Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 25.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 61 16.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 139 38.6%

  • Total voters
    360
All of this has got me thinking. Nick was raised Catholic by Catholic parents and LEFT the church for Kayla whom inducted him into evangelical protestantism. Maybe right now Bob and Celeste are actually saying to him “see! This a result of you leaving the one true faith and following the harlot into harlotville!”

Kayla is CLEARLY a huge part or the problem. The problem for Nick is now he has a literal BROOD of children depending on him as a father and a man to not let Kayla run the family into the ground. And he’s failing miserably. Those poor kids. ☹️

I would think they would want to try to make things work for the sake of children first. I also think they are well aware of Nick's own issues...

Archive | Link

So, @elb joins the never-ending list of liars to Rekieta. It's so fortunate that Rekieta is the one who never lies.
How is she a liar? All she does is clip stuff and post them. Bare minimum of edits and usually with context.

It's not like she ever claimed a mirror of a stream to be an edit because of YouTube's GUI overlay.

She 'clips' the content, which itself is an 'editorial' action. Ergo that implies an agenda and agency of choice! Why does she only show PART of what is said? What DOESN'T she want you to see!?
 
is nick balls or no balls?
When the necrosis sets in from the Balldo no-balls for sure.
Tough shit. Drop April off in Minneapolis to walk the streets.
Pimp Rackets arc will be amazing. Especially when she monkey branches to another pimp with a strong pimp hand who knows to slap a hoe instead of their own face
 
Kayla [is] just some UwU manic pixie dream girl
More like :;(∩´﹏`∩);: catatonic lich nightmare crone
It's scary to see how so quickly after people start doing coke, all of their morals, values, self-worth and principles vanish instantly and they become hedonistic freaks in the blink of an eye.
Both someone who has morals and someone who pretends to be moral are consistent with the appearance of morality.

What's more likely, that an upstanding citizen chooses to use cocaine because it sounds fun, or that a closeted hedonist has an increasingly harder time hiding their true nature as their drug use has more and more impact on their private life and public persona?
 
Last edited:
How is she a liar? All she does is clip stuff and post them. Bare minimum of edits and usually with context.

It's not like she ever claimed a mirror of a stream to be an edit because of YouTube's GUI overlay.
The rules are very simple:

professor_rekieta.png
 
How is she a liar? All she does is clip stuff and post them. Bare minimum of edits and usually with context.

It's not like she ever claimed a mirror of a stream to be an edit because of YouTube's GUI overlay.
The clips clearly stand on their own outside of the account sharing them because from what I can see she rarely offers analysis or opinion. Not because she’s an upstanding person but because she’s dump as a stump and is as incoherent as Nick is. All that being said I’m eternally grateful she’s catalogued Nick’s decent into self and family annihilation. It’s objective evidence anyone can watch to form their own opinions.
 
Balldo Boy has resumed tweeting. Mostly sitting on Juju's lap, though he gets @'d by XiaLand to roast someone (LMAO) and replies to Adam Crigler, who did reply with some follow-up banter.

View attachment 6513944
View attachment 6513946
View attachment 6513948
View attachment 6513949

(Also sorry if the text is a little harder to read at times, it was a pain screenshotting the full tweets of some of these)
Him just being a Twitter reply guy is so fucking gay and pathetic.
He probably does it since not even cleaning up after the bull is as humiliating.
 
I would think they would want to try to make things work for the sake of children first. I also think they are well aware of Nick's own issues...




She 'clips' the content, which itself is an 'editorial' action. Ergo that implies an agenda and agency of choice! Why does she only show PART of what is said? What DOESN'T she want you to see!?
Have you done a deep dive on Nick’s church? Very interesting indeed. They claim to be small c catholic. They oppose what they call “empty rituals” and denounce them but steal a bunch of stuff from the Mother Church. And they’re “new” and “next gen”.

 
Minnesota isn't a community property state, but when they got married they had nothing, and came up together. She didn't work and raised his kids (at least on paper). He's fucked, because he did not enter the marriage with any assets separate from her. He owes her alimony and child support x5. I guess if he can wait a year it'll only be child support x4.
Generally speaking, an inheritance to one spouse even after marriage does not typically become marital property (you can alter that by commingling funds or using the inheritance money for something of benefit to both, etc.). A trust (or rather the money received from it, or the right to it) of which one spouse is the beneficiary would not typically be marital property, either, though again once you commingle the actual money received it is, but not the right to it. And to the extent to creates an income stream it could count as income. But trust or similar devices are complex and highly structured for specific outcomes, so tgat's very general comment.
 
Have you done a deep dive on Nick’s church? Very interesting indeed. They claim to be small c catholic. They oppose what they call “empty rituals” and denounce them but steal a bunch of stuff from the Mother Church. And they’re “new” and “next gen”.


Yes, it was discusses and dissected a few hundered pages ago. The issue at hand is that the Rekieta PARENTS are at least assumed to be heavily devout Catholic. They would be the ones opposed to a divorce.

Nick's religious progression (also discussed to death) seemed to be a show only for his parents, then for his in-laws, and then abandoned when he felt that he could do so. Nick's detest for religious accountability is so extreme that coming up in a very Catholic household, he could not be arsed to follow the tenet of a very liberally minded 'peace and love' type of Protestant church that his family attends.
 
What was the prank? By Dick's own admission Vedo brought a 13yo 'over' --as far as I'm aware it's still unclear if 'over' means to Dick's house or where he was at the con-- so what is she misconstruing?

This has echoes of Nick's quest to discredit the warrant rather than addressing the mountain of drugs in the Balldo Bunker. The full context doesn't matter so much as why the fuck was some fat greasy wop interacting with random minors at a convention. Talk about burying the lead.
 
What was the prank? By Dick's own admission Vedo brought a 13yo 'over' --as far as I'm aware it's still unclear if 'over' means to Dick's house or where he was at the con-- so what is she misconstruing?
It's hard to tell from the babbling of this lying weird slug but I interpreted him as saying the admission to extremely inappropriate behavior with a minor was a "work" or some bullshit like that. Personally if someone admits to something like that I'll take them at their word and take a baseball bat to their head if I actually see them doing that.
 
Back