Joe is delusional. He is the perpetrator here, he did something wrong and then tried to fight it when every halfway sane lawyer would have told him to settle right away.
He can try to gaslight his audience, but he does not deserve a shred of sympathy. On the contrary, he is a slimy debt collector who threatens people with prison and fake court documents. He admits as much in the deposition where he says "this should not have gone out to someone in another state".
Thereby admitting this kind of stuff goes out to in-state debtors all the time.
The slimy retard deserves the judgement and all the scorn he is not getting.
I don't think this idiotic stereotypical Jew appreciates remotely the view normal people have of even debt collectors who comply with all the laws and do all the things. There are plenty of ways of being a gigantic asshole to collect a debt that are entirely within the law.
Now, me, I take a more charitable view of these things. Contracts are important. Enforcing them is important. Even total lolberts admit society can't exist if signing on the dotted line means nothing. Nobody likes debt collectors. Nobody wants to be on the working end of what they do. But they're a necessary evil.
However, as a necessary evil, like government itself, there are limits on what you can do.
And this asshole clearly went well beyond them. Joe is the debt collector equivalent of a dude doing 90 in a school zone drunk off his ass acting like he's the victim.
And he's not merely making lame defenses, because he knows he has no defenses, because the court REJECTED his defenses resoundingly and even helpfully pointed out that the plaintiff in the FDCPA case he got raped in could have gone after him for even MORE shit, but calling the people who came to the same conclusion as a federal judge did that they're somehow "fools," "ignorant," and "insane."
You know, for reading what a federal judge wrote and agreeing with it because it's obviously correct.
The only advice anyone should offer Jew Liarman is this:
