Diseased #Comicsgate - The Culture Wars Hit The Funny Books!

BREAKING: Ethan Van Sciver settled with Preston Poulter in the comicsgate trademark lolsuit. Because Ethan is a chicken, he put Preston under NDA. Didn't he mock Eric July for all the NDA things? How much do you think Preston got paid and Ethan got pegged?
1728486843740.png
[Link]
 
Screenshot_20241009-110514~2.png
Screenshot_20241009-110437~2.png
Here's the ACTUAL article that was used as a template for the fake article that was shared by The Critical Drinker on Twitter. I can't help but notice that the ethnically-vague reporter name "Kirsten Chuba" was changed to the Jewish-sounding "Leah Steinberg" in the fake article which was originally shared on 4chan. TLDR: You can't trust a "critic" who fakes his reviews.
Oh, looks like Ya Boi Zack is accusing the Critical Drinker of being an anti-semite, or maybe... a literal Nazi. Uh-oh, time to cancel the Critical Drinker.

But Zack, didn't you say that was murder before?
Screenshot_20241009-112234~2.png

If the theory was true then there would be ample evidence and thus there would be no reason to create fake articles. It doesn't take 20 minutes to determine that this is a fake article. It takes 1 minute. It's a pattern of behavior. Fake reviews. Fake articles. Because reality does not jibe with his propaganda
So based on Zack's previous commentary on this sort of behavior, he must want the Critical Drinker to commit suicide.
 
Last edited:
Oh, looks like Ya Boi Zack is accusing the Critical Drinker of being an anti-semite, or maybe... a literal Nazi. Uh-oh, time to cancel the Critical Drinker.
Putting out a fake story (I'm assuming he got bamboozled by 4chan?), not good, Drinker. Now Zack will feel that his righteous crusade is 100% vindicated, and he'll never stop with the conspiracy theories. The antisemite angle will just be the beginning of the lore.

I'm wondering how schitzo the theories will eventually get? Drinker, not really Scottish, fake Scottish. All of the books Drinker wrote, fake books ghostwritten by somebody else. The person who shows up on camera and at events calling himself the Drinker, fake Drinker. An actor to throw us off from the true identity of the Nazi CHUD mastermind puppet master hiding in the shadows, plotting against the innocent Hollywood elites and mainstream media.
 
View attachment 6502825
View attachment 6502828

Oh, looks like Ya Boi Zack is accusing the Critical Drinker of being an anti-semite, or maybe... a literal Nazi. Uh-oh, time to cancel the Critical Drinker.

But Zack, didn't you say that was murder before?
View attachment 6502875


So based on Zack's previous commentary on this sort of behavior, he must want the Critical Drinker to commit suicide.
Drinker, noticing a pattern with real articles that really exist accidentally posted a fake article by 4chan.
How many times have we seen that "x property" will be "the Gayest thing to ever gay and be gay" how many times have we seen "misunderstood project flopped but it owned the chuds so give it another chance" or recently with Ghostbusters 2016 drama being brought up AGAIN by Paul faig(name spelled wrong I don't care).
Point being that it was a common mistake and you can forgive drinker for it.
Also jews work in media Zack, your going to see a Stine, Burge or Blatt sometimes.
If it was Goldstein then maybe It would have been a funny mistake.
 
Oh, looks like Ya Boi Zack is accusing the Critical Drinker of being an anti-semite, or maybe... a literal Nazi. Uh-oh, time to cancel the Critical Drinker.
Just watched that video and it's pretty frustrating I can only downvote it once. I just wanted to mash the button every time he says something stupid. He is still pretty hung up on Drinker saying that it takes place soon after the first movie, which has already been noted by other people here as being a completely fine and subjective term that could easily include 2 years. In his first video, he contrasted that with the Penguin show and said that's an example of something taking place soon after the events of the first movie, but I think it's more accurate there to say it took place immediately after.

But it's frustrating how he locks in on some incidental detail and keeps hammering on it as if he found the smoking gun and then uses the flimsy and probably incorrect inferences he's made from that as the foundation for his position - a position he is locked into way harder than any evidence presented would justify. It's the kind of crap where if someone he didn't like was doing the exact same thing he is doing, he would repeat it in his retard mocking voice.
 
Last edited:
Drinker, noticing a pattern with real articles that really exist accidentally posted a fake article by 4chan.
How many times have we seen that "x property" will be "the Gayest thing to ever gay and be gay" how many times have we seen "misunderstood project flopped but it owned the chuds so give it another chance" or recently with Ghostbusters 2016 drama being brought up AGAIN by Paul faig(name spelled wrong I don't care).
Point being that it was a common mistake and you can forgive drinker for it.
Also jews work in media Zack, your going to see a Stine, Burge or Blatt sometimes.
If it was Goldstein then maybe It would have been a funny mistake.
If an SJW did that do you think Drinker would give them the grace you’re giving him?

No, he’s a grifter, he’s one of the more interesting of grifters, but he’s still a grifter.

He tried once upon of time but that guy got drowned by superchats and only the character remains.
 
If an SJW did that do you think Drinker would give them the grace you’re giving him?

No, he’s a grifter, he’s one of the more interesting of grifters, but he’s still a grifter.

He tried once upon of time but that guy got drowned by superchats and only the character remains.
You don't need to like drinker to see Zack is retarded, also drinker takes small swipes at the likes of Moviebob and Boogie that's hardly getting involved in drama.
If you don't like a movie take he had that's fine, it's more about Zack being a faggot than drinker being correct
 
Drinker, noticing a pattern with real articles that really exist accidentally posted a fake article by 4chan.
How many times have we seen that "x property" will be "the Gayest thing to ever gay and be gay" how many times have we seen "misunderstood project flopped but it owned the chuds so give it another chance" or recently with Ghostbusters 2016 drama being brought up AGAIN by Paul faig(name spelled wrong I don't care).
Point being that it was a common mistake and you can forgive drinker for it.
Also jews work in media Zack, your going to see a Stine, Burge or Blatt sometimes.
If it was Goldstein then maybe It would have been a funny mistake.
I believe it is spelled Paul Fag.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Mr Processor
If Zack wasn't a freaking obsessive weirdo about this, his position would almost be fine. Like his actual position from the perspective of a normal person would be something like "this Drinker guy rubs me the wrong way and he strikes me as kind of disingenuous ." But he's such a giant retard that he needs to be validated and vindicated and imagines he has all this objective evidence for his subjective position and if he just keeps making spergout videos, soon everyone will have no choice but to recognize his genius.
 
You don't need to like drinker to see Zack is retarded, also drinker takes small swipes at the likes of Moviebob and Boogie that's hardly getting involved in drama.
If you don't like a movie take he had that's fine, it's more about Zack being a faggot than drinker being correct
Is what Zack doing retarded? Yes. Is what he doing hypocritical? Yes. Is it malicious? Yes. Is it a massive overreaction? Yes. Is he wrong about these people? No.

He’d like some sort of modern day holy fool.
 
Is what Zack doing retarded? Yes. Is what he doing hypocritical? Yes. Is it malicious? Yes. Is it a massive overreaction? Yes. Is he wrong about these people? No.

He’d like some sort of modern day holy fool.
Is he not wrong about how The Drinker gives "fake" reviews, reviews given without actually watching the things he says he watches? That seems to be the foundation and the linchpin of Zack's whole crusade as per what Zack has said.
 
If Zack wasn't a freaking obsessive weirdo about this, his position would almost be fine. Like his actual position from the perspective of a normal person would be something like "this Drinker guy rubs me the wrong way and he strikes me as kind of disingenuous ." But he's such a giant retard that he needs to be validated and vindicated and imagines he has all this objective evidence for his subjective position and if he just keeps making spergout videos, soon everyone will have no choice but to recognize his genius.
The other problem is that about half his commentary isn't about attacking the Critical Drinker and friends for not liking the slop he likes, it's attacking anyone who doesn't like the slop he likes. Like people who watch, or who used to watch his own channel. I mean he's choosing to die on the hill of Joker: Folie a Deux, a film where I think he is the only person who actually likes it.
Oh right. They also inconsistent and have a different face and hairstyle each upload.
He's really getting a lot of use out of that art class he terrorized.
 
Is he not wrong about how The Drinker gives "fake" reviews, reviews given without actually watching the things he says he watches? That seems to be the foundation and the linchpin of Zack's whole crusade as per what Zack has said.
As someone who doesn’t watch Drinker’s reviews I can confirm that Zack is 100% right about Drinker of recent years. Drinker would be proud of my review.
 
1728503957553.png1728503981275.png
[Link]

el-risitas-juan-joya-borja.gif

>Be @FROG
>Consort with Liam to take down JDA with Games Workshop over Space Marine concept Comic
>Find out JDA has your info for taking a PEGGING from Preston Poulter in Comicsgate TM drama
>Retract targeting JDA and truce
>Get Liam mad at you again

"Wise men speak because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something - Plato"

Congrats on being the FOOL! :story:
 
Is he not wrong about how The Drinker gives "fake" reviews, reviews given without actually watching the things he says he watches? That seems to be the foundation and the linchpin of Zack's whole crusade as per what Zack has said.

He's playing a persona. So fake in that sense.

As someone who doesn’t watch Drinker’s reviews I can confirm that Zack is 100% right about Drinker of recent years. Drinker would be proud of my review.

There seems to have been some Fandom cringe simps who have crept into the thread.
 
The other problem is that about half his commentary isn't about attacking the Critical Drinker and friends for not liking the slop he likes, it's attacking anyone who doesn't like the slop he likes. Like people who watch, or who used to watch his own channel. I mean he's choosing to die on the hill of Joker: Folie a Deux, a film where I think he is the only person who actually likes it.

He's really getting a lot of use out of that art class he terrorized.

He likes Joker 2? Really?

That was a movie made for Lady Gaga and Todd Phillips and no one else...fuck.

That is exactly the same as Richard. Same damn problem. Hates something everyone likes, can't take criticism, and doubles down refusing to ever take advice or improve.

Yeah, of course he liked Joker 2.
 
Back