who doesn't know that or is deliberately misrepresenting shit.
I don't even know what side of the issue he's coming from since all of his drawings are racial stereotypes. Is he anti or pro-racist though?
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2020
Well, the one thing I gathered from this is that someone attempted to explain the cartoon through quote tweet form on X/Twitter:
He didn’t make the cartoon, but his quote tweet did managed to get twice the amount of likes in the ten thousands. Plus, he’s Korean-American.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
It still doesn't hit because the vast majority of Americans would be utterly confused to hear "Asian" be used to describe jeets.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2021
Pretty sure it's just saying the Pajeets set themselves apart from and blame the East Asians for negative coverage, only to claim the label again when it's positive coverage. Sorta like that brand of Jew that goes from "hey fellow whites" to "um, I'm not white I'm Jewish" when it's convenient.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2017
Yeah, the cartoon seems to imply that Indians are schrodinger's asian.
Jacques1194
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2023
I'm seeing a lot of similar comments to this twitter thread. What exactly does a character have to do to prove to these idiots they are straight? Even when a guy character sleeps with hundreds of women they still insist he could be bi. This is a "Burden of Proof" fallacy, and again unless a show's creators wanted a character to be gay or bi then there's no reason to assume a character is LGBT.
