Why are so many "gender critical feminists" not critical of The Science in any other way?

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Literally all we're asking is critical of medical science in general. Take chemicals in the drinking water. I don't see feminists talking about that. Its stuff like that.

I bet if you looked at jab data it's mostly liberal white women who accepted becoming guinea pigs.

 

[WelperHelper99]

I bet if you looked at jab data it's mostly liberal white women who accepted becoming guinea pigs.

That and people that didn't want to lose their jobs, but yeah. Getting the jab because of heckin science and group think was very much a liberal thing in general. But I bet no small part was women.

 

[Lidl Drip]

Literally all we're asking is critical of medical science in general. Take chemicals in the drinking water. I don't see feminists talking about that. Its stuff like that.

"If it doesn't happen in my animes it doesn't happen irl".

There's like a million crunchy moms out there who are anti vax and make their own granola with agave syrup cause they don't want to eat any processed foods and think processed sugar will kill you, but they aren't a trope in anime or porn so you've never heard of it.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

There's like a million crunchy moms out there who are anti vax and make their own granola with agave syrup cause they don't want to eat any processed foods and think processed sugar will kill you, but they aren't a trope in anime or porn so you've never heard of it.

That's pretty smart. Not the screeching about anime, but the no processed sugar thing.

 

[WelperHelper99]

"If it doesn't happen in my animes it doesn't happen irl".
There's like a million crunchy moms out there who are anti vax and make their own granola with agave syrup cause they don't want to eat any processed foods and think processed sugar will kill you, but they aren't a trope in anime or porn so you've never heard of it.

I didn't even mention anime, absolute hysteria. Also you make fun of the crunchy moms, so your information is already tainted. I'm talking science. Fucking actual science. Last time I heard a woman discuss metallurgy was trade school, never since, most of them dropped out of the course. Metals of all types actually has quite a few medical applications. Has to be extremely pure and well machined. Women don't talk about that. Instead you focus on specific topics that only benefit you instead of society as a whole. That's feminism in a nutshell.

 

[The Ugly One]

They don't have a mindset of evaluating whether things are true, reliable, or credible. They evaluate whether things are personally beneficial, will increase their social standing, can be used as a cudgel against people they don't like, etc.

"If it doesn't happen in my animes it doesn't happen irl".

There's like a million crunchy moms out there who are anti vax and make their own granola with agave syrup cause they don't want to eat any processed foods and think processed sugar will kill you, but they aren't a trope in anime or porn so you've never heard of it.

This is a good point. There are a lot of pornos about annoying feminists who uncritically follow the soyence about the vax and global warming and whatever but not trannies, and then they do a threesome.

 

[Lidl Drip]

Women don't talk about that. Instead you focus on specific topics that only benefit you instead of society as a whole. That's feminism in a nutshell.

Yes feminism talks about topics that concern women, that's the whole point you fucking sperg.

 

[WelperHelper99]

Yes feminism talks about topics that concern women, that's the whole point you fucking sperg.

The point is why you, gender critical feminists, don't question the science in any other way. Everything you listed concerns womens topics in some way. You don't question the climate, you don't question the way things are made, all of that shit just exists in a void according to all your posts. You apparently don't care how your car is built, how your roads are constructed, the type of power that keeps electricity flowing to your cities- you don't question science at all. Its incredibly short sighted.

 

[Perun]

The point is why you, gender critical feminists, don't question the science in any other way. Everything you listed concerns womens topics in some way. You don't question the climate, you don't question the way things are made, all of that shit just exists in a void according to all your posts. You apparently don't care how your car is built, how your roads are constructed, the type of power that keeps electricity flowing to your cities- you don't question science at all. Its incredibly short sighted.

holy shit are you retarded, we talk about these things on non=feminist sites, do you talk about 9/11 conspiracies on a site about men's rights? If it's not related directly to women's issues there is no point discussing it in a women's only space. Health/medical/conspiracy shit that affects both genders can be discussed in the many other available spaces that focus on those topics.

You don't question the climate

Why the fuck would we be discussing climate conspiracies on platforms for feminist discussion. How do you know we don't discuss those things, just elsewhere? We literally said we do. If I post on a conspiracy site should I start my posts with "as a radical feminist i think that..." otherwise you will continue repeating that radfems don't question anything?

 

[Silence of the Troons]

This is just a thread for spiritual homosexuals to jerk each other off about their own so-called rationality.

"Why do I never see fememenists question The Science [tm] aside from troons?"
"Here are examples of that happening."
"But why don't they do it on the websites that I use and in the ways that I want?"

Why the fuck would we be discussing climate conspiracies on platforms for feminist discussion. How do you know we don't discuss those things, just elsewhere? We literally said we do. If I post on a conspiracy site should I start my posts with "as a radical feminist i think that..." otherwise you will continue repeating that radfems don't question anything?

Obviously yes so that male users can find an excuse to derail the conversation every time a radfem posts

 

[Larry David's Opera Cape]

spiritual homosexuals

Every radfem is a lesbian* so speak for yourself, sis.

*to the extent lesbianism is a thing at all

 

[God of Nothing]

@Larry David's Opera Cape, you've got your answer: they are legitimately too short-sighted to apply their logic on anything outside of their immediate vicinity, which just leads to the current problems they suffer because they missed the symptoms for the cause (which they basically are).
so my first post in this thread

 

[Justa Grata Honoria]

Not vaccinated, basic search anywhere, you would find that coronavirus vaccines always failed due the fact they mutate too fast and have terrible side effects and outcomes. All with the power of soyence.
Flu vaccines are useless also there hasn't been any mortality changes since they got on the market. Again all of this you will found out, if you actually bothered to search and read with the power of soyence.

You confuse propaganda with soyence .

I had to drag kicking and screaming my husband away from getting those bloody things. And then he pretended it never happened like the rest of the " i trust everything that daddy government says" .
Mind you i am a slavic janny with room temp iq . The only difference between me and western believers with much higher iq is the fact i know how blatant propaganda sounds .

Give them time to learn that the government is filthy liar and treat it as such.

 

[isalaide]

Why would women offer you their opinions and ideas about general science? I'm just curious as to why you think women would speak to you about this. Do you teach science at a school? In what context would this conversation arise?

 

[Terrorist]

Women dominate alternative and holistic medicine because women have always been more critical of western medicine

We MOIDS simply don’t understand the power of Reiki Crystal Healing

 

[WelperHelper99]

holy shit are you retarded, we talk about these things on non=feminist sites, do you talk about 9/11 conspiracies on a site about men's rights? If it's not related directly to women's issues there is no point discussing it in a women's only space. Health/medical/conspiracy shit that affects both genders can be discussed in the many other available spaces that focus on those topics.

If your movement has no room for discussing the big questions on how the world works and what forces govern it then it isn't a good movement. Its a dead end. It hyperfocuses on a niche and as such caps itself on the amount of knowledge it can bring to the table by excluding ideas and questions that don't exactly fit the mold.

Why the fuck would we be discussing climate conspiracies on platforms for feminist discussion. How do you know we don't discuss those things, just elsewhere? We literally said we do. If I post on a conspiracy site should I start my posts with "as a radical feminist i think that..." otherwise you will continue repeating that radfems don't question anything?

Like a quantum particle, it must be observed in order to confirm its existence. So far this conversation has been incredibly shallow, recycling the same ideas over and over. Tell me something you question then that is out of the box. If you cannot, it only proves the topic of this conversation right.

 

[Perun]

If your movement has no room for discussing the big questions on how the world works and what forces govern it then it isn't a good movement. Its a dead end. It hyperfocuses on a niche and as such caps itself on the amount of knowledge it can bring to the table by excluding ideas and questions that don't exactly fit the mold.

if a movement focuses on many things at once it will go no where because people with different interests are all pulling it in different directions. Right now the majority is radfem mothers focused on the tranny menace because it is a threat to their children, they don't want to be forced to troon out their kids or have them taken away and they don't want trannies in their spaces. Discussing random conspiracy theories can wait. I don't know why you think one movement has to focus on every question in the world, that's not how you get shit done. Discussing irrelevant shit like that would also alienate new members, you don't just throw people into the deep end, if the front page of radfem sites was discussing conspiracy theories the average normie would immediately disregard everything they have to say on the tranny issue. Seriously, do you even know how to get people to your side.

Like a quantum particle, it must be observed in order to confirm its existence. So far this conversation has been incredibly shallow, recycling the same ideas over and over. Tell me something you question then that is out of the box. If you cannot, it only proves the topic of this conversation right.

Tell me, what does the average normie question? and why do you expect every random radfem to be a conspiracy theorist when that isn't even the norm for most of the population. Good on them for even seeing the insanity of the fucking tranny bullshit when it seems like most people just nod along with whatever they are told.

Sure I like Pollack's and Hillman's alternative theories on cell structure, Gilbert Lings ideas on membrane pumps , Halton Arp's ideas on redshift, the static universe hypothesis, as for actual conspiracies I like the ideas on cluesforum and miles mathis site. If you're not familiar with those it means you're a massive faggot and don't know shit. Oh right and vaccines but at this point most people are sceptical surely. I'll guess now you'll shift the goal posts and say the conspiracy theories I like are dumb so it doesn't count.

 

[Meriasek]

holy shit are you retarded, we talk about these things on non=feminist sites, do you talk about 9/11 conspiracies on a site about men's rights? If it's not related directly to women's issues there is no point discussing it in a women's only space. Health/medical/conspiracy shit that affects both genders can be discussed in the many other available spaces that focus on those topics.

Why the fuck would we be discussing climate conspiracies on platforms for feminist discussion. How do you know we don't discuss those things, just elsewhere? We literally said we do. If I post on a conspiracy site should I start my posts with "as a radical feminist i think that..." otherwise you will continue repeating that radfems don't question anything?

As an aside, feminists do talk about these things, of course. Usually in the sense of "x happens, women most affected". Like climate change. Disproportionately affects women, somehow. I'm sure the moon landings had the same effect.

 

[WelperHelper99]

if a movement focuses on many things at once it will go no where because people with different interests are all pulling it in different directions. Right now the majority is radfem mothers focused on the tranny menace because it is a threat to their children, they don't want to be forced to troon out their kids or have them taken away and they don't want trannies in their spaces. Discussing random conspiracy theories can wait. I don't know why you think one movement has to focus on every question in the world, that's not how you get shit done. Discussing irrelevant shit like that would also alienate new members, you don't just throw people into the deep end, if the front page of radfem sites was discussing conspiracy theories the average normie would immediately disregard everything they have to say on the tranny issue. Seriously, do you even know how to get people to your side.

If you only target one group, you will only end up with a small chunk of the pie. It sacrifices future growth potential. Silencing discussion of ideas cripples you in the long run.

Tell me, what does the average normie question? and why do you expect every random radfem to be a conspiracy theorist when that isn't even the norm for most of the population. Good on them for even seeing the insanity of the fucking tranny bullshit when it seems like most people just nod along with whatever they are told.

Everyone questions something. Everyone. Could be something small. Why is the milk jug shaped the way it is?

Sure I like Pollack's and Hillman's alternative theories on cell structure, Gilbert Lings ideas on membrane pumps , Halton Arp's ideas on redshift, the static universe hypothesis, as for actual conspiracies I like the ideas on cluesforum and miles mathis site. If you're not familiar with those it means you're a massive faggot and don't know shit. Oh right and vaccines but at this point most people are sceptical surely. I'll guess now you'll shift the goal posts and say the conspiracy theories I like are dumb so it doesn't count.

I actually am familiar with those lol.

 

[Gravemind]

Yes feminism talks about topics that concern women, that's the whole point you fucking sperg.

That's not the point of the thread though. You just came in, kvetched about feminists focusing on women's health like it somehow proves that gender critical feminists do actually give a critical eye to other aspects of medical science that don't involve women's health, and have continued being vitriolic about this point ever since.

holy shit are you retarded, we talk about these things on non=feminist sites, do you talk about 9/11 conspiracies on a site about men's rights? If it's not related directly to women's issues there is no point discussing it in a women's only space. Health/medical/conspiracy shit that affects both genders can be discussed in the many other available spaces that focus on those topics.

Why the fuck would we be discussing climate conspiracies on platforms for feminist discussion. How do you know we don't discuss those things, just elsewhere? We literally said we do. If I post on a conspiracy site should I start my posts with "as a radical feminist i think that..." otherwise you will continue repeating that radfems don't question anything?

Okay. So post examples of these discussions being had about other subjects on other sites then. First you said "feminism doesn't have to come up because there's no reason for feminism to come up", and now you're saying "feminists absolutely discuss other fields of medical sciences on other sites".

Prove it. You're making the claim. Prove your own case. Otherwise, it can be assumed that you're not arguing in good faith (which is already incredibly evident), and that you (and others) really only came in here to stir the pot. While also kind of proving OP's point.

You confuse propaganda with soyence .

It's the same thing though.

Why would women offer you their opinions and ideas about general science? I'm just curious as to why you think women would speak to you about this. Do you teach science at a school? In what context would this conversation arise?

Feminists. The topic is about gender critical feminists. Not women in general.

If you hear "feminist" and immediately equate it to "women in general", I think you may have bigger problems you need to address for yourself first and foremost.

if a movement focuses on many things at once it will go no where because people with different interests are all pulling it in different directions. Right now the majority is radfem mothers focused on the tranny menace because it is a threat to their children, they don't want to be forced to troon out their kids or have them taken away and they don't want trannies in their spaces. Discussing random conspiracy theories can wait. I don't know why you think one movement has to focus on every question in the world, that's not how you get shit done. Discussing irrelevant shit like that would also alienate new members, you don't just throw people into the deep end, if the front page of radfem sites was discussing conspiracy theories the average normie would immediately disregard everything they have to say on the tranny issue. Seriously, do you even know how to get people to your side.

Have you considered that you're only writing every other subject off as "random conspiracy theories" purely because they have nothing to do with the thing seemingly most pertinent to you?

Sure I like Pollack's and Hillman's alternative theories on cell structure, Gilbert Lings ideas on membrane pumps , Halton Arp's ideas on redshift, the static universe hypothesis, as for actual conspiracies I like the ideas on cluesforum and miles mathis site. If you're not familiar with those it means you're a massive faggot and don't know shit. Oh right and vaccines but at this point most people are sceptical surely. I'll guess now you'll shift the goal posts and say the conspiracy theories I like are dumb so it doesn't count.

Your misplaced contention and elitism potentially based upon some form of inferiority complex is palpable. I don't know about those things, and I would be interested in learning about them, but not when the hyper-defensive response over my ignorance is just some rabid gnashing of teeth like that. Why would I want to explore any further into a given subject if I'm gonna get my head snapped off over it?