The Easy to Track Username Hall of Shame - Reading warning labels are for chumps.

I am fulfilling your request.

@Isle of Sippy decided to do something quite silly and I decided to Google his username out of curiousity. There are a number of interesting results, but I found that he is/was active on a place called "Neet Forum." In the following archived link (which is visually SFW, ideologically NSFL) a user with the exact same name positively responds to "The pedophile manifesto" (if you search for "Isle of Sippy" in the page, you will see what I'm talking about).

This user is no simple retard or lolicon: he is an unabashed, unashamed pedophile.
So pedophile degenerates get promptly and rightfully banned but pedo-furfag turbo-degenerates do not and are still allowed to freely shit up the site? What the fuck? Why?
 
Report them for being pedophiles. If that doesn't work, you can make a thread in Talk To Staff and ask them there. I've seen a couple exceptions to the "no pedophiles" rule, whether intentional or not, for people who are lolcows like Pamperchu or William Cannon who both have accounts.
 
The bova fans are true rock eating retards. The nova hates jews was funny af to me
@Scorcher565 seems to use the same username everywhere and got doxed within 5 minutes of posting in the Nova_Online thread
1727473503344.png

Archive
1727473513444.png

1727473558785.png
1727473597449.png


Reddit
1727473655219.png
 
So pedophile degenerates get promptly and rightfully banned but pedo-furfag turbo-degenerates do not and are still allowed to freely shit up the site? What the fuck? Why?
It's called letting the cow deliver the milk, faggot. If a cow just walked up to you and openly milked content for you, would you be such an idiot not to exploit it?

I usually love your posts but: When will people learn to stop doxing newfaggots, even if it's obvious. I don't see anything that degenerate or funny, just a guy who probably was kinda cringe at some point.

Let them DO something funny, don't scare them off right away. Jesus christ.
 
The image that was found turned out to be computer generated, NOT real child porn. The state police officer lied about the image; we have evidence to prove it, that evidence comes for the FBI.
They are legally the same thing. A guy in Florida recently got charged for CP, despite his images having been AI-generated. I doubt that the laws in Illinois are really that different
 
They are legally the same thing. A guy in Florida recently got charged for CP, despite his images having been AI-generated. I doubt that the laws in Illinois are really that different
They just changed the law, and it don't go into effect till next year. The law may be challenged because they add cartoons, sculpture, and painting to it as well.

Ai although is computer generated is different then someone using Daz3D, blender or AutoDesk Maya to make something from scratch.
 
They just changed the law, and it don't go into effect till next year. The law may be challenged because they add cartoons, sculpture, and painting to it as well.
Parts of the law may be challenged, but the ones that pertain to what you did will stay, as the content which you have has been ruled to be illegal since the times of Miller V. California and New York V. Feber. You, my man, are fucked, and the best course of action for you (other than killing yourself) is to accept a guilty plea and hope that you don't die of old age before you get out
 
They just changed the law, and it don't go into effect till next year. The law may be challenged because they add cartoons, sculpture, and painting to it as well.

Ai although is computer generated is different then someone using Daz3D, blender or AutoDesk Maya to make something from scratch.
Dude...you're going to prison, and you're going to take black-snake by the mile.tenor32.gif
 
Last edited:
Back