The British Summer of Discontent - The growing civil unrest of the native British population, sparked by the murder of 3 young girls in Southport

Under Communism there's no useless eaters, and people misattribute the expression "he who shall not work shall not eat" to Christ, but it was Lenin or some other senior commie who said this).
Off-topic, but: while Lenin did say it, he didn't invent it. It was originally a New Testament quote attributed to Paul, in 2 Thessalonians 3:10:

For even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: “The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat.”
 
So again, please tell me how the JCP under a Tory government was "fucking over the disabled and unemployed"
Much like the non-disabled benefit claimants there are are a number of factors involved. At its core though are two main things.

Some people who genuinely need the support and have full intent to do whatever work they can do at the first available opportunity have had difficulties due to actual problems with the system that need addressing. These can be resourcing issues, process problems and many more. At its core though it is not perfect and there are fair critiques to level.

The overwhelming majority of complaints come from people who fail to understand that the benefit system is for survival only. Eating anything but the basics, having Netflix subscriptions, new phones, Glastonbury tickets etc. are not essentials. This gets even worse when those claimants have dependents of their own especially if they decide to dip into the money allocated for those dependents for some more non-essential stuff.

This is an over simplification, there are a lot of complicated situations and it is not one size fits all. But that simplifies it.
I'm Scottish.
Everyone makes mistakes.
 
Any more word on that big protest that is supposed to go down in October? It seems like the natives have calmed down a bit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Suicide
Cheddar man
The model they used to ‘prove’ he has dark features is bollocks. I watched this play out on tv - the guy they found an almost exact match with at the tested loci actually looks like him, facially. It’s quite bizarre. There was a lot of interest in it. Then suddenly there was a volte face and we were being bombarded with ‘black!’ When there’s zero evidence for it.
Eye colour is a bit more certain, but the model they used for skin is garbage.
Some nice haplo/read sperging at the link below.
My guess would be blue eyes and a slightly swarthy skin tone, rather like modern Inuit, but he could also have quite European type pale skin.
The skull to soft tissue reconstruction is otherwise excellent, and it’s a shame it got politically pozzed
 
There was a lot of interest in it. Then suddenly there was a volte face and we were being bombarded with ‘black!’ When there’s zero evidence for it.
Also even though the skelly itself is remarkably intact, the DNA is still incredibly degraded. It's possible he was darker than current English, but lots of things are possible. Like you said, there's no actually reliable evidence for it. But it will now go down in KAAAAAANGZ lore.
 
Has anyone heard about this injuction with Kier Starmer? people are saying its an open secret but what are they talking about? was he in a gay relationship with that paki guy?


Cheddar man

The model they used to ‘prove’ he has dark features is bollocks. I watched this play out on tv - the guy they found an almost exact match with at the tested loci actually looks like him, facially. It’s quite bizarre. There was a lot of interest in it. Then suddenly there was a volte face and we were being bombarded with ‘black!’ When there’s zero evidence for it.
Eye colour is a bit more certain, but the model they used for skin is garbage.
Some nice haplo/read sperging at the link below.
My guess would be blue eyes and a slightly swarthy skin tone, rather like modern Inuit, but he could also have quite European type pale skin.
The skull to soft tissue reconstruction is otherwise excellent, and it’s a shame it got politically pozzed
Also even though the skelly itself is remarkably intact, the DNA is still incredibly degraded. It's possible he was darker than current English, but lots of things are possible. Like you said, there's no actually reliable evidence for it. But it will now go down in KAAAAAANGZ lore.
You do get swarthy English people, look at Rowan Atkinson and Russell Brand
 
Has anyone heard about this injuction with Kier Starmer? people are saying its an open secret but what are they talking about? was he in a gay relationship with that paki guy?
Lord Alli? Sounds like Facebooker’s Facebooking.

Starmer is suspiciously well groomed but he’s got enough enemies now who would spread a story like that.
 
You seem to be labouring under the impression that there are no people indigenous to these islands, when we have genetic proof of that very fact in the form of direct, living descendents of cheddar man, a pre-historic, indigenous inhabitant of the south of England. Turns out we're all over the place, but they don't want to admit it because that fucks over their "everyone's an immigrant" narrative.

Get out of my bog begoddamn.

"Indigenous" just means "whoever was here when the white man showed up." Doesn't matter if your people settled the area in 2000 BC, 200 AD, 1200 AD, or 1820 AD...if you're not white, and you were the last people there when paleface arrived on a ship, you're "indigenous." If you're white, obviously, you're not "indigenous," even if your ancestors were never more than 200 miles from your current location for the last 5000 years.

Even if Cheddar Man had dark skin, I don't know what the fuck that's supposed to prove. I think the logic is, "Your ancestors had more melanin than you, that means the entire population of Somalia is entitled to move here because they have more melanin than you, too." I have ancestors who had tails; that doesn't mean every monkey in the jungle gets to live here.
 
"Indigenous" just means "whoever was here when the white man showed up."
The formal definition, which they like to retreat to when challenged, is "the first people to inhabit a region". They don't like this definition though, because it makes the southern Irish and western britons indigenous, so they invent caveats and complain about admixture, even though native Britons share about the same amount of DNA with their neolithic ancestors as North American natives do with the Clovis people. So yes, eventually it boils down to "they aren't white", which is already being used to justify schizo claims that black africans are the original native population of the British Isles. The only question is when those claims stop being treated as schizo nonsense and become mainstreamed. I'm guessing it'll be entering mainstream academia by the 2040s, assuming the trend remains constant.

Even if Cheddar Man had dark skin, I don't know what the fuck that's supposed to prove. I think the logic is, "Your ancestors had more melanin than you, that means the entire population of Somalia is entitled to move here because they have more melanin than you, too."
That's pretty much it. Same sort of logic as saying some historical figure with a tan must actually have been the darkest, blackest sub-saharan nigger you can imagine. It's part of a long-term push of the idea that the British Isles are a land of immigrants with no native population, so we shouldn't complain about immigration now.
 
Taking away fuel payments from our grandparents and parents is not what we voted for.
I'd have voted for it if it had been on the table.

If there's no money to feed little kids at school a hot meal, it's time for the pension scroungers and hospital bed blockers to do this nation a solid and just fucking die.

A strong showing by a flu strain that's not well covered by the vaccine this winter could really improve the public finances.
 
The formal definition, which they like to retreat to when challenged, is "the first people to inhabit a region". They don't like this definition though, because it makes the southern Irish and western britons indigenous,

They also don't like it because it means basically no tribe in the Americas is "indigenous," so the definition in the Americas gets beaten with a cudgel until it's unrecognizable, but then it is just as equally applicable to the Boers as it is to the Aztecs. So, once again, it gets twisted around to mean, "not white."

It's really more a gut-level thing, than anything. They're trying to find a word for savages with bones through their noses, no written history, and a penchant for cannibalism who get displaced in a flash by civilized people. We had perfectly good words for them, like "savages," "barbarians," "uncivilized," and so on, but those words are mean.
 
Even if Cheddar Man had dark skin, I don't know what the fuck that's supposed to prove. I think the logic is, "Your ancestors had more melanin than you, that means the entire population of Somalia is entitled to move here because they have more melanin than you, too." I have ancestors who had tails; that doesn't mean every monkey in the jungle gets to live here.
The scientifically interesting thing (if it were actually true) would be blue eyes developing first when it has generally been assumed complexion changed first and relatively rapidly. But since there's no real evidence for anything but the eyes part (it is genetically simpler), it simply may or may not be true. Make the skin Caucasian colored and there are people currently walking around looking exactly like that still.
 
You do get swarthy English people, look at Rowan Atkinson and Russell Brand

Yup. This is a genetic remnant of the pre indo-european people and it pops up from time to time.

My father is almost completely British Isles ancestry, and he had olive skin and black hair. He looked like a med. But every genetic test indicated british isles ancestry.

The fact is, it doesnt matter what colour skin cheddarman has. He is the ancestor of the native british, not the ancestor of the bantu savages the managerial class has been importing.
 
If there's no money to feed little kids at school a hot meal, it's time for the pension scroungers and hospital bed blockers to do this nation a solid and just fucking die.
There is money for school meals, and there is money for old people. The problem is the bastards in power who are spending that money on putting up immigrant scroungers in hotels at a staggering cost.
The ‘elderly’ contingent at the moment are the earliest boomers, born as the war ended. The ones I know grew up with rationing, no electricity or heating past a single coal fire, and outside toilets. They worked hard, from 14 or 16 when they left school, paid in all their lives and now own a small semi they keep neat. I do not begrudge them a penny. They are entitled to the healthcare and pensions they paid all their lives for.

We should be looking after our own cradle to grave, and while there’s a single British kid going to school hungry or a single pensioner too poor to put the heating on we shouldn’t be spending a single penny on young fighting age men from the third world.
 
I'd have voted for it if it had been on the table.

If there's no money to feed little kids at school a hot meal, it's time for the pension scroungers and hospital bed blockers to do this nation a solid and just fucking die.

A strong showing by a flu strain that's not well covered by the vaccine this winter could really improve the public finances.
If you can’t feed your kids just sell them to a BBC presenter.

Plus the savings won’t be spent on kids, they’ll be spent on shipping in Africans.
 
Back