What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

In the modern world, you need a bit of both since human constructs are basically all around us now [...]
So tl;dr: being human sucks?

:thinking:

Anyway, I think leftism that's definitely not needed is the kind assuming all of a kind are alike with shared perpetual guilt among kinds "communities" of "oppressors", the kind that demonizes natural and healthy male sexuality, the kind with "gender" delusions, and of course the kind leading to no-fun-allowed misery if it's followed devoutly.
 
Last edited:
I don't think any of them dropped out because they couldn't hack it or didn't do well. [...] They dropped out because they could do better.
I'd like to think this is why people like Henry Ford, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, Zuckerberg, Michael Dell, etc. all dropped out of college and most Navy SEALS don't have a college education.
Yes, absolutely. That still fits in Midwit Theory. Midwits don't drop out. Retards drop out, just like geniuses. It's derived from self-confidence. Based retards don't doubt themselves, and super geniuses know they're better than their compatriots.
You know Hollywood has been tanking its own shit since the whole thing started right?

Its to do with lowering your tax bill, or something. You can look it up, but it's been done plenty of times, and it's in aid of not paying as much in taxes. They want a few bombs to balance the books.
If it's not been brought up, allow me to add to this. Hollywood is a massive Ponzi scheme. Movies don't make money. They pay off the debt accrued from other movies. "Hollywood Accounting" is an open secret. If you want a smoking gun, Forrest Gump lost tens of millions of dollars. Now imagine all those massive flops over the past few years, and tell me that they're not indicative of wider economic trends and social conditioning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Foxtrot
Oddly enough, does not seem to affect cats to this degree.
I think they possess some genetic/cellular anomaly, the name of which escapes me now.
It makes them less cancer prone and also causes them to exhibit that noticeably high body symmetry on average.
They're also less sexually dimorphic than dogs, at least it seems like that, so maybe there isn't as much development a cat enuch misses out on, as there is for a dog.
I think on the silver-back gorilla to axolotl scale, which I just made up, cats are more close to axolotl - no regrowth of parts, tho.
 
So tl;dr: being human sucks?

:thinking:

Anyway, I think leftism that's definitely not needed is the kind assuming all of a kind are alike with shared perpetual guilt among kinds "communities" of "oppressors", the kind that demonizes natural and healthy male sexuality, the kind with "gender" delusions, and of course the kind leading to no-fun-allowed misery if it's followed devoutly.
It's got it's downsides. Uncle Ted wasn't entirely wrong when he talked about removing humanity from nature creating a hole that we fill, but it's more that we fill it with societal structures and these concepts that didn't even exist when the biggest concern humanity had was "how do I stop the wolves eating my children".

And for dealing with the leftism, a lot of it is because they're collectivists in a lot of cases, as it proves to be useful for collective guilt or victimhood. The concept of intersectionality's natural conclusion is individualism for example, but they deliberately draw the line way before there so they can still utilize collectivism.
 
Sorry if someone else pointed this out and I skipped reading their post. I just remembered something which I think explains the "Mars is actually grey." It's confusing the fact they take the photos in different color channels which they combine to get a full color image. Which is nothing unusual. It's part of taking photos with the maximum details.
tfw you find out nasa still uses triple ccd cams.
 
You don't even need a telescope. You can see it's red with the naked eye. There's a reason it has been called the red planet for ages.View attachment 6498994
So, which one does the naked eye see? I don't get it. Why isn't the robot rover holding a color card, so we can do proper calibration?
I'm gonna strangle NASA, if they send me there and it turns out to be the right, instead of the middle.

I'm gonna strangle you 'mars is grey' speds, too, if this "activism" leads to them implanting me with fake memories of an altered memory of an actual memory of a grey red planet.
 
Ancient civilisation is right-wing. Left-wing exists to deal with the modern world imo. Early hunter-gatherer societies were extremely focussed on the family unit, had stereotypical roles and never enforced any form of equality (if your nan got too old and started slowing you down, she was left to the wolves).
There's evidence that early humans took care of the weak. There's obviously deformed skulls of children who, because of their deformity or retardedness, died, but they were intentionally buried and grieved over, so I think grandma would have been fine.
 
There's evidence that early humans took care of the weak. There's obviously deformed skulls of children who, because of their deformity or retardedness, died, but they were intentionally buried and grieved over, so I think grandma would have been fine.
Before writing, and even after it, the elderly were valued because they often had knowledge that otherwise wasn't available. Hunter-gatherer societies maintained stability sometimes for tens of thousands of years largely from oral tradition. Without knowledge transference from generation to generation we're basically just the same dumb animals as the rest of the lower primates.
 
So, which one does the naked eye see? I don't get it. Why isn't the robot rover holding a color card, so we can do proper calibration?
I'm gonna strangle NASA, if they send me there and it turns out to be the right, instead of the middle.

I'm gonna strangle you 'mars is grey' speds, too, if this "activism" leads to them implanting me with fake memories of an altered memory of an actual memory of a grey red planet.
They've got a website with the images coming in from Perseverance https://mars.nasa.gov/mars2020/multimedia/raw-images/
Just as recently as today they took a photo of the color calibration gizmo that's on the rover. Looks horribly muted but I guess it's unprocessed.
I also found a photo of the gizmo before they launched the thing, for reference.
Mars_Perseverance_ZL0_1297_0782074273_332ECM_N0603852ZCAM03022_100085J.png11214_2021_795_Fig4_HTML.png
You think if you calibrated based on this photo you could apply that to photos of the landscape from the same site and get a better answer?
 
You think if you calibrated based on this photo you could apply that to photos of the landscape from the same site and get a better answer?
I'm fascinated by the weird dust rings which have formed on the disc's color dots...sorry, yeah, I guess I can see the problem. But I'm now more inclined to believe that it's actually pretty reddish out there. Maybe I will really try to find out what exact color reference model that mcguffin is representing and do some processing for shit's and giggles.
 
So, which one does the naked eye see? I don't get it. Why isn't the robot rover holding a color card, so we can do proper calibration?
You'd see the one in the middle, the natural color. And the rover is, internally, holding a color card exactly for this.
But here's the thing: NASA said that Mars isn't pure red but also has other colors in many regions (duh), and they also sometimes fiddle with color balances for certain outcomes. That, of course, means that Mars is actually grey and not red at all. Apparently.
 
I heard that Jews invented Islam to keep the darkies at a lower societal stage of development and to keep them fighting amongst each other.
Islam/Mohammed just cherry-picked stuff from Judaism and Christianity that could be used to rile up and rally the desert people for war. Wouldn't be surprised if some jews helped him out with that.
 
NASA said that Mars isn't pure red but also has other colors in many regions (duh), and they also sometimes fiddle with color balances for certain outcomes.
Well, the text: "assumes something in the scene is white", is kinda retarded, isn't it?
There have to be highlights but the camera probably hasn't enough dynamic range.
So, it might be less red, like on the right, but also not as blown out.
 
Well, the text: "assumes something in the scene is white", is kinda retarded, isn't it?
There have to be highlights but the camera probably hasn't enough dynamic range.
So, it might be less red, like on the right, but also not as blown out.
Thats a weird description, but the idea for that color grading is to improve contrast under certain conditions.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Dr. Eldon Tyrell
Back