US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
What is Kamala even trying to do here? Who is this for? Both sides of the issue will see this as pandering. At least Hillary Clinton's infamous hot sauce comment was genuine. She actually does love Tabasco and takes it with her.

The empty suits in charge of the propaganda honestly believe they can just gaslight EVERYONE. They really think it is still 1972 and we only have 3 TV channels and they can just have the reporters control the narrative.

The Obama people who understood the internet better are either long gone, were purged for not being progressive enough or got suicided.
 
I'm not a smart guy or anything, but it seems to me like this is pretty clear and i don't see any asterisk there or any mention of background checks or assault weapons or red flag anything.
Also there isn't a solid definition of "assault weapons" either. There is nothing politicians love more than issuing bans with flexible definitions (the ATF based their whole existence around that concept). I'm sure when Kamala defines it all we would have left is muskets.
 
You are about to get thousands...nay....tens of thousands of illegal jeets crossing your border illegally from north because their study/work visa expired in Canada and they can't find any job.

Thank you for your participation.

View attachment 6445055
This is why we keep finding Jeets that have frozen to death near the northern border. For some reason they keep trying to cross in sub degree weather for reasons unbeknownst to me (feel bad for the young children and infants that have met this terrible fate, still don't believe in open borders on either side).
 
What the fuck is even "shall not be infringed"
View attachment 6444905

I'm not a smart guy or anything, but it seems to me like this is pretty clear and i don't see any asterisk there or any mention of background checks or assault weapons or red flag anything. It's pretty simple. From my class on civics at CC, it was explained to me the "shall not be infringed" was put there just in case people want to mince words or try to spin what the previous words were tryign to say.
View attachment 6444922

"Shall Not Be Infringed" wasn't a suggestion. It was a directive.
 
I swear it looks like guyliner to me, but sometimes it's a heavier effect than others. I suspect he has very thick eyelashes and the lighting can make it appear like he is wearing something.
I'm not going to shit on a dude for wearing makeup on stage or on TV, but if he is, they need to lighten up on the eyeliner.
 
If Pink ends up going down for trafficking it's going to be a hell of a schadenfreude moment after all her loud and vocal "muh feminism, muh women strong" shit she's been touring for so long.

Maybe the October Surprise is the Trump curse takes full effect and Taylor Swift gets outed as a sex trafficker.
Already happened. She was trafficked to Travis Kelce as payment for him becoming a shill for big pharma and documents leaked about how their release a sham and how they plan on breaking up once Taylor is contractually free to do so.
 
Here is a nice info.

Virginia early ballot returns favoring republican districts.

View attachment 6444411

View attachment 6444412

Omg Virginia going red.
View attachment 6444419
And don't forget: many of us live in Democrat-leaning parts of Virginia but will be early voting for Trump anyway.

Virginia has secure elections. Unless they are adding fake ballots directly at the ballot counting centers themselves, I have observed every other step of the process and it is CLEAN. And I am talking about Fairfax County. Yes, I just fucking PL'd BIGLY. Deal with it.
 
Perfectly cut. Thanks for the laugh!

https://x.com/BehizyTweets/status/1837686200599302183

Holy shit, I wished I lived in Virginia, if only to vote for Hung Cao.

This is a fantastic political ad.
Holy fuck, that's perfect. This dude is gonna go far, witness watch him.

I think Billie Eilish also has an album about eating pussy or something now.
What about dogs?
joke's getting tiring, I know.
 
In regards to another Trump vs. Harris debate happening ...

The fact that Kamala's campaign is practically begging for another one proves that she's in trouble. The "bump" she got from the first debate seems to be nothing more than a manufactured mirage, and her "town hall" with Oprah was a disaster. That's impressive, considering Oprah almost literally had to hold her hand throughout the entire thing, trying her damndest to get Kamala to actually somewhat ANSWER a question.

Trump should decline the next debate altogether, because it clearly hurts HER if he doesn't agree to it. If she really wants to get her message out there, then she should do more interviews and town halls ... But we all know that she can't.

She needs another debate with Trump to hammer in the "Orange Man Bad" narrative, because lawd knows that she doesn't have any more options at this point since she won't talk jack shit about policy and can't talk jack shit about being in the Biden Administration.

Watching the clips from the debate again, and then watching the Oprah "town hall," I am unironically believing the alcoholism rumors. The ABC moderators tried as hard as they could to guide Kamala to answer some policy questions, and Oprah was basically answering FOR her after seeing her stifling a cringe after one of Kamala's word salad answers.

The woman just spews nonsense. Every single fucking "answer" she gives to a question is a fucking filibuster. lol. It's like watching the first episode of Parks and Rec over and over and over again, except less funny because it's real life.
 
I love them, those faggots not coming together to fuck my ass raw is pretty good. lol.
The 2013 shutdown happened at a very precise time when I needed the National Archives and Records Administration to be open. They were not and it fucked me hardcore. After that, I gained a serious appreciation for a funded federal government.
I'm not going to shit on a dude for wearing makeup on stage or on TV, but if he is, they need to lighten up on the eyeliner.
Just imagine he's an Egyptian pharaoh or something and it's easier to tolerate.
 
In regards to another Trump vs. Harris debate happening ...

The fact that Kamala's campaign is practically begging for another one proves that she's in trouble. The "bump" she got from the first debate seems to be nothing more than a manufactured mirage, and her "town hall" with Oprah was a disaster. That's impressive, considering Oprah almost literally had to hold her hand throughout the entire thing, trying her damndest to get Kamala to actually somewhat ANSWER a question.

Trump should decline the next debate altogether, because it clearly hurts HER if he doesn't agree to it. If she really wants to get her message out there, then she should do more interviews and town halls ... But we all know that she can't.

She needs another debate with Trump to hammer in the "Orange Man Bad" narrative, because lawd knows that she doesn't have any more options at this point since she won't talk jack shit about policy and can't talk jack shit about being in the Biden Administration.

Watching the clips from the debate again, and then watching the Oprah "town hall," I am unironically believing the alcoholism rumors. The ABC moderators tried as hard as they could to guide Kamala to answer some policy questions, and Oprah was basically answering FOR her after seeing her stifling a cringe after one of Kamala's word salad answers.

The woman just spews nonsense. Every single fucking "answer" she gives to a question is a fucking filibuster. lol. It's like watching the first episode of Parks and Rec over and over and over again, except less funny because it's real life.
Trump should do a Twitter Town Hall with Elon Musk as the moderator. She will then screech about it's rigged in his favor and not go while Trump fields questions through Twitter. Or she goes and has to deal with unfiltered questions.
 
Trump should do a Twitter Town Hall with Elon Musk as the moderator. She will then screech about it's rigged in his favor and not go while Trump fields questions through Twitter. Or she goes and has to deal with unfiltered questions.
Why is it always that Kamala and friends get to dictate the venue anyway?
 
First off, imagine being SO obsessed with celebrity culture that you become this invested in who each of them endorse in an election. I've seen people seething online over Lana Del Rey dating a Trump supporter, too. lol. "Love is love," unless you date someone that the mob doesn't approve of! And I've seen the Lady Gaga fans having an absolute FIT online over Gaga's own father openly endorsing Trump and making multiple appearances on Fox News as of late. Gaga fans are like "She needs to denounce her own father!" and "Well, Gaga hasn't spoken out about supporting Palestine, so she's already broken my heart!" :story:

Btw, I read an article literally earlier today that showed some study that those most obsessed with celebrities have low IQs ... Juuust putting that out there. lol.

Also, I've only recently heard about this Chappell Roan person. Looks like she's acting as the new Lady Gaga or something?
I don't know who any of these people are, I just notice the pattern
 
The woman just spews nonsense. Every single fucking "answer" she gives to a question is a fucking filibuster. lol. It's like watching the first episode of Parks and Rec over and over and over again, except less funny because it's real life.
It's not even good filler. When Trump does filler you get stuff like "HARRY GET OFF YOUR ASS AND VOTE", when Kamala does filler she explains her life story and it's not even that interesting of a life story. All of it could be summed up in "boring, average woman wants to become President".

Like, do you have pets? Do you play videogames? What's your favorite perfume? Do or say something that makes you seem like you are more than just a prop they spent millions of dollars in.
 
I am interested in your evaluation of how they’ve changed over the past two decades.
One of the most blatant changes I've noticed is how the Libertarians reversed their view on boarder security since Trump entered politics. Libertarians were always strongly anti-war but also strongly pro-defense. Trump talks about building a wall and now all the sudden Libertarians are all for open boarders. Many will claim this has always been the Libertarian view but it wasn't at all, Libertarians have always said America should put more of their soldier's efforts overseas into protecting our country here at home from said overseas countries. There was also a very massive increase very fast in retards going to Libertarian conventions and clogging any meaningful discussion with ridiculous points like complaining that you need a Drivers License to drive a car with the very famous "What's next, required license to use a damn toaster!?" I refuse to believe these people are real especially considering this isn't really how average Libertarians thought through the years just to all the sudden have a bunch of people talking like retards, and it all serves a purpose to discredit the Libertarian philosophy and it WORKED. How many people will come into this thread and claim the Libertarians are worse than Democrats? A bunch and if it weren't for these people that wouldn't be happening.

Most Libertarians in the past were worried about the kinds of policies that Republicans and Democrats were signing into law, things like The Patriot Act and Military Commissions Act among many other things. Now the Libertarians are more worried about smoking weed, and yes Libertarians were always for legalizing drugs but that was mainly the side effect of their philosophies that government should be as small as possible and NOTHING should ever minimize the freedoms our Constitution gives us, same thing with their view that the government should not be a factor in any marriage, it wasn't that the Libertarians sucked dick for cock back then but rather they believed marriage is a religious matter and the government has no place in enforcing any religious matters although today they will brag about being the party that supports sucking dick for cock. Similarly, they also legit take smoking weed seriously these days beyond it being a freedom of choice thing and you have candidates that act like they are a part of AirsoftFatty's Mother Cana religion. In fact Libertarians are no longer about freedom of choice, as Libertarians like Chase Oliver are actively against State's Rights which I find shocking. The idea of being against a state's right to make their own decision on certain policies that shouldn't be on a federal level seems anti-Libertarian to me, yet you will still have Libertarians today whining about abortion being "outlawed" (it isn't) and how there should be abortions in every state regardless of how the state's population feels about the issue. I haven't even started talking about the modern Libertarian view of trans issues and drag shows (spoiler: they think every child should go see drag shows every week while smoking doobies)

In short, the Libertarian Party went from being concerned about the freedoms our Constitution gives us being stolen from us by our own government to being concerned with "legal weed for all, open boarders for all, abortions for all, troons for all, and good vibes for all". Sounds pretty familiar right? Almost as if they turned into a bunch of blue donkeys.
 
It's not even good filler. When Trump does filler you get stuff like "HARRY GET OFF YOUR ASS AND VOTE", when Kamala does filler she explains her life story and it's not even that interesting of a life story. All of it could be summed up in "boring, average woman wants to become President".

Like, do you have pets? Do you play videogames? What's your favorite perfume? Do or say something that makes you seem like you are more than just a prop they spent millions of dollars in.

Oh, the way she got to where she is now is a VERY interesting and not at all boring story, actually ... It would just ruin her if she shared it though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back