Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.2%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 94 25.7%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 62 16.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 143 39.1%

  • Total voters
    366
It took so fucking long to render all these DENIED.
When one of the DENIED texts is upside down, it appears that the 'N' is backwards because all of the other letters look right. This was driving me nuts until I realized why.

I'm not asking you to do anything, by the way, I just wanted to let you know as a friend.

-- Sent from my Shower

(love it btw)
 
So, in an effort to dazzle Judge Pussy Liquor with technical bullshit, Nick inadvertently made her review the whole 4 hour thing and stumble upon the whiskey squirt ramblings? Am I understanding it right?
 
It’s not just in a court of law where everything you say can be used against you, Rekieta.

Rekieta's Franks Motion was DENIED

View attachment 6453483

It took so fucking long to render all these DENIED.
It almost feels silly to take a victory lap over this because it was so fucking obvious that the practicing lawyers, non-practicing lawyers, and non-practicing non-lawyers realized what utter bullshit Nick's argument was.

What makes it so infinitely satisfying is what a smug little faggot he was about this obviously nonsensical motion.

That's why I'm glad it was so thoroughly smacked down with the judge even taking a moment to comment on the incompetence of Nick's Barneswalker lawyer in waiving any objection to probable cause. You know this cocksucker would have been smug beyond belief if the court had somehow taken pity on him and decided to give him that Barnes hearing despite the utter weakness of his arguments.

Not only did the judge rule the way we said was most likely, but for exactly the same reasons this abjectly incompetent moron ridiculed smugly.

Suck it Balldo. Cope, seethe, punch yourself in the face like a fucking mongoloid some more.

"But muh watermarks." You seriously thought that was a winner of an argument. You utter fucking idiot.
 
Last edited:
This is where we get into "Alford Plea" territory, which has been discussed at length in this thread
I thought an Alford was maintaining innocence in the face of overwhelming evidence. Nick's claim is essentially that the state is trying to extort him and kidnap his kids. Are alford pleas able to be made under duress without raising eligibility to overturn the plea?
 
It almost feels silly to take a victory lap over this because it was so fucking obvious that the practicing lawyers, non-practicing lawyers, and non-practicing lawyers realized what utter bullshit Nick's argument was.

What makes it so infinitely satisfying is what a smug little faggot he was about this obviously nonsensical motion.

That's why I'm glad it was so thoroughly smacked down with the judge even taking a moment to comment on the incompetence of Nick's Barneswalker lawyer in waiving any objection to probable cause. You know this cocksucker would have been smug beyond belief if the court had somehow taken pity on him and decided to give him that Barnes hearing despite the utter weakness of his arguments.

Not only did the judge rule the way we said was most likely, but for exactly the same reasons this abjectly incompetent moron ridiculed smugly.

Suck it Balldo. Cope, seethe, punch yourself in the face like a fucking mongoloid some more.

"But muh watermarks." You seriously thought that was a winner of an argument. You utter fucking idiot.
This is the fascinating part. Balldo, on X, was literally arguing with people who called the arguments dumb. He was making fun of Potentially Criminal and Uncivil Law on both X and YouTube. Why? Why not just shut the fuck up and let the legal process playout?

What are we supposed to conclude? He is a retard and really thought they were good arguments? Or that he knew they were bullshit, tried anyway and then weirdly started arguing with people who knew they were bullshit? For reasons????
 
It’s not just in a court of law where everything you say can be used against you, Rekieta.

Rekieta's Franks Motion was DENIED

View attachment 6453483

It took so fucking long to render all these DENIED.
People using YouTube as an opportunity to get money from people - well, I never!

Remember how for years Nick was so proud to call himself King Grifter, because he extracted the most superberries from his audience?
 
View attachment 6450926
Bizarro Ralph and Drexel are live laughing at Rekeita. Rekeita's misfortunes always bring a smile to people's faces. :)
Kurt making women having to start wearing adult diapers.

Screenshot_20240924_113340_YouTube.jpg
 
Last edited:
>thread hasn't jumped 20 pages in an hour
Nick, you better be visiting Sir Richie tonight and getting a nice eight ball. We're counting on you to lawsplain the actions of those corrupt Kandiyohi County judges.
OMNILOSING.

The stakes have never been higher for all true Amerifags. Will there be a Boston Plea party?
Evil mastermind Eric July and his goon Aaron Imholte are holding Nick hostage so he can't release the bodycam footage! If only we had that, it would be obvious poor Nicky Rackets is a victim of the government, and we're next!
 
I'm more interested on people who still are subbed to his Patreon are saying, Rekieta can only seethe in silence.
It's mostly Still-Life posting swastikas and talking about killing Jews on the philosemitic boomercon site. Otherwise:
2024-09-25 - 11_08_32 - (4) So it doesn’t matter if the cops lie on a search ... - RekietaLaw ...png

"But how do you know you aren't just a brain in a vat?"
2024-09-25 - 09_49_26 - (4) Streaming Tonight! - RekietaLaw Community.png

Dissension in the ranks:
2024-09-25 - 11_13_18 - (4) Streaming Tonight! - RekietaLaw Community.png

Nick has found a kindred spirit:
2024-09-25 - 11_11_58 - (4) Streaming Tonight! - RekietaLaw Community.png
 
Are alford pleas able to be made under duress without raising eligibility to overturn the plea?
"I'm not guilty because I didn't do it but the evidence is overwhelming that I did it so I'm taking the deal" is functionally the same as "I'm not guilty, there is an elaborate conspiracy to frame me for neglecting my children and having a huge amount of personal use coke. I have no evidence of this conspiracy, and the evidence against me is overwhelming, therefore I'm taking the deal."

In both pleas, you're taking a plea deal while maintaining innocence. That being said, Nick is a faggot smarmy like that doesn't make claims of grand conspiracy, he just gets everyone around him to say it while he smugly eats a single Dorito and heavily implies a grand conspiracy. He will never go before the judge or the jury and say outright, "the state is after me, I am being framed, the police, CPS, and the prosecutor are actively committing dozens of felonies in order to silence me, destroy my reputation, put me in prison, and tear apart my family." He will never say that, even in an Alford, so the point is moot.
 
Back