Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 128 37.5%

  • Total voters
    341
In fact, wouldn't Nick's vag liquor comments - if known by detectives - almost compel the unofficial disclosure because it could affect the legal proceedings if it came out after the trial? No detective or prosecutor wants a guilty ruling overturned for judicial bias.
Judge Wentzel recently reviewed the evidence in the case to write his order, and around that time Judge Fischer recused herself from all cases involving Nick in some way.

I assumed that he saw the entire Coke Stream, including the Judge Pussy Liquor comments and just as you assume he informed her of it and she recused herself to avoid the appearance of impropriety.
 
Well what did they expect from a bunch of lawyers?
In all seriousness that's an interesting take, though. I can also see a bit of Rackets's absolute hatred of being told what to do seeping through here ("I will NOT wear shirt NOR shoes! FUCK your sign!").
Absolutely nobody likes to get told what to do, and absolutely everyone does get told what to do sometimes, even kings and Presidents.

Most people who aren't oh-so-special little snowflake princesses like Nick get over it some time in their teens.
In fairness to DUI Guy and something that Nick mentioned too, because it was a response to a particular burn from a witness to Heard's lawyer the entire court room basically went "WHOAAA". Unprofessional? Maybe, but he was tarding alongside the court. I don't feel he should have been raked over the coals for going with the flow.
LawTube is a joke, albeit not as big a one as LawlTwitter. But if you're going to present yourself as part of some group, no shit the people in it are going to criticize you if they think you made them look bad.

I thought the whole thing was petty, but seriously, people should behave themselves in court. Being amused is one thing, but showing much in the way of emotional reaction is something to be avoided. It can't always be, sometimes something actually shocking happens and it's nearly involuntary.

NOTE: Wentzell cited the defendant's efforts to seek treatment when accepting the Alford and the resulting prison sentences. (What an ugly case! I want these parents shot.) A notable quote from a family member: “It took eight years too long for Kandiyohi County to take the children away”
I came across the "uncommon" statement in some Minnesota criminal defense lawyer's website, and it seemed to be the general opinion. I didn't do an exhaustive search but after that, just to make sure it was legit, I did a cursory search for recent cases and there were enough in recent years (including a couple in Kandiyohi) that I decided it looked like a legit claim.

This is just to comment I think Alfords in sex related cases are pretty bad. In almost all these cases where you have to get registered as a sex offender, if it's a not for life situation, if you ever want to get off that, you generally have to prove you've completed some kind of treatment program, and to "graduate" those you almost always are going to have to prove you've taken responsibility.

If you're insisting you never even did it, you're not taking responsibility.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Absolutely nobody likes to get told what to do, and absolutely everyone does get told what to do sometimes, even kings and Presidents.
While I agree, and think most reasonable people would, I think that a lot of people do like being told what to. I think that a large part of Nick's former audience wanted "sage advice from a trad dad". They wanted a smart lawyer man who beat the dating-game and had five kid-accomplishments to tell them what to think about scary things like the Rittenhouse trial. There's a palpable sense of betrayal when they talk about him now. "Just do cocaine about it" was not the advice that made them feel cozy in their tummies.
 
In fairness to DUI Guy and something that Nick mentioned too, because it was a response to a particular burn from a witness to Heard's lawyer the entire court room basically went "WHOAAA". Unprofessional? Maybe, but he was tarding alongside the court. I don't feel he should have been raked over the coals for going with the flow.
I thought the whole thing was petty, but seriously, people should behave themselves in court. Being amused is one thing, but showing much in the way of emotional reaction is something to be avoided. It can't always be, sometimes something actually shocking happens and it's nearly involuntary.
It's been years now since this happened. His reaction was perfectly normal given the events that transpired live in front of him. This is the Nick Rekieta thread, not the Larry Forman or the Alyte Mazeika thread.
 
Fucking copelords. Its a massive fucking defeat.

Nick is now Nelson Mandela to these dumbfucks.
"I don't think it's as devastating as anybody thought it would be"

What???
The ruling explicitly states Rekieta loses on EVERYTHING at issue at the omnibus phase, including the arguments he didn't even took the chance to make yet in favor of the desperation play to demand a Franks hearing.

Even the state, in their filing, appeared resigned to another set of briefs on a general challenge to probable cause before the case moved forward.

To say that it's it's not "as devastating as anybody thought it would be" goes beyond cope, and beyond simple lying into delusional alternate reality land worthy of the Law Pope himself. How could it get MORE devastating? I can't really think of a way other than the judge pursing sanctions against the Barneswalker, and I don't think it crossed the threshold where that would be appropriate.

I agree with the Locals chat - Nick looked fucking PISSED the entire time he was on that stream. I don't think he was wiggling/pacing due to withdrawal, I think he was wiggling/pacing because he was livid that Sean was there and he had to act civil. He was making that face he makes when he's about to yell into the camera at someone and he looked like that the entire stream.
I figure that he shower called Joe after the fact to play the victim after the fact pretending that his dieting joke wasn't a dig at Sean even though he says similar comments over and over on stream and Twitter.

Are we sure Barnes isn't low-key a-logging Nicky at this point? that's one fucking rogues' gallery to be compared to.
He is rewriting history to try to cut bait on Rekieta without admitting being wrong.

At first Barnes claimed that Rekieta's legal troubles resulted because he was the #1 critic of "corruption" in the county (Barnes totally made that up on the spot out of whole cloth, nobody else, not even Rekieta, argued that) and that anyone who claimed that the case was not completely baseless should be ignored in the future on all topics.

Now he says that the case has "low significance", is implying that Rekieta is an easy target because he is unpopular, and coping that the motion was never going to be granted anyway.

It's been years now since this happened. His reaction was perfectly normal given the events that transpired live in front of him.
No, it was a (successful) attempt to force a viral clip centered around him.

If you disagree, you are too naive to be on the Internet, being such an easy mark for grifters and liars.
 
No, it was a (successful) attempt to force a viral clip centered around him.
He had no way to know where he was going to be able to sit to be in sight of the camera at the time and that the TMZ guy was going to drop a bomb on a lolyer would couldn't talk into the microphone. Regardless,
[t]his is the Nick Rekieta thread, not the Larry Forman or the Alyte Mazeika thread.
If you want to jerk off about what Larry Forman did or did not grift, do it somewhere else.
 
Joe being another piece of shit is completely par for the Lawtube course.

He and Nick can host the "Broke & Broker - Lawtube Podcast" from Van in a McDonalds parking lot for free Wifi.
I find Joe to be mostly boring and his analysis shallow for someone who calls himself ‘Good Lawgic’.

He’s one of those guys who can only be entertaining through his failings.
And I’ll never forget the most entertaining ‘failing’ of Joe was when he bestowed us with MANdy’s dox.
Yep. MANdy’s phone number was even accidentally doxxed by Joe (Good Lawgic) at 2:49:43. The call time was at 2:50:24. The old fat chick theory might be the winner. Merry Christmas @elb
https://www.youtube.com/live/wpH283fUFTc?si=REHbju530JyWynx9
 
If you want to jerk off about what Larry Forman did or did not grift, do it somewhere else.
Why?

Why the fuck would I give a fuck about some random account that registered a couple weeks ago wanting to gatekeep a controversy directly involving Nick Rekieta as a central character from being discussed on the Nick Rekieta thread?

Why are you pretending to be a moderator?

Fuck off moron.
 
Don't backseat moderate, if you don't care about the discussion, don't post.
Why the fuck would I give a fuck about some random account that registered a couple weeks ago wanting to gatekeep a controversy directly involving Nick Rekieta as a central character from being discussed on the Nick Rekieta thread?
>muh account creation date
The LegalBytes/DUIGuy kerfuffle has been beaten to death by the tripod from Hedo II. It has been discussed a dozen times in this thread. There is nothing more there. Why does it keep coming up?
 
Chef's kiss was Barnes telling Viva they were longshots he didn't expect to win. They were filed on "principle."

Nick has to be thinking 'WTF? I wish you told me that before I wrote the check and decided to focus on the Franks hearing exclusively. I'm not seeing how your wins on principle are going to keep me out of prison. Are all your constitutional challenges things you don't expect to win either? What happened to my "very strong case?"'
"Rekieta's already won!" --Attorney Robert Barnes

If Aaron planted the coke and poisoned people against Nick, it was all under the orders of the Grand Dragon of Texas Eric July. In fact, the police would have to have gotten permission and authorization to arrest Nick from July
Don't you worry, the boys down at the crime lab are working on the case. They just assigned four more detectives to the case!
 
Fucking copelords. Its a massive fucking defeat.

Nick is now Nelson Mandela to these dumbfucks.
This is the perfect time to share this cool video that @Shush made. A Nick clip costarring Barnes & Vivafag. So far, it’s only been shared in the Balldoverse Memes & Edits thread, but really deserves to be seen far & wide. Especially since Barnes just boss babied all over Nick’s Denialocalypse by lying through his teeth about “power & practice” bullshit while neglecting to even mention the objective facts from the Omnibussin’.

If you’re familiar with Morrowind, you’ll appreciate the following video even more. If not, it’s based on the game, Morrowind, & features Nick as the main villain, Dagoth Ur. Shush even used Dagoth Ur’s move-set from the game in this vid. A viral meme came about a few years back featuring Dagoth Ur dancing to new wave synth music & reciting pertinent lines from the game, called Dagothwave.

Using Viva & Barnes as the backup musicians is particularly impressive as in the original Dagothwave, (& in the game) lizard people were used in the same capacity. The correlation between lizard people & slimey lawyers like Barnes was the cherry on top of this work.
You can see on his face he's fucked, he turned himself into a laughing stock because he couldn't control his own urges. He fucked up so bad the State he hates had to step in to show him how to parent the kids he resents
That’s truly humiliating. Especially in the social class Nick was born into. He even had to be taught (by the court!) how to clean surfaces in his home. Adding insult to such injury, not only was Nick schooled on best parenting practices by the court, but his own parents were legally compelled to teach Nick how to parent, after he had already been a parent for 17 years. Nick was legally deemed subpar & unfit & his mom & das were sent in, by big daddy Kandiyohi, to teach him how to parent properly. And clean. And so on. Even his parenting was DENIED.
 
The only way out is Killdozer, but Nick only has the Rustang, so even his last resort is going nowhere.
Eh, 750 horsepower propelling 4000 lbs means you're putting a lot of kinetic energy into your last teary-eyed hurrah right through the Scandinavian incel prude's house. You're bound to go through at least a few rooms if not just the entire house altogether, though you'd have to gamble on which part of the house to aim for.
 
LawTube is a joke, albeit not as big a one as LawlTwitter. But if you're going to present yourself as part of some group, no shit the people in it are going to criticize you if they think you made them look bad.

I thought the whole thing was petty, but seriously, people should behave themselves in court. Being amused is one thing, but showing much in the way of emotional reaction is something to be avoided. It can't always be, sometimes something actually shocking happens and it's nearly involuntary
I know it is futile in this day and age, but lawyers at least nominally are still officers of the court and are ethically obligated (in theory, obviously not in practice) to conduct themselves in a manner that shows respect for the court's authority and integrity. As a lawyer, you should be held to a higher standard. Mugging for the camera to boost your grift rightly would be frowned upon by any real professional.

I find Joe to be mostly boring and his analysis shallow for someone who calls himself ‘Good Lawgic’.
Joe's a retard. But even among the cognitively limited, he sticks out as being particularly more limited than the rest. A real retard's retard, if you will.

He is rewriting history to try to cut bait on Rekieta without admitting being wrong.
Barnes will never admit to being wrong. The key to Barnes' grift requires never admitting that you were wrong. You were always right. It's everyone else who's wrong, or you were taken out of context.
 
Last edited:
Barnes will never admit to being wrong. The key to Barnes' grift requires never admitting that you were wrong. You were always right. It's everyone else who's wrong, or you were taken out of context.
Barnes has always reminded me of those shameless NY Mob lawyers who used to get guys like John Gotti off.

17shargel-gotti-videoSixteenByNineJumbo1600.jpg
 
Even CGoody, now the ex-sweeper, has turned:

(This is from the comment section on the video I just posted)
:story:

CGoody's gone too?

really_bad.jpg

I did the 'crop job':
But the intention behind my crop was to highlight the dismissive nature he showed towards the Kiwi Farms analysis of his motion. Although, I can see it also implies that it might be referencing his own Omnibus.
It's okay.
The "crop job" and the videos you've posted have been oases in the weeks of content drought which has only been broken by Nick anger-swaying on stream to avoid screeching at Sean "YOU LIED! THEY LIED! EVERYBODY EXCEPT ME LIED ABOUT ME! EXCEPT BARNES!"

I bet Mandy is glad he didn’t get any further involved with this Rekieta guy, he really seems like a bit of a trainwreck.
Spending 16 years pretending to be a woman you knew 20 years ago is certainly embarrassing, but it's still less disgraceful than having a child test positive for hard drugs.
 
It was a while ago but he said that he said he disliked how Lawtube changed from an ethereal idea into a more centralised thing with "rules" and "conduct". It was around the time Legal Bytes was "disciplining" DUI Guy for acting dramatic in court.

A Lawtube Top10 Award Committee (WTF) had revoked it's offering of award to DUI Guy because his conduct "reflected poorly on the community", which now Nick felt he was dragged into this community by people that were deciding how people needed to react and act in general.

He clipped the section where he discusses it on his Rumble livestream and put it on his Youtube. It's bit of a longer watch but I understood where he came from and agreed.
That award committee always had a bad taste in my mouth. It was like grifters grifting off of other grifters. Who were these people and what authority did they have to issue awards? Who was even the people voting?
It was such a weird situation
 
Regarding the Joe judgement, I found the order and uploaded the file HERE in the lawtube thread.
The judgement is for 117639$,

The amusing thing about Joe's case is how $500 in real damages turned into a judgement against him for $117,639.

The case started in 2016. Joe was trying to collect a judgement against this guy for unpaid rent on a unit at 635 West 42nd Street in the amount of $13,000. The guy turned around and sued Joe three months later. In 2021, both parties requested summary judgement of the case. And somehow the judge decided in favor of the plantiff in the amount of $500 actual damages.

The case then went off to calculate additional damages. It was decided that Joe owed the guy $3000 for all his legal costs in defending against Joe's attempt at collecting the debt. They further decided that this guy had suffered $5000 in emotional damages:

Plaintiff testified after his wife. (Id. at 24). He explained that he emigrated to the United States from Israel in 1990 and lived in New York City from about 1990 until 2010. (Id. at 2526). During that time, he struggled with alcohol and drug abuse and “was doing a lot of drinking and a lot of drugs” while living in New York City. (Id. at 28). He acknowledged that he lived at 635 West 42nd Street for “maybe a year,” but did not remember owing any money to the landlord, or having a judgment entered against him as a result. (Id. at 29-30). Plaintiff said that he received the Letter in “mid-December of 2016” and that it was “a very terrifying moment” and “very scary.” (Id. at 33). He explained that he thought if he did not comply with the Letter's demands he could face “fines and imprisonment” or was “going to get arrested.” (Id. at 44-45). Plaintiff said the Letter also confused him because it required him to appear on December 26, 2016, which “was Christmastime. It was Hanukkah, too.” (Id. at 47).

Further, Plaintiff admitted that while living in New York, he moved out of 635 West 42nd Street “for two months” for addiction treatment, which is why he could not remember if he had any debt related to his tenancy. (Id. at 60-61). He explained that when he returned to the building after treatment, all his furniture was gone and he was not allowed to enter. (Id. at 62).

The court then further decided that Joe owed this guy all his legal fees involved in suing Joe which was over $100,000.

In reviewing all the documents, its difficult to figure out exactly what Joe did wrong (other than trying to collect from what seems to be a very influential person). The debt he was collecting seems to have been real.

A very New York sort of case.
 
I may have watched too much Law & Order in my youth, but I think detectives and prosecutors often have a chummy relationship. If true, I would think in a small county this would be ever more the case. So, by that deduction, the info would have traveled from Detective Pomplum (I assume he knows of the comments) > Kristin Pierce (or her boss) > Judge Fischer.
You didn't watch too much. In fact, you watched enough to be 10000% spot on! I'll even take it one step further my @Melty Butter King/Queen. . .

The MEDIA is also tied in. I know folks who've worked all sides: prosecution, judges, and media, and they all work together because rely on one thing . . . ELECTIONS and PUBLIC OPINION. Here's an example . . .

My uncle was a county prosecutor and was on a capital murder trial of two old people by a "big bad black guy." The public called for the death penalty. Welp, it was an election year, and not only was the Judge ready to do every single interview "unbiasedly" that the media asked for, my uncle also was ready. He even had one of the "legal reporters" on speed dial to let her know everyday where the prosecution team would be after court recessed for the daily press conference. Not only that, the reporter had the 2nd and 3rd chair's numbers incase my uncle couldn't answer if she had a question.

The reporters first big interview? The prosecutor calling for the death penalty. SHOCKER!!! Doing what the people called for? No way! The second big interview? The judge saying how they're not against the death penalty. SHOCKER!!! Not going against what the people want? No way! And who gave the judge and prosecution air time and "good coverage" in exchange for courtroom access, interviews, and unfettered access to questions on the case? The media.

The "big bad black guy" was found guilty because the evidence was over the top that he was the man who did it (police were tipped off and arrested him mid-robbery, unfortunately after he had already murdered the couple) but guess what he got as well... the death penalty. Guess who also got re-elected?! THE JUDGE and THE PROSECUTOR... see how it all works?! Oh, and that legal reporter was later promoted to the big anchor in that tiny town. In the words of George Carlin, they all stroke each other and it's a big fucking circle jerk.

That's why it gave me a chuckle when all the Minneapolis stations picked up Rekieta's arrest story. The story is very newsworthy in and of itself, but I wouldn't be surprised if someone knew someone from the county office and made a quick call or shot someone a text. ESPECIALLY with Nick and all the demeaning shit he said about Judge Fischer alone. I mean, it's out there on the internet.

What they DIDN'T teach Nick in law school is that "you don't shit where you eat" didn't just mean "don't fuck people you work with." It also meant "don't shit on people you work with" as well . . . and when you're a lawyer in a small county with a one fucking stoplight and a Dairy Queen, the chances of working with EVERY judge and prosecutor are pretty god damn high.

Dumb mother fucker should have kept his big fucking mouth shut. But no... we here on KF are the dumb ones... WE HERE are the ones who ruined it for him!
 
Last edited:
Back