Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 16.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.0%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 95 24.6%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 69 17.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 156 40.4%

  • Total voters
    386
I was looking for something else and came across the filings for the foundation so I might as well link them here.
1 Million $ in disbursements, negative income of over 400k.
At the current rate the foundation is gone in about 22 years if they keep going like that.

Better cut off Nick and Kayla so the kids can go to College.

PS. Can you people please take you weird grudge postings into the autistic thunderdome and verbally mutilate each other there?
 
1 Million $ in disbursements, negative income of over 400k.
At the current rate the foundation is gone in about 22 years if they keep going like that.

Better cut off Nick and Kayla so the kids can go to College.
That is a charitable foundation, it's not a family trust fund.
 
Two points:

1. The original story from Nick was that his mother was involved in education. He claimed that he was a latchkey child and went to daycare as well. If you do not believe that, the date of the windfall of Petrofac stock occurred while Nick was in his teens, so that contradicts the 'Oil Princess' tale.

2. Given the age of the older sister, she could be either Celeste or Bob's child from before their marriage. There is no firm evidence one way or the other.
Didn’t we confirm his older sister as Celeste’s? Based on the Facebook friends and the fact that Bob wasn’t previously married?
 
Nick should shift to topics he still has some credibility on.

He could become a cuckoldry channel interviewing guests about their favorite experiences sitting in the chair.
Been thinking about Nick’s streaming future & I think the cuckoldry channel could potentially work out well for him. Audiences tend to respond well to honesty. A non-lying Nick, up front in his cuckoldry, might be just the thing that allows him to grow. The question becomes, will the Kiwi Kontrol Kouncil okay such a thing, overall? I’m initiating a vote, yay or nay?
Yay
from me.
Psychiatrists don't really distinguish much between those two terms any more, and on top of that, people can go from one state to the other. Previously, Nick was pretty capable of passing for human and even for nice. Now, anyone watching him who had seen him previously can tell instantly he has some screws loose.
Nice to see that stated as it’s gotten twisted in recent years. It’s a media invention, the sociopath vs psychopath thing. A common & well regarded theory is that many ASPD’s mimic emotions to aid passing as human. Mimicry helps them blend in. Either way, Nick really went mask off in letting his unhinged ego hang all the way out.
 
Nick was planning to sell the house before any of this latest shit blew up, which suggests that he was already hurting financially

It amazes me that he s done what he s done.

It was clear the rumble contract didnt get re newed, I can see him burning through money with the cars and just having those kids but the fucking legal costs with montegraph was soo fucking self inflected.

then all this shit
 
2. Given the age of the older sister, she could be either Celeste or Bob's child from before their marriage. There is no firm evidence one way or the other.
1728687213287.png
She was a director of the foundation in 2018, which would make her Celeste's kid. Nick was a director in 2019.

As a side note, the value of the foundation's assets didn't increase following the deaths of Louis or Peaches so presumably they left no bequests to the foundation. Most years asset sales (presumably of shares) account for a significant amount of the foundation's revenue.
 
Last edited:
Didn’t we confirm his older sister as Celeste’s? Based on the Facebook friends and the fact that Bob wasn’t previously married?

See below. This seems very indicative that Kristen is from the Owens side of the family. Also, Celeste intervened in a family law dispute in TX on behalf of Kristen.

View attachment 6511861
She was a director of the foundation in 2018, which would make her Celeste's kid. Nick was a director in 2019.

As a side note, the value of the foundation's assets didn't increase following the deaths of Louis or Peaches so presumably they left no bequests to the foundation. Most years asset sales (presumably of shares) account for a significant amount of the foundation's revenue.
 
Right, this might just be the family charity where they buy goodwill with.
If you go through the Form 990s there are donations in their local area though I don't remember what they were or how large they were. Not sure if it could be considered "buying goodwill" though.

As a side note, the value of the foundation's assets didn't increase following the deaths of Louis or Peaches so presumably they left no bequests to the foundation. Most years asset sales (presumably of shares) account for a significant amount of the foundation's revenue.
I went through the 990s at one point; the vast majority of the funding came from donations of Petrofac stock in the first couple years of the foundation (2006-2008 tax years, I believe) with a small donation in a later year. While there were some parts of the will that suggested that there were some circumstances that might have resulted in additional donations to the foundation, that appears not to have happened, at least after looking at the 990s.

Note that Nick's parents also have made large charitable donations in their own name; the family may prefer that to donating to the foundation.
 
Last edited:
There's no reason to begin with to conclude that they have an actual trust set up for him as opposed to ad hoc handouts and he has insisted he doesn't have one (probably one of his "technically correct") things.
I think his pedantic faggotry about words is technically correct when he talks about not having a trust. The trust technically owns itself as a legal entity, beneficiaries don’t own anything of the trust outside the four corners of the document as far as I understand it. So the “owner” is Grandpa’s Trust, Beard is the administrator, and Rickety Rackets just gets whatever monthly cash the document stipulates. Ergo not his trust. He never says “I am not a beneficiary of a trust” or “I don’t get any money from a trust”. He just says he never owns one. Legalistic pedantic faggotry at its finest.
 
Neither sociopath or psychopath are recognised terms and sociopath was never used outside of America and never defined properly. Like most of psychology it's pseudoscience
Sociopath is another term for “anti social personality disorder”. It’s just an outdated term used by lay people for that personality disorder. It’s not really that it’s not recognized per se. But the attributes experts recognize are what they are and Nick fits the bill:

Deceitfulness, repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for pleasure or personal profit. Impulsivity or failure to plan.

Consistently shows no regard for right and wrong and ignores the rights and feelings of others.

Lack of empathy, which means you don't care about or understand other peoples' feelings.

We can quibble all day over terms and words and official diagnoses. But when someone consistently demonstrates the above attributes-keen eyed people pick up on it and put it together. Bottom line is Nick is a CON. He’s a conman and a phony and it was only a matter of time before his mask fell. He’s now been de-masked and he’s actually kind of dangerous right now because of that. He’s circling the drain. Desperate, unmasked sociopaths rarely magically get their shit together-they go nuclear and are a risk to everyone around them. Right now he’s facing prison time, further humiliation and depersonifying. He’s a danger to his wife, his girlfriend and his kids.
 
Nice to see that stated as it’s gotten twisted in recent years. It’s a media invention, the sociopath vs psychopath thing. A common & well regarded theory is that many ASPD’s mimic emotions to aid passing as human. Mimicry helps them blend in. Either way, Nick really went mask off in letting his unhinged ego hang all the way out.
Or in Nick's case id. You know, because he's an id-iot.
He’s a danger to his wife, his girlfriend and his kids.
I'd hate to be that pug right now.
 
Note that Nick's parents also have made large charitable donations in their own name; the family may prefer that to donating to the foundation.
I read an interview with Celeste a couple of years ago where she talked about continuing her parents' legacy. It's where I found out that Louis and Peaches gave each of the grandchildren $1500 a year to donate to charity in the hope of instilling the habit of philanthropy early. I wish I had bookmarked it as she also talked about her own faith.

It's very possible that the family have decided that the foundation isn't the ideal vehicle for giving. It was originally set up with the involvement of a woman called Dawn Franks who acted as paid Executive Director in 2019 and 2020.
 
I think his pedantic faggotry about words is technically correct when he talks about not having a trust. The trust technically owns itself as a legal entity, beneficiaries don’t own anything of the trust outside the four corners of the document as far as I understand it. So the “owner” is Grandpa’s Trust, Beard is the administrator, and Rickety Rackets just gets whatever monthly cash the document stipulates. Ergo not his trust. He never says “I am not a beneficiary of a trust” or “I don’t get any money from a trust”. He just says he never owns one. Legalistic pedantic faggotry at its finest.

Most people who now nothing of Nick would say this approach is overly critical, but when you have pedantry like 'I said on the wall, and that means a wall of SHAME!' out there among a myriad of worse examples, you realise nothing is too far for Nick.

I read an interview with Celeste a couple of years ago where she talked about continuing her parents' legacy. It's where I found out that Louis and Peaches gave each of the grandchildren $1500 a year to donate to charity in the hope of instilling the habit of philanthropy early. I wish I had bookmarked it as she also talked about her own faith.

It's very possible that the family have decided that the foundation isn't the ideal vehicle for giving. It was originally set up with the involvement of a woman called Dawn Franks who acted as paid Executive Director in 2019 and 2020.

I was unable to turn up the article, but I found something that may suggest Celeste continued the tradition with Nick:

1728692114631.png

Bob and Celeste gave much more:

1728692194912.png

Link

This is the 'gay' kids camp Nick talked about supporting.
 

Attachments

2. Given the age of the older sister, she could be either Celeste or Bob's child from before their marriage. There is no firm evidence one way or the other.
Didn’t we confirm his older sister as Celeste’s? Based on the Facebook friends and the fact that Bob wasn’t previously married?
She was a director of the foundation in 2018, which would make her Celeste's kid. Nick was a director in 2019.
Except her maiden name is Rekieta. That would normally indicate that she's Bob's daughter from a prior relationship or marriage.

Are we assuming that Bob adopted her? This would mean that...

- Celeste had a prior marriage and the bio dad went MIA
- Celeste had a child out of wedlock and, perhaps, never declared a father

Either option isn't very Catholic. Am I missing something?
 
Except her maiden name is Rekieta. That would normally indicate that she's Bob's daughter from a prior relationship or marriage.

Are we assuming that Bob adopted her? This would mean that...

- Celeste had a prior marriage and the bio dad went MIA
- Celeste had a child out of wedlock and, perhaps, never declared a father

Either option isn't very Catholic. Am I missing something?
She's from an age when it wasn't unusual for fathers to have little to do with their children following divorce and for them to be adopted by step-dads and take their name (at one time they didn't even need to be adopted to use the step-father's name when the mother remarried and step-fathers became legally responsible for the kids when they married the mother, ending any legal responsibilities of biodad).

There are multiple options regarding her maiden name being Rekieta but her role in the foundation makes it almost certain that she's an Owen by blood. Few people practise their religion perfectly and Catholics are no exception.
 
Last edited:
This is the 'gay' kids camp Nick talked about supporting.
It seems that, for once, Nick is being very literally honest about what kind of operation he and his parents are supporting:
We have also added a second week of Camp True Colors for LGBTQ+ youth – another population that’s on the rise.
Definitely a very trad thing to be involved with 🤔
 
He used to have a good grasp of basic concepts and be able to explain them coherently. Maybe he wasn't Chemerinsky or something but nobody expected that in a show mostly about lolsuits. Predictions are mostly for fools and any case that isn't pure buffoonery has two professionals on different sides who think they have a case or at least that it isn't sanctionably frivolous. Any case covered on YouTube that isn't buffoonery has people disagreeing about it too, including the actual practicing lawyers.

I went back and looked at a lot of his older content, even as early as the Maddox v Dick days he wasn’t quite as accurate as he could have been. He could explain the most basic of basic to someone completely out of the know, but he was far from an expert. He got by with subject matter and being approachable.
he has neither the good subject matter or approachability that he did back then.

His 3 biggest successes, Vic, Rittenhouse, and Depp were all extremely unique cases that he was one of the only actual lawyers covering. The field has changed so much that now every case gets YouTube coverage by people who actually do understand the law.
With Rittenhouse your choices were Nick, Law & Crime, and Ralph.
 
Back