Off-Topic Indoctrination Material for Toddlers and Children from Mainly LGBT Organizations - And Unique Niche Books That Fit Nowhere

[ZazietheBeast]

I now have the other books from that same duo who are writing adult manuals posing as kids books. Starting with "I am Love". Bothers me on two ways. First, of all the colors to express 'love', why the troon death flag colors? Second, take note of the 'helpless' person here. Its someone brown as well as the use for the obvious Muzzie and nigger analog. This is current year politics masquerading as children's books. Books for kids in general are supposed to take them to an adventure and let them walk in the shoes of a character and then learn a lesson. No such thing can be found here. You just get the lesson right in your face like all other SJW works tend to be. The worst part? I found all of these in a grade school classroom.

Spoiler: I am Love

And the author's most famous book and recommended by NYT. For a kid's book, there's sure alot of hard words kids wouldn't get.

Spoiler: I am Human

"I Am One" is a book about priming your kid to activism. Even thanks that fetal alcohol syndrome corpo-shill Greta Thunberg. I'll at least give it credit for not trying to get them to be a modern-day SJW. However, factor in all the previous books, it is out to turn your kid into a stereotypical SJW.

Spoiler: I am One

And the last book in the series. A book about about being an attentionwhore being passed as being comfortable with your own skin. It is also heavily fag coded.

Spoiler: I AM ME

One silver lining I can say about these books is that the kiddos don't read em. I know this because when I open these books, they hardly have any use. And kids tend to be not so gentle when it comes to handling books. Its not as appealing compared all the other books in their library. Anyone who does and internalizes the 'lessons' these books try to preach and they can expect a childhood getting bullied. Become a prime recipient of 'early and often'.

"Be Kind" is wannabe commie doublespeak for "be a SJW"?

Yes. But it is merely one of many pieces. The rest of it comes from the pozzed history books and lesson plans these leftist teachers are preaching. Also to no surprise, its the standard demographic for SJWslop. The White woman. That said, I have also seen nog and spic as well.

It must also be said that their rhetoric does get used against them by some malicious kids who understand they can effectively skip school if they claim to be a Tumblr snowflake.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

they changed ‘love’ to basically mean ‘lust’

Brings to mind the CWCki saying "Chris Chan" thinks mere sex is love. Seems "Chris Chan" really is a face of Clown World.

And when the SJWs say "love is love", they really mean "sex is sex"?

I have also seen [...] [Hispanic] as well.

I'm (half) Hispanic and find SJW slop utterly repulsive. To me it looks like demoralizing propaganda.

 

[A Fucking Houseplant]

dude I miss children's books from back when I was a kid

 

[Kari Kamiya]

One silver lining I can say about these books is that the kiddos don't read em. I know this because when I open these books, they hardly have any use. And kids tend to be not so gentle when it comes to handling books.

That's why they have demonic skinwalkers reading them to hostages every weekend instead. Can't have grubby little hands tearing up all that "beautiful" artwork.

 

[the inconfident]

One silver lining I can say about these books is that the kiddos don't read em. I know this because when I open these books, they hardly have any use. And kids tend to be not so gentle when it comes to handling books. Its not as appealing compared all the other books in their library. Anyone who does and internalizes the 'lessons' these books try to preach and they can expect a childhood getting bullied. Become a prime recipient of 'early and often'.

I was about to say... I think the biggest sin of these books is looking utterly boring. As a kid I would like to read, I dunno, a story about a giant snake or some hero shit. They come with this yoga meditation talk about self acceptance... Boring as fuck.

They do have some good messages on authenticity and taking a stand on your own beliefs but:
1. Very young kids wouldnt even get what that means, they dont even have a full personality developed. That happens on adolescence.
2. They never mention rules. Society has rules. Kids gotta learn about it. This book smells like entitled bullshit.

Thank you for your service finding these books (dont forget to wash your hands after touching them)

 

[ToroidalBoat]

However, factor in all the previous books, it is out to turn your kid into a stereotypical SJW.

"I am human" SJWs say, as they imply those who aren't are subhuman (at least if they're white males)?

Fits with "decent human being" being SJW for "woke" thing, despite "dehumanization" being a fixation.

 

[My cravat doesn't flutter]

You just get the lesson right in your face like all other SJW works tend to be.

The entirety of each of those books read like the end of a kids' book. They read like the summary of the lessons that a book would have. I see each of the characters that "I" encounters and think there's a little story that's missing. Like the girl who walks through the flowers - there should be a page or two about the interaction that the two characters have.

 

[ZazietheBeast]

"I am human" SJWs say, as they imply those who aren't are subhuman (at least if they're white males)?

Fits with "decent human being" being SJW for "woke" thing, despite "dehumanization" being a fixation.

Ironically because of their own internal dehumanization, they cannot write a story worth a damn. Because to write a story effectively, you must be human and everything that comes with it. Emotions and experience as well as the gumption to express all of it. But because an SJW's mind is like a bot reading TVtropes, they will quickly pick out everything not acceptable in current year in their own work and insert everything acceptable in current year. Which are elements that simply do not mesh. As such, they cannot create, only destroy. This is also why any work they make comes off as artificial and robotic.

See the two flops in vidya this year. Concord and Dustborn despite being two different works in two different genres have several things in common. Characters that look like someone just smacked a randomizer button with the SJW blend on top of current year messaging being plastered all over it.

That's why they have demonic skinwalkers reading them to hostages every weekend instead. Can't have grubby little hands tearing up all that "beautiful" artwork.

Along with that, you have femoid teachers drunk on college indoctrination happily preaching this bullshit. One thing for certain this indoctrination material is making it clear however is that parents need to stop relying on other sources to raise their children and find a way to raise them themselves. Because they might not like traits these propagandists stuff into them.

I was about to say... I think the biggest sin of these books is looking utterly boring. As a kid I would like to read, I dunno, a story about a giant snake or some hero shit. They come with this yoga meditation talk about self acceptance... Boring as fuck.

This is true. I still remember the little Golden Book about the Little Girl and the Porcelain Doll. That one had a plot and the lessons were subtle. Thankfully, there's still tons of books that are still about weird and cool shit in the schools. Thankfully, they won't go Fahrenheit 451 on the oldies just yet considering the last thing Teachers need are the kids being bored out of their minds and making their already stressful day a living Hell.

The entirety of each of those books read like the end of a kids' book. They read like the summary of the lessons that a book would have.

This is also reflected in other media SJWs dabble in. Its nothing but preachy in your face shit. In short, they've taken the formula in Afterschool Cartoons ala Captain Planet where instead of entertaining the kid first and then belting out the morals, they just cut out entertainment entirely and the entire episode is nothing but the message.

Nobody likes getting lectured. Especially kids.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

Nobody likes getting lectured. Especially kids.

Especially when the subject of the lecture is demoralizing BS.

Can you imagine being a white person -- especially male -- born as "Generation Alpha" or a late "Zoomer", and growing up in Current Year Clown World? Being told your life doesn't matter and that it's "racist" to say it does? Being told your natural sexual urges are inherently "bad" -- delusional BS like "sexualizing" and "objectifying" and "misogynist" -- if you happen to be male? Being told that pretty much everything you do is some form of "white supremacy" or "discrimination", from BS like "cultural appropriation" to BS like "male entitlement"? And if you try to contest any of that demoralizing crap, you may be "cancelled" as "a bad person", or told to "man up" or other "gaslighting" BS? And can you imagine that along with such commie BS vilifying you for who you are, you had to deal with "The New Normal" disrupting formative years?

 

[Elwood P. Dowd]

dude I miss children's books from back when I was a kid

View attachment 6507745

The Heteronormative patriarchal mass birthing stereotyping that is Make Way for Ducklings must be prevented from reaching the eyes and ears of the young!

Also, Mrs. Mallard is a one avian population explosion hatching Jack, Kack, Lack, Mack, Nack Ouack, Pack and Quack. Abortion is a bird's right! To say nothing of being anti-diversity, refusing to raise her brood around foxes or turtles! (Though I don't think even snapping turtles eat baby ducks, do they?)

 

[Kari Kamiya]

(Though I don't think even snapping turtles eat baby ducks, do they?)

They're omnivores, and ducklings are small enough to be snatched up. So they might if the opportunity is there.

 

[ZsaZsaBinks]

We Toot

The premise is this: It’s sexist to be grossed out by girls farting and to tell girls to hold in their farts. Never mind that farting is gross and that even boys are expected to hold in their farts.

 

[Grand Duke Snowfall]

We Toot
View attachment 6604416
The premise is this: It’s sexist to be grossed out by girls farting and to tell girls to hold in their farts. Never mind that farting is gross and that even boys are expected to hold in their farts.

Place your bets, people! What are the chances of this being a case of the author’s barely disguised fetish?

 

[ZsaZsaBinks]

Place your bets, people! What are the chances of this being a case of the author’s barely disguised fetish?

It’s so weird how many SJWs have fetishes.

 

[ZazietheBeast]

It’s so weird how many SJWs have fetishes.

And the whole rule about projection applies to them big-time. Kim Bel Air herself desires to get dicked down and also get dicked down by turtle cock. Yet this person is responsible for uglifying characters in video games because beautiful women are sexist.

The sooner society as a whole start shunning these people and force them out into the street (or given the Suharto solution) is the sooner the West can recover.

 

[GenociderSyo]

That "masterpiece" was on a feminist book site:

 

[FiveStarAce]

Man... this thread makes me glad that i grew up with a steady diet of kung-fu movies and og dragon ball.

 

[ZsaZsaBinks]

That "masterpiece" was on a feminist book site:
View attachment 6604597
View attachment 6604603View attachment 6604636View attachment 6604638View attachment 6604641
View attachment 6604645View attachment 6604673View attachment 6604681View attachment 6604689
View attachment 6604690View attachment 6604715View attachment 6604719View attachment 6604733
View attachment 6604761View attachment 6604763View attachment 6604766View attachment 6604768

I’m sure some weirdo loves this book.

But it makes me so uncomfortable. Most people don’t want to think about this sort of thing. And why does the art look like the art on a New Yorker magazine cover?

I miss when the weirdest book was a book about a girl who got stripes because she refused to eat Lima beans.

 

[VargReallyDidNothingWrong]

We Toot
View attachment 6604416
The premise is this: It’s sexist to be grossed out by girls farting and to tell girls to hold in their farts. Never mind that farting is gross and that even boys are expected to hold in their farts.

Feminists will never get tired of turning some private mental illness (their mom telling them it wasn't polite to fart loudly at the dinner table once when they were 11) into a serious problem that little girls face day in and day out, and that needs to be addressed to ensure they don't grow up with trauma.

 

[ZsaZsaBinks]

Feminists will never get tired of turning some private mental illness (their mom telling them it wasn't polite to fart loudly at the dinner table once when they were 11) into a serious problem that little girls face day in and day out, and that needs to be addressed to ensure they don't grow up with trauma.

At least the book Everyone Poops wasn’t pushing an agenda.