US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Bit late on this but Bill "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Clinton states America needs mass immigration because we got the lowest birth in over 100 years. Going to go on a bit of a rant here but I thought the 1965 immigration act was suppose to solve this issue? It's been 60 years since that act was passed and if these people are still complaining about a negative population then this shows the failure of the policy. I would also like to ask a leftist what's going to happen when these countries start having negative populations. Where are they going to get migrants from? This goes to show you that mass migration doesn't solve the issue that many democrats keep claiming it does.
View attachment 6527817
Does being below replacement really doom nations?
 
Does being below replacement really doom nations?
China has one of the lowest fertility rates in the world and I never see the anti-American shills ever concerned about it, so I smell bullshit.
Maybe i am retarded. What evidence is there that the early voting is favoring Trump?

And even if there was. Letting Fulton county know how much printing to have ready aint the best idea.
Whoops! You aren't retarded, I am. I linked the wrong post. I have corrected the necessary post, but here is the link I meant to reference.
 
Was helping my mom at her house and I brought in her mail. There were two absentee ballots, one for her and one for my dad. My mom's currently hobbling around with a cane because of recent hip surgery, so understandable for her.

For my old man, though, he's been dead for 2 years. Well, then.
My grandfather lives in an extremely blue county in an extremely blue state. Both this year and four years ago he received two absentee ballots for him and my grandma, even though he's perfectly capable of driving himself and never requested one. My grandma has been dead for five years.
 
Bit late on this but Bill "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Clinton states America needs mass immigration because we got the lowest birth in over 100 years. Going to go on a bit of a rant here but I thought the 1965 immigration act was suppose to solve this issue? It's been 60 years since that act was passed and if these people are still complaining about a negative population then this shows the failure of the policy. I would also like to ask a leftist what's going to happen when these countries start having negative populations. Where are they going to get migrants from? This goes to show you that mass migration doesn't solve the issue that many democrats keep claiming it does.
View attachment 6527817
The thing that pisses me off the most about this is leftists kept screaming that we needed to reduce the population and America could only support 100 million people.

The same people who told people not to breed from the 1960's on are now screaming we need illegal immigration to keep up the population numbers.

Hang every fucking leftist.
 
China has one of the lowest fertility rates in the world and I never see the anti-American shills ever concerned about it, so I smell bullshit.

Whoops! You aren't retarded, I am. I linked the wrong post. I have corrected the necessary post, but here is the link I meant to reference.
China doesnt have a ponzi scheme style retirement program that is foundational to their nations stability and the low birth rate fucks them in other ways. They also dont have any restrictions on taxing and taking from automation capital to make up for reduction in human taxation vs automation.

The country that figures out a scalable and good enough model to tax ai and other forms of automation will have a big advantage.
 
Bit late on this but Bill "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Clinton states America needs mass immigration because we got the lowest birth in over 100 years. Going to go on a bit of a rant here but I thought the 1965 immigration act was suppose to solve this issue? It's been 60 years since that act was passed and if these people are still complaining about a negative population then this shows the failure of the policy. I would also like to ask a leftist what's going to happen when these countries start having negative populations. Where are they going to get migrants from? This goes to show you that mass migration doesn't solve the issue that many democrats keep claiming it does.
View attachment 6527817
Clinton literally described The Great Replacement yesterday down to a T, and yet we are being called conspiracy theorists over it.

lmao. Fuck this timeline.
 
A similar thing happened here. Legalizing marijuana would create jobs and the resulting taxes would better fund schools, help fix the roads, and do all sorts of good. Spoiler: If it's happening in my part of Kiwi Land, it's happening on a much smaller scale than envisioned.

It does fund all of those things, but politicians just cut that same amount from what they would have otherwise spent out of the usual budget. It's the same with gambling or anything else politicians have managed to tax under the pretense of using the revenue for the children. I would be okay with this is my taxes went down in turn, but that never seems to fucking happen for some reason.

He always posts weird shit like this in regards to women, too.

And when it's not about women, it's about being violent to someone in general too.

Weird dude.

Olbermann developed terminal political brain rot long before he ever came down with an acute case of TDS. I'll never know why anyone thought it was a good idea to let a sports commentator have a political show, but if he wasn't on Sports Center 30 years ago no one would pay him any mind. That he's relegated to screaming into the void of social media should tell everyone how irrelevant he is now.
 
China has one of the lowest fertility rates in the world and I never see the anti-American shills ever concerned about it, so I smell bullshit.

Whoops! You aren't retarded, I am. I linked the wrong post. I have corrected the necessary post, but here is the link I meant to reference.
A 1 percent edge when 5 percent are "undecided"?

I mean "i know i am voting Trump but know that will get me on a list" might be some of that 5 percent. The only people who are undecided are rinos that know Kamala is objectively bad but orange man bad programming and people who know but wont say. The left wing undecided are kamala, stein or not at all.

This also is pre polling not exit polling.
 
Does being below replacement really doom nations?
From what I’ve seen not really. Shit like the British losing generations of kids in the war did doom them because they literally could no longer compete and had to import people to make up for it and Enoch Powel told them that it would never stop because parties realized immigrant voters could be bought very easily.

The US tried to solve a temporary problem with immigration and letting eugenics retards rebrand as “family planning”.
 
Bill O'Riley comes out and endorses Trump and does some based statements about black people, Harris, Obama and the modern day news machine. Cue much shrieking from the old guard leftists. (I know most people here won't know who Bill O'Riley is but TLDR he was a old school political news reporter who most held in high regard)

O'Riley's never endorsed anyone in his 40 years in News and says openly that Harris will destroy America and he feels strongly forced to speak out about it.

It might not mean that much beacuse most of the people who knew his work back in the day are...dead. But to have such and old school political journalist, in the true sense of the word, come and say these things...well it's a good thing he retired 15 years ago cuz there will be some backlash no doubt.

Anyway, I thought it was funny.

 
Bill O'Riley comes out and endorses Trump and does some based statements about black people, Harris, Obama and the modern day news machine. Cue much shrieking from the old guard leftists. (I know most people here won't know who Bill O'Riley is but TLDR he was a old school political news reporter who most held in high regard)

O'Riley's never endorsed anyone in his 40 years in News and says openly that Harris will destroy America and he feels strongly forced to speak out about it.

It might not mean that much beacuse most of the people who knew his work back in the day are...dead. But to have such and old school political journalist, in the true sense of the word, come and say these things...well it's a good thing he retired 15 years ago cuz there will be some backlash no doubt.

Anyway, I thought it was funny.


Bill O'Riley is one of those dudes who I classify as "incredibly smart, but unlikable." Not a very charismatic dude, but I have to admit that he's right about a lot of things for the most part.

I remember years ago when he had a debate with Jon Stewart ... And Jon Stewart showed that he didn't know the difference between the national debt and the national deficit (and yet his fans claimed that he "smoked" O'Riley).

God, I hate Jon Stewart ...
 
Bill O'Riley comes out and endorses Trump and does some based statements about black people, Harris, Obama and the modern day news machine. Cue much shrieking from the old guard leftists. (I know most people here won't know who Bill O'Riley is but TLDR he was a old school political news reporter who most held in high regard)

O'Riley's never endorsed anyone in his 40 years in News and says openly that Harris will destroy America and he feels strongly forced to speak out about it.

It might not mean that much beacuse most of the people who knew his work back in the day are...dead. But to have such and old school political journalist, in the true sense of the word, come and say these things...well it's a good thing he retired 15 years ago cuz there will be some backlash no doubt.

Anyway, I thought it was funny.

Are we really at the point where Bill is starting to be forgotten? The O’Reilly factors only been off the air for 7 years, and it was huge for decades before that.
 
Bit late on this but Bill "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" Clinton states America needs mass immigration because we got the lowest birth in over 100 years. Going to go on a bit of a rant here but I thought the 1965 immigration act was suppose to solve this issue? It's been 60 years since that act was passed and if these people are still complaining about a negative population then this shows the failure of the policy. I would also like to ask a leftist what's going to happen when these countries start having negative populations. Where are they going to get migrants from? This goes to show you that mass migration doesn't solve the issue that many democrats keep claiming it does.
View attachment 6527817
They simply don't care. They want the West to be the dumping ground for the world's trash in the name of "social justice." Never mind that the people actually driving the problems in those countries won't pay- they didn't just tell people not to have kids, they made each and every step of childrearing harder, down to finding a date. Used those problems, and the results, to justify flooding the West with invaders.
Hang every fucking leftist.
 
China has one of the lowest fertility rates in the world and I never see the anti-American shills ever concerned about it, so I smell bullshit.
I saw this data posted. If this is true then notice how they aren't stating the same in Latin American countries. This also goes back to what I said, if Latin American countries also have a negative birth rate then where the hell are they going to find immigrants to import from? Africa? What happens when those African countries start having low birth rates?
463410230_10212189355564556_5982438577929518174_n.jpg
 
Bill O'Riley is one of those dudes who I classify as "incredibly smart, but unlikable." Not a very charismatic dude, but I have to admit that he's right about a lot of things for the most part.

I remember years ago when he had a debate with Jon Stewart ... And Jon Stewart showed that he didn't know the difference between the national debt and the national deficit (and yet his fans claimed that he "smoked" O'Riley).

God, I hate Jon Stewart ...
O'Riley just isn't pretty. That's it. People who sat through a presidential debate in front of a tv thought Kennedy won. Those listening to the Radio thought Reagan or whoever did.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back