/horror/ general megathread - Let's talk about movies and shit.

Watched some more J-horror, Kyofu: The Sylvian Experiment and Infection NOT CURE, FUCK, I''M WRITING WHILE SHITTING MYSELF HALF TO DEATH IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT AND IF ANYONE SAW THIS POST THE SECOND IT CAME UP I SAID CURE INSTEAD OF INFECTION.

Kyofu started out promising and then in the last 10 minutes perfectly achieved the J-Horror cliche of being utterly anthropocentric navel-gazing about human anxieties, but up until that point it seemed like a Japanese take on From Beyond, with existential dread replacing libido as the motivation for exploration.

Alright, maybe I'm being too harsh. If you like horror primarily as a means to explore the human condition then maybe there's something here, but after getting punked once by the ending of Pulse I'm not so eager to continue entertaining this cinematic family of non sequitur - or at least, distinctly, similarly incongruous - finales.

Infection, on the other hand, was much less worthy of any "serious" (AKA makes film students feel fuzzy inside for "getting it") analysis, but so entertaining all throughout. It even has a twist ending that, rather than just being an abrupt bitch-slap by concentrated existential despair, was actually well set up and satisfying! Though perhaps my appreciation comes too easily, because Infection seemed more like a Western horror flick than anything else I've watched so far; it's like going to Japan and then eating at McDonald's, of course it will be easy to "appreciate."
 
Last edited:
Did you watch the theatrical cut or the restored Director's cut? At least the director's cut is much less choppy and some things are a bit more clear.
Directors cut, and upon some digging it does look like the real carnage in the movie was happening in the editing room and that shooting down the mines was even more nightmarish than I considered...oh yeah and blumkinhouse are set to do one of their patented reboots on the franchise
1726997796704.png

On one hand I'd love seeing Jason brought back to Manhattan. But these days they'd screw it up big time. *sigh*
Ya know... if whomever winds up gets the rights to the franchise decides on another movie, they could decide to ignore the last two non sequential movies that were not technically titled "Friday 13th" (i.e Jason Goes To Hell/Jason X), and have the new movie continue the whole picking up directly where the last movie left off tradition, with Jason's mummified corpse being dug out of a long derelict section of the Manhattan sewer in currentyear, before inevitably reviving in the morgue as per tradition and going on a rampage in New York and end with him making his way back to Crystal Lake after over thirty fucking years to set up the inevitably disappointing sequels.

Hell they could even title the movie "Friday 13th Part IX: Jason *actually* takes Manhattan"
 
Full Moon's new motion picture event, entitled "Quadrant", shows us the future of film-making, today:

View attachment 6389492

I made it maybe ten minutes before I started furiously mashing the right arrow to skip ahead. As best as I could gather, it seems to be a remake of that movie where John Connor met Drop Dead Fred and killed people in cyberspace. There are boobs which is a moral victory of sorts but it doesn't really help. In conclusion, I regret that I know this movie exists, but I had to pass along the curse to make sure I don't die in seven days.
Modern Full Moon is the worst shit ever.
 
Jason would get as far as vintage 80s Times Square, then he'd get caught in a targeting loop, he'd see somebody doing sex and drugs on one corner, start heading there, see somebody on another corner, start heading there, and then you get this Sideshow Bob vs Rakes scene where it's just Jason lumbering around Times Square in a rough circle until somebody hits him with a car because lol NYC
 
Aaaand I'm not terribly surprised that this is the direction Flanagan took with Usher. How dreadful. I shall now continue to fantasize about a Poe adaptation done by Robert Eggers.
You talked me out of watching it, but anyway, apparently there's a TV show based on Cronenberg's Dead Ringers, I just wanted to say I'm very angry about that, raargh
Now I'm starting to feel bad, because I do think it's a very good horror TV-series, all things considered. It's just the politically correct nonsense that is grating, but if you can look past that, I believe there's a good chance you will enjoy "The Fall of the House of Usher".

Of the 8 episodes, I especially liked the second episode. You have an inkling of what's about to happen, but when it happens, it is still horrifying. It seems to me that many people who have watched the TV-series remember this episode in particular.
If all the hamfisted politically correct material isn't an immediate dealbreaker, I'd encourage you to at least watch the first and second episode, and see if you want to continue.

It's just that I'd hate it if I had encouraged you not to partake in material you would have otherwise enjoyed if you hadn't listened to me! :-)

Quadrant sounds trippy. I might check it out!
 
Last edited:
Now I'm starting to feel bad, because I do think it's a very good horror TV-series, all things considered.
Well you only talked me out of watching it after having previously talked me into watching it, so overall, you broke even. Causing me to briefly consider watching a Netflix series could be counted as a persuasive win.

I have other things to clear off the list, like RAT MAN.

ratman 01.jpg

Is he rat? Or is he man? No, he is a rat/monkey hybrid, played by a two-foot-four/71 cm actor.

I notice, and not for the first time, that shower curtains don't seem to exist in exploitation movies. Presumably these women are getting water all over the floor. Is it merely an appeal to the male gaze, or is it, in fact, an uncharacteristic sign of situational awareness? Because if you've seen Psycho, you know that showering with a curtain is just asking to get stabbed.
 
Now I'm starting to feel bad, because I do think it's a very good horror TV-series, all things considered. It's just the politically correct nonsense that is grating, but if you can look past that, I believe there's a good chance you will enjoy "The Fall of the House of Usher".
I don’t have a Netflix subscription, I might pirate it and give it a watch if it’s readily available. Are its connections to Poe only superficial, or is it more inspired than advertisements are letting on?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Felis Meanis
I completely forgot about this weird little movie…gonna give it a rewatch tonight and see how it holds up.
I think it holds up pretty well. Considering that I've seen it almost a decade ago and, while vividly remembering it, don't really want to rewatch it again. Leaves a feeling of empiness inside and not really giving a good therapeutic feel of "hey, maybe my life sucks, but at least I'm not over there".
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Cherry Eyed Hamster
Well you only talked me out of watching it after having previously talked me into watching it, so overall, you broke even. Causing me to briefly consider watching a Netflix series could be counted as a persuasive win.

I have other things to clear off the list, like RAT MAN.

View attachment 6444228

Is he rat? Or is he man? No, he is a rat/monkey hybrid, played by a two-foot-four/71 cm actor.

I notice, and not for the first time, that shower curtains don't seem to exist in exploitation movies. Presumably these women are getting water all over the floor. Is it merely an appeal to the male gaze, or is it, in fact, an uncharacteristic sign of situational awareness? Because if you've seen Psycho, you know that showering with a curtain is just asking to get stabbed.
Well, I wouldn't want to make things too easy, would I? :-)

Netflix is what it is, so I completely understand and agree with you, but again: the TV-series is not all bad, and have some golden nuggets nestled into it just waiting to be explored by horror aficionados such as yourself!

Rat Man looks very, very freaky though.
Reminds me of this: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt14867006/
Then again, that's Raatma, and not Rat Man. Still "thematically" (what with the rats) relevant though!
Anyways, who uses shower curtains? You get that floor all soaked just to remind others that you will have your birthday costume at full display when cleaning yourself, in case there's some perverted Peeping Tom running about. The potential presence of murdeous psycopaths is irrelevant to this conviction.
I don’t have a Netflix subscription, I might pirate it and give it a watch if it’s readily available. Are its connections to Poe only superficial, or is it more inspired than advertisements are letting on?
Unfortunately, I haven't read The Fall of the House of Usher, but I take it you have? :-)

From what I gather from the short description from the above linked article, I'd say there are plenty of references to the story in the show, but whether or not they are substantial or superficial in nature is unfortunately something I cannot discern, as I haven't read Poe's work.

My recommendation would be for you to just sail the high seas for the first two episodes to get an idea of whether or not the show as a whole is potentially worthwhile to you, and then decide whether or not you want to continue.
 
Last edited:
Well you only talked me out of watching it after having previously talked me into watching it, so overall, you broke even. Causing me to briefly consider watching a Netflix series could be counted as a persuasive win.

I have other things to clear off the list, like RAT MAN.

View attachment 6444228

Is he rat? Or is he man? No, he is a rat/monkey hybrid, played by a two-foot-four/71 cm actor.

I notice, and not for the first time, that shower curtains don't seem to exist in exploitation movies. Presumably these women are getting water all over the floor. Is it merely an appeal to the male gaze, or is it, in fact, an uncharacteristic sign of situational awareness? Because if you've seen Psycho, you know that showering with a curtain is just asking to get stabbed.
The tag line from the UK DVD always made me laugh
D2-6IaUWoAElPM3.jpg
 
I completely forgot about this weird little movie…gonna give it a rewatch tonight and see how it holds up.
How did it hold up?

I tried watching it a few months ago and just...couldn't, it felt a little too aimless. The scene with the girls pulling tape off their nips made me a little uncomfortable too.

Kids, from 1995, is a way better take on the "stupid teenagers getting up to bad shit" genre imo, it feels like it has a point and it was written by the same guy.
 
How did it hold up?
Well it was just as gut-wrenching as I remember it being when I first saw it lol. Not sure I would quite put it at the level of squeamish and disturbing as Todd Solondz's Happiness, but it's certainly up there. They belong in the same genre: horrifying hilarity. Felt really itchy and filthy while watching it, so I guess it did its job. Wouldn't watch it again, but I recommend everyone see it at least once, at least with a barf bag on disposal. I've yet to see a film that's anything like it.
Kids, from 1995, is a way better take on the "stupid teenagers getting up to bad shit" genre imo, it feels like it has a point and it was written by the same guy.
Great movie, but also pretty disturbing (and hilarious). I need to watch more of Harmony Korine's works.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ShiftyBoi
Last edited:
Back