Last edited:
US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians
- Thread starter SeniorFuckFace
- Start date
- Status
TheDarknessGrows
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2021
Nothing at all. You are good at your job but maybe include more context and analysis in your info dumps. But you're probably one of the top contributors.
It's just that you're a janny.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2019
Netizennameless
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2021
It was the one retarded line "I'm something you'll never be, President" that Obama slipped in there that did it. Obama's ego and arrogance cost the Democrats everything.
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2023
I love this meme
Best thing ever.
Best thing ever.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2019
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2023
How does Trump literally "profit" from a product or business he does not own or have zero control over?
That's like saying McDonald's profits from burger food trucks.
That's like saying McDonald's profits from burger food trucks.
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2018
Short answer is that if Trump wins, Democrats will say fuck it and pretty much trigger Great Depression 2.0 on their way out of office. Or WW3. Or BOTH if they feel extremely cunty.
Long answer is that Vance is Trump's insurance policy against further assassins. Vance will reign vengeance and damnation against the left and Democrats if Trump is killed by them
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2024
In 2011. The people killed were Al-Qaeda members, but still American citizens. It also killed some teenager who was a "bystander" (despite being in the same place as a major Al-Qaeda leader).
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2020
September 30, 2011.
Do not get me wrong I am not standing up for them but they were citizens and deserved a trial.
Amelia Troonheart
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2022
One cope I've heard is that it wasn't a teleprompter in the typical sense but was a Spanish translation of what she was saying or what the questions were or something to help the showrunners. Note that I saw this stated on Twitter with no source. Is that a thing or just pure delusion?
How would she script an entire town hall? Does she just have a set of pre-written answers and they match a response to an actual live question or are the questions scripted too?
I'm so confused by the logistics of this.
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2014
That would be me.
It's less that he's a leader per se, and more that he's their Jesus figure. He's the biggest success story they have. He's the most charismatic Democrat in decades (not a high bar to clear when most of your competition has been in office longer than most members of this forum have been alive), and his sole interest as president was establishing his own personal legacy. He's everything the establishment ever wanted rolled into one dude and then some.
His administration is what metastasized some of the biggest issues we now face politically into the form most are familiar with now:
* The Wall of Silence is a defensive tactic his administration started implementing - namely, that he began the process of aggressively filtering out his critics - you want to talk to the big man, you have to go through his associates, and if they think you're going to criticize his policies or call him out for fuck-ups, you simply wouldn't be allowed. This continues, in a fashion, under Biden.
* The overt weaponization of the fed against poltiical opposition is something Obama himself started and which has continues under Biden and friends.
* The Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act, despite the name, functionally legalized propagandizing in the USA. You tell me how that shit has gone.
The Dem side of the uniparty apparatus was never going to allow their most successful pawn to leave the board. Ever.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2019
Oh, so he killed a muslim terrorist. And that's a bad thing how?
Necrosan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 15, 2024
October 9, 2024
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Robert N. Garcia Chief Patrol Agent Swanton Sector
FROM: Zachary Apotheker Border Patrol Agent Newport Station
SUBJECT: Line in the Sand Film
I participated in Line in the Sand Film on duty in uniform, as did many other Border Patrol Agents. I do not recall what dates I participated in the film. None of the interviews were filmed on USBP property. The only compensation I received and benefitted from was a free, clean, and clear conscience because I told the truth to the American Public and fulfilled my duty to the Constitution of the United States of America.
I did participate in Line in the Sand from inside a USBP service vehicle just like other agents who are in the film. I did not transport any non-USBP employee in a USBP service vehicle.
I have provided no CBP information to any non-CBP employee, and I accessed zero systems regarding this film. I have given zero information that is not public and that thousands of other agents have not told their families at social gatherings. All the information I gave regarding this film is clearly and readily available all over the internet and television.
There are over 300,000 missing children that the Department of Homeland Security has admittedly not been able to keep track of. I noted that Border Patrol’s policy is to not take their biometric information making it effectively impossible to be able to positively identify them.
Regarding if I received Supervisory approval in advance of my actions, I did not. However, I received all of the necessary approval I needed from the United States Constitution. In fact, I am directed to do what I have done from the Oath of Office I took under God the day entered on duty.
I remind you it is the same Oath of Office every Border Patrol Agent takes the day they choose to enter on duty. For reminder in case some have forgotten. “I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” I respectfully reiterate that policy does not supersede the Constitution. God Bless.
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Robert N. Garcia Chief Patrol Agent Swanton Sector
FROM: Zachary Apotheker Border Patrol Agent Newport Station
SUBJECT: Line in the Sand Film
I participated in Line in the Sand Film on duty in uniform, as did many other Border Patrol Agents. I do not recall what dates I participated in the film. None of the interviews were filmed on USBP property. The only compensation I received and benefitted from was a free, clean, and clear conscience because I told the truth to the American Public and fulfilled my duty to the Constitution of the United States of America.
I did participate in Line in the Sand from inside a USBP service vehicle just like other agents who are in the film. I did not transport any non-USBP employee in a USBP service vehicle.
I have provided no CBP information to any non-CBP employee, and I accessed zero systems regarding this film. I have given zero information that is not public and that thousands of other agents have not told their families at social gatherings. All the information I gave regarding this film is clearly and readily available all over the internet and television.
There are over 300,000 missing children that the Department of Homeland Security has admittedly not been able to keep track of. I noted that Border Patrol’s policy is to not take their biometric information making it effectively impossible to be able to positively identify them.
Regarding if I received Supervisory approval in advance of my actions, I did not. However, I received all of the necessary approval I needed from the United States Constitution. In fact, I am directed to do what I have done from the Oath of Office I took under God the day entered on duty.
I remind you it is the same Oath of Office every Border Patrol Agent takes the day they choose to enter on duty. For reminder in case some have forgotten. “I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” I respectfully reiterate that policy does not supersede the Constitution. God Bless.
It's a big gamble but I'm sure that if Trump & Co. were to enter office they'd pardon him if they are able to prosecute this guy for telling the truth.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
The more I see of Kamala Harris the more I see a low IQ person who isn't smart enough to act like she hasn't been told the fix is in.
IF Trump wins this election Kamala will be the most surprised of all.
IF Trump wins this election Kamala will be the most surprised of all.
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2024
I think it could be argued that they were enemy combatants. However, it does get fucky because we aren't at war with Yemen and they were American citizens.
At the end of the day, though, Obama had lawyers on speed dial for literally every air strike, drone strike, or artillery barrage. There is a reason why combat veterans fucking hate Obama.
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2023
Her face is photoshopped onto her body from another picture. This fucking retard can't even post properly.
Anasûrimbor Kellhus
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 9, 2022
Really for me it’s only that if trump did it the people who deep throat Obama would be crying every day about how it’s proof of trumps disregard for constitutional rights and proof of him being literally hitler
Other than that… eh.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2021
The moderator claims it was his speech:
Source (Archive)
But if that’s true, why was it showing his speech and not the timer when Kamala was speaking? Why has Univision not shared any close ups of the text or video of the screen showing the timer?
The screen never shows the timer. It does turn off, but it doesn't show a timer like the moderator said:
YouTube
Also, the comments on both the English and Spanish versions of the video are pro-Trump (the Spanish stream has a fraction of the views as the English one and Google Translate messes up pronouns):
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2021
Hating a Janny is nothing personal it’s just the nature of the things. It’s like hating someone for walking slow, it’s nothing really personal unless you are a great big fat person.
You are okay as far as Jannie’s go, but you are still a Janny.
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2020
You pretty much answered question 1 with question 2
if her whole campaign has taught me anything it's that all she does is reiterate the same talking points over and over again... which are no talking points because it's more about her than whatever "policies" she has to offer.
i mean at this point she's a pro at dodging questions via storytelling.
- Status