Viva & Barnes - Balldowasher, delusional "constitutionialst", the "confession through projection" guy who accuses people denouncing child abuse of paedophilia.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
HootersMcBoobies said:
Viva doesn't really push back against Barnes in their streams. When he asks Barnes questions, it almost always feels like a "Devil's Advocate" position. I think that's one really big problem with their show. There's no legitimate adversarial process. Viva got roped into Barnes's ideology early on and seems to view the current world through exclusively through that lens.
Click to expand...
It's one of those Hannity/Colmes things where you have a weak version of the "opposition" to make it look like it's not completely one-sided.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: stares at error messages, Vecr, Himedall All-seeing Waifu and 3 others
AnOminous said:
It's one of those Hannity/Colmes things where you have a weak version of the "opposition" to make it look like it's not completely one-sided.
Click to expand...
Nah, Viva doesn't even pretend to be opposition. He's just brings up the strongest talking point, but doesn't really understand it enough to push back on Robert's answer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stares at error messages
TheDarknessGrows said:
Didn't Alan Colmes die a few years ago?
Click to expand...
He looks dead in every picture. He just looks like a dead guy.
1722384831678.jpeg
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Vecr, Taco Conspiracy, Accidental Protege and 5 others
AnOminous said:
He should get MAID. All Canadians should get MAID. Jihad on Canadians.
Click to expand...
I dunno. TBH, there are times I can appreciate Warski and PPP. It's fun background noise.

But French Canadians? I don't think I have met a single one I like. They go to the camps. JF Gayrapey especially.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: SargonF00t, Accidental Protege, Mourning_Cloak and 2 others
mindlessobserver said:
Gentlemen, I told you he was schizo and falling into Wonderland. I stand by this.
Click to expand...
He was always was an egotistical self serving Jew who carefully hedged all his bets in a way that nobody can pin him down on any particular topic that would adversely affect his youtube monetization. I think that would explain his attraction to Tim Pool, as Tim Pool follows the same business model, minus the Jewishness and the hair.

Viva's appearance has changed dramatically over the years. His long curly unkempt hair, he thinks he's going for the Einstein, I'm a Jewish genius angle, but to me it looks more like he's exploring the possibility of trooning out.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: John.Doe, Pagan Min and sixart
mr_negativity said:
He was always was an egotistical self serving Jew who carefully hedged all his bets in a way that nobody can pin him down on any particular topic that would adversely affect his youtube monetization. I think that would explain his attraction to Tim Pool, as Tim Pool follows the same business model, minus the Jewishness and the hair.

Viva's appearance has changed dramatically over the years. His long curly unkempt hair, he thinks he's going for the Einstein, I'm a Jewish genius angle, but to me it looks more like he's exploring the possibility of trooning out.
Click to expand...
I find it funny that he found his old hairstlye so iconic that he made silhouettes of it as his logo only to drastically change his hair style later.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: DuranceVile
I tried watching the stream tonight, but couldn't stand listening to more than 10 minutes of that fucking blowhard talk. Thankfully, Elissa Clips suffered through it and brought us Barnes insane rambling on Balldo and also insulting every other lawtube channel:

The absolute absurdity of this clip. First, attacking every other lawyer in your sphere is not a good for Mr. Southern Fucktard Barnes.

At one point he mentions "Legal Mindset who has 'questionable' travel patterns," once again implying he's a sex-tourist pest.

He goes into detail on explaining what an Evidentiary Hearing is, as though this is some vindication. Evidentiary hearings are pretty standard, and even though the warrant is pretty cut and dry, it's not unusual for a judge to schedule these out just to show everyone had time to review and prepare. Especially when Rekieta files a last minute motion pissing off everyone (likely intentional to push everything back and give him more time).

He claims the cop lied in the warrant. Other lawyers have talked about the warrant at length, specifically how detailed it was and that the warrant mentioned the original video had been taken down and the office stated in the warrant he used an archive clip. The original clip is still up on Odysee (probably because if Rekieta takes it down at this point, it's destroying evidence) so I guess a judge is going to have a fun time reviewing all four hours, four minutes and four seconds of both to make sure it wasn't digitally altered. That's going to make him really love you Rackets.

They still get a ton of viewers on their streams. I guess people eat this bullshit up. It's fucking sad.

It's also proof you should never hire Barnes to argue anything ever unless you want to lose.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
Reactions: botrix_fan, Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL, Permanent Resident Cope and 1 other person
HootersMcBoobies said:
They still get a ton of viewers on their streams. I guess people eat this bullshit up. It's fucking sad.
Click to expand...
If you watch that video with ANY knowledge of what actually is going on with Rekieta and his case, you learn that he is willing to 100% bullshit his audience with full confidence and no hesitation.

No reason to think they aren't willing to do that with every other topic.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Third World Aristocrat, RandomBattles and mitro
HootersMcBoobies said:
The absolute absurdity of this clip. First, attacking every other lawyer in your sphere is not a good for Mr. Southern Fucktard Barnes.

At one point he mentions "Legal Mindset who has 'questionable' travel patterns," once again implying he's a sex-tourist pest.
Click to expand...
I like how Barnes is so unhinged in this clip that he doesn’t offer any counter arguments other than ad hominem attacks against other lawyers (including semi-neutral ones).
 
  • Like
Reactions: OnetoKill, botrix_fan and RandomBattles
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back