Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 129 37.7%

  • Total voters
    342
He is presumed to be competent until proven otherwise.
A review of publicly available documents for cases of his shows repeated dropped balls, memorialized in letters from him to the Court begging forgiveness and for the Court not to punish his client for his mistakes. He didn't even show for April's ticket hearing (which was remote, ffs) in the spring, despite appearing on record as her attorney.

That doesn't prove incompetence, and plenty of lawyers fuck up from time to time, but the difference between a lawyer who
fucks up with few consequences and a lawyer who gets sanctioned or disbarred for it (and I know one who in fact was disbarred by MN precisely for failing to tend to cases properly) is often a matter of of things outside the lawyer himself - indulgence of the Court, knowledge/ ability (or lack of) of the client(s) to pursue action, or ultimate impact on the client(s). There's a reason a lot of lawyers are neurotic.

In fairness to DUI Guy and something that Nick mentioned too, because it was a response to a particular burn from a witness to Heard's lawyer the entire court room basically went "WHOAAA". Unprofessional? Maybe, but he was tarding alongside the court. I don't feel he should have been raked over the coals for going with the flow.
Going to disagree (and not to you but to Mr. Busybody over there: idc if it's been discussed. It happened just a couple of years ago, he seemed and seems to stand by it, and it's still unbecoming). DUI Guy is an officer of the Court and a representative of a profession in that profession's house. Not tarding out in that context is basic professionalism. He was also front row (iirc - but either way, close enough to be noticed). And from the lawtuber perspective, he was at least a bit of a representative of the general enterprise of online legal commentary, even if not some kind of badged rep (and iirc, he sort of was there as a rep - or at least he was talking with and sharing info with them from his on-the-ground perspective). Reputation matters to most people; for most lawyers it is important professionally; and the Bar also cares about it. The DUI Guys and the Rekietas of the world may think it doesn't, and maybe in their arenas you can make a buck without it (well, at least apparently DUI Guy can). But they aren't the standard for most.

And to the one so upset about a little ribbing for a minor but telling dumb judgment: until you repeated his name several times in the last couple of pages, I had no recollection of it. So thanks - I can now say with precision that Larry Forman was a dumbass and an embarrassment in that courtroom. Good job, though tbh I'll likely edit it from my memory by tomorrow.
 
It is pretty simple.

Joe tried to collect debt, claimed to have a judgement, created a fake legal document ordering someone to show up in court.
The threatened person (plaintiff in the case against Joe) then got himself a lawyer (for a flat 3000$ fee to start) who contacted Joe.
Joe said "No problem, I will send the documents!" and then ghosted the lawyer.

The lawyer then contacted the courts in New York and requested information about the suppoed judgement, which did not exist.
Joe tried to threaten someone into paying money by making up a judgement AND creating a fictive legal document.

Since it was made up, they counter sued for the cost.
Then Joe dragged it out for 7 years and now has to pay over 100000$ in lawyer fees alone.

He is just as retarded as Nick Rakieta and they deserve each other.
It's a shame no one in lawtube will touch this because it seems like an entertaining case. I am surprised Joe wasn't punished for fabricating government docs.
 
Going to disagree (and not to you but to Mr. Busybody over there: idc if it's been discussed. It happened just a couple of years ago, he seemed and seems to stand by it, and it's still unbecoming). DUI Guy is an officer of the Court and a representative of a profession in that profession's house. Not tarding out in that context is basic professionalism. He was also front row (iirc - but either way, close enough to be noticed). And from the lawtuber perspective, he was at least a bit of a representative of the general enterprise of online legal commentary, even if not some kind of badged rep (and iirc, he sort of was there as a rep - or at least he was talking with and sharing info with them from his on-the-ground perspective). Reputation matters to most people; for most lawyers it is important professionally; and the Bar also cares about it. The DUI Guys and the Rekietas of the world may think it doesn't, and maybe in their arenas you can make a buck without it (well, at least apparently DUI Guy can). But they aren't the standard for most.
>fourth row is the front

Hardly unbecoming considering the woman next to him had exactly the same reaction. Regardless, if you can't even bother to get the details correct for something multiple years in the past, why are you bothering to comment? It's been beaten to death by the tripod.

Mr. Busybody
It's Ms., you faggot.
 
>fourth row is the front

Hardly unbecoming considering the woman next to him had exactly the same reaction. Regardless, if you can't even bother to get the details correct for something multiple years in the past, why are you bothering to comment? It's been beaten to death by the tripod.
Was the woman next him there in the sane capacity as he? If so, then she was also dumb.

The context is a lawyer's behavior.

And he was in fact in the first row of people. Your keen eye for detail surely noticed the empties in front of him. And as I said - irrelevant, as he was front and center from a camera perspective.

It's Ms., you faggot.
Tragic. And so am I, so "faggot" doesn't apply, Miss Thing.

I'm sorry your internet boyfriend is such an embarrassment.
 
While I agree, and think most reasonable people would, I think that a lot of people do like being told what to.
You're probably right there. I just said "nobody likes" probably generalizing my own personal preference, because I definitely get annoyed when being told what to do, even by people I know are right. And when I think they're actually wrong, it pisses me off.

But you just gotta cope with it. You don't throw a tantrum, you don't screech autistically, you just do the dumb things you gotta do. And it's not exactly rare that the thing you were told to do was actually the right thing anyway.
 
Barnes has always reminded me of those shameless NY Mob lawyers who used to get guys like John Gotti off.
Those lawyers are actually competent though and doing their job of representing a client and getting the best possible result. Barnes is just a fucking Boss Baby-looking faggot incompetent idiot who gives shit takes that even the non-practicing lawyers can see are wrong beyond belief.

Look at Barnes pimping this dumb Franks motion. He was an absolute joke. Everyone said his dumb arguments wouldn't work, and the Barneswalker didn't even use them, and the Franks motion failed, just like most people said it would.

He was such a dipshit he was claiming it was not only all but already won, but that the actual normal, sane people who can understand reality who said it was a crapshoot at best were not just wrong, but were lying.

He's a piece of shit. He's a fucking imbecile.
That doesn't prove incompetence, and plenty of lawyers fuck up from time to time, but the difference between a lawyer who
fucks up with few consequences and a lawyer who gets sanctioned or disbarred for it (and I know one who in fact was disbarred by MN precisely for failing to tend to cases properly) is often a matter of of things outside the lawyer himself - indulgence of the Court, knowledge/ ability (or lack of) of the client(s) to pursue action, or ultimate impact on the client(s). There's a reason a lot of lawyers are neurotic.
Words have contexts. The fact that Nick is incompetent as a lawyer does not mean he is incompetent in the legal sense to choose his own (retarded) defense. He is presumed to be competent for that purpose.

So if you get sued successfully for malpractice because your legal representation was incompetent, that doesn't mean you get a free pass on being incompetent for any other purposes, such as standing for trial or for suing another lawyer you are accusing of being a malpractitioner because they did what you told them to do.
 
Last edited:
Those lawyers are actually competent though and doing their job of representing a client and getting the best possible result. Barnes is just a fucking Boss Baby-looking faggot incompetent idiot who gives shit takes that even the non-practicing lawyers can see are wrong beyond belief.

Look at Barnes pimping this dumb Franks motion. He was an absolute joke. Everyone said his dumb arguments wouldn't work, and the Barneswalker didn't even use them, and the Franks motion failed, just like most people said it would.

He was such a dipshit he was claiming it was not only all but already won, but that the actual normal, sane people who can understand reality who said it was a crapshoot at best were not just wrong, but were lying.

He's a piece of shit. He's a fucking imbecile.
That stuff was targeted at his QAnon-believing Youtube audience though. It works on them.
 
At this current time my prediction is that it will finally penetrate that his situation is serious and he will plead guilty, get his white-boy slap on the wrist, and then make a couple of 4-hour videos rambling about how this is actually a victory and that since he isn't currently in prison his conviction doesn't count. Just like Ethan Ralph; if you don't go to prison it's basically an aquittal. We'll still laugh at you regardless, Nick. Drink more, you BBC loving faggot.
 
Kino Casino is finally back. "NOOOOOO, NICK NOOOO!" Live starting now.

https://kick.com/kinocasinogaming

1727743624537.png
 
At this current time my prediction is that it will finally penetrate that his situation is serious and he will plead guilty, get his white-boy slap on the wrist, and then make a couple of 4-hour videos rambling about how this is actually a victory and that since he isn't currently in prison his conviction doesn't count. Just like Ethan Ralph; if you don't go to prison it's basically an aquittal. We'll still laugh at you regardless, Nick. Drink more, you BBC loving faggot.
Courts generally frown on someone pleading guilty and then immediately professing their innocence to a live audience the next day.
 
Putting all eggs into the basket of the long shot is exactly what you advise a client who you know will pay your exorbitant legal fees for the appeal, and has a trust fund that can be milked for all those juicy dollerinos.
Just ask Randazza.

Remember when that fat buffoon was bloviating on and on about how anyone who thought this motion was a pathetic Hail Mary weren't just wrong, but were utterly incompetent at best and lying at worst?

Yeah what a fucking pile of shit Barnes is.
Barnes absolutely owes @Potentially Criminal an apology.

He will not get one, but hopefully Sean can take solace in the fact that pretty much everybody here knows what a shitbag Barnes is.

Yes, you absolutely can get a warrant from watching a livestream. This is the 21st century, dummy.

Joe's a retard. But even among the cognitively limited, he sticks out as being particularly more limited than the rest. A real retard's retard, if you will.
You know, as bad as Joe is, I find him less irritating than Viva, actually.

Viva is fucking useless. He just sits there, grinning like a jackass, agreeing with whatever poppycock flows from Barnes mouth.
 
I think he was wiggling/pacing because he was livid that Sean was there and he had to act civil.
For a bit I wondered if Nick asked for the invite list, but I doubt there was that much thought / interaction.
How it think it went was :
Joe invited Nick as a long-shot hopeful and did not invite Sean
Sean superchatted with congratulations and Joe sent him the link because he realized it was a dick move to not invite Sean who had been on Joe's channel many times
Nick decided to actually show up, to everyones surprise, and even if he knew Sean was there while Nick was waiting in the backroom, it was too late to back out.
Nick then made it awkward and gloated about it.

Barnes is like a scam chiropractor
I bet the weekly family chiropractic visits that made Nick bow out of Eric Hunley's Law News stream was like that.

Barnes is just a fucking Boss Baby-looking faggot
I laugh every time I see this written.

1727743929867.png
 
What do you think the next goal post moving cope will be? My prediction is they'll say they knew this franks thing would fail and they planned to appeal anyway.
Nick claims the Franks hearing was denied because judge pussy liquour formed a cabal with the other two judges to fuck him over.

Also, please bill the Alex Jones judgement to Barnes please. Barnes isn't funny, at least Alex is.
"How do you do fellow whites?"

Someone is not from the south. Southern courts are very harsh on Whyte peepoh.
We find the defendant, not guilty. However, however your honor, we find this carpetbagging, communist, pinko, jew boi lawyer guilty of getting him off!
 
Back