Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[The Internet Dick]

If Nick and Kayla got together in college after Nick told her he was gay...

Rekieta's 'I pretended I was gay to get close to Kayla' bit sticks out like nothing else. I keep revisiting it, turning it over, trying to get my head around it, and still can't imagine the thinking behind it. Who does that shit? How does it work? More importantly, how could it work? I knew gay kids in high school and college. Some came out late, waiting until after they started college when they had a modicum of autonomy and were at least partially on their own, but even so most people back home knew or strongly suspected they had a same-sex preference, parents included. For Operation Gay BFF to work, Rekieta would need to bring everyone in his social circle in on the gag, telling them his plan. It wouldn't do for his friends--those encountering Kayla--to let slip his true heterosexuality until the time was right for the big reveal. And then we come to Kayla herself. How would a woman take that big reveal? Badly, I would think. Rekieta would need to convince her that his was a strategy of desperation, that he loved her so much that he was willing to live a lie just to be close to her, which is apparently what happened.

But why? What was his motive?

Money, of course. I don't know the details of Rekieta's trust fund arrangement, but I'm guessing every kid he and Kayla produced meant more money from the trust. I took a psychology class in college and the professor showed a series of filmed interviews of men and women clinically diagnosed with anti-social personality disorder, psychopaths and sociopaths. One thing I noticed was the psychopaths had a tough time passing for human, but the sociopaths could be more convincing. One of the sociopaths, a handsome young man, referred to his two girlfriends not by name but as Bank One and Bank Two, which is how he saw them--solely as objects, financial resources, walking ATMs. That is, I think, how Rekieta sees his children. And his wife.

EDIT: Added 'and his wife'. Let's not forget Kayla.

 

[not william stenchever]

One of the sociopaths, a handsome young man, referred to his two girlfriends not by name but as Bank One and Bank Two, which is how he saw them--solely as objects, financial resources, walking ATMs. That is, I think, how Rekieta sees his children.

It would explain his absolute rage at having to drive his keeds around. They are meant to serve him, not the other way around.

 

[uhoh spaghettios]

Especially when those orders come from strong, virile Black men! —Mark

 

[Lian Xing]

Money, of course. I don't know the details of Rekieta's trust fund arrangement, but I'm guessing every kid he and Kayla produced meant more money from the trust.

Exactly. He's a narcissist. He doesn't genuinely care about those children. They are a means to an end.

 

[Sharpeteer]

When it comes to Nick possibly wanting to divorce Kayla. Idk how exactly to feel about that. One one hand - this isn't to absolve him of blame for his actions in any way, but I cannot fault someone for wanting to leave her. She's always asleep, doesn't seem fit to really do anything given what we've seen about her to this point, and is, in my opinion, a mental nutcase. I wouldn't want to be with somebody like that either.

But on the other hand - he made the decision on his own to have a bunch of children with her that he now hates, to make all these comments and remarks about how her body is ruined (which is likely what led to the plastic surgeries), and continued to bring drugs into the house, so one could argue that some, not all, but some of Kayla's failures as a provider are in part his doing. So it's being partially responsible for ruining a person, then wanting to leave them when you've done too much damage.

But regardless, whatever happens there, it'll be a fun watch.

Because they don't respect anyone here and consider all of us below them, and only to be used as a tool to exact their will.

This is it. All those words words words about being so thankful for the Farmers and how the users are oh so great, that's a bunch of garbage. One of the very last lines:

Word of advice, "If you want honey, don't kick over the beehive."

Finally, that is the truth of how they really feel.

View attachment 6510765

Super upscaled mugshot Nick is horrifying.

 

[Irony Deficiency]

Nick's parents own a house locally, so it's doubtful he'd be reduced to living in a shitty one bedroom but his lifestyle would be dictated by what level of financial support his parents are willing to provide.

Nick's parents are obviously in a position to offer Kayla a decent financial settlement, but that doesn't seem to be their plan for saving Nick at the moment. Maybe the major sticking point isn't so much money as the fact that no-one, including either set of grand-parents, actually wants full-time custody of the kids.

This is where I am at: understanding that on a very basic fundamental level, every human being is at least partially a result of their upbringing/parental influence. The old nature vs nurture argument-and it’s clear we are all a combo of both.

Nick is narcissistic and anti social pd with sociopathic tendencies. He’s a complete hedonist and screams like a giant baby when he doesn’t get his way. Generally with men like this-the MOTHER is to blame. The father is usually a mealy mouth potato who lets the Smother rule the roost and it seems ole Bob does fit that bill.

I see two possibilities. Celeste is either an over-bearing, sadistic, brow beating Aunt Lydia type mother OR conversely she is a spineless push over who coddled Nick from day one and gave in to his every last whimper and temper tantrum. I need more on Celeste to round out the picture.

But I completely agree she and Bob do NOT want the kids full time and are very annoyed their degenerate son’s midlife crisis is horning in on their end of life world tour complete with wrinkled, crepey skin poolside selfies. They’re mad as hell about it and likely irritated to the point they’re behind Nick’s recent hiatus.

 

[ChromaQuack]

he has insisted he doesn't have one (probably one of his "technically correct")

: I don't HAVE a trust, it exists for my benefit you incel scandinavian.

There's no reason to begin with to conclude that they have an actual trust set up for him as opposed to ad hoc handouts

It's assumed as that's how families with this kind of money would normally operate, plus the comments from other lawyers about how Nicky somehow knows a lot about how trusts work, very odd considering he doesn't know shit about law in general. It could also just be a case of 'why not both'.

 

[repentance]

Interesting... I never saw this! Do you recall when this occurred?

I wasn't the one who discovered it so I don't recall exactly, but it was a while back and I remember thinking at the time that they'd probably taken it out to fund the renovations Nick was talking about.

Money, of course. I don't know the details of Rekieta's trust fund arrangement, but I'm guessing every kid he and Kayla produced meant more money from the trust.

Although Louis made provision for generation skipping if he died before a certain date (presumably related to some advantage that would confer), he didn't die before that date. iirc, the grandchildren of Nick's generation rotate roles on the board of the trust for the foundation, and it's possible they get paid for that. "The trust", as people imagine it, doesn't exist though. We're not talking about the Hilton estate here, which made provision for multiple successive generations. Even in those type of trusts, money is often released to the beneficiaries when certain milestones are reached by them (so money would go to the kids at certain ages or life events rather than more going to the parents for each kid).

Trusts were created for Celeste and each of the other Owen children. Presumably it is Celeste who created the Robert Lord Trust which owns Nick's house, but there is nothing to indicate that any trust created by Louis provided for either regular or occasional disbursements to his grandchildren.

The Robert Lord trust is opaque. While Nick has clearly received significant financial support from his family, his own statements make it seem unlikely that he receives any regular, predictable amount of money from them. His relief at earning significant enough amounts from streaming to not depend on his parents financially, and the change of his public persona after that, suggests that there were probably some strings attached to whatever money Celeste and Bob provided. I'm sure there are strings attached to whatever they are doing to bail him out now, as well, which will make him seethe even more.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

There's no reason to begin with to conclude that they have an actual trust set up for him as opposed to ad hoc handouts and he has insisted he doesn't have one (probably one of his "technically correct") things.

Quite true, but there is *some* kind of subsidisation at work here. I want to explore the possibility that Kayla's parents might determine that separating Nick from Kayla and the children might be in their best interest and what kind of payout Bob and Celeste might be required to arrange.

We have precious little information coming in to inform such, but exploration of the possibilities might produce a logical line of thought that may be later confirmed.

There is no proof what so ever that Nick's parents so much as gave him a stern talking to. Parents will cover for serial killers. Let alone coke head deadbeat dads.

Very true. I tend to lean toward the theory that Nick really hid what was going on very well form his parents, and they barely paid attention until the arrest.

The idea I have is that they were used to paying for Nick and the children's basic subsistence while Nick spun tales of 'working hard' and the 'difficulties' of establishing a large practice in a small town to support his trad family unit. Enter his YouTube career, and his parents are amused by it. They tune in occasionally, but there are no signs that he is slacking off. It is a nice hobby for him. Then it starts paying some respectable money, and he starts full-time on it--excitement! He is finally getting serious about SOMETHING!

When the Rittenhouse and Depp money is rolling in, they are elated that he is finally self-supporting and think he has forged his own path. They do not watch it all, but the stories they are hearing and the numbers on social media all point in positive directions. He signs a big dollar contract, and they think he is finally a responsible adult. Then the arrest happens, and they have to deal with this shite...

I still don't get why people are so determined that Kayla is an unwitting/willing participant in everything that's transpired. As far as I'm aware, we only have Nick's word that she's constantly zoinked out on pills, and his word is worth about as much as his law degree.

Aside from being rail thin and her mugshot, every other public appearance I've seen of her she looks perfectly lucid, if a little psychotic.

There are the accounts of those who met her in-person at events. Not only Warski and other streamers, but also some Farmers. She really does seem flighty and a bit touched from those accounts.

 

[Soapmore]

I'm just saying plenty of reasons for somebody to have a "worst day" In my headcanon it was the day his dick finally decided not to work so Kayla demanded Drex finish the job in front of him. Drex seems like a superstraight kinda guy so I don't imagine Nick being allowed into the action which means he was cucked by his best friend.... and he liked it.

I doubt it would be Drex banging her that would be Nick's worst day. Nick looks up to Drex, perhaps in a similar way he looks up to muscly jamaicans (from his knees, //rimshot//) in that they are men he respects--respects enough to cuck him in front of his wife. Their sweaty black bodies and animal grunts are a thing of awe to him.

No, no I think Nick's worst day would be Kayla betraying him for someone he deems far inferior to himself, like say a STAR TREK FAN. Seeing Kayla's starry-eyed expression like Gollum holding his ring as she comes home from a hotel meetup with a Trekker and Nick knows he's been bested by someone he sees as so much smaller and less impressive than himself.

 

[repentance]

It's assumed as that's how families with this kind of money would normally operate, plus the comments from other lawyers about how Nicky somehow knows a lot about how trusts work, very odd considering he doesn't know shit about law in general. It could also just be a case of 'why not both'.

Nick interacted a lot with Ty, who was an original trustee for all of the trusts set up by Louis. I'm quite sure he has quizzed Ty extensively about every provision of those trusts and whether there are any loopholes.

 

[crab fucker]

Ultimately Kayla has just as much responsibility as Nick for what happened. A bit more blame can probably be placed on Nick for bringing cocaine into the house in the first place, but Kayla was already eating pharmaceuticals by the handful, so I'm sure she took to it like water. I didn't fully realize how much of a mess she was back before the criminal charges until someone reminded me to go and look at what happened during the Depp trial.

Nick was streaming almost constantly at that time and making a shitload of money and e-fame from it, but he would have to routinely walk away from the stream from time to time to go and do something for his kids or make some ramen noodles for himself. What the fuck kind of wife, while her husband is making mondo money for the family and trying to cement his livestreaming career, doesn't care for the kids or prepare food or drinks for her husband? Kayla has been a drugged out zombie possibly for as long as we've seen her, and I don't really want to pretend like she's some innocent victim in all this. She's in an extremely terrible situation and marriage, and while her mental state could have been a result of postpartum depression or the miscarriages they had, she still had the responsibility to do what's right for her children.

Kayla didn't do that, and neither did Nick. They are both retards and they should both be required to eat the biggest portion of crow possible before they see their children again, but of course the state is probably going to rush putting them all back together despite neither parent learning anything.

 

[datura_binge]

When it comes to Nick possibly wanting to divorce Kayla. Idk how exactly to feel about that. One one hand - this isn't to absolve him of blame for his actions in any way, but I cannot fault someone for wanting to leave her. She's always asleep, doesn't seem fit to really do anything given what we've seen about her to this point, and is, in my opinion, a mental nutcase. I wouldn't want to be with somebody like that either.

But on the other hand - he made the decision on his own to have a bunch of children with her that he now hates, to make all these comments and remarks about how her body is ruined (which is likely what led to the plastic surgeries), and continued to bring drugs into the house, so one could argue that some, not all, but some of Kayla's failures as a provider are in part his doing. So it's being partially responsible for ruining a person, then wanting to leave them when you've done too much damage.

But regardless, whatever happens there, it'll be a fun watch.


This is it. All those words words words about being so thankful for the Farmers and how the users are oh so great, that's a bunch of garbage. One of the very last lines:

Finally, that is the truth of how they really feel.


Super upscaled mugshot Nick is horrifying.

Divorcing Kayla is like someone asking Nick a hypothetical about how he could possibly make things even worse. Although if he did it the inevitable Bible posting afterward would be just beyond hysterical.

 

[Sharpeteer]

Divorcing Kayla is like someone asking Nick a hypothetical about how he could possibly make things even worse. Although if he did it the inevitable Bible posting afterward would be just beyond hysterical.

Part of why I'm hoping it happens. Whoever is ultimately the "worse" of the two, this all going down would be spectacular.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

This is it. All those words words words about being so thankful for the Farmers and how the users are oh so great, that's a bunch of garbage. One of the very last lines:
Finally, that is the truth of how they really feel.

She really shows her method of thinking when you break down the posts she makes when flustered.

As for my last post, I apologized and made changes immediately. I followed the advice from other farmers and deleted my YouTube and Twitter to avoid seeking attention.

despite me giving the farms the credit and praising KF.

She doesn't view us as people. How she sees it, she performed the correct rituals, she ticked the boxes, and we damn stubborn stupid K-Farmers STILL AREN'T DOING WHAT SHE WANTS!!!

 

[HodgePodgeRogerDodger]

This thread still moves so fast.

Him pulling the 19th Century literature that seems to having an autism fit about how Indians have the same Sky deity meme of the Europeans is not anything new. If you’ve read the Golden Bough, autistic German cosmopolitan philosophy where they seethe about Jesus not being a warrior God like Thor, or any modern or post modern philosophy that exists you will see the same shit. Any serious theological circles will talk about this.

Also, Celeste seems like she’s the more manic parent. Bob seems to be responsible, but in a way where he’ll put up with her bullshit and the responsibility of her actions. Kind of a weak fag. The more I see of Celeste, the more I think she wasn’t as much as a parent as Bob.

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

Who does that shit? How does it work?

I just remembered I had someone do that to me once. Why? He was highly suppressed (not suppressed gay, but suppressed in the sense of extremely conflict-avoidant). He said later that he had wanted to be "unthreatening." What he was was deceptive and calculating - manipulative. Skipping a PL, people who are deceptive and manipulative by nature don't change. And people who are naive or overly optimistic (or, like Kayla, just stupid, with poor self-esteem, and/or financially dependent/invested) will not believe their own eyes or gut, or will ignore them.

That aside - his motive was likely just what most young men's motives are - to get a girl. I don't think it has to be more complicated than that.

Didn't the money come along much later? I may be misremembering. But even if it was an expected thing, it clearly wasn't an immediate windfall, and I doubt Nick was diligent enough at 23 (or ever) to plot out a 10-15 year long game involving that particular and susceptible girl and a projected 5 or 8 or 15 kids just to get a bigger piece of pie. I'm sure he multiplied with full knowledge that he would be able to afford kids, but for real, though he's a twit and a schemer, he's not enough of one to fake a religious breeder mind-state and create kids until he reached some optimal proportion of whatever money could come his/their way. His current life situation pretty clearly shows he is no mastermind 9 steps ahead of everyone else.

As far as divorce - he would never be poor, if his available/projected assets are anything close to reality. And if he got cut off for divorcing (doubt), then they'd all be poor, not just him.

In MN, the basic support calculation looks at income. So with financial info if he gets a set amount, that's what's relevant. I plugged in random numbers of $100k/mo for him $0 for her, $2500/mo paid by him for Healthcare and dental insurance, 0 custody for him, all for her. In other words, an extremely unfavorable situation support-wise. Want to know the MN minimum? $3356/month in child support, for all 5 kids. THAT'S IT.

Now, of course with those numbers they would almost certainly not be going by base support minimums, but that would require either a settlement agreement for more or litigating it. And a judge is going to apply some level of fairness. But he's not going to be made destitute by some family court judge

And if money is in a trust and he cannot control it and doesn't get guaranteed income, the negotiation/litigation is much harder (for her).

 

[AnOminous]

Nick could come into tomorrow, 100% stone sober and talk about just legal cases and law topics and nobody would watch. The entire facade of his channel was that he was a legal expert who was cool with Internet topics. But Nick isn’t a legal expert, he knows less about the law than the average Kiwifarms user, and he isn’t cool with Internet topics.

He used to have a good grasp of basic concepts and be able to explain them coherently. Maybe he wasn't Chemerinsky or something but nobody expected that in a show mostly about lolsuits. Predictions are mostly for fools and any case that isn't pure buffoonery has two professionals on different sides who think they have a case or at least that it isn't sanctionably frivolous. Any case covered on YouTube that isn't buffoonery has people disagreeing about it too, including the actual practicing lawyers.

So I really wouldn't judge on predictive ability since, unlike meteorology where we're getting pretty good at getting predictions right at least in general, legal cases are usually not so easy to predict. If they go to trial at all, even the judge agrees it could go either way.

It's a pretty recent thing and has become incredibly bad lately when Nick is literally the only one advocating his position because it's so insanely ridiculously bad it actually CAN be predicted. I'll note even Barnes, while advocating for Nick, wasn't advocating the positions taken by the actual Barneswalker in the case, but based on his own fanatical everything da goovermint does is bad crap.

I'll also note his bad takes often directly contradict correct shit he said back in the pre-holes-in-the-brain era. Absolute crack brain nonsense like it isn't defamation per se to repeatedly accuse someone of literally sucking little boys' dicks.

There's no reason to begin with to conclude that they have an actual trust set up for him as opposed to ad hoc handouts and he has insisted he doesn't have one (probably one of his "technically correct") things.

There's that "Robert Lord" trust but we don't really know what that is other than that it owns property. That may have been set up by Nick himself and exist solely for that purpose and have no other assets.

 

[Swole McPole]

But I completely agree she and Bob do NOT want the kids full time and are very annoyed their degenerate son’s midlife crisis is horning in on their end of life world tour complete with wrinkled, crepey skin poolside selfies.

Celeste has the sort of face I see whenever I watch a documentary on Hedonism II. I swear I've heard that mouth talking authoritatively about why well-to-do American women in their later years are happy to pay for Big Black Cock.

 

[Soapmore]

Also, Celeste seems like she’s the more manic parent. Bob seems to be responsible, but in a way where he’ll put up with her bullshit and the responsibility of her actions. Kind of a weak fag. The more I see of Celeste, the more I think she wasn’t as much as a parent as Bob.

Then Bob is more the culprit in Nick's dysfunction. Bob after all was there for drunk streams, had to know his son was hitting it hard night after night, then told the court he'd never see his son abusing drugs or alcohol. Bob's a liar. Like father like son.

EDIT: Wait, do I have the right parents? Forget everything I said, or, don't.