Diseased Open Source Software Community - it's about ethics in Code of Conducts

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
(old news that I've been meaning to post)

stenzek has taken Duckstation, perhaps the nicest PSX emulator has relicensed the project under CC-BY-NC-ND, making it basically proprietary. Believed to be in response to Arcade1Up forking Duckstation for a Simpson's Bowling arcade machine, among possible other examples. I want to point out that stenzek has previously ragequitted Duckstation before, only to return later.

1726942489342.png

Friend of the site Leah Rowe wrote an article about it, forking the GPL licensed code. Formerly calling it a GPL violation but now walking it back after talking directly with stenzek.

https://vimuser.org/duckstation.html (WARNING: Rowe's Server)
 
Hackers characters are lightly bending gender stereotypes, which troons immediately pulled over the line to say it's queer and trans symbolism
Hackers was my favorite movie growing up (cringe) and I'm actually distressed to hear that trannies are twisting the story into a pretzel to suit their agenda.

None of the main cast are pretending to be something they're not and the plot revolves around the male lead chasing a female love interest. There's also this scene

How the fuck can you watch this and think the writers were secretly pandering to trannies? :story:

I never noticed before but it sounds like Mr. The Plague voiced the creepy weirdo on the phone.
 
I'm not sure how the characters in Mr Robot are, I did not watch it, maybe someone here can share some thoughts.
There's a lot of weird sex stuff in Mr. Robot, no outright trannys, but the main antagonist cuts it close as a gay, cross dressing Chinese crimelord billionaire, well past twink death.
He thinks that dying in a nuclear meltdown in upstate New York will send him to an alternate reality where everyone is happy and his drag queen boyfriend is still alive.

It's anybody's guess if this character is flattering to a tranny as they are insane and idolize evil at an alarming rate.
 
skill issue
Uh, I guess. I still despise that moron since it could've all been done via making this a plugin.
As an example, the SSGI for the EEVEE render engine started out as a plugin, then a fork, and it was then merged into the main (EEVEE Next).
Dillongoo is too busy in his discord making excuses and spamming memes, for what little info I can gather. And with that discord being also full of kids, I can only wait for the inevitable.

It's a shame I can't edit the old post, I wanted to add a strikethrough and then link to your post to disprove that claim. At least it still follows
some principle.

One last thing: Does it work? Can you test out a quick node and render? I read on the github page that it keeps crashing.
 
Last edited:
Even Cereal (Matthew Lillard, 2nd from the right) is not even close to how a troon looks and behaves today, despite being the flamboyant gay character in the movie he is still masculine.

Hackers was my favorite movie growing up (cringe) and I'm actually distressed to hear that trannies are twisting the story into a pretzel to suit their agenda.

It was probably my favorite movie too. You know, I've probably watched it over a half dozen times though, and not once did I think that Cereal Killer was supposed to be a gay character.
 
It was probably my favorite movie too. You know, I've probably watched it over a half dozen times though, and not once did I think that Cereal Killer was supposed to be a gay character.
I watched it first when I was 15 and I didnt catch that either. I only noticed after looking at the photos and rewatching the scenes for the umpteenth time. Maybe I am trying to see something thats not there but for me it's the manners and moves that make him at least stand out.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Vecr and Dr. Sexbot
I watched it first when I was 15 and I didnt catch that either. I only noticed after looking at the photos and rewatching the scenes for the umpteenth time. Maybe I am trying to see something thats not there but for me it's the manners and moves that make him at least stand out.
I always just figured he was supposed to be the "edgy deviant" or whatever. But next time I watch it, I'll give it some thought.
 
Some startups are going ‘fair source’ to avoid the pitfalls of open source licensing (archive)
Developer software company Sentry recently introduced a new license category dubbed “fair source.” Sentry is an initial adopter, as are some half dozen others, including GitButler, a developer tooling company from one of GitHub’s founders

The fair source concept is designed to help companies align themselves with the “open” software development sphere, without encroaching into existing licensing landscapes, be that open source, open core, or source-available, and while avoiding any negative associations that exist with “proprietary.”
No more of that "open sores".
 
How long before a company rug pulls their open source contributors/users? You just know there's gonna be an epic meltdown in a few years when a company gets bought out and their new management restructures their product focus.

Sadly, the software you've been using and have helped develop is reaching its end of life. We are sorry for any inconveniences this may bring and we hope to see you in our other new and exciting product communities. Stay zesty 💖
And no, you cannot just fork it, because it's still company intellectual property. Total copyright death, code communism now
 
How long before a company rug pulls their open source contributors/users? You just know there's gonna be an epic meltdown in a few years when a company gets bought out and their new management restructures their product focus.


And no, you cannot just fork it, because it's still company intellectual property. Total copyright death, code communism now
It's a tricky situation because the problem this is attempting to solve is real. The argument used to go that you can monetize free software by selling hosting or consulting, but that doesn't hold much water when cunts like Amazon can just decide to roll in, offer your unchanged software as a service on top of their mega infrastructure, and make tons of money off your work while you don't see a dime. This has happened repeatedly.
 
The Great Wordpress war is upon us as Automattic (the company that currently owns Wordpress, and sells Wordpress hosting as a service) and its CEO Matthew Mullenweg have started a "scorched earth nuclear approach" campaign (in his own words) against WP Engine, another company that offers Wordpress hosting. The stakes are high as Wordpress constitutes almost half of all websites on the internet and hundreds of millions of dollars in profits.

A few days ago Mullenweg ran a Q&A at a huge Wordpress conference where he slandered WP Engine in a big way, including direct calls for customers to switch away from their services:


He has also written a hit piece on the official Wordpress blog, attacking several aspects of WP Engine's offering:


Excerpt:
[WP Engine] are strip-mining the WordPress ecosystem, giving our users a crappier experience so they can make more money.

What WP Engine gives you is not WordPress, it’s something that they’ve chopped up, hacked, butchered to look like WordPress, but actually they’re giving you a cheap knock-off and charging you more for it.

This is one of the many reasons they are a cancer to WordPress, and it’s important to remember that unchecked, cancer will spread. WP Engine is setting a poor standard that others may look at and think is ok to replicate. We must set a higher standard to ensure WordPress is here for the next 100 years.

Every Wordpress instance management panel includes a "WP News" widget at the top, and this blog post landed there as well, meaning WP Engine customers (and anyone else using Wordpress) who try managing their instances are treated to this obloquy and it's the first thing they see. Word is, WP Engine have already done something to remove this widget from their management UI.

In response, WP Engine have issued a Cease&Desist letter to Automattic and Mullenweg, the full text is available here: https://wpengine.com/wp-content/upl...ic-and-Request-to-Preserve-Documents-Sent.pdf

It includes a long list of accusations and documents Automattic's amusing antics very thoroughly

Excerpt:
Stunningly, Automattic’s CEO Matthew Mullenweg threatened that if WP Engine did not agree to
pay Automattic – his for-profit entity – a very large sum of money before his September 20th
keynote address at the WordCamp US Convention, he was going to embark on a self-described
“scorched earth nuclear approach” toward WP Engine within the WordPress community and
beyond. When his outrageous financial demands were not met, Mr. Mullenweg carried out his
threats by making repeated false claims disparaging WP Engine to its employees, its customers,
and the world. Mr. Mullenweg has carried out this wrongful campaign against WP Engine in
multiple outlets, including via his keynote address, across several public platforms like X,
YouTube, and even on the Wordpress.org site, and through the WordPress Admin panel for all
WordPress users, including directly targeting WP Engine customers in their own private
WordPress instances used to run their online businesses.

Chief among these are accusations of outright extortion where Mullenweg and other C-level executives at Automattic have sent text messages to WP Engine board members threatening to "go to war", unless they started paying tens of millions of dollars on an ongoing basis.

Mullenweg use his upcoming presentations and various Wordpress conferences as a bargaining chip, threatening to dedicate them to slandering WP Engine unless they paid up, up until the very last moment where he sent them a photo of the audience waiting to hear his speech, with the message that he could shift gears and turn his talk into “just a Q&A” if WP Engine agreed to pay up.

1727205378378.png

Mullenweg also alleged that WP Engine have fired an employee that spoke up against them agreeing with Automattic that they do not contribute to open source as much as they should. Here's what a hacker news user has to say (could be true or false):

It looks like people here are missing the context of the source of the issue between Matt and WP engine. Couple days ago he posted on X that wpengine has similar revenue to automattic, yet doesn’t contribute back to open source as much as they promised to (5 hour per week per employee or something like that). A wpengine employee replied to a post saying that management doesn’t allow them to contribute to Wordpress open source because it doesn’t align with KPI targets. That employee got fired the next day. That’s when Matt’s issue with wpengine escalated.

Of course, as Automattic own Wordpress, they surely would like if their competitor's employees were dedicating 12.5% of their job to working for their benefit.
 
Wayland news everyone:
Valve Merge Request on FreeDesktop Git

Apparently the Wayland committees have been slow as molasses and Valve has become fed up with them not moving forward on pressing issues. So they have developed their own client server protocols, that have been rolled out and used on their Linux devices as far as I understand. Now they ask to merge their tried and tested protocol

The Wayland community seems to be seething in the comments, fearing - correctly - that their oh so holy committee will lose decision making power
 
Winamp of Winamp 2.95 fame recently open sourced their music player, You might be ecstatic that your favorite program from Windows XP will be maintained by the community and get better and bett... STOP, Just check out this license. Here's some interesting snippets:

4. Contributions​

  • Contribution to Project: You are encouraged to contribute improvements, enhancements, and bug fixes back to the project. Contributions must be submitted to the official repository and will be reviewed and incorporated at the discretion of the maintainers.

5. Restrictions​

  • No Distribution of Modified Versions: You may not distribute modified versions of the software, whether in source or binary form.
  • No Forking: You may not create, maintain, or distribute a forked version of the software.
  • Official Distribution: Only the maintainers of the official repository are allowed to distribute the software and its modifications.
You might wonder, how for project hosted on GitHub, a developer is both supposed to be encouraged to contribute AND prohibited from making a fork. Just this line skyrocketed the repo's fork counter to 234 (as of posting and still counting). Additionally, a clause like this is against GitHub ToS. (For uninitiated, providing contributions on GH requires a fork) But that's not the best part.
The best part is by releasing WinAmps source code they accidentally leaked:
If you ever wondered what happened to Winamp after NullSoft, they got bought by AOL and later by Radionomy and Targetspot (Ad company), which it's CEO said he had great plans for WinAmp, mainly making it a Web Client and a music NFT marketplace.
Edit: If it makes you sad, consider using WACUP, community patches to base Winamp instead.
 
The Wayland community seems to be seething in the comments, fearing - correctly - that their oh so holy committee will lose decision making power
Good. I lost all respect for Wayland community fags when they not only did nothing about Drew DeVault starting a hate campaign against Vaxry but contributed to it. They don't deserve power.
 
It's a tricky situation because the problem this is attempting to solve is real. The argument used to go that you can monetize free software by selling hosting or consulting, but that doesn't hold much water when cunts like Amazon can just decide to roll in, offer your unchanged software as a service on top of their mega infrastructure, and make tons of money off your work while you don't see a dime. This has happened repeatedly.
This is also why a lot of open source business software puts the desired features behind an API they host. Rocketchat does this.
 
You might wonder, how for project hosted on GitHub, a developer is both supposed to be encouraged to contribute AND prohibited from making a fork. Just this line skyrocketed the repo's fork counter to 234 (as of posting and still counting). Additionally, a clause like this is against GitHub ToS. (For uninitiated, providing contributions on GH requires a fork) But that's not the best part.
The best part is by releasing WinAmps source code they accidentally leaked:
it's gonna be so much worse since given that GitHub tracks the code changes people make, they're going to get turbo sued since many of the forks and history make it super clear that they open-sourced so much shit they wern't allowed to (I'm sure Dolby will be really happy to heat thier proprietary audio codec library got open-sourced without thier permission)
 
Back