Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 66 13.9%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 11.8%
  • This Year

    Votes: 74 15.6%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 163 34.3%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 116 24.4%

  • Total voters
    475
I'd love to see that come in front of a judge.
Why? It's not like this (or any other) judge is ever interested in slapping this shit down.

If courts actually started putting people in jail for contempt and perjury, you'd see this crap disappear overnight, but humans will evolve to shit solid gold nuggets before American courts collectively decide to put a stop to this shit.
 
View attachment 6508544
Is this a flub on Mr. Hardin's part? I had a hard time parsing this unless "Plaintiffs complaining of Greer's failure to comply" and other instances of Plaintiff refers to something the DJF said before bowing out. He corrects to Defendants when referring to their own acceptance of an extension because of his father being in the ICU.
Yes. Hardin needs an editor.
it's been corrected in the errata (ecf 166) that useful mistake posted above.
1728611621096.png
instead of hiring an editor, mr. hardin ought to consider running all of his filings past the thread.
 
I am certainly not a lawyer but It really stands out just how much more coherent and logical and intelligent Hardin is than russyel. I had no clue what that drooling retard was talking about half the time but Hardins thoughts and conclusions are extremely well communicated.
 
I want to clarify that I think Hardin is doing an excellent job and I understand that filing a near immediate response increases the possibility of minor errors. It's also hard to see your own mistakes in written work unless you have the time to take a decent break from looking at it, which he doesn't.

But also I wonder why he's not bringing up the fact that Greer has a paralegal degree more. As someone above said, he should know this shit already but he's trying to coast on his retardation and pro se status.
 
I am certainly not a lawyer but It really stands out just how much more coherent and logical and intelligent Hardin is than russyel. I had no clue what that drooling retard was talking about half the time but Hardins thoughts and conclusions are extremely well communicated.
It's almost like one of them went to real college to actually learn how to do this, while the other took 5 years to complete a 2 year program on how to (partially) do this.
 
That's actually a good question for the higher ups around here.
Greer has committed perjury when he was instructed move this case forward or else. Is this not cause to have this whole thing scrapped? If the judge accepts the filing, perjury and all, is that not cause for something to raise their hand and say Hi, excuse me what the fuck is happening here?
Unless they're specifically under oath, legal filings are not under oath and therefore cannot be perjury.
 
But also I wonder why he's not bringing up the fact that Greer has a paralegal degree more. As someone above said, he should know this shit already but he's trying to coast on his retardation and pro se status.
Because insofar as the court is concerned, there are lawyers what should know better and pro se retards. They don't admit of any other variations, and I believe sometimes even a lawyer representing himself will fall into the pro se retard bucket. After all, the rules of conduct for lawyers are to protect the clients, and if a pro se retard lawyer is fucking himself over, that's on him.
 
After all, the rules of conduct for lawyers are to protect the clients, and if a pro se retard lawyer is fucking himself over, that's on him.
But since he's pro se he's given a lot of leniency for errors he claims he didn't know about, but as a paralegal he SHOULD know them...
 
But since he's pro se he's given a lot of leniency for errors he claims he didn't know about, but as a paralegal he SHOULD know them...
He's fucking up on shit that anyone who doesn't have manually breathe should know or be able to figure out, and that hasn't derailed him yet.
 
Unless they're specifically under oath, legal filings are not under oath and therefore cannot be perjury.
Well, forgive me for being a retard. IA(fucking definitely)NAL. Either way, presenting a thing (like the schedule) that is supposed to be decided by both parties as being decided by both parties without one of the party's consent is, I would assume, not a good thing to present to the court. Please inform me if I'm wrong on this, but I feel I'm not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marvin
Back