Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What is Kamala even trying to do here? Who is this for? Both sides of the issue will see this as pandering. At least Hillary Clinton's infamous hot sauce comment was genuine. She actually does love Tabasco and takes it with her.
Also there isn't a solid definition of "assault weapons" either. There is nothing politicians love more than issuing bans with flexible definitions (the ATF based their whole existence around that concept). I'm sure when Kamala defines it all we would have left is muskets.I'm not a smart guy or anything, but it seems to me like this is pretty clear and i don't see any asterisk there or any mention of background checks or assault weapons or red flag anything.
I love them, those faggots not coming together to fuck my ass raw is pretty good. lol.Me. I don't like government shutdowns. It's retarded and never, ever works.
This is why we keep finding Jeets that have frozen to death near the northern border. For some reason they keep trying to cross in sub degree weather for reasons unbeknownst to me (feel bad for the young children and infants that have met this terrible fate, still don't believe in open borders on either side).You are about to get thousands...nay....tens of thousands of illegal jeets crossing your border illegally from north because their study/work visa expired in Canada and they can't find any job.
Thank you for your participation.
View attachment 6445055
What the fuck is even "shall not be infringed"
View attachment 6444905
I'm not a smart guy or anything, but it seems to me like this is pretty clear and i don't see any asterisk there or any mention of background checks or assault weapons or red flag anything. It's pretty simple. From my class on civics at CC, it was explained to me the "shall not be infringed" was put there just in case people want to mince words or try to spin what the previous words were tryign to say.
View attachment 6444922
I'm not going to shit on a dude for wearing makeup on stage or on TV, but if he is, they need to lighten up on the eyeliner.I swear it looks like guyliner to me, but sometimes it's a heavier effect than others. I suspect he has very thick eyelashes and the lighting can make it appear like he is wearing something.
Already happened. She was trafficked to Travis Kelce as payment for him becoming a shill for big pharma and documents leaked about how their release a sham and how they plan on breaking up once Taylor is contractually free to do so.If Pink ends up going down for trafficking it's going to be a hell of a schadenfreude moment after all her loud and vocal "muh feminism, muh women strong" shit she's been touring for so long.
Maybe the October Surprise is the Trump curse takes full effect and Taylor Swift gets outed as a sex trafficker.
And don't forget: many of us live in Democrat-leaning parts of Virginia but will be early voting for Trump anyway.Here is a nice info.
Virginia early ballot returns favoring republican districts.
View attachment 6444411
View attachment 6444412
Omg Virginia going red.
View attachment 6444419
Perfectly cut. Thanks for the laugh!
Holy fuck, that's perfect. This dude is gonna go far,https://x.com/BehizyTweets/status/1837686200599302183
Holy shit, I wished I lived in Virginia, if only to vote for Hung Cao.
This is a fantastic political ad.
What about dogs?I think Billie Eilish also has an album about eating pussy or something now.
The 2013 shutdown happened at a very precise time when I needed the National Archives and Records Administration to be open. They were not and it fucked me hardcore. After that, I gained a serious appreciation for a funded federal government.I love them, those faggots not coming together to fuck my ass raw is pretty good. lol.
Just imagine he's an Egyptian pharaoh or something and it's easier to tolerate.I'm not going to shit on a dude for wearing makeup on stage or on TV, but if he is, they need to lighten up on the eyeliner.
Trump should do a Twitter Town Hall with Elon Musk as the moderator. She will then screech about it's rigged in his favor and not go while Trump fields questions through Twitter. Or she goes and has to deal with unfiltered questions.In regards to another Trump vs. Harris debate happening ...
The fact that Kamala's campaign is practically begging for another one proves that she's in trouble. The "bump" she got from the first debate seems to be nothing more than a manufactured mirage, and her "town hall" with Oprah was a disaster. That's impressive, considering Oprah almost literally had to hold her hand throughout the entire thing, trying her damndest to get Kamala to actually somewhat ANSWER a question.
Trump should decline the next debate altogether, because it clearly hurts HER if he doesn't agree to it. If she really wants to get her message out there, then she should do more interviews and town halls ... But we all know that she can't.
She needs another debate with Trump to hammer in the "Orange Man Bad" narrative, because lawd knows that she doesn't have any more options at this point since she won't talk jack shit about policy and can't talk jack shit about being in the Biden Administration.
Watching the clips from the debate again, and then watching the Oprah "town hall," I am unironically believing the alcoholism rumors. The ABC moderators tried as hard as they could to guide Kamala to answer some policy questions, and Oprah was basically answering FOR her after seeing her stifling a cringe after one of Kamala's word salad answers.
The woman just spews nonsense. Every single fucking "answer" she gives to a question is a fucking filibuster. lol. It's like watching the first episode of Parks and Rec over and over and over again, except less funny because it's real life.
Why is it always that Kamala and friends get to dictate the venue anyway?Trump should do a Twitter Town Hall with Elon Musk as the moderator. She will then screech about it's rigged in his favor and not go while Trump fields questions through Twitter. Or she goes and has to deal with unfiltered questions.
I don't know who any of these people are, I just notice the patternFirst off, imagine being SO obsessed with celebrity culture that you become this invested in who each of them endorse in an election. I've seen people seething online over Lana Del Rey dating a Trump supporter, too. lol. "Love is love," unless you date someone that the mob doesn't approve of! And I've seen the Lady Gaga fans having an absolute FIT online over Gaga's own father openly endorsing Trump and making multiple appearances on Fox News as of late. Gaga fans are like "She needs to denounce her own father!" and "Well, Gaga hasn't spoken out about supporting Palestine, so she's already broken my heart!"
Btw, I read an article literally earlier today that showed some study that those most obsessed with celebrities have low IQs ... Juuust putting that out there. lol.
Also, I've only recently heard about this Chappell Roan person. Looks like she's acting as the new Lady Gaga or something?
It's not even good filler. When Trump does filler you get stuff like "HARRY GET OFF YOUR ASS AND VOTE", when Kamala does filler she explains her life story and it's not even that interesting of a life story. All of it could be summed up in "boring, average woman wants to become President".The woman just spews nonsense. Every single fucking "answer" she gives to a question is a fucking filibuster. lol. It's like watching the first episode of Parks and Rec over and over and over again, except less funny because it's real life.
Just imagine he's an Egyptian pharaoh or something and it's easier to tolerate.
One of the most blatant changes I've noticed is how the Libertarians reversed their view on boarder security since Trump entered politics. Libertarians were always strongly anti-war but also strongly pro-defense. Trump talks about building a wall and now all the sudden Libertarians are all for open boarders. Many will claim this has always been the Libertarian view but it wasn't at all, Libertarians have always said America should put more of their soldier's efforts overseas into protecting our country here at home from said overseas countries. There was also a very massive increase very fast in retards going to Libertarian conventions and clogging any meaningful discussion with ridiculous points like complaining that you need a Drivers License to drive a car with the very famous "What's next, required license to use a damn toaster!?" I refuse to believe these people are real especially considering this isn't really how average Libertarians thought through the years just to all the sudden have a bunch of people talking like retards, and it all serves a purpose to discredit the Libertarian philosophy and it WORKED. How many people will come into this thread and claim the Libertarians are worse than Democrats? A bunch and if it weren't for these people that wouldn't be happening.I am interested in your evaluation of how they’ve changed over the past two decades.
It's not even good filler. When Trump does filler you get stuff like "HARRY GET OFF YOUR ASS AND VOTE", when Kamala does filler she explains her life story and it's not even that interesting of a life story. All of it could be summed up in "boring, average woman wants to become President".
Like, do you have pets? Do you play videogames? What's your favorite perfume? Do or say something that makes you seem like you are more than just a prop they spent millions of dollars in.
Yeah JD is married to an indian he will surely be infavor of a completely open border policy towards them!Anybody still wants to thirst over JD Vance's Indian wife or Vivek?