Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 15.4%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 6 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 103 25.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 73 17.8%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 164 40.1%

  • Total voters
    409
And then, 5 days ago, he cried about how life is so complicated, and how he's struggling with mental health.
Everybody on there should mock him for his mental health problems, and encourage him to end it all in Minecraft. As I seem to recall, that's how he treats other people with said problems.
 
This is funny but Nick, being a misogynist porn-enthusiast, probably does view women not as living human beings, but as modifiable commodities, like cars. Gotta have more than one! Gotta get mud grips and a light bar!
Even more than the porn addiction, this type of instrumentality is deeply embedded in how narcissists interact with those around them. I doubt Nick has ever thought about women in any other way.
I’m legitimately curious if he would pass April around the way he did with Kayla.
I can see it going either way. On the one hand, Nick doesn't like sharing his toys. On the other hand, it's April who has the pineapple tattoo and she could be traded for access to BBC.
 
It has been 2 weeks since his first "Talk to you soon" Locals post:
View attachment 6521923

And then, 5 days ago, he cried about how life is so complicated, and how he's struggling with mental health.
View attachment 6521930
He promised his Locals, once again, that he'd see them very soon.
Since then: 0 Locals / YouTube / Rumble streams.

• 5k Locals Gift: DENIED
• 14 Locals Streams in May: DENIED
• See you all very soon: DENIED

Explanations to his paying Locals supporters: DENIED.
Aww man I was really looking forward to his reading of the gay, boring old book of heresy. Me and my homies have been on the edge of our seats for this kontent.
 
He promised his Locals, once again, that he'd see them very soon.
Since then: 0 Locals / YouTube / Rumble streams.

• 5k Locals Gift: DENIED
• 14 Locals Streams in May: DENIED
• See you all very soon: DENIED

Explanations to his paying Locals supporters: DENIED.
Is not doing the thing he was paid for an idiot filter? Like after this only the truly delusional die-hards will stay subscribed?
Yes.

I have zero sympathy for anybody left in that Locals. Not that I ever really did. It is a absolutely mind blowing that any of them re-upped after he got arrested.

I don't think he gives a shit, either. He stopped caring a lot after the women were scared off from posting their ludes. He knows he's left with the dumbest of the dumb, and it's not that much money anymore.

If he had any sense of shame, he'd shut it down. He divested from the Discord he hated so much, so I don't know why this would be any different.

You don't understand, Nick is operating under Blizzard's Soon™ guidelines.
In the case of the 5k Locals gift, it's more like Valve's Half Life 3 guidelines.

Meaning it will never happen.
 
It has been 2 weeks since his first "Talk to you soon" Locals post:

And then, 5 days ago, he cried about how life is so complicated, and how he's struggling with mental health.

He promised his Locals, once again, that he'd see them very soon.
Since then: 0 Locals / YouTube / Rumble streams.
At this point I would be somewhat surprised if he streams again before his criminal case has concluded (or at least he has plead guilty) but I guess anything's possible. I think he intends to do a 180 and pretend to be a totally penitent reformed person and assume his audience is stupid enough to have forgotten all of his earlier statements.

However, for the reason BG and I have laid out, I think they have finally stepped in to tard wrangle him given the obvious seriousness of the situation. They did it right after denied, denied, denied.

They understand now that, contrary to Barnes' claims, his behavior on livestreams can be used against him in court. Something they maybe didn't grasp before, given their age (old people and tech), and the fact they probably had just believed whatever crap Nick fed them.

The way Nick is acting now is totally unlike how Nick normally acts when he's in trouble.

The alternate theory is the synapses finally started firing, and he suddenly realizes he needs to shut the fuck up...
To be clear, I think the reason the address on file change is because he's being wrangled in his criminal case, but who knows as to whether that extends to the lack of streaming or not.

It's possible that Nick is being he is instructed to stop streaming, but it's also possible that Nick is in agreement with that, or that it's his idea.

The idea that he has secretly moved out of his house is obviously not right, though.
 
Except it didn't work. The Court said his claim under Franks was bullshit. He challenged probable cause, and that's where he won.
Isn't the Franks challenge a case of something that's technically allowed but is exceedingly rare? You are almost trying to prove that the cop defamed you in the warrant (Nick's life path all goes back to defamation, I guess), which cops will pretty much never do unless you are on the wrong side of the Chicago PD.

My original impression was that Nick won the chance to have a Franks hearing in that case but lost at the hearing, and maybe I was wrong. It may be that just having the hearing is common enough that this wasn't a big win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USAroXX
Throwing a hail mary guess to say is it possible that Nick's "worst day" was he or his someone in his family receiving a terminal/severe diagnosis?

As an archetypical narcissist, something Nick would rate as "the worst day ever" would have to directly apply to him and his immediate surroundings. Unless it was some mentor character he was truly attached to in an emotional way, I doubt he'd file it as worst. More likely something within his direct family that hurt him specifically, physically or emotionally (though I'd presume the latter over the former).
 
You faggots with the KKK stuff is very cringe. You should all neck yourselves.

Nick has agency, if even his parents have, for the time, tard wrangled him. Nick's failings are his own, including his dying streaming career. No amount of hur durr here impacts Balldoman's ability to cuck his audience of content.
 
It's possible that Nick is being he is instructed to stop streaming, but it's also possible that Nick is in agreement with that, or that it's his idea.
I don't believe the last one. I'd barely even consider the second one.

This man is incapable of not doubling down whenever he takes an L. That became evident when his way of dealing with Monty was to get fucked up on coke and bitch about Fischer's pussy liquor. The very judge overseeing his case (at the time).

We should have gotten a stream where he is screaming about how Wentzell is a moron, and bourbon comes out his dick, but we... didn't. Which is weird (but not funny, sadly).

And I don't think it's because he suddenly became smart. When was the last time he made a good decision? Like, seriously?

Lolcows don't learn. That's what makes them lolcows.
 
Wait Wait Wait wait wait

… Rekieta’s confirmation name is Ignatius? For fuck’s sake. He and Riley are Dax’s Ignatius Riley.

Yes. I take this now as a sign that he was a 'difficult' child.

Just to sperg about this a little bit, when I first heard that he got a Rumble contract, I assumed the contract was a deal of the kind you normally expect for a streamer: "$X million spread over 4 years." The key here is that it's a multi-year deal that covers the inevitable hit you're going to be taking by moving platforms, and many streamers don't seem to have been able to build back nearly as well on the new platform when they do this. For Nick at his peak, X might have been greater than 1, too. When he was talking about contract renewal less than a year later, I was very surprised.

Nick obviously did not foresee any loss of audience and Rumble thought they could get away with this in their creator contracts by having him do the "Rumble flip" instead of saying "hey guys, I'm only on Rumble now." As far as I can tell, it was (naturally) only rightoid spergs who took the Rumble deal. He also clearly didn't foresee any loss of viewers or the loss of the contract after 1 year (despite no guarantees) from him becoming an open degenerate.

RUMBLE (in hindsight) obviously intended to throw a bunch of money at people with large audiences to try to drag them onto the new platform, then to drop the individual contracts. They have not renewed many of those original contracts and published a statement that their plan was to focus in improving ad revenue as a source of income for their creators.

Nick thought he would get a multi-year contract (despite the terms only being solid for a year) and had the gall to think that it would happen when he stopped doing EVERYTHING that made him popular on YouTube and veered into some degenerate shit. he boasted on stream about how he could not stream and make money and how he did not stream when it didn't make him more money or it was too much work.

Idiocy.

As near as anybody can tell, the biggest issue this spoiled nigger has with his dad is his dad didn't tell him about his sex with his mom. Which is fucking weird.

His father and mother were absent a lot as well, by his own account. Without diving too deep into psychoanalysis, his lack of familial contact may have fed his desperate attention-seeking need for approval.

Maybe Nick needed a mail opening supervisor. He’s had issues with not opening email and physical mail in a timely manner (or at all) in the past.

I am almost tempted to send him an e-mail to see if his inbox is full. It was a regulatory occurrence during his popular years that he would fail to empty the inbox and messages from fans and guests would bounce back.
 
Isn't the Franks challenge a case of something that's technically allowed but is exceedingly rare? You are almost trying to prove that the cop defamed you in the warrant (Nick's life path all goes back to defamation, I guess), which cops will pretty much never do unless you are on the wrong side of the Chicago PD.

My original impression was that Nick won the chance to have a Franks hearing in that case but lost at the hearing, and maybe I was wrong. It may be that just having the hearing is common enough that this wasn't a big win.

He won nothing. Judge just did not outright at that point deny it. As the prosecution really did not have time to make sufficient argument. After prosecution did argue against it. Well that one went fast by judge.
 
Nick has agency, if even his parents have, for the time, tard wrangled him. Nick's failings are his own, including his dying streaming career. No amount of hur durr here impacts Balldoman's ability to cuck his audience of content.
In all likelihood, Nick is not streaming either because his parents have ordered him not to (because they don't trust him not to say something stupid to damage his case) or because he is going to have to eventually act penitent and pretend he is a reformed person who regrets his fall into drug abuse. Either of those is more embarrassing than the idea he is afraid of being discussed online.

I don't believe the last one. I'd barely even consider the second one.

This man is incapable of not doubling down whenever he takes an L. That became evident when his way of dealing with Monty was to get fucked up on coke and bitch about Fischer's pussy liquor. The very judge overseeing his case (at the time).
If he intends to take a plea deal, he is going to have to pretend to be remorseful at some point. That's something I don't believe he relishes doing.

And I don't think it's because he suddenly became smart. When was the last time he made a good decision? Like, seriously?
A week ago, after giving $75+ to Melton, when he made the decision to stop giving Melton any more money that day.
 
You faggots with the KKK stuff is very cringe. You should all neck yourselves.

Nick has agency, if even his parents have, for the time, tard wrangled him. Nick's failings are his own, including his dying streaming career. No amount of hur durr here impacts Balldoman's ability to cuck his audience of content.
You are NOT invited to the KKK barbeque this weekend, mister
 
Isn't the Franks challenge a case of something that's technically allowed but is exceedingly rare?
Yes, the general rule is that when challenging probable cause, you are limited to the "four corners of the document." That is, you can only base your arguments against the warrant on the fact that the warrant affidavit fails to establish probable cause justifying a search. Some profoundly dumb arrest warrant affidavits are still good enough to stand up to this challenge.

It doesn't have to be quite this bad, but "suspect had long hair and looked like a hippie so let's search his house" would fail on this standard. There have been the occasional situations where some judge had a bunch of pre-signed blank warrants and never even looked at the affidavits, or misconduct on that level.

Where Franks comes in is where the COPS LIED MAN! That is, the cops either outright made up the basis for the warrant or knowingly relied on sources they knew were bogus, i.e. their sole basis for the search was some rambling schizophrenic who routinely called in fake tips.

There are two necessary elements. Cut and pasted from some random site:
  • The affiant knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, included a false statement in the warrant affidavit.
  • The allegedly false statement was necessary to a finding of probable cause.
However, even to get the hearing at all, you need at least to allege that both of these elements apply. Nick and the Barneswalker screamed at the top of their lungs that THE COPS LIED PEOPLE DIED! Or whatever. But no matter how loudly they screamed about the first element (and the cops didn't even lie), even by Nick's own Barneswalked claims, they were lies about absolutely nothing relevant to probable cause, and even if you entirely subtracted these OMG COPS LIED parts, there would still be probable cause.

Hence, he got no hearing. He hadn't even alleged reasons that would satisfy both prongs of the Franks test, since even if he proved everything he argued for, it still would not have knocked out probable cause, rendering a hearing pointless.

My personal opinion is to err on the side of giving criminal defendants due process, and I wouldn't have complained too much about Nick getting that hearing, as smug as it would have made him, but I believe he ultimately would have lost, so even if an appeals court looks at it and says it was wrong to deny it, well. . .that's what "harmless error" is for because he would have lost anyway.
You faggots with the KKK stuff is very cringe. You should all neck yourselves.
latest (1).png
 
You faggots with the KKK stuff is very cringe. You should all neck yourselves.

Nick has agency, if even his parents have, for the time, tard wrangled him. Nick's failings are his own, including his dying streaming career. No amount of hur durr here impacts Balldoman's ability to cuck his audience of content.
We've just finished our meeting and determined that you are now also on the no-stream list.

You will be informed when we have decided to reinstate your streaming privileges.
 
Throwing a hail mary guess to say is it possible that Nick's "worst day" was he or his someone in his family receiving a terminal/severe diagnosis?
Oh yes, he was diagnosed with the faggotry, and has never recovered. It's a miracle he can muster the physical strength to sit at his computer, and be a reply guy. His life is just so hard man.
 
In addition, there is no reason to suggest from the address that he had moved. It says it's being sent to Nick/Kayla c/o ("care of") Bob and Celeste. If he was trying to change his address to convince people he had indefinitely moved he/his attorney would not have written the address that way.

He's being wrangled by Bob and Celeste. It's that simple.
I think the mail forwarding is a response to all the unpaid fines and bills that have mounted up. Methinks Nick has been using the house money for playtime given the conditions of the family entire.
 
Back