Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 25.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 60 16.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 139 38.7%

  • Total voters
    359
So I am not out of the loop (I don't think), but is the current prevailing thinking that someone (his lawyer or someone else) is stopping Nick from streaming? Because up until that hearing he lost (denied denied denied) he sure was singing a different tune online etc. Now suddenly he is awol except for these random tweets to nobodies.
That or his parents threatened to cut off his trust fund
 
So I am not out of the loop (I don't think), but is the current prevailing thinking that someone (his lawyer or someone else) is stopping Nick from streaming? Because up until that hearing he lost (denied denied denied) he sure was singing a different tune online etc. Now suddenly he is awol except for these random tweets to nobodies.
In an extraordinary session, the court allocated Nick's streaming rights to an entity called the Kiwi Kontrol Kouncil, which you automatically sign up to by posting in this thread. The Kouncil has thus far DENIED Nick's right to stream, and though there have been whispers of dissent among radical members, largely holds firm in its mission to make Nick its BITCH.
 
So I am not out of the loop (I don't think), but is the current prevailing thinking that someone (his lawyer or someone else) is stopping Nick from streaming? Because up until that hearing he lost (denied denied denied) he sure was singing a different tune online etc. Now suddenly he is awol except for these random tweets to nobodies.
@Shush appears to have figured it out:
There's been a lot of wild, baseless speculation around why Nick hasn't streamed. As such, I'm here to add more wild, baseless speculation.

So, @elb joins the never-ending list of liars to Rekieta. It's so fortunate that Rekieta is the one who never lies.
SHE IS ABSOLUTELY BULLSHIT LYING.
 
That’s what makes this so worth it, that he isn’t still sitting on a pile of money from Depp. It’s all gone.
Correct! I've long thought that he's been spending down his online earnings on depreciating assets - bad art, Mustang, Rendazza, drugs (lolz) - in an effort to reduce any rightful, non-trust/unprotected funds that Kayla could claim as part of the estate.

Don’t forget that sweet, sweet alimony! Kayla hadn’t had a job in like a decade. Any divorce would mean he’d have to pay alimony for a good five years.
Minnesota isn't a community property state, but when they got married they had nothing, and came up together. She didn't work and raised his kids (at least on paper). He's fucked, because he did not enter the marriage with any assets separate from her. He owes her alimony and child support x5. I guess if he can wait a year it'll only be child support x4.
The issue is how much the trust fund protects Nick's wealth for the division of assets and future spousal support. This is potentially substantial. If the trust monies were kept separate and funneled through a sole account in Nick's name, Kayla would have no claim to that money within the division of assets.

Nick, despite being a wreckless person, may have been organized in this regard. He has spoken on stream about "wealth management" (he claims to have worked in this area, broadly) and his own investments. There was a real estate investment fund in TX he once mentioned when addressing the trust fund accusations. I believe Ty Beard works with the family's investments.

Kayla does have a claim to half of his online earnings and prior work. That's roughly $1.5M by my estimate: $150K Rittenhouse + $250K Depp + $1M Rumble deal + extra Superchat money and whatever he earned pre-YT. She'd get half of that. That's been highly eroded (see above). Also, back out taxes. It's a pittance.

(I'm not sure what "4x" means. Most "high value" divorces require the monied spouse to pay for tuition and living expenses of a child through college, assuming the eldest child is college-bound. Nick can fight that. He can claim destitution, I suppose, but I have got to believe he wouldn't be that disgusting or that Bob and Celeste would step in.)
 
>I brought a 13-year-old over
>Gross paedophile
>ACKACKACKACKACK that was a JOKE ACKACKACK
Is it really though? When you say something like that and nobody think it's a joke, is that really an own? So Juju and Vaedophile's gay fake lolcow live tier "breakup" didn't work but this one did, somehow. Really desperate attention seeking behaviour for a group of people you claim you don't care about.

Vaedophile at one point said Skelly raped Hispanic children. Now he's sucking his cock. The same goes with piggy's comments about his "loose whore wife and retarded kids". Spineless Balldo skelly, his name is Nicky Rekieta. How sad and pathetic.
 
24.10.12 - completed rehab.png
Archive | Link

I thought he did recovery, and not rehab... 🤔
 
>I brought a 13-year-old over
>Gross paedophile
>ACKACKACKACKACK that was a JOKE ACKACKACK
Is it really though? When you say something like that and nobody think it's a joke, is that really an own? So Juju and Vaedophile's gay fake lolcow live tier "breakup" didn't work but this one did, somehow. Really desperate attention seeking behaviour for a group of people you claim you don't care about.
Apparently it's a lie because it lacked "context" and people were assuming it took place at Dax's home rather than a convention

Vito clarified this in the comment section (which was pinned to the top of the comments, despite Nicks "SHE LIES" whining)

cope_post.png

Let's get real: Dax knows what he's doing when he tells little stories like this, it's to drum up negative attention towards Vito.

The "Vito fired" arc may have been Lolcow Live kayfabe but eventually when Dax decides it's more profitable to try to make Vito Maddox 2.0 he's going to spin it into overdrive.

I thought he did recovery, and not rehab... 🤔
He made a very big point in insisting it wasn't rehab and that he didn't need recovery because he didn't have a problem.

It seems as if he's laying the groundwork to take a plea.
 
The issue is how much the trust fund protects Nick's wealth for the division of assets and future spousal support. This is potentially substantial. If the trust monies were kept separate and funneled through a sole account in Nick's name, Kayla would have no claim to that money within the division of assets.
It would be up to Kayla’s lawyers to dig up all that money, and personally I’d be delighted to read all about it here.

As far as I understand, and @AnOminous or other well informed kiwis may set me straight, but while you can do all sorts of tricks with property and trusts and so on, ultimately a court will dig it out and make you pay. (Otherwise everyone would do it).

View attachment 6514653
Archive | Link

I thought he did recovery, and not rehab...
🤔
AHAHAHA CHECKMATE CHUD!

It was OUTPATIENT rehab for well functioning non addicts! Not the kind of inpatient rehab that junkie losers go to!
 
Last edited:
Archive | Link

So, @elb joins the never-ending list of liars to Rekieta. It's so fortunate that Rekieta is the one who never lies.
How the fuck is Elissa lying? Nick its literally clips of YOU and the idiotic shit that leaves your mouth. Its not like she's uploading 4 second clips of Nick quoting someone like Darrell Brooks then titling the video "Nick Rekieta believes little girls deserve vehicular manslaughter".
 
The clips clearly stand on their own outside of the account sharing them because from what I can see she rarely offers analysis or opinion. Not because she’s an upstanding person but because she’s dump as a stump and is as incoherent as Nick is. All that being said I’m eternally grateful she’s catalogued Nick’s decent into self and family annihilation. It’s objective evidence anyone can watch to form their own opinions.

What are you talking about? Have you confused Elissa with someone else?
 
As far as I understand, and @AnOminous or other well informed kiwis may set me straight, but while you can do all sorts of tricks with property and trusts and so on, ultimately a court will dig it out and make you pay. (Otherwise everyone would do it).
It's not illegal to use trusts this way though. It's kind of what they're for.
How the fuck is Elissa lying? Nick its literally clips of YOU and the idiotic shit that leaves your mouth.
It's the usual buttfuck retarded shit cows do where quoting exactly what they said is somehow "lying."
(I'm not sure what "4x" means. Most "high value" divorces require the monied spouse to pay for tuition and living expenses of a child through college, assuming the eldest child is college-bound. Nick can fight that. He can claim destitution, I suppose, but I have got to believe he wouldn't be that disgusting or that Bob and Celeste would step in.)
Minnesota doesn't do that, though. I think by 4x he meant just four kids. Five currently but one of them might age out before it becomes a thing. Minnesota doesn't force parents to pay for college as part of child support. In some cases, if they're delayed in school, the obligation can continue to the age of 20, but the lawyer websites I looked at seem to be of the opinion this is rare.

And of course it's possible Kayla is such a limp dishrag she just doesn't divorce her cheating cuck husband.
 
Last edited:
The Church does not allow for Catholic marriage without an annulment granted by them--even if one was married outside the Church. They were devout enough to get a personal audience with John Paul II when Nick was in his teens, and to have him confirmed with the name 'Ignatius'. They seem very active and devout on the surface to do all these things.
Louis and Peaches were unquestionably, traditionally devout. I do wonder to what extent the manner in which Celeste expresses her faith has changed since their deaths. Nick has certainly implied in the past the existence of family expectations and Celeste would have been subject to those prior to the deaths of her parents, too.
 
By Dick's own admission Vedo brought a 13yo 'over' --as far as I'm aware it's still unclear if 'over' means to Dick's house or where he was at the con-- so what is she misconstruing?
He's just doing his usual thing of posting a screenshot and blatantly lying about its contents.
It must be a day ending with the letter 'y'.
That or his parents threatened to cut off his trust fund
He's still grounded. He needs to do his chores and get more Good Boy Points before he's allowed on the computer again.
 
Last edited:
Back