Trading the forex fully automated martingale

  • 🔧 Actively working on site again.
You think I'm pulling rank? are you that dense? nobody is going to create an account and use it for years just to waste it on a scam, they always use new accounts for that, that was the point.

Many scams I seen were always theoretically possible, its the execution what matters and he's not sharing the code nor allowing anyone to use the bot, any other proof can be faked.
Absolutely not true.

I have posted these trades immediately after I executed them, and then I told you what was happening with them as they were trading blah blah blah.

You could have loaded up a 4X terminal and played along and watched it you could have seen the charts that I was producing were legit.

It is impossible I was bullshiting

Trades are open

Screenshot_20240928-035942.pngScreenshot_20240928-035928.png
 
Last edited:
Markets are closed for the weekend but trades are open, do you keep your trades open for the entire weekend or do you trade in after hours?
 
Markets are closed for the weekend but trades are open, do you keep your trades open for the entire weekend or do you trade in after hours?
Some people trip out and want to close their trades during the weekend, but I just I just leave them open.. things will pick up right where we left off at 4:00 p.m. on Sunday which I think is midnight in London it's the beginning of Monday morning.

Basically with the forex, trading stops on Friday at 4:00 p.m. Central Texas time and it starts back up at 4:00 p.m. on Sunday Central Texas time.

According to what my trading program says, I'm expecting to make a $400 profit (18%) on this position and I currently sit with about a $2,200 balance right now which will leave me at $2,600 when this is finished.
Screenshot_20240928-035942.pngScreenshot_20240928-035928.png
Let me say this a different way instead of saying that trading is closed I should say that the markets are closed and that trades remain open.

Notice my heavy exposure right now.

I have slightly above 1,300 of margin used I've got about $800 free margin remaining, but guess what.. I'm going to walk that bitch right into a corner I don't mind I'm a cowboy.

The eagle has landed.

When I was homeless during this project in California, I literally slept on every sidewalk in this video. Yup. All the while carrying a shoulder bag that contain two IBM think pads and wading through herds of tweakers oh my God.

My friends call me zero.


I acquired the nickname of zero because it is the center of positive and negative numbers.

It is a very interesting part of the world of mathematics. There are things about the number zero that fascinate mathematicians around the world. At the most basic level we have the issue where you cannot divide by zero.

Video: math movie zero


The markets are closed yet trades remain open.
Screenshot_20240928-035942.pngScreenshot_20240928-035928.png

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Many scams I seen were always theoretically possible,

That's why the model needs to be objectively validated, and the easiest way to do that is using real, historical, representative data with a simulation that has as much computing power as one can get at a reasonable cost. One could execute a significant number of runs with an obscene amount of data in a short period of time and easily prove the validity of the model to at least 3σ, which would be more than good enough to demonstrate it isn't a fluke. Doing it with 100% transparency would be the easiest way to do it.

But, it could also be done using a hermetic black box test. A black box, running on a verified hermetic platform, with no possibility for external interference would be nearly as good as 100% transparency since the only thing that could influence the output for a given input would be the black box itself. If any kind of fuckery was going on it would be impossible for the black box to reach 3σ statistical validity because the statistical analysis is intentionally designed to detect fuckery. You could subject the data to multi-dimensional analysis so you wouldn't need to rely on just one type of statistic analysis. It would be essentially 99.7% as good as 100% transparency. That's probably about as good as you are going to get with a black box analysis, and it allows the person with the black box not to reveal its internal contents. It would be a win/win for both sides, the person with the black box can prove that their box isn't bullshit, and the skeptic can prove with actual data that what the person with the black box is saying is true to 99.7% certainty.

I doubt I could come up with a better compromise than that.
 
Last edited:
That's why the model needs to be objectively validated, and the easiest way to do that is using real, historical, representative data with a simulation that has as much computing power as one can get at a reasonable cost. One could execute a significant number of runs with an obscene amount of data in a short period of time and easily prove the validity of the model to at least 3σ, which would be more than good enough to demonstrate it isn't a fluke. But you are correct it would have to be done 100% transparently. It would be the only way to provide objective verification.

I suspect that you are referring to back testing?

I don't really want to get into an endless debate about why back testing is useless, but you can feel free to start another thread somewhere and talk about it on your own time.

I'm going to give it to you in a nutshell, but beyond that I'm not interested to debate it because it's child's Play and it's nonsense.

Most people build their trading bots using the basic free indicators which are all based on moving averages.. a moving average is simply a memory of the past and is in no way an indication of what is going to happen in the future. A moving average will usually have a period variable parameter and what people do when they back test is they change that. Variable to different values until they produce a successful back test.. the only problem is that trading in real time will require a different value to be fed to the period variable for your basic indicators or moving averages.

Back testing is useless and I do not wish to debate this with you.

The markets are closed and trades are open.
 
I suspect that you are referring to back testing?

I don't really want to get into an endless debate about why back testing is useless, but you can feel free to start another thread somewhere and talk about it on your own time.

I'm going to give it to you in a nutshell, but beyond that I'm not interested to debate it because it's child's Play and it's nonsense.

Most people build their trading bots using the basic free indicators which are all based on moving averages.. a moving average is simply a memory of the past and is in no way an indication of what is going to happen in the future. A moving average will usually have a period variable parameter and what people do when they back test is they change that. Variable to different values until they produce a successful back test.. the only problem is that trading in real time will require a different value to be fed to the period variable for your basic indicators or moving averages.

Back testing is useless and I do not wish to debate this with you.

The markets are closed and trades are open.

Two things:

1) You don't get to dictate what people discuss in a given thread

2) I wasn't interested in discussing this or any other topic with you. Note that i never once quoted anything you wrote, or asked for more information from you.

I don't see how you expect anyone to take you seriously when you are a schizocow that lives in his car and are quite clearly an old, mentally ill, terminal autist. It's easy to see why cybertoaster believes you are full of shit.

Consider a name change to "TradeCow"
 
Last edited:
Two things:

1) You don't get to dictate what people discuss in a given thread

2) I wasn't interesting in discussing this or any other topic with you. Note that i never once quoted anything you wrote, or asked for more information from you.

I don't see how you expect anyone to take you seriously when you are a schizocow that lives in his car and is quite clearly an old, mentally ill, terminal autist. It's easy to see why cybertoaster believes you are full of shit.

Consider a name change to "TradeCow"
Why don't you just fuck off and let tradecode do his thing? He clearly doesn't want your or our advice.
 
Two things:

1) You don't get to dictate what people discuss in a given thread

2) I wasn't interesting in discussing this or any other topic with you. Note that i never once quoted anything you wrote, or asked for more information from you.

I don't see how you expect anyone to take you seriously when you are a schizocow that lives in his car and is quite clearly an old, mentally ill, terminal autist. It's easy to see why cybertoaster believes you are full of shit.

Consider a name change to "TradeCow"

Please show us all in realtime how you can backtest and then trade live.

Do it here.

Go ahead.

Dont just share your theories, dont just run your piehole.. show us..

Your move.
 
Has anyone written a plugin yet that just lets ChatGPT guess randomly at what might help your investment accounts? Like you just let ChatGPT loose and tell it to work hard and try its best with all your money during open trading hours?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: fentanyl tester
Has anyone written a plugin yet that just lets ChatGPT guess randomly at what might help your investment accounts? Like you just let ChatGPT loose and tell it to work hard and try its best with all your money during open trading hours?

Well, you have two issues. The first is that ChatGPT, just like most computer programs, can never be truly random, they use a random generator that is only pseudo-random. It is random enough that it is almost impossible to tell the pseudo-random from the true random, but, with enough data generated, you could start to see the difference. The second is that if it is truly random how would that be better than any other random mechanism?

Why don't you just fuck off and let tradecode do his thing? He clearly doesn't want your or our advice.

Where was I giving him any advice? I wasn't. Learn to read, moron. I was only conjecturing on the potential for his methodology to not be completely bullshit. If you didn't notice, I was actually in favor of his theory since it has real math and statistical analysis behind it, but that it needed to be proven.
 
Hello chatgpt, can you write for me a program in Atari basic that is written for an Atari 800 that is an Atari ping pong game that also has BBs telephone connection for multiple players and the ping and pong functions are written in assembler?



Creating a full Atari ping pong game with multi-player support and integrating both BASIC and assembly code is an advanced task. I'll break this down into parts:

1. **Game Logic in Atari BASIC**: The main structure of the game, including the ball's movement, paddle control, and basic collision detection, can be written in Atari BASIC.
2. **Assembly for Ping and Pong Functions**: The actual mechanics for moving the paddles or the ball (ping and pong) will be handled in assembly for faster performance.
3. **BBs Telephone Connection**: Implementing this would involve interfacing with hardware or software that supports modem communication, likely needing custom solutions for the Atari 800 era.

Here's a simplified outline of how to write this. I'll start with the BASIC structure, and I'll show how to interface with assembly code for the ping and pong functionality.

### Step 1: BASIC Outline for the Ping Pong Game

```basic
10 GRAPHICS 0 : REM Set to text mode or use GRAPHICS 1 or 2 for basic visuals
20 POKE 710,0 : REM Set the color for the background
30 DIM P1(2),P2(2),BALL(2) : REM Positions for paddles and ball
40 P1(0)=5 : P2(0)=5 : BALL(0)=20 : BALL(1)=10 : REM Starting positions
50 REM Initialize paddles and ball
60 REM Main game loop
70 GOSUB 200 : REM Call assembly routine for 'Ping'
80 GOSUB 300 : REM Call assembly routine for 'Pong'
90 REM Update ball position
100 BALL(0)=BALL(0)+DX : BALL(1)=BALL(1)+DY
110 REM Check for paddle and wall collisions
120 IF BALL(0)=0 OR BALL(0)=39 THEN DX=-DX
130 IF BALL(1)=0 OR BALL(1)=24 THEN DY=-DY
140 GOTO 70

200 REM Call Ping assembly function
210 REM Insert assembly routine here
220 RETURN

300 REM Call Pong assembly function
310 REM Insert assembly routine here
320 RETURN
```

### Step 2: Assembly for Ping and Pong (Moving Paddles or Ball)

In this example, the "Ping" function could move the first player's paddle, and the "Pong" function could move the second player's paddle.

You would need to write these functions in 6502 Assembly, which can be stored in memory and called from Atari BASIC.

**Example Assembly Code (simplified)**

```assembly
; Pong.asm - move the paddle

ORG $0600 ; Memory location for assembly code

PING:
LDA P1Y ; Load paddle 1 Y position
CMP #1
BCS PING_DONE
SEC
SBC #1
STA P1Y ; Update paddle 1 Y position
PING_DONE:
RTS

PONG:
LDA P2Y ; Load paddle 2 Y position
CMP #1
BCS PONG_DONE
SEC
SBC #1
STA P2Y ; Update paddle 2 Y position
PONG_DONE:
RTS
```

The above assembly code handles simple paddle movement for two players. You'd need to use `XIO` commands to load and call these from BASIC.

### Step 3: BBs Telephone Connection (Modem Support)

To connect multiple players using a modem for the Atari 800, you'd likely have to work with existing software libraries or BBS systems. The Atari 800 can interface with modems through the RS232 interface, but writing a full modem-handling routine from scratch is complex.

- **Steps**: Interface through the modem using BASIC’s `XIO` commands and set up appropriate AT commands to manage communication between multiple players.

Example of a modem initialization (simplified):

```basic
10 OPEN #1,8,0,"R2:" : REM Open RS232 for modem
20 PRINT #1;"ATDT5551212" : REM Dial a number using the modem
30 REM You would handle communication here
40 CLOSE #1
```

### Combining BASIC and Assembly
You can call the assembly functions from Atari BASIC using memory locations where the assembly code is loaded. Use the `USR` function to call them.

```basic
70 X=USR(1536) : REM Call assembly code for PING (assuming code is loaded at $0600 = 1536)
80 X=USR(1550) : REM Call assembly code for PONG
```

### Full Implementation Considerations
- **Graphics Mode**: Switch between text and low-res graphics for better visuals.
- **Player Input**: Use joystick or keyboard input for paddle movement.
- **Modem Communication**: You’ll need to manage packet transfer to synchronize multiple players.

This setup provides a foundation, but further development is necessary for full gameplay and multiplayer modem support. You would also need debugging tools to ensure smooth communication between BASIC, assembly, and modem handling.
 
Read the room before posting this:

1) You don't get to dictate what people discuss in a given thread
I don't see how you expect anyone to take you seriously when you are a schizocow that lives in his car and is quite clearly an old, mentally ill, terminal autist. It's easy to see why cybertoaster believes you are full of shit.

Consider a name change to "TradeCow"

Why can't people just come here, read the thread and participate without shitting it up?
 
Read the room before posting this:




Why can't people just come here, read the thread and participate without shitting it up?

Just because you don't like how people respond doesn't mean anyone is shitting up anything. Also, my assertion is correct, an OP of a thread has no say in how a thread evolves and what is posted in it. It means absolutely nothing if you disagree since that is a fact.
 
Back