Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

Well, yes, a certain type of man has long understood that pretending to go along with women's BS can definitely gain access to sex. Moira Greyland, in her autobiography, The Last Closet, flatly states that men are smarter than women and do this because it works.
I wish more people knew about Moira Greyland and what she went through.
 
I wish more people knew about Moira Greyland and what she went through.
Normies should be forced to read that book. Feminists who historically allied themselves with the LGBPedo movement should have it thrust it their stupid, lying faces when they try to deny their culpability in all this gender nonsense and the connection between fags and pedophilia.
 
Well, yes, a certain type of man has long understood that pretending to go along with women's BS can definitely gain access to sex. Moira Greyland, in her autobiography, The Last Closet, flatly states that men are smarter than women and do this because it works.
>when you are so stupid pointing out how stupid you are leads to worse results for everyone
it's sad but it's true
but frankly i lack the patience to deal with such nonsense
 
Normies should be forced to read that book. Feminists who historically allied themselves with the LGBPedo movement should have it thrust it their stupid, lying faces when they try to deny their culpability in all this gender nonsense and the connection between fags and pedophilia.
I've said it before, but feminists supported, and many of them still support, troons because they see troons as ultra-faggy, and therefore safe and emasculated, men. They also thrill to the idea of trooning out their own sons, flipping them over to the superior sex and gaining attention and adulation for being more progressive than that bitch across that street who think she's all that just because her husband bought her a BMW.
 
I wish more people knew about Moira Greyland and what she went through.
It all goes back to the authors and (((publishers))). The same apparatus that brought us Twilight (as mentioned earlier in this thread) has a 70-year history, beginning, as most of this sort of stuff does, in the 1960s. Put it all together:
- On average women have a preference for stories and words
- On average women have all sorts of psychological defecits that make them vulnerable to psychological manipulation (a horse that has already been beaten to death in this thread.)
Controlling the direction of literature is a surefire way to influence the behavioral patterns of women in one way or another.

Edit: forgot a crucial detail. The people writing the stories for this agenda need to be absolutely mind-broken, and mind-broken they were. Moira was collateral damage.
 
Last edited:
I've said it before, but feminists supported, and many of them still support, troons because they see troons as ultra-faggy, and therefore safe and emasculated, men. They also thrill to the idea of trooning out their own sons, flipping them over to the superior sex and gaining attention and adulation for being more progressive than that bitch across that street who think she's all that just because her husband bought her a BMW.
Yes, this is exactly correct. But, goddamn, you can't say it or you get screeched at and b&.
 
On a side note has anyone else ever met women that were die-hard fans of something like Twilight or Harry Potter only to find out they never read any of the books or even saw all of the movies?
This is who everything traditionally male-oriented in entertainment is now attempting to cater to by becoming a "lifestyle brand" so to speak. It's not about enjoying interesting stories, it's about buying T-shirts and showing off how hip you are with the current thing.
 
The greatest women writers, George Eliot, Wharton, Austen, Woolf, O'Connor, Dickinson, would have been forgotten if not for male critics championing their work.

Women have typically dominated in novels. Maria Edgeworth was the most popular author of her time, but nobody save academics remembers her mediocre work. If a man believes in his art, then he is usually willing to sacrifice his career and short-term success for the sake of perfection. No woman would do what Flaubert did and 'die before death'. A woman sees big sales as proof of her quality; many men would see success as a cause for self-doubt.

Many female writers, primarily novelists, obsess either about crass moralism (always lacking in gravity) or self-indulgent neuroticism. Contemporary poetry is basically venting about trauma, true or otherwise; there is no genius or mystery to be found in it. Could a woman write about guilt and sin in the way Baudelaire did? Could she write the grotesque characters of Browning? What about the playfulness and irony of Shakespeare's sonnets? Great poetry, as with great prose, requires cold precision in self-judgement, but also an awareness of all human emotions (good and bad), to convey experience convincingly. The reason why free verse is so predominant now, other than its general ease, is because writing in metre is too strict, too cold. It excludes those who do not write in it ("poetry is aristocrat" said Hazlitt). This does not gel with society's obsession with levelling everything down to mediocrity. That the best writers of Free Verse, TS Eliot, Wallace Stevens, Pound, were aware of metre -Eliot basically wrote in traditional Blank Verse without line breaks- is proof enough that the other 99% that is published is simply bad prose masking itself as something higher.

Dickinson is the exception to this for she is masculine minded (this could be applied to several other female writers). Rarely does metaphysics broach the feminine narrative. And literature is such an artificial artform that metaphysics is essential.

Typically, films will try to show a character as being smart by making him well-read. This is nonsense and usually written by a screenwriter who is not too smart himself but is believed by an audience who do not read. I studied two degrees in English Literature at a middling and a well-regarded university and much of the sentiments expressed in both can be found in your average office space. I would say now I am more comfortable with someone who has learned perspective on their own terms then one who has read a profound thought in a book (a hard lesson to learn if you’ve read too much too early). Schopenhauer was right that too much book learning is like wearing a wig: you might be able to refer to facts and quotes, but it is not a part of your character. It is like reading a thousand romance novels but never falling in love.

Literature courses are dominated by women, and they tend to do quite well because they are great at regurgitating theories and know what to write to achieve a quality grade. Often my seminars featured women verbatim quoting essays as opinions. Women are liberal only because their teachers, those in power, tell them to be. It really is all about power.

There is a brilliant short story by Maugham that conveys this quite well. Writing proficiently and being well-read is a hobby any average person can learn. Similarly, many learn to play an instrument, but how many compose an unforgettable tune?
 
Last edited:
No woman would do what Flaubert did and 'die before death'.
Emily Bronte did. But Bronte is like Ada Lovelace in computer science. She's the exception that proves the rule. There are many men who are her equal, and almost no women.

You can also see the difference in the mediocrities, like Robert Ludlum or RA Salvatore. An unremarkable male writer writes trope-filled trash, some forgettable pulp about a spy, a mountain man, a space-faring adventurer, and the like. Mediocre women seem to all write the exact same thing, yet another story about an unremarkable self-insert who captures the attention of a dreamboat man because she existed in his presence.
 
Last edited:
I am a Womb-Man and I'm hear to say
Having sex with women is mighty gay
Just call up the boys, get the bussy on tap
As a bonus, your penis gets crusted with crap

1727548129554.png
 
Mediocre women seem to all write the exact same thing, yet another story about an unremarkable self-insert who captures the attention of a dreamboat man because she existed in his presence.
I've never understood that Woman thing of wanting to be "mysterious" and "magical", etc, etc. How is it that women still do not grasp that men only see that as playing games/manipulation, and get extremely annoyed by it?
 
I've never understood that Woman thing of wanting to be "mysterious" and "magical", etc, etc. How is it that women still do not grasp that men only see that as playing games/manipulation, and get extremely annoyed by it?

Because the brutal reality that women are primarily sought after because of their looks is one of those many ugly truths of nature that our brains have evolved workarounds to avoid ever really facing. They have to believe there's something about them other than how big their boobs are, how soft their skin is, and how shiny their hair appears that attracts us, otherwise, they feel rather awful.
 
They have to believe there's something about them other than how big their boobs are
This is also why foids are obsessed with collecting retarded labels. They think a word salad of retarded labels makes them heckin unique and special

"Wow, so you're a Gemini who loves travel, pumpkin spice latte. the office and yoga??? You're so interesting and unique!" said literally 0 men, ever
 
I'm wondering, being totally out of the YA loop, are there even equivalent novels aimed at boys/young men? Like, wankfests instead of schlickfests?
I guess boys just cut out the middle man and watch straight up porn when they have tingles, and would rather read about dragons and spaceships if they read a book.
I was, and am, a big reader so I went through a lot of YA books when I was that age.
The ones for the boys are typically Fantasy. We got fucking magic swords and dragons and battles and sorcery and all that good shit. Eragon, Percy Jackson, Rangers Apprentice, Fablehaven, most anything Brandon Sanderson writes, lots of stuff that if not aimed towards boys is very appealing to them.
Girls liked the post apocalyptic books like Hunger Games where there’s two guys fighting over a special girl who will save the world.
 
Last edited:
Back