Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[AnOminous]

One thing I noticed was the psychopaths had a tough time passing for human, but the sociopaths could be more convincing. One of the sociopaths, a handsome young man, referred to his two girlfriends not by name but as Bank One and Bank Two, which is how he saw them--solely as objects, financial resources, walking ATMs. That is, I think, how Rekieta sees his children. And his wife.

Psychiatrists don't really distinguish much between those two terms any more, and on top of that, people can go from one state to the other. Previously, Nick was pretty capable of passing for human and even for nice. Now, anyone watching him who had seen him previously can tell instantly he has some screws loose.

It's assumed as that's how families with this kind of money would normally operate, plus the comments from other lawyers about how Nicky somehow knows a lot about how trusts work, very odd considering he doesn't know shit about law in general. It could also just be a case of 'why not both'.

As dumb as Nick acts, he isn't actually dumb, or maybe he is now from the drugs (possibly permanently), but he could generally be bothered to understand something if it was in his interests to do so.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

BREAKING NEWS! New recording* from INSIDE the Rekieta household PROVES the 9 year-old was the one who introduced cocaine into the home! Nick VINDICATED!

*Due to the minor status of those involved, the video has been censored, but audio has been unaltered.

 

[AnOminous]

That aside - his motive was likely just what most young men's motives are - to get a girl. I don't think it has to be more complicated than that.

Assuming the whole "pretending to be gay" story was true, he was a male cheerleader. I doubt with that and his overall faggy mannerisms that it would be a tough sell. He comes across as a complete fag. When he showed up and had five kids you would assume heterosex despite those mannerisms but now?

Now, of course with those numbers they would almost certainly not be going by base support minimums, but that would require either a settlement agreement for more or litigating it. And a judge is going to apply some level of fairness. But he's not going to be made destitute by some family court judge

He might if he "handles" it like he has his criminal case and the Monty case.

 

[Fapcop]

Now, of course with those numbers they would almost certainly not be going by base support minimums, but that would require either a settlement agreement for more or litigating it. And a judge is going to apply some level of fairness. But he's not going to be made destitute by some family court judge

Don’t forget that sweet, sweet alimony! Kayla hadn’t had a job in like a decade. Any divorce would mean he’d have to pay alimony for a good five years.

And 100.000$ is a very low estimate of his income. His trust fund income would become part of the divorce hearings. I could imagine Nick giving Kayla a very generous divorce just to avoid that

 

[Major]

Psychiatrists don't really distinguish much between those two terms any more, and on top of that, people can go from one state to the other. Previously, Nick was pretty capable of passing for human and even for nice. Now, anyone watching him who had seen him previously can tell instantly he has some screws loose.

As dumb as Nick acts, he isn't actually dumb, or maybe he is now from the drugs (possibly permanently), but he could generally be bothered to understand something if it was in his interests to do so.

Neither sociopath or psychopath are recognised terms and sociopath was never used outside of America and never defined properly. Like most of psychology it's pseudoscience

 

[Irony Deficiency]

Then Bob is more the culprit in Nick's dysfunction. Bob after all was there for drunk streams, had to know his son was hitting it hard night after night, then told the court he'd never see his son abusing drugs or alcohol. Bob's a liar. Like father like son.

EDIT: Wait, do I have the right parents? Forget everything I said, or, don't.

They 100% will lie for their son, not out of love and concern for him but in a vain attempt to save face and try to mitigate embarrassment with friends and family. He’s making THEM look bad. And maybe his outlandish behavior is in some twisted way a measure of revenge on them. But my sense is Celeste is the one who brings the hammer down.

By Nick and Qayla changing their address to HER parents this surely means the kids are there. Celeste and Bob were having none of that inconvenience! They have Hollywood vacations to take, Nicholas! So off the kids go to the less fortunate grandparents to be their problem. Celeste and Bob will avoid, avoid, avoid. That being said-I do suspect a threat came down from the hammer to stop streaming and get his life in order. Commenting in pedo-chats is like a grounded kid breaking out his old Ipod to get his social media fix cuz mommy hammer and daddy potato forgot he kept the old thing around.

And yes I suspect Nick supports pedos for the same reason anyone else who wants to live vicariously through them supports them.

 

[Melty Butter]

Law people of Americaland, what are the alimony and child support obligations upon a trust? I assume that anything that passes to Nick is fair game, but what if his allowance is cut? Can the courts compel the family estate to support Kayla and the brood, or is Nick simply reduced to deadbeat status?

IANAL but I know the basics.

• Any co-mingling of funds (e.g shared accounts) from the trust is fair game for Kayla. This is relevant for Nick because we know that he is chronically disorganized. She has a right to approximately half because it is considered a marital asset. Say Nick owns 100 shares of Tesla that he bought from trust funds. He cashes out and, out of laziness, he dumps it into their joint account. This means Kayla has claim to half of the $24K value. In some states this can also be considered relevant for future spousal support.
• Any trust fund money that goes to the daily needs of the kids (tuition, food, clothing) would proportionally go to the parent with the custody. For example, if the kids are with Kayla for 80% of the time, she gets approximately 80% of the funds needed for the kids. It does not matter if that was funded by the trust. Nick is obligated to pay for them.
• Any gifts Kayla recieved from trust fund money - clothing, jewelry, etc. - is hers to keep.
• If Nick declared any of the trust's money as income in joint tax returns, Kayla may have claim to a proportion of the funds. The details vary by state.
• In some states (blue typically), the non-trust fund spouse can claim half of the increased value of the home. In this case we know the main home is owned by the trust but I believe the value has increased by several hundred thousand. She may have claim to approximately half of that.

I'm sure there are exceptions to the above but this is the general landscape. I have not looked up MN laws.

To answer your question more directly, no. Trusts are highly protected. Courts would generally not compel the trust to pay more than what was established by the family unit's historical spending.

 

[repentance]

Nick thinks his future lies in LA, not Bumfuck MN, so I doubt that he'd care if a settlement was negotiated where Kayla keeps the house until the youngest is an adult. He's only going to care about what he, personally, has to pay and a lump sum payment from mummy and daddy to Kayla could get him off that hook.

 

[Gorton Colu]

The LA reception to a middle aged balding skelly druggie would be funny to witness Daxipad would own him even more than we control him.

 

[uhoh spaghettios]

When it comes to Nick possibly wanting to divorce Kayla. Idk how exactly to feel about that.

Super upscaled mugshot Nick is horrifying.

I have zero sympathy for Kayla, she's as bad, if not worse than Nick. I don't think a divorce will happen, she doesn't have the will to get out of bed, do laundry, or cook. She clearly doesn't want to raise children, but she can get Nick to put in the bare minimum in while she pops pills and watches Star Trek.

Thanks. I trained a flux model on Nick, the dataset was almost entirely pillstream screenshots for maximum horror.

Celeste is either an over-bearing, sadistic, brow beating Aunt Lydia type mother

Celeste has the sort of face I see whenever I watch a documentary on Hedonism II. I swear I've heard that mouth talking authoritatively about why well-to-do American women in their later years are happy to pay for Big Black Cock.

Seeing as how Nick's dad has zero aura and has cuck written all over him, my money's on Celeste being a twisted freak. Sanpaku eyes never lie. Kayla's got them too.

 

[TherapyMan]

There's no reason to begin with to conclude that they have an actual trust set up for him as opposed to ad hoc handouts and he has insisted he doesn't have one (probably one of his "technically correct") things.

I am not sure why people are at all charitable to Nick on this. We have no idea how any trust may or may not function because it's largely private information. I would say that there is substantial circumstantial information to conclude that Nick receives a payout subject to conditions. Examples:

1. We know for a fact that for Celeste has a trust fund created in 2005 by Nick's grandparents, and we do not have a complete accounting of how it was financed by the Nick's grandparents or the composition of the trust, or the trust's history.
2. It would be highly unusual for the Owens to not account for biological children of Celeste in structuring the trust or give Celeste exclusive control over the purse strings. Far more likely is that the Owens to set up a dynasty trust using Celeste's name.
   1. In this respect, it also would be out of character for the Owens generally, who seemed to be pretty pragmatic individuals.
3. Nick has always had close ties with Ty Beard, who we know to be the executor of Louis Owen's will and almost certainly to trustee of any trust fund created by the Owens. These close ties would be a bit strange if Nick had no relation with Ty Beard outside of being a family friend of Louis Own.
4. Gifts from Celeste to Nick directly would have tax implications which a trust would avoid and a trust payout would be a more convenient vehicle than an ad hoc arrangement for a litany of reasons.
5. In general, it would just make more sense for Nick to be a beneficiary of Celeste's trust.

My bet has always been that Nick's claim that he does not have a trust fund stems from the idea that it's technically Celeste's trust fund, of which he is a beneficiary that receives regular payments. It's exactly the type of lie by omission he'd tell. I also think in addition to whatever funds Louis and Peaches earmarked for Nick, Celeste Rekieta probably pitched in to help her son when he wanted something.

 

[datura_binge]

On the subject of his legal expertise. I think it's less than zero. He knows the terms etc but he clearly has no grasp and even laymen like me could tell a couple years ago which is why we all quit watching. The second he started having real lawyers on with him it became clear that Nick was out of his element. All he had left was the family man Christian thing. God knows why he decided to out that persona as fake because its literally all he had left.

Nick legit thinks those fans will come back. Imagine giving him real money in a superchat so he, a man portraying a trad Christian, would offer a custom prayer for your sick or dying relative then finding out that he was actually one of the most degenerate people you could imagine.

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

Then Bob is more the culprit in Nick's dysfunction. Bob after all was there for drunk streams, had to know his son was hitting it hard night after night, then told the court he'd never see his son abusing drugs or alcohol. Bob's a liar. Like father like son.

EDIT: Wait, do I have the right parents? Forget everything I said, or, don't.

From how it sounds like Bob worked full time. Celeste was a bit of a Texas Oil Princess who had a kid (I forget how much older his sister is, but I think close to a decade) from a previous marriage that did go back to work once Nick was as old enough to be in school.

Nick was not ever middle class middle class or even lower middle class. He always was upper middle class even before the oil money actually hit his parents.

 

[thebigdream]

The LA reception to a middle aged balding skelly druggie would be funny to witness Daxipad would own him even more than we control him.

I don't want to speak for the other KKK members as this would obviously need a Kouncil vote, but I would reluctantly allow Nick to stream IF he became the live-in slave of Dax and had to kiss Vito's feet on the regular.

 

[repentance]

I was looking for something else and came across the filings for the foundation so I might as well link them here.

https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/205919770

https://archive.md/ke5Fz

 

[Bowl of Ramen]

Seeing as how Nick's dad has zero aura and has cuck written all over him, my money's on Celeste being a twisted freak. Sanpaku eyes never lie. Kayla's got them too.

Spoiler that shit, dang. I smell Icy Hot, baby oil, and boxed wine seeping out of those photos. And Celeste's skin is aging about as well as a football. *gag* Are none of these people decent Catholics?!

 

[General Kalani]

So has Nick Rekeita gone from lolcow to horrorcow now that he apparently gave cocaine to his 9 year old kid?

 

[WEEKEND]

Seeing as how Nick's dad has zero aura and has cuck written all over him, my money's on Celeste being a twisted freak. Sanpaku eyes never lie. Kayla's got them too.

Holy shit Nick looks a lot like his dad, or did look like him before the coke/alcohol/anorexia/negro AIDs cum destroyed our boy's skin. Daddy cuckieta's got a decent hairline too, he's probably in much better health.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

From how it sounds like Bob worked full time. Celeste was a bit of a Texas Oil Princess who had a kid (I forget how much older his sister is, but I think close to a decade) from a previous marriage that did go back to work once Nick was as old enough to be in school.

Nick was not ever middle class middle class or even lower middle class. He always was upper middle class even before the oil money actually hit his parents.

Two points:

1. The original story from Nick was that his mother was involved in education. He claimed that he was a latchkey child and went to daycare as well. If you do not believe that, the date of the windfall of Petrofac stock occurred while Nick was in his teens, so that contradicts the 'Oil Princess' tale.

2. Given the age of the older sister, she could be either Celeste or Bob's child from before their marriage. There is no firm evidence one way or the other.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

1. The original story from Nick was that his mother was involved in education. He claimed that he was a latchkey child and went to daycare as well. If you do not believe that, the date of the windfall of Petrofac stock occurred while Nick was in his teens, so that contradicts the 'Oil Princess' tale.

The IPO was in October 2005, he would have been 23 I believe.

So has Nick Rekeita gone from lolcow to horrorcow now that he apparently gave cocaine to his 9 year old kid?

Wait? He did that? I didn't know that. You're telling me for the first time.

I don't pay close attention to spergs on here. I remembered PVS for some, but clearly not all of his infamy. I remember him being a faggot that dug into other users and played gayop games. If I read any of the other information, then I've clearly forgot it as uninteresting. Gayop games should be rooted out and I congratulate you if you were the one that did root it out.

I made an off hand remark about digging into people's post history for proof in an argument as reddit tier, since it is. I will now state that Balldo's Gate is in gayops with PVS, since you are so butthurt over the idea.

Reddit-tier is sending me an unsolicited DM about how much you hate me which I left without reading - because of course I did - why would I care?

I have no idea why you have a one-sided grudge for a year, but if my posts make you that angry there is an "ignore" button instead of continuing to embarrass yourself.