So does Barnes apply the same standard to everyone? Surely when "community activist" LeTyrone gets arrested for coke and child abuse, Barnes is on the case accusing the cops and government of corruption. I sure hope he's defended Hunter Biden, Bob Menendez, and other recent corrupt and criminal Democrats. He's an ethical and Constitutional lawyer, after all!
I remember him using his "court of public opinion" schtick to say why a client should just settle for an apology plus expenses.
Both Viva and Barnes have taken the position that sending them money grants you nothing and they will ignore anything the don't want to answer. At best Viva will display the superchat and you may get Barnes to sperg. It is not worth wasting your money.
I think Barnes will sperg regardless because he has no reason to not sperg. "No! I was right! This just goes to show how the whole system is rigged against populist voices!"
>not a big deal, franks hearings are hard to get so this is not an unexpected development
Oh but I thought this was a total slam dunk. Wasn't this fat faggot gloating like the motion had already been granted just a week or so ago, and on top of that, insisting all the real lawyers out there saying it was a Hail Mary pass with little chance of success weren't just wrong, but were grifting liars?
This is what activist lawyers do and there's nothing wrong with it. What's wrong is boondoggling clients into bullshit like this. You have all kinds of activist organizations like the ACLU and ACLJ (sort of a right wing ACLU for the civil rights the ACLU is currently failing at), and they're openly pushing an agenda. They don't make bop-clown arguments in court, though.
I think you're giving him too much credit. Part of him probably does want something like what you're mentioning to be given to him as something to have on his legal reputation. But he isn't using Rackets to get it. He is defending Rackets because he is publicly connected to him and wants to save face. He also doesn't want any of their detractors having ammunition to go after either of them with.
How the fuck are retards like this allowed to become lawyers? "You say exercise of power good here but bad there? No principles much?" no you stupid fucking faggot it's because in one case it was done rightfully and even in the trump case it's more that they all do illegal shit and selectively punish each other, but if you found a case where I agreed it was wrongfully applied full stop there'd be actual reasons for it.
Doesn't even make a legal argument. What a shit heel. This really is a case of even the mildest push back completely deflating any argument he can make so instead of admitting that he might have been wrong he instead impugns everybody but himself. Other lawyers, commentators, the cops, judges, and drug labs.
I bet he doesn't make any arguments about the facts because he can't, and he can't because he doesn't even know them.
Whatever good reputation the profession of being a law-man enjoys is overstated and greatly exaggerated, reality is that the world would be better off if graduation from law school involved a woodchipper.
But I mean how do you pass the fucking bar man? All his answers seem to just be "muh freedom muh freedom". Do they have some kind of dei special ed fasttrack so absolute mongoloid retards can be lawyers? Do they allow rich parents to pay someone to take their offspring test for them? Serious question
You just like take it dude, I've passed the bar in multiple states including one considered the second toughest. If you have an autistic ability to pass standardized tests it's a joke. You literally just pass it. That's what you do.
