Annealing Crater
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2020
Fucking bugged law mechanics. The family annihilation clock has ticked one minute closer to midnight.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When one of the DENIED texts is upside down, it appears that the 'N' is backwards because all of the other letters look right. This was driving me nuts until I realized why.It took so fucking long to render all these DENIED.
It almost feels silly to take a victory lap over this because it was so fucking obvious that the practicing lawyers, non-practicing lawyers, and non-practicing non-lawyers realized what utter bullshit Nick's argument was.It’s not just in a court of law where everything you say can be used against you, Rekieta.
Rekieta's Franks Motion was DENIED
View attachment 6453483
It took so fucking long to render all these DENIED.
I thought an Alford was maintaining innocence in the face of overwhelming evidence. Nick's claim is essentially that the state is trying to extort him and kidnap his kids. Are alford pleas able to be made under duress without raising eligibility to overturn the plea?This is where we get into "Alford Plea" territory, which has been discussed at length in this thread
"You guys are fucking embarrassing"It’s not just in a court of law where everything you say can be used against you, Rekieta.
Rekieta's Franks Motion was DENIED
View attachment 6453483
It took so fucking long to render all these DENIED.
This is the fascinating part. Balldo, on X, was literally arguing with people who called the arguments dumb. He was making fun of Potentially Criminal and Uncivil Law on both X and YouTube. Why? Why not just shut the fuck up and let the legal process playout?It almost feels silly to take a victory lap over this because it was so fucking obvious that the practicing lawyers, non-practicing lawyers, and non-practicing lawyers realized what utter bullshit Nick's argument was.
What makes it so infinitely satisfying is what a smug little faggot he was about this obviously nonsensical motion.
That's why I'm glad it was so thoroughly smacked down with the judge even taking a moment to comment on the incompetence of Nick's Barneswalker lawyer in waiving any objection to probable cause. You know this cocksucker would have been smug beyond belief if the court had somehow taken pity on him and decided to give him that Barnes hearing despite the utter weakness of his arguments.
Not only did the judge rule the way we said was most likely, but for exactly the same reasons this abjectly incompetent moron ridiculed smugly.
Suck it Balldo. Cope, seethe, punch yourself in the face like a fucking mongoloid some more.
"But muh watermarks." You seriously thought that was a winner of an argument. You utter fucking idiot.
This oneHe is a retard and really thought they were good arguments?
People using YouTube as an opportunity to get money from people - well, I never!It’s not just in a court of law where everything you say can be used against you, Rekieta.
Rekieta's Franks Motion was DENIED
View attachment 6453483
It took so fucking long to render all these DENIED.
Kurt making women having to start wearing adult diapers.View attachment 6450926
Bizarro Ralph and Drexel are live laughing at Rekeita. Rekeita's misfortunes always bring a smile to people's faces.![]()
Evil mastermind Eric July and his goon Aaron Imholte are holding Nick hostage so he can't release the bodycam footage! If only we had that, it would be obvious poor Nicky Rackets is a victim of the government, and we're next!OMNILOSING.
The stakes have never been higher for all true Amerifags. Will there be a Boston Plea party?
I'm more interested on people who still are subbed to his Patreon are saying, Rekieta can only seethe in silence.Do you think we’ll get a Rekieta seethe stream today?
It's mostly Still-Life posting swastikas and talking about killing Jews on the philosemitic boomercon site. Otherwise:I'm more interested on people who still are subbed to his Patreon are saying, Rekieta can only seethe in silence.
"I'm not guilty because I didn't do it but the evidence is overwhelming that I did it so I'm taking the deal" is functionally the same as "I'm not guilty, there is an elaborate conspiracy to frame me for neglecting my children and having a huge amount of personal use coke. I have no evidence of this conspiracy, and the evidence against me is overwhelming, therefore I'm taking the deal."Are alford pleas able to be made under duress without raising eligibility to overturn the plea?