Careercow Donald J Trump - 45th/47th President of the USA, convicted felon, Epstein bro, Putin simp, serial liar, sore loser, cheat and the Chris-Chan of Presidents. THIS IS NOT A POLITICAL DEBATE THREAD.

Is that more likely, or is it more likely this is a staged photo? I wonder..
You mean staged like this:
trump-arlington-1291667952.jpg


It's also pretty funny to think that despite having a Trump love safe space in the main U.S politics thread trumpies are just far too sensitive to let even a single thread be allowed to exist in peace that makes fun of Trump who is an objectionably laughable human being.
 
Is that more likely, or is it more likely this is a staged photo? I wonder..
I don't think it's likely at all.

Here's a perfectly reasonable scenario:

  • Harris is on phone A with the earbuds plugged in. Maybe to Biden? Idk, doesn't fucking matter.
  • Someone else calls on phone B. Maybe it's an aid's phone? who knows. Doesn't fucking matter.
  • Who's called on phone B has important information. So she puts it on speaker and sets it on the table, putting phone A in her lap or pocket. Now the earbud cord goes to her lap.
  • Now she can talk to both whoever is on phone A in the bud and Phone B who's on speakerphone.
  • Phone A can hear what information phone B has to convey because the buds have an open mic and they don't need a middle man to tell them what phone B had to say about something.
This is a very simple premise, one that most normal people can come up with who aren't obsessed with conspiracies and explains whatever Trump is asserting here in a much more reasonable way than some clandestine plot for a psyop.
 
I don't think it's likely at all.

Here's a perfectly reasonable scenario:

  • Harris is on phone A with the earbuds plugged in. Maybe to Biden? Idk, doesn't fucking matter.
  • Someone else calls on phone B. Maybe it's an aid's phone? who knows. Doesn't fucking matter.
  • Who's called on phone B has important information. So she puts it on speaker and sets it on the table, putting phone A in her lap or pocket. Now the earbud cord goes to her lap.
  • Now she can talk to both whoever is on phone A in the bud and Phone B and who's on speaker.
  • Phone A can hear what information phone B has to convey because the buds have an open mic.
This is a very simple premise, and explains whatever Trump is asserting here in a much more reasonable way than some clandestine plot for a psyop.
You are putting entirely too much effort for something that literally doesn't matter. It is fake outrage bait created by a floundering old man to distract people from all the other dumb shit he did/said today. He dangled shiny shit-covered keys in front of your face.
 
You're so right, Kamala just has the new bluetooth AirPods with the cable that hangs down loose. What a design.
They're definitely not the apple USB-C earpods that just aren't plugged in.
Idk if you’re blind but the EarPods are clearly plugged into the phone. Either way, if the photo was “staged”, so what? You think the vice president doesn’t do stuff like what she’s claiming she’s doing daily?
 
You're so right, Kamala just has the new bluetooth AirPods with the cable that hangs down loose. What a design.
They're definitely not the apple USB-C earpods that just aren't plugged in.
Kamala refuses to use Bluetooth for operational security reasons. She's absolutely correct to do so, anything transmitted over the air is going to be much less secure than something transmitted across a wire. After Trump's complete lack of respect for opsec and boomer presidents that don't understand what that word means, it's very refreshing to see a politician dedicated to keeping data safe.

Either the plug can't be seen from that angle or she's got another device on her lap. Either option could be correct.
 
I don't think it's likely at all.

Here's a perfectly reasonable scenario:

  • Harris is on phone A with the earbuds plugged in. Maybe to Biden? Idk, doesn't fucking matter.
  • Someone else calls on phone B. Maybe it's an aid's phone? who knows. Doesn't fucking matter.
  • Who's called on phone B has important information. So she puts it on speaker and sets it on the table, putting phone A in her lap or pocket. Now the earbud cord goes to her lap.
  • Now she can talk to both whoever is on phone A in the bud and Phone B who's on speakerphone.
  • Phone A can hear what information phone B has to convey because the buds have an open mic and they don't need a middle man to tell them what phone B had to say about something.
This is a very simple premise, one that most normal people can come up with who aren't obsessed with conspiracies and explains whatever Trump is asserting here in a much more reasonable way than some clandestine plot for a psyop.

If you hold your iPhone at the same angle as in the photo with a charging cable plugged in, as long as the tail sweeps to the left (her right) slightly, you can’t see it anyway.

I could believe a VP possibly having to avoid Bluetooth for security reasons.

Or it’s on speakerphone and she just hasn’t taken the buds out.

Or it’s literally just that they came in to take the photo after the call was finished so as not to be a nuisance, and nobody thought it was a big deal.

I mean if it was Trump he’d just use his second, personal iPhone supplied by a known Russian agent but that’s obviously fine.
 
It's also pretty funny to think that despite having a Trump love safe space in the main U.S politics thread trumpies are just far too sensitive to let even a single thread be allowed to exist in peace that makes fun of Trump who is an objectionably laughable human being.
Why don't they just make a Kamala Harris thread? There's clearly plenty of material if she's apparently a laughing psycho who shits everywhere and can't string two sentences together. It couldn't just be that they're upset they hitched their wagon to a punchline, right?
Or, to be fair, it could also just be that they're newfags who don't know how to make a thread
 
Why don't they just make a Kamala Harris thread? There's clearly plenty of material if she's apparently a laughing psycho who shits everywhere and can't string two sentences together. It couldn't just be that they're upset they hitched their wagon to the biggest punchline of a person this century, right? Or, to be fair, it could also just be that they're newfags who don't know how to make a thread
They're just plain lazy. They would much rather just randomly say things then do anything else.
 
Why don't they just make a Kamala Harris thread? There's clearly plenty of material if she's apparently a laughing psycho who shits everywhere and can't string two sentences together. It couldn't just be that they're upset they hitched their wagon to a punchline, right?
Or, to be fair, it could also just be that they're newfags who don't know how to make a thread
1) A complete lack of relevant material. Having a weird laugh, being a sociopathic lizard, and holding niggers past their release date do not a thread make. Imagine how many more threads this website would have if literally anybody who people hate qualified. Clinton would get a thread much sooner than Harris would, which is funny because cowdom is the only thing she beats Harris at. No, the Don earned the careercow thread by... being a careercow. It's not even just politics, it's all of his failed ventures and business class welfare wigger king status. It's Truth Social. It's the Trump merch, like his goddamn themed silver. It's Trump being a risible individual 24/7 as opposed to committing one or two gaffes or having one or two quirks.

2) Most of people you're mentioned don't even post anywhere on the website that isn't their containment board. They don't know anything about the website culture, which isn't exactly the problem - the problem is that they don't CARE about the website culture.
 
Kamala refuses to use Bluetooth for operational security reasons. She's absolutely correct to do so, anything transmitted over the air is going to be much less secure than something transmitted across a wire. After Trump's complete lack of respect for opsec and boomer presidents that don't understand what that word means, it's very refreshing to see a politician dedicated to keeping data safe.

Either the plug can't be seen from that angle or she's got another device on her lap. Either option could be correct.
I love this Harris cope and seethe.
That and they have nothing on her other than calling her a nigger.
But she's not even black. How does that work?
 
Statistics have shown that September usually accounts for about 45% of a season’s activity. From 1851 to 2020, 301 hurricanes made landfall in the United States with 110 of these hitting in September.

Trump:

"Nobody thought a hurricane would hit this time of year..."

45645.png

He’s a fucking idiot. I'll never forget this man floating the idea of nuking Hurricanes.


"During one hurricane briefing at the White House, Trump said, "I got it. I got it. Why don't we nuke them?" according to one source who was there. "They start forming off the coast of Africa, as they're moving across the Atlantic, we drop a bomb inside the eye of the hurricane and it disrupts it. Why can't we do that?" the source added, paraphrasing the president's remarks."
 
And like so much of the weird, ego/vanity driven shit he comes up with, he got it almost 180 degrees wrong. It went in the path the NWS was predicting. NWS said it was going to take a sharp turn towards the north, Trump insisted with his sharpie it would turn west.

He should really just stop talking about weather in general. The man looks at the sun without protection.

234.png
 
Last edited:
He's advocating for the purge. I've not seen the movie, so I'm not sure how the repercussions played out, however I doubt it was anything rooted in reality - because you're right about what that reality would look like.
It was absolutely retarded story. In the movie they allow people to do whatever they want for one night and then people don't commit crimes for the rest of the year. In reality not much would've changed if you allowed people to do whatever they want for one night, because:
- Organized crime operates constantly, it's like a business for those people and no business can operate for one night every year and stay open.
- Spur of the moment crimes would still be committed.
- Crimes committed under the influence of drugs and alcohol would still be committed.
And those are vast majority of all crimes.
 
Back